Quantcast
Channel: Business Insider
Viewing all 103365 articles
Browse latest View live

7 great movies you can watch on Netflix this weekend

$
0
0

Paddington 1

Netflix has too much content. It's a great thing, but it also leads to hours spent trying to figure out what to watch, instead of actually watching something.

We're about to make your streaming a little easier. We combed through Netflix's current inventory and collected some relatively recent movie adds that might spark your interest.

From a blockbuster like "Rogue One" to the ray of British sunshine that is "Paddington," these are some great movies on Netflix that you can watch over the weekend. 

Here's 7 movies you should watch on Netflix this weekend:

SEE ALSO: If you miss 'Game of Thrones' you should watch AMC's 'The Terror' — a historical horror series critics are calling a '10-episode nightmare'

"Wind River" (2017)

Netflix description: "A tracker with the US Fish and Wildlife service assists a rookie FBI agent who's investigating a teen girl's murder on a remote Wyoming reservation."

Rotten Tomatoes critic score: 87%

Rotten Tomatoes audience score: 90%

Remember Hawkeye? No? He's the lost Avenger, who didn't even make the poster for "Infinity War." While "Wind River" is not in the MCU, it does star Hawkeye himself, Jeremy Renner, who proves in this riveting mystery that he is one of the greatest actors right now. It's violent, but powerfully so, all while being an excellent example of character-driven story. 



"Paddington" (2015)

Netflix description: "He's a bear without a home. They're a family without a bear. It seems like a perfect match, till an evil schemer enters."

Rotten Tomatoes critic score: 98%

Rotten Tomatoes audience score: 80%

Paddington bear wears an old red hat, a blue coat, carries a battered briefcase, and loves marmalade. It is an absolutely delightful, short movie that you won't regret watching, no matter how old you are. It's like a Wes Anderson movie, minus Bill Murray. You will honestly probably want to "Paddington" again right after it's over, it's that good. As an added bonus to the cuteness and exquisite set design, it features Nicole Kidman as the villain, an evil taxidermist. 



"Adventureland" (2009)

Netflix description: "Summer turns bummer for a seriously uptight Gen-Xer. but a crappy job may just be the thing to loosen him up."

Rotten Tomatoes critic score: 88%

Rotten Tomatoes audience score: 61%

Set in the 80s, years before "Stranger Things" made the era really popular, "Adventureland" is a sweet coming-of-age story about a recent college graduate who has to work at a local theme park to make money after his dad loses his job and can't pay for his grad school in New York. All the characters, played by some of the best comedic actors before they were super famous (Kristen Wiig, Bill Hader, Martin Starr), make the story more authentic. It also has great dramatic performances from Ryan Reynolds and Kristin Stewart.

 



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

Netflix's 34 original drama series, ranked from worst to best

$
0
0

stranger things

Netflix's library of original content has grown exponentially since it released its first big show, "House of Cards," in 2013.

Over the years, it has proved to be a hotbed for original drama programming, with shows like "Stranger Things" and "13 Reasons Why" becoming cultural sensations.

With so many drama series on the service, however, it can be hard to keep up with which shows are worth watching.

To create a cheat sheet for you, we turned to review aggregatorRotten Tomatoes to rank all of Netflix's original drama series by their composite critical ratings. The shows had to have at least one season designated "Fresh" or "Rotten," to ensure they had a high enough number of reviews.

We excluded shows that were continuations from other networks, like Channel 4's "Black Mirror," and we used audience scores to break any ties.

Here are Netflix's 34 original drama shows, ranked by their Rotten Tomatoes critic score from lowest to highest:

SEE ALSO: All 65 of Netflix's notable original shows, ranked from worst to best

34. "Iron Fist" — 18%

Critic score: 18%

Audience score: 75%

Netflix description: "Danny Rand resurfaces 15 years after being presumed dead. Now, with the power of the Iron Fist, he seeks to reclaim his past and fulfill his destiny."



33. "Between" — 22%

Critic score: 22%

Audience score: 67%

Netflix description: "After a mysterious disease kills every resident over 22 years old, survivors of a town must fend for themselves when the government quarantines them."



32. "Gypsy" — 37%

Critic score: 37%

Audience score: 85%

Netflix description: "Therapist Jean Holloway develops dangerous and intimate relationships with the people in her patients' lives in this simmering psychological thriller."



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

The characters of HBO's 'Silicon Valley' are inspired by real people in the tech world — here they are

$
0
0

silicon valley in real life 2x1

HBO's "Silicon Valley" gives a whirlwind tour of the triumphs, debauchery, and epic fails of the real tech world. It's a show so spot-on, Snap CEO Evan Spiegel once called it "basically a documentary."

In an interview with INSIDER in 2017, "Silicon Valley" showrunner Alec Berg said the writers find inspiration for the series' storylines in real events and people. 

As season five ramps up, we set out to create the definitive, person-to-person mapping of "Silicon Valley" characters to tech-world personalities. Our guide was largely inspired by a blog post from superfan and tech consultant Rex Sorgatz, which you can read here.

Study up before the next episode of "Silicon Valley" on Sunday night.

SEE ALSO: How the fleece vest became the unofficial uniform of Silicon Valley investors

Richard Hendricks is the classic Silicon Valley wunderkind who codes his way to the top.

The hoodie-wearing, college-dropout protagonist of "Silicon Valley," Richard Hendricks (played by Thomas Middleditch) calls to mind the classic Valley Boy stereotype.

His devil-may-care tousled locks and frenetic personality remind us of Facebook's Mark Zuckerberg, while his story arc mimics the rhythmic highs and lows of Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey's career. Twitter ousted Dorsey in 2008, but he later reclaimed the CEO title.

Richard also bears a striking resemblance to the CEO of Quora, Adam D'Angelo, as some contributors on the site have pointed out.



Gavin Belson combines the megalomaniac style of tech CEOs Larry Page, Larry Ellison, and Marc Benioff.

Gavin Belson (played by Matt Ross) fits all the requirements of a Silicon Valley titan — down to the five-finger running shoes inspired by Sergey Brin's shoe wear aesthetic.

Gavin, who was CEO of a Google-like company called Hooli until his season-four firing, wants to make the world a better place, better than anyone else can. He does so by trampling his competition and lawyering up when someone gets in his way,just likeOracle's Larry Ellison.

"The CEO of Hooli is clearly patterned after (Salesforce CEO) Marc Benioff," BuzzFeed founder Jonah Peretti wrote. They both run enterprise companies while also "bettering the world through charity, destroying the competition, and seeking spiritual council from gurus."



The late Peter Gregory embodied Peter Thiel to his core. (The actor who played him, Christopher Evan Welch, died of a heart attack midway through filming season one.)

Eccentric billionaire and angel investor Peter Gregory (played by Christopher Evan Welch) reminded us of a fellow member of the "three-comma club," Peter Thiel, cofounder of PayPal.

Gregory encouraged young genius geeks to drop out of college and start companies, which sounds a lot like the mission of the Thiel Fellowship. But "Silicon Valley" showrunner Alex Berg said Gregory was never intended to be a caricature of Thiel.

"The honest answer is we didn't even really know who Peter Thiel was when we did season one, and then people kept saying that the Peter Thiel character, and we started looking at Peter Thiel videos and were like, 'Oh, I can see why people are saying that,'" Berg told INSIDER.



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

Spotify could announce a $155 Amazon Alexa-powered gadget for cars at a mysterious event on April 24th

$
0
0

Spotify_1_Daniel Ek

  • Spotify announced on Friday that it will be making a news announcement during an event in New York City on April 24.
  • There's no indication what Spotify will reveal at the event. 
  • One clear possibility is a rumored Spotify gadget for cars, designed to let you control your music with your voice. 

