Earlier this month, a David Lynch fan transformed a scene from "Blue Velvet" into a commercial for Pabst Blue Ribbon. While we enjoyed the ad—and support the tag line "Because Heineken Is For Pussies"—fake Lynch commercials are nothing when compared to his actual oddball advertising creations.

Case in point: The Mulholland Drive director just released the second ad (above) for his official coffee brand, David Lynch Signature Cup Coffee. [Via The HuffPost]

That's right, coffee obsessed Lynch made his own blend of coffee. The bean aficionado himself, has given the coffee a lukewarm endorsement, writing, "I really like it very much. My friend who came over today had a decaf cup and said it tasted very good."

The ad, however, is less effusive. It features disjointed flashes of a woman brewing coffee and cooing, "Oh yeah!" This is actually more traditional than Lynch's first ad for the coffee, in which he engaged in flirty banter about fair trade coffee with a decapitated Barbie doll.

He's made a ton of other bizarre ads, as well, for everything from pregnancy tests to PlayStation 2.

David Lynch Talks To A Barbie Head About Fair Trade Coffee

Lynch's Ad For PlayStation2 (Featuring A Talking Duck)

Bizarre (And Backwards) Cigarette Commercial

Please follow Advertising on Twitter and Facebook.

See Also:

• DRUM ROLL PLEASE: The Winner Of Business Insider's Weekly Caption Contest Is...
• Read This Exec's BRUTAL Rebuttal To A Slate Writer's 'Bitter Hatred' Of Her Ad Agency
• 11 Amazing Augmented Reality Ads

After taking a nearly six-year hiatus, "Fear Factor" is back with a vengeance and making new disgusting headlines.

While NBC usually gives a decent amount of freedom to the "Fear Factor" minds so they can execute some sick and twisted stunts, turns out there is one episode, originally set to air tonight, that has just been nixed in favor of a re-run.

So what was on this evening's extra-special menu? Contestants were required to chug glasses of ... donkey semen.

The stunt had NBC and their parent company Comcast, feeling a bit squeamish, to say the least.

In honor of the disgusting challenge that, alas, will never be seen, here are the top five grossest stunts in "Fear Factor" history.

Buffalo Testicles (Season 1)

In the first ever season of "Fear Factor" from 2001, contestants were required to eat two buffalo testicles.

Not only was it the first time the show brought out animal nether regions for consumption, it was also one of the most disgusting because of the process in which the contestant had to eat the testicles. See, in order to win, contestants had to eat everything. And that means peeling certain layers to get to the "meat," if you will.

Horse Rectum (Season 3)

In this challenge, contestants played horseshoes and the score they got would represent the number of inches of horse rectum each player had to eat. NBC affiliates in MIssouri pulled the episode before it could air.

Cow Eyeballs (Season 4)

It seems that the most disgusting stunts on "Fear Factor" have to do with eating and transferring disgusting food from one container to another.

Contestants in the fourth season were treated to a feast of cow eyeballs. While the show had worked with eyeballs before, most specifically with sheep in season one, this time there was a twist. In order to win the challenge, contestants had to bite into the eyeballs and drain the fluid into a cup.

It does not get grosser.

Please follow The Wire on Twitter and Facebook.

See Also:

• Kim Kardashian Joins TV Show Cast, Acts Like A Diva—Here's Today's Buzz
• The Biggest Jaw-Droppers From Last Night's SAG Awards—Here's Today's Buzz
• Dwight Schrute May Get An 'Office' Spin-Off

In December, Fox Business News reported "The Muppets" movie is trying to brainwash kids against capitalism. 

Kermit the Frog, Miss Piggy, Fozzie Bear, and Animal. Yes, those Muppets. 

The Fox channel suggested the film was using the oil tycoon villian character named Tex Richman to deliver an anti-corporate message to children. 

Media Research Center's Dan Gainor agreed that Hollywood has been using "class warfare" to "brainwash" children. 

"They've been doing it for decades. Hollywood, the left, the media, they hate the oil industry. They hate corporate America. You'll see all these movies attacking it," said Gainor.  "Whether it's "Cars 2," which was another kids movie, the George Clooney movie "Syriana," or "There Will Be Blood," all of these movies are attacking the oil industry."

"None of the movies are reminding people what oil means for most people," added Gainor. "Fuel and ambulance to get to the hospital if you need that. They don't want to tell that story."

Rather than dismissing the report, Disney's Muppets held a press conference to address Fox's accusations.

And Miss Piggy had a few choice word for the network. 

See the entire hilarious result below along with the original Fox Business News story:
 

Please follow The Wire on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

See Also:

• Kim Kardashian Joins TV Show Cast, Acts Like A Diva—Here's Today's Buzz
• The Biggest Jaw-Droppers From Last Night's SAG Awards—Here's Today's Buzz
• Paula Abdul, Nicole Scherzinger And Steve Jones Fired From 'X Factor'—Here's Today's Buzz

• Kim Kardashian posts a picture of her new, lighter hair to Twitter. Yeah, it's the hair she wants us to see…

• Prince William and Kate Middleton confirm their puppy love by adopting an adorable cocker spaniel.

