Quantcast
Channel: Business Insider
Viewing all 103316 articles
Browse latest View live

JIM ROSS: Here's who will take over WWE after Vince McMahon

$
0
0

For decades, WWE has ruled supreme as the world's number-one "sports entertainment" company.

In 1982, Vince McMahon bought the company that would eventually become WWE from his father, and he's run the empire ever since. Today he is the Chairman and CEO, and he also occasionally appears on television as his "Mr. McMahon" character. 

Now 72, McMahon still oversees every aspect of the company, but some have begun to speculate regarding who might take over his role, assuming he ever decides to step down. We asked WWE Hall of Famer Jim Ross, a part-time WWE employee whose relationship with the company spans decades, what he sees as the most likely outcome.

Ross is currently promoting the release of his new book 
"Slobberknocker: My Life in Wrestling," which he wrote with Paul O'Brien. Following is a transcript of the video.

Jim Ross
: I have an opinion on where
the company will go. I will say this — you know, Vince is very healthy. He still works out like a crazy man. He really takes care of himself. So, he ain't going anywhere soon. We don't want him to go anywhere soon. He's the rock that built that thing. He's the rudder in the water. It's an amazing company.

[Jim Ross is a legendary WWE announcer and executive. He wrote a new memoir about his career in wrestling]

I think that, if I'm guessing, and it's gonna strictly be a guess — that the money would be on, probably, Paul Levesque to be Vince's successor.

[Paul Levesque is better known as "Triple H." He's one of the most popular WWE superstars in history. And he's married to Vince's daughter Stephanie McMahon.]

I think Vince is kind of 
preparing him for that in a lot of ways. You always knew that he was different from the other guys because he was very studious, and very – under control. He didn’t drink. No drugs. He looked to be a lifer early on, and he got a lot of that from being a fan all his life growing up in the northeast — New Hampshire. Then, getting trained by Killer Kowalski who was a great, old-school guy. So, I think he's probably the heir apparent.

[Levesque is WWE's EVP of Talent, Live Events, and Creative. He also runs WWE's developmental promotion known as NXT]

Stephanie is very involved and, you know, is really more of a face of WWE. She does a lot of charity work.  And she's great at that. And you've got to have that in that world.

[Stephanie's older brother Shane also works for WWE]

I think Shane seems to be, apparently, content with being a TV character. I don't know where his role's gonna be going forward or what he wants it to be. But, I think that Paul Levesque is the one that seems to be earmarked to be the next guy, if and when Vince is not in that role. 

But Vince is a — he's a unique cat, man. For him to get a publicly traded company in wrestling — are you kidding? Think of the image that wrestling has had for so many years. And I will tell you that if Vince had not rehabilitated the image of sports entertainment and made it a global brand, there's just no way in hell I'd even be sitting here talking to you. I wouldn't even —I would be unknown!

He made all of us known and he created a Walt Disney empire with bodyslams and headlocks and the actors playing the role of their own stuntmen. It's been an amazing metamorphosis, how that's evolved. And I don't believe that there's ever been a more brilliant entrepreneur than Vince McMahon in any walk of life. Think about it. Smokey old arenas — the image that wrestling had. "Oh, that rasslin' stuff’s all fake! Aw, nobody watch rasslin’.”

All of a sudden, he's in over a hundred countries and 40 languages or something and it’s big-time. And I just think that what he's done, without me kissing his behind – I've done that, too, on television. In the world that he was managing and pulling out of, he had to be tough. You know, he's a brilliant man.

Join the conversation about this story »


5 reasons 'Wonder Woman' was one of the most important films of 2017, and deserved a best picture Oscar nomination

$
0
0

 

wonder woman 2017

  • A lot of people predicted that "Wonder Woman" would get an Oscar nomination for best picture, but it didn't.
  • Its impact on the industry and culture made it deserving of a nomination, and it was robbed.  
  • Even though "Wonder Woman" is a summer action and superhero movie, it was a huge cultural moment in a year that was empowering for women in many ways.