 

On Friday, Spotify invited members of the press to a mysterious event in New York City on April 24th, where it promises an announcement. 

The subject of Spotify's event is completely unknown at this point. One possibility could be a rumored Spotify device, designed for vehicles, that would let you control your music playback with your voice.  potify declined to comment for this story.

The device was first seen on Reddit back in February, when users posted screenshots from the Spotify app showing a pre-order offer for an unannounced and unreleased Spotify device:

The supposed offer, as spotted by Reddit users, included the device itself, which would come with Amazon's Alexa smart voice assistant built in. One user said that Spotify was offering it, along with a 4G data connection for music, for $12.99 a month, with a 12-month commitment, for $155 total. 

Another Reddit user posted that they received a similar offer in the Spotify app, with a difference. They were offered the device for a one-time payment of $155, which would also include the 4G data service.

Apart from the the offers, which appear to have been rolled out in error by Spotify, nothing is officially known about these mysterious devices. However, given the timing, it seems very possible that Spotify will roll out this device. 

Spotify went public on Tuesday under the SPOT trading name, where its stock started trading at $165.50 a share. Shares are priced at $147.92 at the time of writing. 

SEE ALSO: Here's what's next for Spotify after going public

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: How superstar DJ Steve Aoki built an empire by giving away his music

YouTube Kids is reportedly releasing a version that swaps out the algorithm for actual humans (GOOG, GOOGL)

$
0
0

Child looking at phone

  • YouTube is releasing an alternative version of its YouTube Kids app that will rely on human curation to sift through video content instead of an algorithm, according to Buzzfeed News.
  • The whitelisted app will reportedly be available in a matter of weeks.
  • The move comes after a Business Insider investigation revealed that the app, intended for young kids, is prone to surface videos containing conspiracy theories.

YouTube will soon be offering an alternative YouTube Kids app that will swap out an algorithm for actual humans to suggest videos to its young users, reports BuzzFeed News

With this new version, the report says, YouTube employees will sift through and approve individual channels to be included on the app, to make sure that no unsavory content sneaks through — something that a Business Insider investigation revealed to be a problem with the app.

Parents will apparently be able to choose between this human-curated version and the original. This new whitelist-driven version of YouTube Kids will be available in a matter of weeks, says BuzzFeed.

"We are always working to update and improve YouTube Kids, however we don't comment on rumor or speculation," says a spokesperson for YouTube.

Though the kid-friendly YouTube platform was created to provide a safer way for youngsters to surf for videos, it was recently discovered that multiple videos promoting conspiracy theories were viewable by YouTube Kids users. The conspiracy material included claims that the 1969 moon landing was fake, and lectures featuring conspiracy theorist David Icke who proclaimed that reptile-human hybrids rule the world.

The YouTube Kids homepage states that it's a safer experience for kids, but that "no system is perfect and inappropriate videos can slip through, so we’re constantly working to improve our safeguards and offer more features to help parents create the right experience for their families."

Should this app come to pass, it would be part of an ongoing initiatvie by YouTube to stop the spread of misinformation on the service. Earlier this year, YouTube came under fire after a video accusing Parkland school shooting survivor David Hogg of being an actor was featured prominently, before removal.

Another part of this initiative: YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki recently detailed the company's plan to link Wikipedia pages to videos that contain conspiracy-related materials. Background information will accompany vertain YouTube videos, as well as include a link for users to follow to the full Wikipedia page. 

Read the full BuzzFeed report here.

SEE ALSO: YouTube will include Wikipedia info next to videos promoting conspiracy theories

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: YouTube and Facebook have a serious problem with 'promoted' conspiracies about the Parkland shooting

Controversial YouTuber Logan Paul is tanking on views and new subscribers

$
0
0

Logan Paul

  • YouTuber Logan Paul is seeing a big slowdown in subscribers and views in the months after he controversially posted a video of a dead body in Japan's so-called suicide forest.
  • SocialBlade statistics examined by Business Insider show a 47% dropoff in views, and an 88% slowdown in subscribers between December and March.
  • Paul stopped posting videos for the month of January, and YouTube has taken steps to demote Paul on its platform.
  • The figures cast Paul's decision to move to rival platform Twitch in a new light, given his YouTube revenues are probably meaningfully impacted.
  • Paul has also agreed to fight fellow YouTuber KSI which is likely to give a big boost to his numbers.


There's a good reason why controversial YouTuber Logan Paul has decided to launch a channel on rival site Twitch — and it isn't just creative pride.

Statistics from SocialBlade show that Logan Paul is seeing a major decline in his viewers and subscribers on his primary YouTube channel LoganPaulVlogs. This will directly be hitting his earnings, pegged at up to £5.6 million ($7.9 million) a month.

The numbers show the slowdown began to bite from December onwards, when Paul hit the headlines for posting a video showing a dead body in Japan's "suicide forest." He was subsequently kicked out of Google's Preferred ads programme, which lets top-tier advertisers place ads against the most popular creators, handpicked by YouTube.

At the beginning of December, Logan Paul's YouTube channel LoganPaulVlogs had 316 million views. By the beginning of March, that had fallen to 168 million views, a decline of around 47%.

SocialBlade Logan Paul viewers

And you can see a similar impact on subscribers. To be clear, the figures don't show that Paul is actively losing subscribers. Rather, SocialBlade's numbers show Logan Paul is struggling to add as many new subscribers each month as he used to.

When Logan Paul was at his peak in June 2017, he added more than 2 million subscribers to his channel that month alone. In March, he only added around 241,200. That is a huge 88% decline.

SocialBlade YouTube Logan Paul

It's also important to note that Paul still has more than 17 million subscribers in total. But the numbers show he's no longer on a tear.

YouTube punished Logan Paul after a string of offensive incidents

The dropoff is likely down to two factors: YouTube's sanctions, and Paul's decision immediately after the suicide body scandal to post less frequently on Youtube.

Paul posted only two videos in the entire month of January, as a kind of penance for his actions, before posting around 15 videos in February, and 23 videos in March. That explains the initial steep dropoff in numbers — but also shows that Paul hasn't been able to recover his previous popularity levels.

After the suicide forest backlash and Paul's removal from the Preferred ads programme, YouTube also canned a movie deal with Paul, which was supposed to debut on the platform's YouTube Red subscription service. He was also removed from the upcoming fourth season of the YouTube Red original sitcom "Foursome."

Paul didn't seem to learn from his mistakes or the punishment as, after a brief pause on uploading videos, he returned with a controversial video where he tasered a dead rat on camera. YouTube said it had "temporarily" suspended ads from Logan Paul's entire channel because of his recent "pattern of behaviour" which would likely put off advertisers.

Logan Paul

Creators rely heavily on ads to make money from their videos, and the more views and subscribers they have, the more likely they are to become a preferred channel. That becomes a virtuous circle, where YouTube heavily promotes the most popular creators through its recommendation algorithms.

Paul might reverse the decline. He's made the commercially savvy move of agreeing to fight fellow YouTuber KSI in two fights in Manchester, UK, and a rematch in the US. A previous match between KSI and another YouTuber, Joe Weller, drew in 1.6 million viewers when it was streamed live— and 20 million were predicted to watch the footage later.

SEE ALSO: The world's biggest YouTube stars are seeing a massive slowdown

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: These 3D printed homes can be constructed for $4,000 — and they might change the approach to underdeveloped housing

An exec who helped start ESPN Films wants to use Marvel's digital content to tell real-world stories

$
0
0

marvel

  • Marvel New Media, a division of Marvel Entertainment, announced new digital content at the Chicago Comic and Entertainment Expo on Saturday.
  • Marvel New Media vice president Dan Silver talked to Business Insider about Marvel's digital push and how it focuses on true stories.
  • The content includes a variety of new podcasts and video series — "Women in Marvel," for instance, is a podcast that focuses on the comic industry from a female perspective.