• Meanwhile, Barbara Walters says she isn't in a bidding war with Oprah WInfrey for the first Pippa Middleton interview—in fact, she refuses to pay for an interview at all.

• Madonna to open 10 schools in Malawi. Wonder what Elton John has to say about THAT?

• Kim, Kourtney and Khloé Go Topless for Kardashian Kollection. Because we didn't see enough of them this week.

• After facing criticism for saying she is "gay by choice," Cynthia Nixon clarifies that her "bisexuality is a fact."

• Simon Cowell gives the "X Factor" axe to judges Paula Abdul and Nicole Scherzinger, and host Steve Jones.

Please follow The Wire on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

See Also:

• Kim Kardashian Joins TV Show Cast, Acts Like A Diva—Here's Today's Buzz
• 'Monty Python' Gang Reunites For 'Absolutely Anything'
• The Biggest Jaw-Droppers From Last Night's SAG Awards—Here's Today's Buzz

Scarlett? Sofia? Kim? Katy? Which sexy, confident, spectacular women captured our hearts this year? AskMen.com scoured the globe to find the Top 99 Most Desirable Women of 2012—from steamy Colombian nightclubs to the high fashion runways of Milan, from brains to busts to business sense.

The ladies of 2012 aren't just the next pretty faces: They're smart, strong women who offer the complete package. So, who moved up the ranks from last year? Who didn't make the cut? Who burst onto the scene and demanded our attention? And, out of all of these, who claimed the No. 1 spot?

25. EMMANUELLE CHRIQUI

2010's Most Desirable Woman dropped a few spots in last year's Top 99, but nobody is disputing that Emmanuelle Chriqui is still as sought-after as ever. The gorgeous Montreal native returned to Entourage for its final season, during which Eric (Kevin Connolly) tried to win his former fiancée back. We don't blame him. For some reason, the stunning actress still remains woefully underrated outside of premium cable. After having a low-key past few years (except for a crazy hot lap dance in Elektra Luxx), Chriqui will hopefully see more screen time if the planned Entourage movie pans out.

THAT'S WHAT SHE SAID:

"I'm a late bloomer... Really, in my mid to late 20s, things turned for the better." — Emmanuelle Chriqui (Access Hollywood)

24. JESSICA ALBA

Beginning her career as a wholesome teen star, Jessica Alba probably would have stayed on that safe, shrink-wrapped career path if Robert Rodriguez hadn't gotten a hold of her. The two first teamed up for Sin City -- in which Alba does the sexiest stripper dance without nudity ever filmed -- and then again for 2010's Machete. Appearing in a gritty grindhouse movie gave her a dangerously sexy edge and also reminded us that Alba is half Latina. Now we'll watch anything that she's in, even if it's Spy Kids 4. Unfortunately, there was no Aromascope for Alba's hair.

THAT'S WHAT SHE SAID:

"All of the stuff I got made fun of as a kid — bubble butt, fish lips, the dark skin — I'm proud of now." — Jessica Alba (Latina)

23. OLIVIA WILDE

How hot is Olivia Wilde? The former House star is so attractive that men want her, and women, well, want her, too. During her career, the brunette bombshell has made out with more actresses than we can count, and Megan Fox once openly campaigned to be next on that list. Wilde has added sci-fi geeks to her dance card, first making $200-million worth of CGI eye candy pale in comparison to her skintight suit in Tron: Legacy, and then making us indifferent about who'd come out on top in Cowboys & Aliens - as long as she got screen time. Now that's hot.

THAT'S WHAT SHE SAID:

"I'm trying to be adult, entering the shark pool of dating, but I'm hopeless at it." — Olivia Wilde (Marie Claire)

Please follow The Wire on Twitter and Facebook.

See Also:

• 16 Celebrities Who Started Their Careers in Finance
• P&G To Lay Off 1,600 After Discovering It's Free To Advertise On Facebook
• Why The Obama Recovery Has Been Much More Impressive Than Reagan's

Comedy staple and late-night icon David Letterman is celebrating his 30th year on late-night television this evening.

Letterman started his after comedy career on a short-lived morning show called "The David Letterman Show" which was critically acclaimed but not a ratings success.

Two years later came the big NBC gig, "Late Night with David Letterman." The show was a huge hit and Letterman was responsible for some of the best comedy bits of all time. "Late Show" saw the creation of such classic routines like "Stupid Pet Tricks," "Stupid Human Tricks," and "Small Town News."

But when Johnny Carson retired from "The Today Show" in 1992 and the gig went to Jay Leno, Letterman moved to CBS and started a late night rivalry that provided for some awesome (and sometimes even awkward) laughs.

Celebrities, comedy bits, and surprising emotional moments are what make Letterman's show so fun to watch. 

10. "Will It Float?"

One of Letterman's new bits on "The Late Show with David Letterman" was also one of the most bizarre. This bit saw Letterman take different items and put them in water to see if they'll float or not. It was preceeded with a hard rock theme by sidekick and music legend Paul Schaffer and it spawned a board game of the same name.

Though how this bit actually works as a board game is still a mystery.

9. Crispin Glover gets physical

"Back to the Future" star Crispin Glover always looked a bit strange. But it wasn't apparent how strange he really could be until he made his first appearance on "The Late Show" in 1987.