 

The most iconic best picture winners define their year, and their generation. And so do their fellow nominees.  "Wonder Woman" defined 2017 in a lot of ways, and absolutely deserved to make the list of nominees, but it was robbed. 

2017's "Moonlight," which beat the predicted winner "La La Land," marked the start of a big change in the industry. The film, which follows a gay black man from an impoverished neighborhood in Miami through multiple stages of his life, represented the kind of diverse storytelling that underrepresented storytellers had been fighting to get made. 

The film, like "Wonder Woman," proved that these stories can work for everyone, and be universally loved. 

Even without "Wonder Woman" in the line-up for best picture at the 2018 Oscars, the nominees, like gay coming-of-age story "Call Me by Your Name," prove a wave of change in cinematic storytelling has come. "Get Out," written and directed by Jordan Peele (who is now the fifth black man to be nominated in the directing category) is a horror satire about racism among white liberal elites. The female written, directed, and led "Lady Bird" focuses on a complicated relationship between a mother and daughter. Like "Wonder Woman," it has romance, but the film and its characters don't revolve around it. 

Even so, "Wonder Woman" deserves to be among them, because it's also had a significant impact on Hollywood. 

Here's why "Wonder Woman" deserved to be in the running for best picture at the 2018 Oscars:

SEE ALSO: Here are the 17 biggest Oscar snubs of 2018

It empowered women and encouraged women in Hollywood to speak out.

2017 started with the historic Women's March. And in 2017's last few months, notorious film producer Harvey Weinstein was accused of sexual misconduct by dozens of women, from both behind and in front of the camera. "Wonder Woman" producer Brett Ratner was also accused of sexual harassment, and won't be involved in further films in the franchise. The reports of this behavior from powerful men across multiple industries inspired the #MeToo movement that is occupying awards season. 

"Wonder Woman" itself didn't spark the current cultural moment, but it did instigate an industry-wide conversation about women in film that’s been brewing for decades, thanks to vocal director Patty Jenkins and actress Gal Gadot. Around the film's release, Jessica Chastain called the portrayal and representation of women in films "quite disturbing," at the Cannes film festival. "Wonder Woman," conversely, was praised for its empowering, woman-led representation of a female superhero.

Actress and producer Elizabeth Banks even cited the film as an example to show children, especially boys, how women should and can be represented.

 

 

 



For the first time, a major Hollywood movie provided a female perspective, rather than a male gaze.

"Wonder Woman" marked a turning point in the way superhero films are shot.

A female director made all the difference. Just watch the scenes with Wonder Woman/Diana Prince from "Batman vs Superman: Dawn of Justice" and "Justice League." In the Zack Snyder films, everything lingers on Gal Gadot — from camera placement (usually low and behind her, to get her butt), to long close-ups of her face.

The way women are shot in "Justice League," which came out months after "Wonder Woman," feels especially gratuitous after seeing them shot so well. In "Wonder Woman," the Amazons' armor covers the torso, appearing reasonable for fighting in battle. In "Justice League," the Amazons wear pieces of fabric that don't cover more than they have to for the film to keep a PG-13 rating. 

The same is not true for the men in the Snyder films. Ben Affleck, Henry Cavill, Ray Fisher, Jason Momoa, and Ezra Miller are all attractive men with ripped bodies. But besides tight suits, there is no lingering, and no butt shots.

Gal Gadot is breathtaking. It's ok to say that, and it's also acceptable to emphasize a woman's beauty (or anyone's). But Jenkins, unlike Snyder and so many men who've directed women, doesn't use it as a tool, and doesn't use it to sell the story. The character is already great, and the story is already compelling enough. 

Instead, Jenkins showcases Diana's strength, optimism, and fearlessness to prove she is beautiful.



It broke records for female directors, who need to be taken more seriously than they have been in the history of filmmaking.