 

As an entertainment company with a bevy of fictional characters at its disposal, Marvel isn't exactly in the business of telling true stories. But a new digital push hopes to change that.

Dan Silver, vice president of Marvel New Media — a division of Marvel Entertainment — told Business Insider that Marvel is a "lifestyle brand" now, and should be telling stories that appeal to anyone. That means telling "real" stories, too.

Silver comes from a nonfiction background. He's been with Disney — which owns Marvel — for a decade, and helped start ESPN Films, which produces sports films such as the "30 for 30" documentary series.

While at ESPN, Silver worked on the documentary "1 of 1 — Genesis," which he said was about "the crossover between the world’s greatest athletes and the world’s greatest superheroes."

"We interviewed athletes about their own ‘origin stories’ and created video comics for it," he continued.

It's these kinds of stories — "stories that represent Marvel in the real world" — that Silver ultimately hopes to capture with its new digital content.

marvel

"There are so many stories nowadays [for example], of people buying out theaters to go see 'Black Panther,' and we should be a participant in those stories in telling them," he said.

"Women of Marvel," for instance, is a bi-weekly podcast re-launched in February that focuses on the comic-book industry — an industry largely dominated by men — from a female perspective.

During a panel at the Chicago Comic and Entertainment Expo (C2E2) on Saturday, Marvel New Media announced this and five more new digital series.

What does all this digital content mean for Marvel's comics line? Much of the content will still be inspired by the comics, Silver said, so fans shouldn't worry.

Cooking show "Eat the Universe" will be hosted by Justin Warner, who is not only a celebrity chef (he was a winner on the Food Network series, "Food Network Star"), but also a huge Marvel fan. Dishes on the show will be inspired by Marvel comics and characters.

Dan Silver"My hope is that what we’re doing forms a symbiotic relationship with our comics just as there is with all of our lines of business," Silver said. 

Silver also teased that the content won't be the only thing that's new, but the platforms — like Marvel.com — will be changing, as well.

"Over the next few months you’ll start seeing improvements in the products our audience is consuming," he said. "That includes places — that’s a bit of a tease."

All of the content is currently or will be available on Marvel.com, Marvel's social media, or its YouTube channel.

A full list of new content is below:

This Week in Marvel
A weekly podcast offering a behind-the-scenes look at Marvel. (Relaunching this month; originally launched in November 2011)

Earth’s Mightiest Show
A weekly variety web-series focusing on fandom and Marvel culture. (Launched in March)

Women of Marvel
A bi-weekly podcast that looks at the comic industry from a female perspective. (Relaunched in February; originally launched in June 2014)

Marvel’s Voices
Released bi-weekly as both a podcast and set of video clips, it features interviews that focus on a variety of cultural topics. (Launching this month)

Marvel’s Eat the Universe
Celebrity Chef Justin Warner — who's also a hardcore Marvel fan — cooks dishes inspired by Marvel comics and characters. (Launching this month)

Wolverine: The Long Night
Marvel's first scripted podcast, starring the X-Man Wolverine. (Launched in March)

SEE ALSO: The mystery behind why a beautiful movie theater in the town created by Disney World has been closed for almost a decade

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Why 555 is always used for phone numbers on TV and in movies

'High school now, it's a whole other level': 7 adults who posed as teenagers for a semester were shocked by how much things have changed

$
0
0

undercover high students

  • Seven adults posed as high school students on the A&E documentary series "Undercover High."
  • For one semester, the undercover students got a glimpse of everyday life for teenagers today — and it was nothing like how they remembered.
  • They found that smartphones have changed everything for high schoolers, pregnancy isn't viewed the same way as in the past, and much more.


If you could relive your high school experience for a day, would you jump at the chance?

How about for a whole semester?

That was the premise of "Undercover High," the A&E documentary series that followed seven adults as they posed as students at Highland Park High School in Topeka, Kansas, for the spring 2017 semester. The adults, aged 21 through 26, took classes, joined clubs, and navigated social life alongside real high school students to get a glimpse into what life is like for the average teenager today.

The unique experiment finished airing two weeks ago, and made clear that high school today is nothing like what the undercover students remembered.

"High school was already hard. But high school now, it's a whole other level," said Gloria, a 26-year-old undercover student who teaches kindergarten.

For one thing, technology has transformed the way teenagers go about their lives. The undercover students found that smartphone use was rampant at Highland Park, and teachers were constantly fighting for students' attention during class hours. On top of that, social media led to numerous instances of cyberbullying and sexual harassment, and several students told cameras that social media had contributed to their depression.

"The kinds of challenges that I experienced in high school along with my peers are now 24/7 issues because of technology, computers, cell phones, and social media," Shane Feldman, an undercover student who graduated from high school in 2012, told Business Insider. "There's no real escape."

undercover high nicoletteThroughout the semester, the participants bonded with students with whom they shared common traits. Nicolette, a 22-year-old undercover student who became pregnant when she was in high school, discovered that for many girls at the school, pregnancy had gone from a taboo subject to something of a status symbol. She started an after-school group where female students who were pregnant or parenting children could lend support to one another.

Another undercover student, a 24-year-old named Jorge who is openly gay, bonded with a student who identified as bisexual but was reluctant to come out to most of his peers.

"There's always that fear, what if I lose all my friends?" Jorge said.

The show's final episode followed the undercover students as they revealed their true identities to their school. They also debriefed with administrators from the school and the Topeka Public Schools district to fill them in on their experiences and suggest improvements for the future.

The undercover students noted that at Highland Park, where more than 80% of students come from economically disadvantaged families and where many students are dealing with tragedy in their home lives, teenagers from different backgrounds were able to find common ground over their shared experiences. Administrators said they would form a council to address how to better serve disadvantaged students as a result of the show.

"Trauma is something that I think unites the student body," Feldman said. "And there's just this known feeling that, 'I've gone through stuff, you've gone through stuff, we get each other. And I think students are searching for a trusty support system to know that they're going to be heard."

SEE ALSO: Adults who went undercover at a high school found 7 things people don't realize about life for teenagers today

DON'T MISS: 7 adults went undercover in high school for 4 months — see how the 20-somethings passed as teens

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Teens told us why they're not sold on virtual reality


Battle Royale: These massive hits are battling to be the biggest video game in the world

$
0
0

With tens of millions of players each, both "Fortnite" and "PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds" ("PUBG") are incredibly popular games in the nascent "Battle Royale" genre of video game.

They're on consoles, and phones, and computers. Kids are playing them, adults are playing them, maybe you're playing them, too. Even Drake's getting in on it.

Fortnite (mobile)

If you've somehow managed to avoid learning about both, here's a quick primer on the "Battle Royale" concept:

-100 unarmed players parachute to an island that's full of abandoned buildings chock full of weapons and supplies.

-The goal is survival — kill or be killed, while attempting to stay within a shrinking zone of safety that inevitably brings you closer to your fellow players. If you're outside of that safe zone, your health drains until you die.

-You only get one shot at victory. The last player standing is the winner!

As both "PUBG" and "Fortnite" have exploded in popularity, the "Battle Royale" game genre they popularized has become a hot commodity unto itself. A quick look at the top charts on the Apple App Store or Google Play offers a glimpse of how many other games are trying to cash-in on the "Battle Royale" formula. 

It's no surprise, then, that the company behind "PUBG" (PUBG Corp.) is suing a Chinese game publisher for allegedly infringing its copyright with two games that it says closely resemble "PUBG." TorrentFreak got its hands on the lawsuit on Thursday, which aims to shut down two mobile games developed by Chinese company NetEase. NetEase and BlueHole did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the lawsuit.