While promoting his film "River's Edge," Glover made his appearance as a character from one of his other movies, "Rubin and Ed." A movie which would not be released for another four years.

During the weird interview, Glover challenged Letterman to an arm-wrestling match and proceeded to do a roundhouse kick which almost his Letterman in the face. After commercial break, Glover was gone.

Awkward...

8. "Great Moments in Presidential History"

When George W. Bush was in office, Letterman used his two-term presidency as comedy gold. He didn't have to do much for this particular sketch.

"Great Moments" took bits of different speeches and press conferences by the former president and picked out the most embarrassing moments or the scenes that made Bush look as ridiculous as possible.

In early 2009, right before President Obama's inauguration, Letterman showed the grand finale of "Great Moments." Check it out.

Please follow The Wire on Twitter and Facebook.

See Also:

• Time Warner Gives Ryan Gosling To The People, For $1.99
• Why TV Chef Gordon Ramsay Paid His Father-In-Law $3 Million To Go Away
• Hollywood Says Goodbye To 'Soul Train' Creator And A Reality TV Star

Ads by Pheedo

Now that we finally have precise financial information for Facebook, we can get a good sense of what the company is worth.

The answer?

Not as much as some people thought a few weeks ago, before they knew the numbers. ($100+ billion.)

Before we get to that, though, we need to tweak some other folks who should now tuck their tails between their legs and admit that they were colossally wrong.

Which folks?

The folks who said Facebook was just a fad. The folks who said Facebook would never have a good business. The folks who said there was no way in hell Facebook was worth $2 billion, then $4 billion, then, gasp, the $15 billion that Microsoft paid for a stake in it a few years ago. Even the folks who scoffed when Facebook sold stock at $50 billion a year or so ago.

Because it turns out that Facebook has an absolutely amazing business with astonishing usage metrics that is worth many tens of billions of dollars.

Specifically, Facebook is nearly a $4 billion company with nearly a 50 percent operating profit margin growing at better than 75 perecent per year. And, 7 years after its founding in a college dorm room, it is used by about 1/7th of the world's population.

That is an awesome business, no matter how you look at it. And it's worth a ton of money.

So admit it, Facebook scoffers. It's time to eat crow.

Of course, just because Facebook has an amazing business doesn't mean it's worth $100+ billion, which is what everyone was saying it was worth a couple of weeks ago (when they didn't know what they were talking about). The unofficial range for the Facebook IPO pricing has since been reduced to $75-$100 billion, but even that's aggressive.

How much is Facebook worth?

Probably about $75 billion—with a wide range of reasonable differences of opinion around that number.

How do we get there?

A few different ways.

(Before we jump into the analysis, though, a word of caution: What we're looking for is an estimate of what Facebook's stock is actually worth, not an estimate of where it will trade when it goes public. Sometimes, depending on the market's mood, those two numbers are quite different, especially for a company as hyped as Facebook. Over time, however, stocks do have a tendency to gravitate toward their "intrinsic value," so it's helpful to have a sense of this. Put differently, in theory, stocks are worth the "present value of future cash flows"—the total amount of cash the company will generate over its lifetime, discounted to the present. But in practice stocks are worth what everything else is worth—what someone will pay for them.)

In the current market, investors are actually being relatively intelligent about what they're willing to pay for stocks, which means that valuations matter more than they sometimes do. But, again, let's focus on value, not price.

There are a few things to look at when assessing value:

1. Earnings (or cash flow, or revenue, or whatever metric makes the most sense)
2. Future growth rate and trend (accelerating or decelerating)
3. Multiple (what the market should pay for those earnings)

For Facebook, we can look at both earnings and revenue multiples. Let's start with earnings.

Facebook earned $1 billion last year. 

That's a nice round number, and it's easy to put a price-earnings ratio on.

What's a fair PE for Facebook?

Well, as a first step to figuring that out, let's get a sense of the PE ratios for some other phenomenally big, successful, and profitable tech companies—like Google and Apple.

Google has a 20X P/E on 2011 earnings.

Apple has a 13X P/E on 2011 earnings.

In a historical context, those multiples are reasonable. The S&P 500 historical average P/E ratio is about 16X. So, considering Apple's amazing growth rate, Apple's multiple might even be low.

If Facebook traded at Google's 20X PE, it would be worth $20 billion. If it traded at Apple's 13X PE, it would be worth $13 billion.

But Facebook's much smaller than Apple and Google, and it's growing faster than they are—much faster than Google and a little bit faster than Apple (which is an extraordinary comment on Apple). So Facebook should trade at a significantly higher PE than either of those companies.

To be generous, let's say Facebook should trade at a PE multiple that is more than twice as high as Google's PE and about 4-times Apple's, or 50X. At a 50X PE, on last year's earnings, Facebook would be worth $50 billion.

Of course, market valuations are a function of what is expected to happen in the future, not what has happened in the past. So the next question is ... how fast will Facebook's earnings grow over the next few years?  And as we consider that question, we should keep in mind that the market generally places a higher multiple on companies whose earnings are growing fast and accelerating, and a lower multiple on the companies where earnings are growing slowly or decelerating.