Director Patty Jenkins broke records with "Wonder Woman." Not only was she the first woman to direct such a large-scale superhero film — which, after so many years is a pretty sad statistic — but the movie became the highest-grossing movie ever directed by a woman, surpassing 2013's "Frozen," which was co-directed by Jennifer Lee and Chris Buck. "Wonder Woman" is also the highest-grossing superhero origin movie of all time. 

If Hollywood continues to give women and minorities opportunities to direct, the stories will naturally get better, because unique perspectives spur more interesting stories.  

 



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

26 Easter eggs hidden within your Google search bar

$
0
0

Google Search

Google has come a long, long way since its startup days, but it hasn't forgotten how to have fun. 

The search giant loves to hide fun tricks, or "Easter eggs," into its services. From Google Hangouts to Google Maps, there are neat games or features hidden inside nearly every product and service Google makes (even its spreadsheets).

But its Google's search engine that holds most of these jokes, games, and nifty features. There are almost too many to count, so we’ve rounded up a handful of our favorites from over the years.

Here are 26 Easter eggs hidden inside Google Search:

Jeff Dunn contributed to an earlier version of this story. 

SEE ALSO: Here are all the new Animojis coming to your iPhone X

1. If you search for “solitaire,” you can play a round of the classic card game.



2. Searching “tic tac toe” will let you start up that game. You can set it to play against a friend or Google itself. For a real challenge, set the difficulty to “Impossible,” and try to get anything done at work.



3. If you're in the holiday spirit, you can play a digital game of dreidel by searching "spin (or play) dreidel."



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

The 21 music artists with the most Grammy awards of all time

$
0
0

Jay Z

Over the 60 years of its existence, the Grammy Awards have heaped golden gramophone statues on some of the most influential musicians in history.

Prominent artists like Jay-Z, Beyoncé, and Stevie Wonder rank among the top Grammy winners, and they are joined by a number of notable composers and producers.

But Jay-Z — who is up for a field-leading eight nominations at the 60th Grammy Awards on Sunday — has the potential to significantly shake up the list that follows.  

Here are the 21 artists with the most Grammy awards of all time:

SEE ALSO: The 50 best-selling albums of all time

Paul McCartney — 18 wins

McCartney won his first Grammy award in 1965 for best new artist with The Beatles. He has received 78 nominations. 



Yo-Yo Ma — 18 wins

The renowned cellist won his first Grammy in 1984 for a Bach recording. He has received 27 nominations.  



Aretha Franklin — 18 wins

The soul legend won her first Grammys in 1967 for best R&B recording and solo vocal performance for her hit single "Respect." She has received 44 nominations.



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

Broadcast networks are bringing back shows like 'Roseanne' and 'Murphy Brown' to squeeze every last ad dollar out of TV until the party's over

$
0
0

Roseanne

  • Broadcast networks are bringing back lots of hits from the past, including CBS' just-announced reboot of "Murphy Brown."
  • It's a smart short-term stunt programming move. But it's also something of a give-up when it comes to trying to connect with the streaming and mobile generation.
  • With live commercial TV viewing in decline, these revivals are short-term money grabs as much as they are nostalgic. Yet they'll probably not change the trajectory of the TV ad business.



CBS is bringing back "Murphy Brown" for 13 episodes next year. The show went off the air in 1998. Candice Bergen is coming out of retirement at age 70!

Somewhere, the entirety of Gen Z is typing ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ into its phones.

Of course, CBS isn't the only network riding the nostalgia train. ABC is bringing back "Roseanne." Fox has already brought back "The X-Files" and "Prison Break," while NBC has scored a decent hit with its "Will and Grace" revival and might bring back "The Office"  – which went off the air in 2013. We're not sure what the cast of "Night Court" is up to, but stay near a phone, Richard Moll.

Pop culture has always mined nostalgia. And creatively, for the most part these reborn shows are being well-received and don't feel like straight money grabs. The fans wanted more "Full House" and Netflix gave it to them, and everyone seems happy.