All of this is just the latest volley in the ongoing battle to be the biggest game in the world.

SEE ALSO: Over 45 million people are playing a bizarre shooter that pits 100 players against each other in a fight to the death — here's what's going on

DON'T MISS: Forget 'Call of Duty' — the best game of 2017 is an insane 100-player battle royale

The history of the "Battle Royale" genre is largely credited to one man: Brendan Greene. He's the man in charge of "PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds."

The "PlayerUnknown" in the name "PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds" is a person, and his name is Brendan Greene. He's an Irish game developer who works for Bluehole Studios, the parent company of PUBG Corp. 

Before he worked with Bluehole to create "PUBG" — the first game dedicated to the concept of "Battle Royale" — Greene created mods to existing games that offered a glimpse of what the genre could become. 

In March 2017, "PUBG" launched on the Steam digital storefront as an "Early Access" PC game — an unfinished product that was playable, that players could pay for, thus funding ongoing development. It became a runaway success, making over a half billion dollars, and remains the most-played game on Steam at any given time to this day.

On the day I'm writing this, "PUBG" had four times the amount of concurrent players of any other game on Steam:

Steam stats (April 6, 2018)

More people played "PUBG" on Friday on Steam than the rest of the top 10 most played games on the entire platform. Combined. It's a pretty big deal!



"Fortnite" wasn't originally a "Battle Royale" game. That came later, with the launch of "Fortnite: Battle Royale," a separate mode. It's a subtle difference that's important here.

"Fortnite" —as it was originally concieved —  is a third-person shooter that's focused on survival gameplay. You, or you and a group of friends, take on hordes of enemies from the tentative safety of a fort you've crafted.

It launched on July 25th, 2017, and is available on Xbox One, PlayStation 4, PC, and Mac.

There's a cartoony art style to "Fortnite," which tonally fits in alongside the game's goofy dialog; there's a playful tone about everything in "Fortnite," which is starkly different from the dreary, dire tone of "PUBG." Moreover, the core of "Fortnite" is very different from "PUBG" — it's essentially a "tower defense" game.

In "Fortnite," like other tower-defense games, you're defending an immobile thing from waves of enemies. You have a period of time before the attack begins, when you're able to set up defenses (turrets, traps, walls, etc.). Once you trigger the battle, you must defend whatever that aforementioned thing is from being attacked. If you survive those waves, you've succeeded.



In September 2017, Epic Games added a new mode to "Fortnite." The new mode was called "Battle Royale." Moreover: It was free and available on game consoles like the PS4.

"We love Battle Royale games like 'PUBG' and thought 'Fortnite' would make a great foundation for our own version," a September 12, 2017 Epic Games blog post announcing the new game mode said.

And so, Epic released "Fortnite: Battle Royale" as a free addition to the game. Better yet, it was free even for those who didn't own the original "Fortnite." Anyone could download it and get to battling. 

In retrospect, Epic's blog seems prophetic: "Fortnite: Battle Royale" is outrageously popular, eclipsing the original game its built upon.

Somewhere in the realm of 45 million people have the game across PlayStation 4, PC, Xbox One, and Mac. The iOS version, which is a standalone version of the "Battle Royale" mode, has somewhere in the realm of 11 million downloads according to Sensor Tower data provided to Business Insider.

Fortnite (mobile)

Initially, "PUBG" parent company Bluehole Studios took issue with "Fortnite: Battle Royale." There are some major differences between the games, but they are foundation ally very similar, in the sense that they place 100 people on an island for a last-man-standing shootout.

In the months following that early dispute, Epic and Bluehole seem to have squashed the beef. "I've tried to combat the perception that we're competitive with other 'Battle Royale' games," Greene said in March. "Its great that the space is expanding. We're happy that more and more people are getting to play games."



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

How Barry Levinson got Al Pacino to perform at his peak for the HBO movie about Joe Paterno's fall

$
0
0

Paterno 2 Atsushi Nishijima HBO final

  • Barry Levinson explains the key to getting a great performance from a legend like Al Pacino is casting great actors around him.
  • Out of all the amazing actors he's worked with, he reveals why he's grateful most for how Robert Redford treated him on the set of "The Natural."
  • And Levinson opens up about being on stage when John Oliver brought up Dustin Hoffman's sexual misconduct allegations at an anniversary screening of his movie "Wag the Dog" last December.


Oscar-winning director Barry Levinson has been around the movie business for so long he hasn’t just worked with both Robert De Niro and Al Pacino, he’s worked with them multiple times — not to mention a whole bunch of other Hollywood legends.

From “Diner” — where Levinson basically launched not only his directing career, but the careers of Micky Rourke, Kevin Bacon, Steve Guttenberg, Paul Reiser, Ellen Barkin, and Daniel Stern — to “Rain Man” (which earned him his Oscar win), to “Wag the Dog,” Levinson’s work has created some of the best dramas of the last 30-plus years. And recently, in an era when major studios only want franchises that can bring in billions, Levinson has moved his storytelling to HBO and found success with the Bernie Madoff movie “The Wizard of Lies” (his latest collaboration with Robert De Niro), and now a look into the fall of legendary Penn State football coach, Joe Paterno, with Pacino in the lead role.

In “Paterno,” Levinson explores the scandal that tarnished the football god’s legacy when it was revealed, days after he became the winningest football coach in NCAA football history, that his one-time defensive coordinator, Jerry Sandusky, sexually abused children for at least 15 years — with some of the incidents happening on the Penn State campus. Taking place mainly from inside the Paterno home with his family, Pacino gives an incredible performance of a man who must cope with being part of an institutional failure.

Business Insider sat down with Levinson in Lower Manhattan to talk about bringing a story about Paterno to the screen, how he’s come to terms with the fact that many of the people who watch his work are doing it through their phones, and the “peculiar and awkward” experience last December of sitting on stage while “Last Week Tonight” host John Oliver questioned Dustin Hoffman about the sexual misconduct allegations against him.

Jason Guerrasio: Brian De Palma originally was doing this with Pacino. Did you take anything from their collaboration or did you start fresh?

Barry Levinson: Al told me he had been dying to do Paterno but that all didn't work out. And I said let me look at the stuff and basically we came back with a different take on it.

Guerrasio: I talked to De Palma back in 2013 and he said he was imagining Paterno as a King Lear character, it feels that wasn't the way you went.

Levinson: I mean you take a character like that I guess you could make that. But [De Palma] had a different take on it, completely. What we did takes place over a two-week period. You go from the highest high to the lowest low in two weeks. Because otherwise you would be back in the 1980s and '90s, you would be all over the place to hold the story together. Which you could do in some form, probably in a mini series. But in a two hour format, I thought we could get a lot out of it this way.

Guerrasio: It's a great jumping off point to tell the story. He becomes the winningest coach in college football history and then, what a week later —

Levinson: He won on a Saturday, winningest coach in the history of college football, the following Friday the Sandusky scandal begins. And literally, five days after that he's fired.

Guerrasio: Was the thinking also that with so much that has been written about Paterno over the years, on top of the documentary on the scandal itself, "Happy Valley," that there's a lot out there already. You can get away with just doing this pinnacle moment and not lose people.

Levinson: Yeah. The documentary covers a whole lot. We don't need to compete with all of that, but we can tell a separate story that almost nobody will know about. When you think about, one day there's an army of press outside his home and Paterno and his wife and the boys and daughter, everyone is like, "What happened?"

Guerrasio: It's fascinating to compare “Wizard of Lies” and “Paterno” in the aspect of family. The fallen patriarch. Both families are in the dark. Did you model some of “Paterno” off of what you did on “Wizard of Lies?"