Facebook's $1 billion of earnings in 2011 was up from $600 million the prior year, about 66 percent growth. That's fast growth, but it's not spectacularly fast. Worse, from a valuation perspective, it's also decelerating growth. (Facebook's growth in Q4 of last year was much slower than it was in Q1—only 55 percent). The market does not like deceleration. All else being equal, therefore, Facebook's earnings multiple should compress until the company hits a steady-state growth rate.

But if Facebook's earnings grow at nearly the same rate as they did last year for the next two years, say 50 percent, Facebook will earn ~$1.5 billion this year and ~$2.25 billion next year.

Using the same 50X multiple, Facebook would be worth $75 billion based on this year's earnings, and $113 billion on next year's earnings. So that supports a central value of around $75 billion.

As a gut-check on earnings, we can also look at Facebook's revenue multiple.

Facebook generated $3.7 billion of revenue last year. Facebook is a super-high margin business—extraordinarily high—which means it should trade at a high revenue multiple, especially considering how fast the company is growing.

To get a sense of revenue multiples for comparable profitable, fast-growing tech companies, let's again look at Apple and Google. And this time, let's also look at LinkedIn (LinkedIn is still in heavy investment mode, so it doesn't make sense to look at LinkedIn's PE multiple—it's meaningless).

Apple's trading at 3X revenue.

Google's trading at 5X revenue.

And LinkedIn's trading at 16X revenue.

Again, Facebook is growing faster than Apple and Google. But it's actually growing more slowly than LinkedIn. So, arguing that Facebook should have a higher revenue multiple than LinkedIn would be aggressive.

Based on Facebook's size, growth rate, and profitability, a 10X-15X revenue multiple is probably fair.  So that would give you a "fair value" range of ~$40 billion to $60 billion based on last year's revenue. Looking forward, you'd get $55-$80 billion based on a reasonable projection for this year's revenue ($5-$5.5 billion) and $70-$100 billion based on a 2013 revenue estimate ($7 billion).

So, what do you get when you mash all that together?

A central value for the company of about $75 billion, with a range of $50-$100 billion, depending on how relatively aggressive or conservative you want to be.

Personally, I'd be conservative.

Facebook's business is decelerating rapidly.

Advertising revenue, which accounts for more than 80 percent of the business, grew only 44 percent in the fourth quarter. Forty-four percent growth just isn't that fast, especially for a company that's supposed to be the next Google. (Google's revenue was growing much faster than 44 percent at this stage of the company's development).

Payments revenue, meanwhile, which exploded from ~$100 million to ~$550 million in 2011, was driven in large part by a change in Facebook's policies to require games-makers like Zynga to hand over 30 percent of their take. This change was phased in through the first half of 2011, which added greatly to the payments growth rate last year. Once the change anniversaries early this year, the growth of Facebook's payments revenue will likely decelerate sharply.

And then there's Facebook's profit margin; the other big driver of earnings.

Facebook already has an extraordinary 50 percent operating margin. There are very few companies in history that have had this high a profit margin (Google being one). And there are even fewer companies that have sustained a profit margin higher than 50 percent. So the potential for Facebook to increase its profit margin in the future seems very limited. And, in fact, it seems likely that, as Facebook invests in new businesses, its profit margin may drop.

(Facebook should invest in new businesses. Earning big profits now is likely to be much less valuable than earning bigger profits later.)

So, when you put those two things together—decelerating revenue plus an already maxed-out profit margin—it seems likely that Facebook's earnings growth could slow significantly over the next couple of years. And that will make sustaining even a 50X earnings multiple difficult.

Ultimately, Facebook will trade at a similar earnings multiple to where companies like Apple and Google are trading today (15X-20X). The only question is when. So folks who gleefully pay 50X+ earnings for the company had better be VERY confident that Facebook's earnings growth won't slow over the next few years.

If you want to argue that Facebook is worth $100+ billion, meanwhile, you have to believe that Facebook will eventually launch a huge, fast-growing business that they haven't yet launched, or radically accelerate one of the two businesses they're in today (payments and ads).  Either of those things is possible, of course. With Facebook's astounding user-metrics, it has one hell of a platform to build on.

But possible is not the same as probable. And paying a $100+ billion price for Facebook's stock based on the possibility that they might someday invent an amazing new business would be fairly described as speculative. Or nuts.

So let the speculating begin ...

SEE ALSO: Meet Some Of The 1,000 Millionaires Facebook Has Made...

Please follow SAI on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

See Also:

• Facebook Just Cloned A Google+ Feature And Then Stuck Ads Inside Of It
• THE GOOGLE INVESTOR: Chrome Falls In Browser Share For First Time In Two Years
• Zynga's Shares Are Skyrocketing After Facebook Revealed Its Addiction To Farmville

• Coutney Love's daughter says her mom killed their pets after they got into her drug stash. Not okay.
• Khloé and Lamar have this controversial urinal in their home.

• Sarah Jessica Parker dons a blonde wig on the "Lovelace" set for her role as Gloria Steinem. SJP took the role after Demi Moore dropped out.

• Kristen Stewart tells awaiting paparazzi to "Freeze to death! Freeze to death!"