But in the case of the broadcast networks, which are perennially talking about getting younger audiences, these strategies won't help much there. Young people have fallen for "Friends" and "Seinfeld" for whatever reason — but how many 20-somethings have ever seen "Murphy Brown," or know what it is?

Will and GraceThe folks running broadcast networks surely realize this, yet they're going full steam ahead with the reboots, because they know that boomers and Generation X might actually show up, just like they might go see Billy Joel at Madison Square Garden.

It's a good bet that "Roseanne" and "Murphy Brown" will deliver relatively sizable audiences, at least initially given the upcoming hype, curiosity, and nostalgia.

Networks reach into the past, hoping people will watch TV the way the used to

The broadcast networks have to try something to get people to tune into shows live – with ads. As much as they pay lip service to loving the idea of delivering shows to viewers whenever and wherever they want, they make the vast majority of their money from selling ads during primetime shows that get beamed out to the whole country at the same time.

Live TV viewing is an endangered behavior. Look at this analysis put together by Ad Age's Anthony Crupi on the biggest live broadcasts of 2017. A whopping 37 were NFL games (which though still huge are trending down in terms of viewing and ad spending, per Bloomberg). The rest of the broadcasts were other sports and award shows like the Oscars (also trending down).

Not a single sitcom or drama made the list.

Bringing back a show like "Murphy Brown" is a pretty clear admission from the network TV industry. We could put a brand new workplace, three-camera sitcom on the air, and millennials and Generation Z likely wouldn't show up. So why even try?

When was the last time the country fell for a broad-range traditional sitcom? "The Big Bang Theory" you say? "Modern Family?" Both shows still draw big audiences, and they are 10 and nine years old respectively.

That's not to say there aren't great comedies on TV right now. But imagine throwing a voicey, audience-challenging show like FX's "Atlanta," or Netflix's completely off-the-wall "Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt," or HBO's super-cynical "Veep" on ABC. They'd be watered down creatively (could "Veep" exist without cursing?), and few would probably watch them. And then they'd get cancelled.

So the networks figure they better go with established hits, even it they're 20 years old, because the kind of audiences that grew up with live commercial television as their standard might actually tune in. Might as well make some money from these folks while we still can. To be sure, recognizable names surely help cut though the clutter at a time when roughly 500 scripted shows are one the air.

[By the way, it's wild to think about how political and progressive "Murphy Brown" was in its CBS heyday. It's hard to see a show like that being launched in the hyper-divided US right now].

This Is Us

TV viewing is only going to get more fragmented and time shifted

Hang on, you're screaming! What about NBC's "This is Us?" Or ABC's breakout hit "The Good Doctor?" Are they beloved? Isn't that a sign that network TV is fine?

Plus, did the TV business enjoy a robust upfront sales market last year, as Variety reported? 

That's all true. People will still tune in right away for their favorite shows, particularly plot-driven dramas where fans don't want to miss what happens or get spoiled. That will probably never change. But, in a peak TV era, these shows are few and far between.

Not to mention that the live audiences they deliver — "This is Us" drew 9 million viewers the other night — are paltry compared to network hits a decade or two ago.

Plus, as NBC's Bob Greenblatt said at Business Insider's Ignition conference a few months ago, so many shows get half their audience after they air live. And the networks make less ad money when people watch on other platforms.

"I would prefer everybody watches the night we air it on the NBC network because that is the most potent use of our advertising revenue," Greenblatt told Business Insider's Alyson Shontell. "It's where we make the most .. .however the audience will do what the audience wants."

thisisusThese trends are only going to accelerate. It feels like the super lucrative broadcast TV ad model party will end sooner rather than later. So network TVs may as well latch onto yesteryear, and cash in on it, as long as they can. 

What's the cast of "The Nanny" up to?