Levinson: I didn't model it because we tell it in a different fashion. But I thought it was interesting. The fact that the family is under siege and they don't know. This blindsides them. I thought that would be good to explore, because they don't know so they are asking questions. They aren't accusing, but the daughter is asking, "Who spoke to the boy?" Paterno is like, "I don't know, it was an oversight." So we're learning as they are learning. That seemed to be a good way to do it. Because you're not just providing information, you're providing information in the midst of a drama.

Guerrasio: And to do that, in both films, you cast actors who aren't scared to work alongside legends. Hank Azaria in "Wizard of Lies" or Greg Grunberg in "Paterno" — they up De Niro and Pacino's game. How hard is it to cast actors who won't be scared of working with iconic actors?

Levinson: You have to find strong characters, in this case, for Pacino to work against. How do I make the son, daughter, wife of Paterno interesting? Then you just have to start seeing people. For the [Paterno] boys, I don't even know how many people we looked at.

Guerrasio: At some point do you bring in Al to make sure you'll get out of these actors what you need?

Levinson: No.

Guerrasio: But on the day of shooting, when the lights are brightest, they could fold working opposite Pacino.

Levinson: It's scary. [Laughs]

Guerrasio: Has that ever happened to you?

Levinson: No. You just have to go with your instinct. You meet people and you can tell they can do it. They can step up. At the end of the day you can't have one person, your star, doing whatever. You're putting the instruments into the orchestra, they all have to work.

Guerrasio: In your career you've worked with huge stars, going all the way back writing for Carol Burnett and Mel Brooks. Was there a point where you realized you can work with the cream of the crop?

Levinson: I don't think it ever did. If I think back now and say, I did “Diner” with a bunch of unknown guys and —

Guerrasio: But you were working with much bigger stars before that.

Levinson: Well, I was "working” on their stuff.

Guerrasio: Ah, not the guy at the helm.

The Natural TriStar PicturesLevinson: Yeah. And then I do "The Natural" and I'm working with Robert Redford who is not just a big star but he had just won the Academy Away as best director. So when I think back now I go, "Oh, boy, that was a daunting task." But at some point I went, "Okay, that worked, now I go to the next one." And Redford was great in that he did not impose — [Redford did not say] "Well, this is how I do it." I'll be forever grateful to him that he allowed me to do this crazy fable and didn't go, "No, I don't see that. I don't like that." He went with it. Light stands blowing up, he's rounding the bases night after night after night. He could have gone, "What the hell are we doing?" He was great.

I've been lucky in that regard that I've been able to work with a lot of big names and had solid relationships. De Niro, Al, Redford. Others along the way. It's been very satisfying as opposed to, here it is, that star's coming into the scene, make way. I've seen them as a great collaboration.

Guerrasio: You mentioned before we started this interview that you got to see "Paterno" on the big screen last night and it will probably be the only time that happens. You are making great work in your career currently that will only be seen by most on the small screen, or tablet or even iPhone, are you okay with that?

Levinson: The business has changed and some people can keep talking about theatrical in these wondrous terms — it will survive but it becomes narrower what you can make. So the films I'm most interested in, studios or even the independents, aren't making them. I'm mostly interested in people. I'm interested in the relationships of people. I'm interested in the darker moments within us. All those aspects of human behavior I'm fascinated by. But in the times we're in, those are hard movies to make. So if I can do it at HBO, fine. More people will see it. At the end of the day, when it's all said and done, everything is on television.

Guerrasio: It's where it all is.

Levinson: And it's where it was. Think about it, where did I see "Casablanca?" "Maltese Falcon?" "Citizen Kane?" It was all on television. Those films that were before my time they showed it on the late show. Did I appreciate them less because I didn't see them in a theater? No. I loved them. The kids today, they want to watch it on their iPhone, to me that's crazy, but that's the way. I can't say no.

Guerrasio: “Paterno” looks at an institutional failure of sexual abuse. The movie business is going through the same thing with the #MeToo and Time’s Up movements. You were front and center for one instance of that. Can you talk a little about what the experience was like being on that stage when John Oliver confronted Dustin Hoffman with the sexual misconduct allegations against him. This was during an anniversary screening of your movie, "Wag the Dog," do you wonder if that movie and another movie you did with Hoffman, "Rain Man," are now tainted because of the allegations against Hoffman?

Levinson: I don't know if I can answer that because it's too soon to know what the repercussions are of all of that. I would just be making a theoretical. How do we view something because of something? In the end, even applying it to "Paterno," if the voices of things that happened would have been heard it would have ended as it would have been made public and opening it up. There wouldn’t have been more victims. You can never squash something and assume it's not going to come back in some fashion. It's going to bubble up until it explodes. Society evolves to find a better way. It always has these hills and valleys. We're looking in the early stages of this. We understand the justification of it, but we don't understand how it will settle in and define itself.

Guerrasio: But it must have been strange for you sitting there with Oliver and Hoffman going at it.

Levinson: It was in a sense because I didn't know about anything. So it was literally, when he mentioned it to Dustin I didn't know about anything. I'm listening to a conversation that I can't even participate in because I don't know exactly what they were talking about. It was peculiar and awkward. And then we thought we got past it and then the conversation came back.

Guerrasio: To really understand it you would have had to have been up on the news.

Levinson: Yeah. I knew nothing beforehand. We were all taking back in the green room before going out and I hadn't seen Dustin in years. So we were talking and I was talking to John Oliver and we went out and then this thing took place.

Guerrasio: When it all ended. What was it like backstage?

Levinson: I think at the end of the night it was literally, "What happened?" Dustin and his wife and I think he had one of his sons with him and he was shell shocked. Oliver seemed, in a sense, disturbed by it. None of us knew what to say about what took place because it went in a different direction. Me and Bob [De Niro], we just didn't know where to jump in. You couldn't offer any insight or an opinion because you didn't understand what happened.

Guerrasio: I’ve been thinking often, how is a director or a film's work perceived post #MeToo? Because you worked with Hoffman on "Wag the Dog" and "Rain Man.” Are those movies looked at differently now?

Levinson: As I say, I don't know. But, I was in Switzerland last week, there's a festival there, and they showed "Rain Man." It was the first time I watched it since I made it. So it's like 30 years. But Hoffman never came up. They watched the movie and we talked.

Guerrasio: That's good to hear.

Levinson: Yeah. Your question is valid, but I don't know what things are going to be like, say, next year. I can't surmise what is next.

SEE ALSO: Believe the hype: John Krasinski's is the next hit horror movie and will scare the heck out of you

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Why 555 is always used for phone numbers on TV and in movies

The 44 worst movies made by iconic directors — from Spielberg to Scorsese

$
0
0

hook  worst movies

Most of the greatest film directors in history have swung and missed on occasion. 

Francis Ford Coppola, Steven Spielberg, and many other critically acclaimed directors have directed at least one movie that critics tore apart. 

For this list, we chose 45 directors who have largely been praised by critics as masters of their craft, and we turned to the reviews aggregator Rotten Tomatoes to find out which of the films they've directed was the most critically panned.

We excluded a number of great directors who did not have a film in their catalog with a critic score under 70%. (Stanley Kubrick, for instance, is not on this list, as his "worst" film, "Eyes Wide Shut," has a 74% "Fresh" rating on the site.)