• Forget Michelangelo's David statue in Italy, David Beckham has been bronzed in London—in his H&M knickers.

• Julianne Hough rarely gets to see her busy boyfriend Ryan Seacrest—unless she watches him on "American Idol."

• Blake Lively would like us to believe her love life isn't that…lively. Oh, and she hopes that if she ever has a son that he become a transvestite.

Please follow The Wire on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

See Also:

• Roseanne Barr Is 'Nuts' For Running For President—Here's Today's Buzz
• Kristen Bell Has An Adorable Meltdown Over A Sloth—Here's Today's Buzz
• 10 Box Office Hits You Didn't Know Started As Tiny Films At Sundance

Sundance 2012 ended on Sunday and dozens of films were purchased with the promise that they will one day see the light of day—or better yet, the dark insides of a movie theater.

But before the filmmakers and actors can rejoice in their happy, Hollywood ending, they first will have to see how the films fare at the box office.

While many purchased Sundance films later struggle at the box office, there have been a few successful surprises to come out of the film festival.

The last two years have seen a giant surge of Sundance films that are nominated for Academy Awards as well as a spike in box office results. And throughout the over 25-year history of Sundance, several films have had surprisingly high box-office results considering their low-budgets.

Since this year's Sundance films haven't yet been released to the public...

"Garden State" (2004)

Box Office Gross: $26,782,316

It seemed like a joke. "Scrubs" TV sitcom star Zach Braff wrote and directed a movie and got Natalie Portman to star in said movie? And then the film released and the world got it.

"Garden State" was a runaway hit at Sundance and ended up doing fairly well for being such a low-budget film. The plot centered around Braff's character Andrew going back to his childhood home for his mother's funeral, where he deals with a dysfunctional relationship with his father and finds love with Portman's Sam.

"Bend it Like Beckham" (2003)

Box Office Gross: $32,543,449

This 2003 adorable comedy proved to be a celebration of Indian film as well as a fusion of East and West.

Starring a much younger Keira Knightley and "ER" star Parminder Nagra, "Beckham" was about an Indian girl living in London who wants nothing more than to break away from the stereotypical Indian traditions so she can play professional soccer. Of course, her parents and family don't understand this at all.

The film ended up raking in over eight times its production budget.

"In the Bedroom" (2001)

Box Office Gross: $35,930,604

This gripping tale of an elderly couple who deal with losing their son and seeing the murderer go free was a monster hit with audiences and critics in Park City.

But no one figured it would have the mainstream success it received after the theatrical release.

The box office result was most unexpected as the film was made for a mere $2 million. But the cherry on top was the five Academy Award nominations for Best Picture, Best Screenplay and noms for actors Sissy Spacek, Tom Wilkinson and Marissa Tomei.

Please follow The Wire on Twitter and Facebook.

See Also:

• Sundance Roundup: Which Films Sold For The Most Money
• Blake Lively Swears She's Only Had 4 Boyfriends—Here's Today's Buzz
• Kristen Bell Has An Adorable Meltdown Over A Sloth—Here's Today's Buzz

Incarcerated rap star Ja Rule has made some new friends in prison -- Alan Hevesi, disgraced ex-New York State Comptroller, and ex-Tyco CEO Dennis Kozlowski, the New York Daily News reported.

His new pals “Hevey D” and “Koz” have been giving Ja Rule some pretty good advice, too.

The 36-year-old high school dropout rapper, who is currently serving a two-year prison sentence for a weapons charge and tax evasion, has been encouraged by his friends to return to school. 

Kozlowski also told Ja Rule to invest in airline stocks and study business, the report said.

Hevesi is currently serving time for corruption, while Kozlowski is in prison for fraud.

Please follow Clusterstock on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

See Also:

• Facebook's IPO Will Make These People Millionaires And Billionaires
• HOPE KILLS: Susan G Komen Foundation Would Rather Be Associated With A Handgun Than Planned Parenthood
• Most US States Are Ignoring The World's Fastest Growing Criminal Enterprise

If you're going to the Super Bowl this weekend, you're already luckier than most people in America.

But here's a bonus opportunity: you could also win a walk-on role on the ABC comedy "Cougar Town" and schmooze with a cast that includes Courteney Cox, Busy Philipps and Christa Miller.

Super Bowl attendees, all you have to do is hold up a sign that says, "Cougar Town returns to ABC Feb 14, 8:30 PM." In the most creative way possible.

If your poster gets on the air during the game, you could win that coveted walk-on role.

Not a bad reward for almost no effort at all.

Please follow The Wire on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

See Also:

• Here's the 'Fear Factor' Challenge NBC Cut For Being Too Gross—And 5 Other Disgusting Show Moments
• The Biggest Jaw-Droppers From Last Night's SAG Awards—Here's Today's Buzz
• 'The Muppets' Respond To Fox News' Accusation That They Are Anti-Oil

Ads by Pheedo

The March issue of Harper's Bazaar does something it's never done before—show the back of someone's head. (This image with Gisele Bundchen in 2002 wasn't an actual front cover.)

That's Gwyneth Paltrow gracing the cover in a black Anthony Vaccarello dress and showing a lot of leg.