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: How the ancient Greeks proved Earth was round over 2,000 years ago

Everything we know so far about HBO's 'Big Little Lies' season 2, including details about Meryl Streep's pivotal role

$
0
0

Big Little Lies Cast

HBO's Golden Globe and Emmy winning "Big Little Lies" was intended to be a one-season limited series. 

But the show was such a hit that HBO and its stars, which include some of the most respected actresses in Hollywood, decided to make a second season (even though the first season is based on a book with no sequels). 

On Wednesday, HBO announced that Oscar winner Meryl Streep would join the season two cast. The season won't arrive until 2019, so we collected everything you we know about it so far.

When the season two pick-up was announced, HBO said in a statement:

"The subversive, darkly comedic drama Big Little Lies will explore the malignancy of lies, the durability of friendships, the fragility of marriage and, of course, the vicious ferocity of sound parenting. Relationships will fray, loyalties will erode…the potential for emotional and bodily injury shall loom."

Here's everything we know so far about season two of "Big Little Lies:"

SEE ALSO: 5 reasons 'Wonder Woman' was one of the most important films of 2017, and deserved a best picture Oscar nomination

It will have seven episodes.

Season one also had seven episodes, each about 50 minutes long. 



Meryl Streep will be in it.

Yes. That Meryl Streep. The one with 21 Oscar nominations, and three wins. 

Streep will play Mary Louise Wright, Celeste's mother-in-law and Perry's mother. AKA: the mother of Alexander Skarsgård's character from season one, who was killed in the season finale. This tie-in pretty much guarantees that her role will be huge. 

Streep will be the third Oscar winner on the show, joining former winners Reese Witherspoon and Nicole Kidman.

This isn't Streep's first time doing TV for HBO. She starred in the 2003 miniseries "Angels in America," and won an Emmy and a Golden Globe for her performance. 



There will be several new characters.

According to Vulture, in addition to Streep's role, there will be a few more new characters. Judging from Streep's casting, these roles will likely go to some big names:

Michael Perkins, a new second-grade teacher at Otter Bay Elementary School. He will not get along with Renata (Laura Dern).

A new employee at the school administration office who befriends Jane (Shailene Woodley).

Bonnie’s (Zoë Kravitz) parents, Elizabeth and Martin Howard, who have a complex relationship with their daughter. 



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

The maker of Crock-Pot is plunging as people freak out over a character's shocking death on 'This Is Us'

$
0
0

Crock Pot

  • Newell Brands' stock is plunging after the company announced 2018 full-year guidance that disappointed analysts and investors.
  • The company is already dealing with the PR fallout after its Crock-Pot product caused the death of a beloved character on NBC's "This Is Us."


Newell Brands is having a rough day.

The maker of the popular Crock-Pot product saw its stock price plunge as much as 24% on Thursday after the company announced disappointing guidance for 2018.

Meanwhile, it's also facing a disaster on the PR front as people freak out about a shocking moment during Tuesday night's episode of NBC's "This Is Us," which saw a beloved major character apparently meet his demise due to a faulty Crock-Pot.

The company, which acquired the Crock-Pot slow cooker brand in 2016 when it bought consumer products maker Jarden, has been in damage control mode since the episode aired.

"For nearly 50 years, with over 100 million Crock-Pots sold, we have never received any consumer complaints similar to the fictional events portrayed in last night’s episode," Newell said in a statement. "In fact, the safety and design of our product renders this type of event nearly impossible."

The show's creator Dan Fogelman also sought to quell outrage, which extended to Twitter, where hordes of angry fans led a backlash against Crock-Pot.

The "This Is Us" bombshell is just the latest development for struggling Newell, whose stock had already dropped as much as 49% from a record high reached in June 2017, even before it released guidance on Thursday.

The fallout from the 2018 outlook came swiftly from analysts across Wall Street, as Wells Fargo and JPMorgan cut their price targets on the stock, while Barclays said "put simply, we've lost confidence" in Newell.