Here are the 44 worst movies made by iconic directors, ordered from the (relative) best to worst, according to their critic scores:

SEE ALSO: The 50 best movies of all time, according to critics

Alejandro G. Iñárritu — "Biutiful" (2010)

Critic score: 65%

What critics said: "It's the kind of film that congratulates the viewer on her tolerance for the spectacle of unrelieved misery." — Slate



Guillermo del Toro — "Blade II" (2002)

Critic score: 57%

What critics said: "The only dread it inspires is in the possibility that its director prefers turning human flesh into CGI-enhanced mush over exploring genuinely frightening material." — The Village Voice



Sergio Leone — "The Colossus of Rhodes" (1961)

Critic score: 57%

What critics said: "This ludicrous costume epic complete with hambone acting is interesting to film buffs because it is an early work by the king of the spaghetti Westerns, director Sergio Leone." — TV Guide



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

Why 'Guardians of the Galaxy' is still the best movie in the Marvel Cinematic Universe — yes, even better than 'Black Panther'

$
0
0

guardians of the galaxy

It seems like we've barely had time to get over the thrill of watching "Black Panther" before "Avengers: Infinity War" tumbles into theaters on April 27 as the "most ambitious crossover in history."

Indeed, "Infinity War" is what the entire Marvel Cinematic Universe — 10 years and 18 movies — has been building toward.

And for many, "Black Panther" has been the best of the bunch up until now. It is now the highest-domestic grossing superhero movie of all time.

But to me, "Black Panther" still isn't the MCU's best movie. That honor goes to 2014's "Guardians of the Galaxy," an insanely fun, surprisingly touching, and all-around great movie that never should have worked.

I understand why some people consider "Black Panther" the best of the best, and even see the arguments for other standout movies in the MCU, such as "Captain America: The Winter Soldier" or "The Avengers."

But which of those 18 movies is the best to me? Which one sticks with me personally? The answer is most certainly "Guardians of the Galaxy." 

Below are 7 reasons why:

SEE ALSO: New MoviePass data reveals the 27 movies that sold the most tickets to its subscribers since August

A strong ensemble cast that perfectly embodies the characters — who were largely unknown before the movie.

As mentioned, "Guardians of the Galaxy" is a superhero movie that never should have worked. It features characters largely unknown to general audiences — two of which are a walking, humanoid tree that can only say three words and a talking, genetically modified raccoon. Even more so than "Thor" — about an alien god — "Guardians" was the Marvel Cinematic Universe's first real test. Just what would audiences go along with?

Well, a lot. Thanks to a strong ensemble cast, these bizarre characters are now just as well-known and admired in the MCU as Tony Stark. What's more impressive is that these characters didn't have the benefit of being introduced in an earlier movie like Black Panther or Spider-Man.

It's the movie that introduced the world to the now mega-popular Chris Pratt as an unlikely, quirky action hero. And even more unlikely but proven to be possible, Dave Bautista steals the show as the awkwardly delightful Drax.

It's not just that the actors bring to life their characters so well, it's that they have such good chemistry. The Guardians are a family — a highly dysfunctional one, but a family nonetheless, and that makes them different than many other super-teams. 

 



James Gunn.

No other MCU movie has James Gunn at the helm, and his passion both behind the camera and away from it helps make "Guardians" the best of them.

The actors help make their respective characters so likable, but it's Gunn's direction, attention to detail, and engagement with fans that make the "Guardians" movies — yes, even the sequel — so fun even after the credits have rolled.

Gunn's social media presence is notable for engaging with fans and answering questions. He's not shy about revealing new tidbits about the movies. For instance, he recently revealed that the Baby Groot seen in "Vol. 2" is actually the original Groot's son, who sacrifices himself at the end of the first film.

There's also a bevy of Easter eggs hidden in "Guardians of the Galaxy," and Gunn has claimed that there is one Easter egg that fans have not discovered yet. It's this kind of engagement that heightens the experience of watching "Guardians."



It was the first movie in the MCU that didn't feel like it was part of the MCU.

Being a movie within the Marvel Cinematic Universe has become a trustworthy trait, so it's not a bad thing by any means. But in regards to "Guardians of the Galaxy," the movie works so well because it doesn't feel stuck in that universe, or pressured to tie into the larger events of it.

Sure, it sets up Thanos as a future bad guy and much of the story revolves around an Infinity Stone that Thanos will be after in "Avengers: Infinity War," but that feels natural and secondary to the characters' relationships. "Guardians" brings the action to planets we hadn't seen before; there's no S.H.I.E.L.D. or Nick Fury or Tony Stark. Again, none of those things are bad, but for this particular movie, it was refreshing and only made it better.



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

'A Quiet Place' scares up $50 million to win the weekend box office (VIA)

$
0
0

a quiet place

  • Paramount's "A Quiet Place" wins the weekend box office with an estimated $50 million.
  • That's a huge profit for a movie made for only $17 million.
  • "Black Panther" now is the third highest-grossing movie all-time at the domestic box office (not counting inflation).

Paramount's frightening "silent" horror movie "A Quiet Place" proved audiences still love to go to the movies to get scared, as it won the weekend box office with an estimated $50 million, according to boxofficepro.com.

That's a huge success for a movie that has around 15 lines of dialogue and was made for just $17 million.

Directed by John Krasinski, who also stars with his wife Emily Blunt, the movie follows a family trying to survive a group of monsters who are wiping out the human race by attacking anything that makes a sound.

Playing on over 3,500 screens, the horror took in an impressive $19 million on Friday. Sunday's $50 million weekend estimate blows away the industry projects for the movie which ranged from mid-$20 million to low $30 million estimates for the weekend.

Thanks to the hype around the movie, which at one point had a perfect 100% score on Rotten Tomatoes, it was able to fend off strong competition.

After a strong $41.7 million opening weekend, Warner Bros.'s "Ready Player One" dipped only 40% to earn $25 million this weekend to come in second place. And Universal's R-rated comedy "Blockers," starring John Cena, took in an impressive $21.4 million for third place.

And while all that was going on, Disney's "Black Panther" is still chugging along. The movie's domestic total is now at $665.3 million, putting it in third place all-time at the domestic box office (not counting inflation), passing "Titanic" ($659.3 million).

More on "A Quiet Place":

SEE ALSO: If you miss "Game of Thones," you should watch AMC's "The Terror" — a historical horror series critics are calling a "10-episode nightmare"

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: A father and son are growing fruit and vegetables 8 metres below the surface of the Mediterranean Sea — here's why

The absolute best cosplay photos from Silicon Valley Comic Con 2018 — where tech and pop culture superfans collide

$
0
0

silicon valley comic con best cosplay 4501

Fans in cosplay, or role-playing costumes, invaded San Jose, California, for the third annual Silicon Valley Comic Con.

The event, which Apple cofounder Steve Wozniak co-created, combines the Silicon Valley icon's love of technology and pop culture. This year, we saw screen accurate supervillains, "Game of Thrones" queens, and video game heroes descend on the San Jose McEnery Convention Center.

Here are some of our favorites.

See any great cosplay? Email me your best photos at mrobinson@businessinsider.com.

SEE ALSO: These are the real faces behind every Disney princess

DON'T MISS: The San Francisco housing market is so dire that people are leaving in droves — here's where they're headed

A "life-sized" Totoro greeted attendees of Silicon Valley Comic Con at the doors.



The man inside the costume, Zach Dender, said he made Totoro by wrapping fabric around a skeleton he made from drainage pipe. A camera situated by his ears let Dender see outside.



Ciri from video game "The Witcher" is a princess who doesn't need saving.



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

The 17 shows Netflix has canceled, including recently cut comedy 'Everything Sucks'

$
0
0

Everything Sucks!

Netflix did some major house cleaning in 2017, cutting expensive shows like "Sense8" and "The Get Down." 

It also killed flops like "Girlboss" and "Gypsy" after only one season, and old favorites like "House of Cards," which will end after its sixth season. 

And Netflix isn't holding back in 2018 either.

Netflix's most recent cancellation is the 90s coming-of-age story "Everything Sucks," which received lukewarm reviews and didn't generate the buzz that Netflix expected. 