The cover won't be seen on newsstands. Rather, this version of the March issue will be the cover that only subscribers receive. Newsstand buyers will get a more "normal" cover, featuring Paltrow's face and a bunch of teasing headlines.

Click Here To See Bazaar's Other Great 'Hidden' Subscriber Covers >>

The faceless Paltrow cover kicks off the magazine's redesign—its first revamp in a decade.

The redesign comes after a 12 percent decrease in ad pages last year. The revamped magazine will contain 15.5 percent more ad pages, bringing the page total from 235 to 271—still behind Elle, InStyle and Vogue's March numbers. 

The new Harper's is one inch larger, contains thicker paper and has new cover typography (Didot, in case you're a font geek).

Two items that remain unchanged are the iconic black logo and the "Fabulous at Every Age" feature. Harper's will also continue to make separate covers for newsstands and subscribers. 

Publisher Carol Smith, formerly of Elle, credits the redesign as her first official issue even though she has been with the magazine since last May. 

The issue hits stands Feb. 14. 

(Sources: Harper's Bazaar, Women's Wear Daily)

Britney Spears: August 2006

Britney Spears bared her belly in an all nude cover back in 2006.

Gisele Bündchen: February 2002

Ok. This isn't an actual subscriber cover...However, Gwyneth Paltrow wasn't the first to have the back of her head photographed for a Bazaar shoot. In 2002, model Gisele Bundchen appeared in a front-to-back photo on the magazine's cover. 

Katy Perry: December 2010

Katy Perry's 2010 cover played off of Vogue's iconic '50s cover. Perry's lips were adorned with Swarovski crystals. 

Please follow The Wire on Twitter and Facebook.

See Also:

• Vanity Fair Just Revealed Its Hollywood Issue—With A Whites-Only Cover Again!
• Actually The Entertainment Industry Had An Amazing Decade
• Nicole Scherzinger's Post-'X Factor' Gig? Nearly Nude Spokesmodel

Ads by Pheedo

She may have just been fired by Simon Cowell as a judge on "X Factor," but Nicole Scherzinger isn't unemployed just yet.

The former Pussycat Dolls front woman is now the spokesmodel for London Fog's spring campaign—sporting nothing but a trench coat.

"My newest ad for London Fog has just been released! It might be my favorite one yet! What do you think?" Scherzinger tweeted to her 1.2 million Twitter followers on Wednesday.

The former "X Factor" judge follows in the footsteps of former London Fog spokesmodels Gisele Bundchen, Eva Longoria and Christina Hendricks.

Scherzinger's ads will appear beginning in December issues of magazines as well as online, outdoor and in-store images.

Not quite the exposure she had with Fox's "X Factor" but at least Scherzinger won't be left completely out in the cold with no jacket.

In Fall 2009, a pregnant Gisele Bundchen posed in nothing but a London Fog trench coat. The campaign was shot by fashion photographer Nino Munoz.

London Fog’s chief marketing officer, Dari Marder, stated: “Although Gisele was photographed while pregnant, most of the shots have been retouched to respect her privacy during this wonderful and personal time in her life.”

In Winter 2009, Eva Longoria and her then-hubby Tony Parker posed as spokesmodels for London Fog.

Please follow The Wire on Twitter and Facebook.

See Also:

• Top 10 Late Night Moments With David Letterman
• Why TV Chef Gordon Ramsay Paid His Father-In-Law $3 Million To Go Away
• Snooki: 'I'm Not Pregnant!'

Ads by Pheedo

Brad Pitt and Jon Stewart have a few suggestions for the Academy.

Last night Pitt stopped by "The Daily Show" to discuss his stance on Oscar distribution with host Jon Stewart.

“Why don’t Oscar movies go negative on other movies?” Stewart questioned Pitt, comparing the process to the current Republican presidential nomination race.

“It’s always ‘For your consideration: Moneyball,’ but why not, like, ‘The Artist: Go F**k Yourself,’ joked the host.

But politically correct Pitt had a different suggestion.

"I think we should just put a trophy on the table and we should all just put our hands on it and see who can hold it the longest," expalined Pitt. "And the last man standing takes the trophy!”

Sounds like a competition straight out of "Survivor,"

See the entire clip below:

(The two begin discussing Oscars right under the six-minute mark.) 
 

Please follow The Wire on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

See Also:

• Kristen Bell Has An Adorable Meltdown Over A Sloth—Here's Today's Buzz
• Vanity Fair Just Revealed Its Hollywood Issue—With A Whites-Only Cover Again!
• Maya Rudolph Tells Conan Her Connection To The Head Found Near The Hollywood Sign

Ads by Pheedo

He has killer good looks, he breaks up street fights and now you can see him from the comfort of your own home.

From now through February 27, Time Warner Digital TV subscribers can purchase “Ryan Gosling On Demand" for just $1.99 to $4.99 per film.

The cable company will include eight fims, from new releases like "Drive" and "The Ides of March" to the romantic comedy roles that made him a heartthrob.

Now you can watch, rewind and re-watch Gosling's swoon-worthy one-liners in "The Notebook" and those NOT-photoshopped abs in "Crazy, Stupid, Love."

What better way to celebrate Valentine's Day than to revel in a Gosling marathon?