Screen Shot 2018 01 25 at 1.52.05 PM

SEE ALSO: Rapper 50 Cent reportedly made millions selling his album for bitcoin

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Microsoft President Brad Smith says the US shouldn't get 'too isolationist'

The 15 Oscar best-picture winners that made the most money at the US box office

$
0
0

forrest gump

As the 2018 Academy Awards draw closer, it's time to dive into the numbers and check out which of the best-picture winners are the biggest moneymakers of all time at the box office.

There are some obvious ones here, but thanks to inflation, there are a few titles that may surprise you.

Here are the top 15.

Note: All box-office figures are domestic grosses only and include any earnings from rereleases. All figures are from Box Office Mojo.

SEE ALSO: 5 reasons "Wonder Woman" was one of the most important films of 2017, and deserved a best picture Oscar nomination

15. "The Best Years of Our Lives" (1946) — $504.9 million

Unadjusted: $24 million



14. “Rocky” (1976) — $505 million

Unadjusted: $117 million



13. “Lawrence of Arabia (1962) — $508 million

Unadjusted: $45 million



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

Director Rian Johnson says fan backlash to 'Star Wars: The Last Jedi' gave him 'a very dark hour of the soul'

$
0
0

rian johnson

  • "Star Wars: The Last Jedi" director Rian Johnson said in a new interview that fan backlash to his "Star Wars" movie led him to "a very dark hour of the soul."
  • Though "The Last Jedi" earned a 90% "Fresh" rating among critics on Rotten Tomatoes, audiences had mixed reactions to the film, some of which were fervently negative. 

 

"Star Wars: The Last Jedi" director Rian Johnson continued to discuss the fan backlash to his critically acclaimed "Star Wars" entry in a new interview with The /Filmcast

Days after "The Last Jedi" premiered in December, Johnson told Business Insider's Jason Guerrasio that the fan backlash he encountered on social media "always hurts," but that he didn't "take it personally if a fan reacts negatively and lashes out on me on Twitter."

Though "The Last Jedi" earned a 90% "Fresh" rating among critics on Rotten Tomatoes, audiences had mixed reactions to the film. While many praised Johnson's new direction for the franchise, there were also fervent detractors, including a group that petitioned to remove "The Last Jedi" from the "Star Wars" canon entirely. 

the last jedi lucasfilm finalIn his interview with The /Filmcast, Johnson further addressed how he initially had a tough time processing the negative fan response, which led him to "a very dark hour of the soul."

"The crazy thing is, I had no perspective on these tweets. I had no perspective in terms of how big a group of people this was, even what they were upset about specifically,” he said. "Over the next few weeks, I was able to contextualize it and feel much better about it. But at the time, I thought, 'Oh my god, does everybody hate this? Did I totally mess up, was I wrong?' And I had a very dark hour of the soul … because I had no context for this."

Johnson went on to say that he wouldn't change "The Last Jedi" in retrospect, despite some fans' disapproval.

"There’s nothing I’ve read or seen that’s made me think, 'Oh god, I did kind of mess that up, I would’ve done that differently if I could go back,'" he said. "I still genuinely believe in all the decisions I’ve made."

SEE ALSO: 'Star Wars: The Last Jedi' director Rian Johnson reacts to the backlash and addresses the movie's most shocking moments

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Here's how easy it is for the US president to launch a nuclear weapon

Casey Affleck, previously accused of sexual harassment, has withdrawn from presenting the best actress award at the Oscars

$
0
0

Brie Larson Casey Affleck

  • Casey Affleck has withdrawn from presenting the best actress award at the 2018 Oscars.
  • It's Oscars tradition that the winner for best actor the year before presents the best actress award.
  • Affleck has been accused of sexual harassment, and has likely withdrawn due to the #MeToo movement.

 

Casey Affleck will not present the award for best actress at the 2018 Oscars ceremony, breaking tradition, according to a spokesman for the Oscars, who confirmed an earlier report from Deadline.