This is Netflix's third cut show in 2018, the other being quirky comedy "Lady Dynamite" and "Disjointed," a critically panned weed comedy starring Kathy Bates.

Here are the seventeen shows Netflix has killed in total, along with their critic and audience ratings from Metacritic.

Additional reporting by Jethro Nededog. 

SEE ALSO: All the TV shows that have been canceled in 2018

"Everything Sucks": Canceled after one season

Netflix description: "It's 1996 in a town called Boring, where high school misfits in the AV and drama clubs brave the ups and downs of teenage life in the VHS era."

Critic rating: 62/100

Audience rating: 7.3/10

Date canceled: April 2018 



"Disjointed": Canceled after one season

Netflix description: "Pot activist Ruth Whitefeather Feldman runs a medical marijuana dispensary while encouraging her loyal patients to chill out and enjoy the high life."

Critic rating: 43/100

Audience rating: 7.4/10

Date canceled: February 2018 



"Lady Dynamite": Canceled after two seasons

Netflix description: "Comedian Maria Bamford navigates awkward dates, bizarre gigs and the fallout from a major breakdown in a funny and poignant series based on her life."

Critic rating: 85/100

Audience rating: 6.6/10

Date canceled: January 2018



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

Inside the surprise success of 'A Quiet Place' — from a worrisome test screening to a 100% Rotten Tomatoes score

$
0
0

A Quiet Place Paramount final

  • "A Quiet Place" is now a box-office hit, which isn't just a surprise for most in Hollywood, but also for those who made it.
  • The production company behind the movie, Platinum Dunes, told Business Insider about the test screening that left its audience confused, and the anxiety of showing the finished movie for the first time.

Warning: Mild spoiler below if you haven't seen "A Quiet Place"

This weekend Paramount’s new horror movie, “A Quiet Place,” about a family forced to live in silence to hide from monsters that kill anything that makes a sound, won the weekend box office after earning an impressive $50 million domestically — exceeding all industry projections.

Made for $17 million, the third (and by far most successful) directing effort by actor John Krasinski snuck up on everyone in Hollywood to become the latest hit horror movie. And according to the producers behind the movie, Andrew Form and Bradley Fuller of Platinum Dunes, no one involved with the movie knew they had a potential hit on their hands until about a month ago.

Horror remake kings

Form and Fuller, along with their mega-blockbuster filmmaker friend Michael Bay, started Platinum Dunes in 2001 and quickly made a name for themselves remaking classic horrors like “The Texas Chainsaw Massacre” (2003), “The Amityville Horror” (2005), “Friday the 13” (2009), and “A Nightmare on Elm Street (2010). They made a nice profit on all of them — “Chainsaw Massacre” made $107 million worldwide on a $9.5 million budget, “Amityville” made $108 million worldwide on a budget of $19 million, and “Elm Street” made over $115 million worldwide on a $35 million budget.

nightmare on elm street 2010 Warner BrosSince then, the company has expanded its portfolio. It got the rights to the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles, releasing two movies on the characters for Paramount. It teamed with Jason Blum at Blumhouse Productions to make “The Purge” movies — three releases have earned a combined $319.8 million worldwide (all made for $10 million or under), with a prequel, “The First Purge,” coming July 4. And it's developing TV projects like “The Last Ship” for TNT and the upcoming Amazon series, “Jack Ryan,” starring Krasinski.

But Platinum Dunes’ comfort zone will always be horror, and it proved this weekend it’s a major player in the genre.

Krasinski's power play

Screenwriters Bryan Woods and Scott Beck wrote the “A Quiet Place” script on spec and 18 months ago, while deep into preproduction on “Jack Ryan,” Form and Fuller got a call from their agents at WME that they wanted to pass along the script, which they described as a “high concept” genre movie.

“They send it over and the script is 67 or 68 pages long, and I'm like, 'This is a movie? This is like a one-hour pilot,'” Form told Business Insider. “When we went through it you realize there's no dialogue in the movie. The script had a map of the farm and numbers on a page for a countdown. There were literally pages that were just one number. So it wasn’t even like the script had pages of full text. But the story was there.”

a quite place paramountThey took the project to Paramount, where Platinum Dunes has a first look deal, and the studio bought it. Then Form and Fuller reached out to their “Jack Ryan” star, John Krasinski, to see if he would play the role of the father in the movie, Lee Abbott.

“John called back a couple of weeks later and said, 'I definitely want to play the dad, but I also want to rewrite the script and direct it,’” Form said. He and Fuller quickly agreed.

The project became even more attractive when Krasinski’s wife, Emily Blunt, signed on to play the role of the mother. On paper, it all seemed right. But would audiences get a “silent” horror movie?

A test screening leads to lots of anxiety

Form and Fuller said they only did one test screening of the movie before its world premiere at the South by Southwest Film Festival in March, and it got mixed reactions because of one obvious omission.

“The big problem was there was no creature in the test,” Form said. “It was either plates or a motion-capture actor. Sometimes John was in the motion capture suit playing the monster. In that basement scene he was the creature down there.”

a quiet place

Not having a creature in the test screening was most apparent in the scene where the monster runs away from the daughter, Regan (Millicent Simmonds), because her hearing aid hurts its sensitive ears.

“When her hearing aid goes off in the cornfield you have her in the shot but there was nothing behind her, so the audience did not understand that a creature came up behind her,” Form said.

But that scene worked incredibly well at the SXSW screening, when audience could see the terrifying creatures brought to CGI life by Industrial Light and Magic.

However, the uncertainty leading up to the night of that screening had everyone on edge. Though Paramount studio executives had seen cuts and liked what they saw, as Form put it, “1,200 strangers in a theater can tell you something very different.”

“If there was optimism it was self-created,” Fuller said of the lead-up to the SXSW screening. “Usually when you go into a screening like that you know what you have, this was totally blind. It was crazy. We were all very apprehensive. When the movie ended and the people started cheering I put my head on my wife's shoulder and cried because it was so fraught with tension and emotion. Because we had no idea.” 

Bradley Fuller Andrew Form Nicholas Hunt GettyNow the movie is riding high. Leading up to its opening weekend it was sporting a 100% Rotten Tomatoes score. And Form and Fuller now have some bragging rights on their horror colleague, Jason Blum, as “A Quite Place” topped the opening weekend box office of Blumhouse’s last two hit movies — “Get Out” ($33.3 million) and “Split” ($40 million).

“A Quiet Place” is the latest example that audiences will come out to theaters for more than just superhero movies and “Star Wars.” And though Platinum Dunes has no problem getting into the blockbuster game — it’s one of the production companies on the upcoming first Transformers spin-off movie, “Bumblebee” — the company is also striving to develop genre projects that are high in originality and will attract studios.

“It's a miracle that a major studio made a movie that is practically devoid of dialogue,” said Fuller, who wouldn’t address the possibility of a sequel to “A Quiet Place” (though with its big opening weekend number, it would be shocking if Paramount doesn’t want one). “But I also think studios recognize they have to make concepts that get people to leave their homes, so as producers it's incumbent upon us to find things that will get people to go watch a movie in a movie theater. So if you find a strong concept, I think they will always get behind it.”

"A Quiet Place" is currently playing in theaters.

SEE ALSO: The 44 worst movies made by iconic directors — from Spielberg to Scorsese

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: A neuroscientist explains why reality may just be a hallucination

Amazon canceled Golden Globe winner 'Mozart in the Jungle' after a shift in strategy — here are the other 11 shows it has dropped

$
0
0

rodrigo conducting mozart in the jungle

Amazon had a big night at the 2018 Golden Globes, with high-profile wins for its hit comedy series, "The Marvelous Mrs. Maisel."