Please follow The Wire on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

See Also:

• Why TV Chef Gordon Ramsay Paid His Father-In-Law $3 Million To Go Away
• Top 10 Late Night Moments With David Letterman
• George Clooney's Ex-Girlfriend Is Dating…Steve-O?!

Ads by Pheedo

Following in Kim Kardashian and Suze Orman's footsteps, comedian and actor George Lopez launched a prepaid card with Mango Financial this week. 

The Mango MasterCard Prepaid Card offers a lot of pros and a handful cons, which means you'd better know the facts before you sign up. 

With the help of Mango's spokesperson Jason Jepson and CardHub.com's CEO Odysseas Papadimitrious, we did the homework for you: 

Pros of the Mango Prepaid Card

1. 6 percent APY. The promotional (key word: promotional) APY lets cardholders with direct deposit sub the Mango Prepaid Card for their savings account at a sweet 6 percent APY. Other cardholders get a 2 percent APY, which is pretty competitive by today's standards.  

"I love the Mango Card’s 6% APY, not only because it’s over 33 times the current national average for savings accounts, which is 0.18%, but also because it encourages people to hold onto their money for longer instead of just spending whatever they bring in each month," Papadimitrious said. 

2. Free customer service. Whether by email, chat, phone or snail mail all customer service is FREE. That's a plus considering other prepaid cards like Orman's Approved card, for example, only offer one free customer service call each month then charge $2 for every call after that. 

3. Direct deposit bonus. Enroll in direct deposit within the first 90 days of opening your account (and throw in at least $50) and Mango will hand you a cool 20 bucks. 

4. Comparable fees. Compared with Green Dot, Suze's Approved Card, Walmart's Money Card and the RushCard, the Mango Card won't ding you for cash reloading or replacements. 

Cons of the Mango Prepaid Card 

1. ATM and balance checking fees. The ATM withdrawal fee is $2, PLUS whatever the ATM charges. There's also a strange 50 cent fee for balance inquiries made via ATM, automated phone system, or customer service.

“While the Mango Card does not charge a maintenance fee for months that you load at least $500, the fact that you have to pay $2 per ATM withdrawal regardless of the ATM in addition to the average ATM owner surcharge fee of around $2.33 means that it (could be) prohibitively expensive when used as either a replacement checking account or a financial literacy teaching tool," said Papadimitrious. 

That said, Jebson offered a way to circumvent the problem.

"If you go to a store and make a purchase, you can ask for cash back and there's no fee," said Jebson, adding that the company is working on ways "to minimize things." 

2. No online bill pay. If you're looking to replace your checking account, you might look elsewhere. The Mango Card doesn't offer this service and since not all companies will accept your MasterCard number, you may need to send a check or money order. 

Said Jebson: "Financial regulations made this hard, but we are working on a solution to rectify that. We do understand that pain point." 

Other things to consider 

Mango is offering free renters insurance and an investment opportunity with Goalmine.com with the card. Whether either offers a great deal is hard to tell, but we do like the fact any customer can start investing with a mere $25. 

Finally, if friends and/or family get a Mango Card, you can literally text them money using the Card's smartphone app, which comes free with enrollment.  

See CardHub's full review of the Mango MasterCard Prepaid Card here. 

Now check out the best rewards cards for road warriors > 

Please follow Your Money on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

See Also:

• This Prepaid Debit Card Tool Helps You Choose The Right Card For Your Lifestyle
• FTC: Prepaid Phone Card Marketers Will Pay $2M For Lying To Customers
• Facebook's IPO Will Make These People Millionaires And Billionaires

Ads by Pheedo

Celebrities, they're just like us!

A new report by Coupons.com takes a look at the ten most frugal personalities in entertainment–and some of them are a bit surprising. 

No one probably expected anyone with the last name Kardashian to make the cut, but little sister Khloe apparently isn't above coupon clipping.

And if you thought a Pussycat Doll couldn't balance a checkbook, you were sadly mistaken.

“Celebrities may be thought of as living lavish lifestyles but the truth is, like most of us, many stars love a good bargain,” said Jeanette Pavini, Coupons.com Household Savings Expert. 

Here's the full list of their top "frugalebrities" of 2011:

• Sarah Michelle Gellar ("Buffy the Vampire Slayer", "The Ringer")
• Manny Delgado ("Modern Family")
• Halle Berry  ("Moster's Ball" "Catwoman")
• Hilary Swank ("Million Dollar Baby", "The Next Karate Kid")
• Roy Hibbert (Indiana Pacers)
• Kourtney Kardashian (A Kardashian)
• Renee Zellweger ("Bridge Jones's Diary")
• Tim Hasselbeck (ESPN analyst)
• Caroline Channing ("Two Broke Girls")
• Nicole Scherzinger (Pussycat Dolls)

Follow their lead. See 10 things you should never buy new >

Please follow Your Money on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

See Also:

• Only 4% Of Employers Are Confident Their Employees Saved Enough To Retire
• INFOGRAPHIC: Can You Afford To Weather A Financial Storm?
• There Are 4 Plausible Reasons Lab Fees Vary So Much These Days

Ads by Pheedo

MTV has spent the last two years making grown-ups clutch their pearls: Fans of scripted shows wince at the phenomenal ratings for "Jersey Shore." Parents groups were horrified by the sexualized "Skins." And "Teen Mom" has been accused of glamorizing young pregnancy.