Then it turned around and canceled three shows at once: "Jean-Claude Van Johnson," "One Mississippi," and "I Love Dick." More recently, it canceled "Mozart in the Jungle" in April, another Golden Globe winner, after four seasons. 

The cancellations come as Amazon continues to clean house after a management shakeup.

In October, Amazon Studios head Roy Price resigned after allegations of sexual harassment surfaced, and CEO Jeff Bezos has reportedly directed a change in strategy at the company, which led to Amazon in November grabbing the rights to make a TV series based on "The Lord of the Rings."

Here are the shows Amazon has killed, along with their critic and audience ratings from Metacritic:

SEE ALSO: Amazon's 15 original comedy TV shows, ranked from worst to best

'Mozart in the Jungle': Canceled after four seasons (2014-2018)

Amazon description: "What happens behind the curtains at the symphony is just as captivating as what happens on stage. Created by Paul Weitz (About a Boy), Roman Coppola (The Darjeeling Limited), and Jason Schwartzman (Rushmore). Brash new maestro Rodrigo (Gael Garcia Bernal) is stirring things up, and young oboist Hailey (Lola Kirke) hopes for her big chance.."

Critic rating: 78/100

Audience rating: 7.9/10



'One Mississippi': Canceled after two seasons (2015-2017)

Amazon description: "Love is in the air when we pick up with Tig, Bill & Remy, living together again in Mississippi. It's a season of new beginnings and new relationships for each of them. Tig's back on the radio, but her outspoken point of view proves controversial for the local market. A chance to take a bigger stage in New Orleans comes with more reach, and responsibility."

Critic rating: 77/100

Audience rating: 6.7/10



'I Love Dick': Canceled after 1 season (2017)

Amazon description: "Adapted from the lauded feminist novel, I LOVE DICK is set in a colorful academic community in Marfa, Texas. It tells the story of a struggling married couple, Chris and Sylvere, and their obsession with a charismatic professor named Dick. Told in Rashomon-style shifts of POV, I LOVE DICK charts the unraveling of a marriage, the awakening of an artist and the deification of a reluctant messiah."

Critic rating: 73/100

Audience rating: 6.4/10



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

Facebook is under fire once again — but this time, it's coming from its social media stars

$
0
0

The Pun Guys Facebook creators

  • Facebook's social media influencers are unhappy with a recent change that de-emphasizes content shared by outside publications in favor of posts from family and friends, according to The New York Times.
  • Many Facebook influencers feel that Facebook has benefited from their presence on the site, and that Facebook has yet to repay the favor with a wide rollout of often-requested features.
  • Facebook, who says professional creators on its platform are still "incredibly important," has reportedly participated in talks with several top social media influencers to see how it can create better creator tools and lines of communication.


Facebook is fielding more complaints, but this time, they're coming from Facebook's social media stars who are calling on the company to do more for its professional creators.

In a series of interviews with The New York Times' Kevin Roose, some of Facebook's top social media influencers said they are unhappy with a recent change made on Facebook that emphasizes stories and interactions from friends and family — what Mark Zuckerberg calls "time well spent" — over that of news outlets and viral videos from social media influencers.

The unprecedented shift in Facebook's algorithm has been a blow to many digital media companies, some of which have had to shut down after relying almost entirely on the social media platform for their readership.

But media companies aren't the only figures affected by Facebook's change. According to the Times, the site's top social media influencers have seen a significant decline in traffic to their pages, as well. While some of the professional social media page managers and viral video creators the Times talked to said they understood Facebook's thinking behind the change to its News Feed, many pointed out that they're also partly responsible for the tremendous growth Facebook experienced in the first place. Some feel that the company has benefited from their presence without repaying the favor in a meaningful way.

Roose writes, "[Facebook's social media influencers] argue that Facebook owes much of its growth to the kinds of entertainment they offer, and that users will spend less time on the social network if it’s not shown to them."

Roozy Lee, a social media promoter and online influencer, told the Times that Facebook needed to start treating influencers with more respect. Another influencer with 1.2 million Facebook followers, Dan Shaba of The Pun Guys, described the shift in Facebook's algorithm as "the biggest bait-in-switch of all time" following the company's big push toward viral videos in 2016.

Facebook is aware of the critique, and has reportedly invited several top influencers to private meetings at the company's headquarters to discuss how Facebook can improve influencers' use of the site. The social media company has also been working on additional creator tools, some of which are currently being tested with small audiences.

Read the full feature, including interviews with some Facebook social media stars, over at The New York Times.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: The best and worst features of the Samsung Galaxy S9

All the TV shows that have been canceled in 2018

$
0
0

Everything Sucks!

It's still early in the year, but the list of canceled TV shows is already piling up.

Networks haven't announced many cancellations yet, except for ABC, which canceled its freshman sitcom "The Mayor" and "Once Upon a Time," once a ratings hit. And in March, TNT announced the cancellation of its original series "The Librarians."

On the streaming side, things are a bit different. Amazon kicked off the year with a slew of cancellations, announcing the end of three quirky comedies, including the Golden Globe nominee "I Love Dick" and the comedian Tig Notaro's semi-autobiographical show, "One Mississippi." It canceled Golden Globe nominee "Mozart in the Jungle" in April, after four seasons. Also in April, Netflix canceled the 90s coming-of-age comedy, "Everything Sucks," which came to the streaming service in February. 

There are many more cancellations to come, especially since networks haven't announced the fate of their fall shows.

We'll update this list as more are announced.

Here are all the shows that have been canceled this year, including those from networks and Netflix:

SEE ALSO: The worst TV show of every year since 2000, according to critics

"The Mayor" — ABC, one season



"Chance" — Hulu, two seasons



"Lady Dynamite" — Netflix, two seasons



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

12 of the worst TV reboots of all time, ranked from bad to unbearable

$
0
0

fuller house

With shows like "Jersey Shore," "Roseanne," and "Queer Eye" returning this year, TV reboots are having a moment.

The "Roseanne" reboot may have premiered to high numbers (over 18 million viewers) and positive response, but that doesn't mean all TV reboots strike the same success.

For every "Twin Peaks: The Return," there is a "24: Legacy" — meaning there are plenty of truly bad reboots that get greenlit and make it onto our television screens. 

Business Insider looked at 12 of the worst TV reboots ever. Some didn't last long, while others somehow found a longer life than their Rotten Tomatoes scores would suggest.

We ranked them from bad to worst based on those RT critic scores (we took the average of the available seasons) and broke any ties with audience scores on the review-aggregator site. 

The worst of the bunch even has the rare misfortune of having a 0% Rotten Tomatoes score.

Below are 12 of the worst TV reboots of all time, ranked by how bad they were:

SEE ALSO: The best TV reboots and revivals of all time — and the worst

12. "Melrose Place" (2009)

Critic score: 60%

Original series run: 1992-1999 on Fox

"It's still not good, mind you, but it's more honest and enthusiastic about its badness, you know?" — Alan Sepinwall, Newark Star-Ledger

 



11. "24: Legacy" (2017 on Fox)

Critic score: 59%

Original series run ("24"): 2001-2010 on Fox

"If the story was half as compelling as an average Homeland season, perhaps audiences could overlook the political commentary. But there's little urgency driving the conventional TV action ... its stars' personalities are largely drowned out by exposition." — Ben Travers, Indiewire



10. "Dynasty" (2017-present on The CW)

Critic score: 53%

Audience score: 85%

Original series run: 1981-1989 on ABC

"I'll never watch this again. Dynasty reminds you of all the bad ways in which the world has changed. It's not niche or interesting to have a soap opera about people who are merely undeservedly loaded any more." — Hugo Rifkind, The Times (UK)



See the rest of the story at Business Insider
Viewing all 103365 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images