MTV unveils its latest shocker tonight -- but it's not shocking in the way you might expect: The new comedy "I Just Want My Pants Back" is a sensitive, scripted show about young, vulnerable New Yorkers trying to find meaningful relationships. Sometimes -- brace yourself -- it's kind of sweet.

Also read: MTV Cancels 'Skins'

Relatable characters -- more than sex -- are key to MTV's recent success, says head of programming David Janollari. It's one of the lessons MTV learned from last year's incendiary and quickly extinguished "Skins." And Janollari says it's even true of "Jersey Shore," which has been roundly criticized for its many bar brawls and sloppy, drunken hook-ups.

"That rootability, and that emotional vulnerability, is a key to success with our audience," he told TheWrap. "Even with 'Jersey Shore,' it's hilarious and outrageous and they're big, larger-than-life characters, but you come back to the end of the day and you're like, 'They care about each other.'"

"Pants" is just MTV's latest foray into scripted television after building its brand on three-minute videos, and later, boundary-pushing reality shows. (MTV's "The Real World" reinvented the genre nearly two decades after "An American Family" created it in 1971.) After years of breaking the TV mold, the network is embracing one of its most traditional formats.

Watch an exclusive preview of "I Just Want My Pants Back":

While controversies over "Skins" and its reality shows have drawn headlines, the network has quietly and successfully launched two other scripted series that, like "Pants," emphasize feelings over flash: "Awkward" focuses on a high school school who struggles to define herself after an accident is interpreted as a suicide attempt. "Teen Wolf," is a darker re-imagining of the goofy '80s comedy.

The network's first scripted show, "The Hard Times of RJ Berger," about a well-endowed high school outcast, was canceled last year after two seasons. But "Awkward" and "Teen Wolf," which have both received fairly positive reviews, will return for their second seasons in the summer. MTV also plans the scripted series "Inbetweeners," "Underemployed," and "Zach Stone Is Gonna Be Famous" for later this year.

As its title suggests, "Pants" still has plenty of sex. And weird sex, at that. It gets its name from a sequence in the pilot episode in which the lead character, Jason (Peter Vack) loses his pants to a young woman he brings home for a one-night stand in his refrigerator.

But the show's sex is mixed with self-deprecating humor, genuine friendships and a pursuit of true romance. Jason wants to reconnect with the pants thief as much as he wants his pants.

Please follow The Wire on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

See Also:

• Here's What Comcast And NBCU's Merger Looks Like One Year Later
• 10 Movie Stars Who Should Take the Plunge Into TV
• Kodak's Bankruptcy Leaves Oscar Theater Searching For A New Sponsor

Ads by Pheedo

Katy Perry may be making her way to a different stage soon. 

According to the Hollywood Reporter, Paramount is discussing a 3D film on the singer with Imagine Entertainment. 

"Dealmaking is still in the early stages, and no director is officially on board yet. But both sides are eager to make the details work, and insiders say it's just a matter of working out the logistics."

The movie would be a concert film similar to Justin Bieber's 2011 "Justin Bieber: Never Say Never."

If the deal goes through, Perry would join the ranks of Bieber, Miley Cyrus, The Jonas Brothers, Michael Jackson and "Glee" with concert documentaries. 

Save Fox's "Glee the 3D Concert Movie," the 3D concerts have fared well at the box office. Disney's "Hannah Montana/Miley Cyrus: Best of Both Worlds Concert Tour" grossed $65 million while Jackson's "This Is It" grossed $261.2 million. 

Despite the ubiquity of 3D these days on the big screen, we're betting the pop star will be a hit considering her chart-topping songs and sold out performances by female teenagers—the same demographic attracted towards both Bieber and Cyrus' concerts. 

Please follow The Wire on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

See Also:

• Top 10 Late Night Moments With David Letterman
• Here's The Hollywood Hills Home Scarlett Johansson And Ryan Reynolds Lived In Before They Got Divorced
• How Alec Baldwin Lost 30 Pounds In 4 Months

Ads by Pheedo

• Willow Smith shaved her head, can whip her hair back and forth no more.

• Scarlett Johansson and her new advertising exec boyfriend have "undeniable chemistry" over breakfast in NYC.

• Check out this sneak peek of Madonna's new football-themed "Give Me All Your Luvin" music video featuring Nicki Minaj and M.I.A.

• Pippa Middleton is dating the guy whose family's home was the setting for Hogwarts in the "Harry Potter" movies.

• Report: Kim Kardashian is slowly making her way through the NFL, secretly dating Mark Sanchez.

• Roseanne Barr is running for president. Guess the hopeful Green Party candidate really is "nuts."

Please follow The Wire on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

See Also:

• Kristen Bell Has An Adorable Meltdown Over A Sloth—Here's Today's Buzz
• Blake Lively Swears She's Only Had 4 Boyfriends—Here's Today's Buzz
• 10 Box Office Hits You Didn't Know Started As Tiny Films At Sundance