Affleck, who won the Oscar for best actor last year for his role in "Manchester by the Sea," was accused of sexual harassment on the set of the 2010 film "I'm Still Here." He is likely withdrawing from the ceremony as a result of the #MeToo movement.

An Academy spokesman confirmed the report of Affleck's withdrawal to Business Insider: "We appreciate the decision to keep the focus on the show and on the great work of this year." A representative for Casey Affleck was not immediately available to comment. 

In 2010, two women who worked on "I'm Still Here," which Affleck directed, sued him alleging sexual harassment. The women claimed that Affleck crept into one of their beds, routinely demeaned them, and encouraged the movie's crew to harass them as well. Affleck denied the allegations and threatened to counter-sue, before eventually settling, according to The Daily Beast.

In an interview with the Boston Globe after his Oscar win in 2017, Affleck said those involved in the lawsuits, including himself, were barred from commenting on them, and that the public didn't know the full details of the cases.

"I believe that any kind of mistreatment of anyone for any reason is unacceptable and abhorrent," Affleck said. "And everyone deserves to be treated with respect in the workplace and anywhere else. There’s really nothing I can do about it, other than live my life the way I know I live it and to speak to what my own values are and how I try to live by them all the time."

It is an Oscars tradition that the best actor for the previous year hands out the award to the new best actress winner.

At last year's ceremony, Brie Larson, who won the best actress Oscar in 2016 for her role in "Room," announced and handed out the award to Affleck. Judging by the look on her face when she announced he was the winner, she was not happy. Larson did not clap for Affleck, which she told Vanity Fair was intentional. 

"I think that whatever it was that I did onstage kind of spoke for itself," Larson said. "I've said all that I need to say about that topic."

Without Affleck, there's no telling who will present the award. But it could be Leonardo DiCaprio, who won best actor in 2016 for his role in "The Revenant." 

SEE ALSO: 5 reasons 'Wonder Woman' was one of the most important films of 2017, and deserved a best picture Oscar nomination

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: The surprising reason some countries drive on the left side of the road

There’s a hidden message in Apple’s new privacy logo — and you can’t unsee it (AAPL)

$
0
0

tim cook shadow

  • Apple has a new icon that it will display when the company is collecting personal information. 
  • Apple's new privacy warnings will start showing up in the next major iPhone update, which will be released this spring. 
  • Apple's new privacy logo is two people holding hands — but if you squint, it looks like a smiley face too. Once you see it, you can't un-see it.

When you install Apple's next major iPhone software update, you'll receive a new pop-up after your phone reboots. 

Basically, Apple is using a new icon showing two people holding hands to show when an app is using personal data. The first time you'll see it is on a pop-up screen informing users about Apple's privacy policies — something designed to underscore Apple's public commitment to privacy, which the company sees as a major competitive advantage over Google's Android. 

"Apple believes privacy is a fundamental human right," says the pop-up, which echoes language on Apple's website

Here's the screen:

Privacy Window

But the logo at the top isn't just two people holding hands — it's also a smiley face. Look closer: 

smiley privacy

See, smiley face!

We've seen the logo pop up in Apple's Health app, but not a lot of apps where you'd expect it. "You won’t see this icon with every feature since Apple only collects this information when it’s needed to enable features, to secure our services, or to personalize your experience," according to the text of the pop-up.

The new pop-up is in iOS 11.3, which is currently in beta. Most iPhone owners will be able to download it later this Spring. 

new privacy log

We've reached out to Apple to get more insight on the design of the logo, and we'll reach out if we hear back.

Not the only hidden message in a tech logo 

The tech industry has a long history of having fun with their logos.

Susan Kare's original Macintosh logos were playful, fun, and showed a computer with a smiling face, for example. Apple's current Finder logo is a smiley face, too. 

Susan Kare icons

But perhaps the best example of a message hidden by a smile in a technology logo is from Amazon. 

Amazon's famous logo does not hide its smiley face, but it does have an easter egg of its own.

The arrow goes from the 'A" to the "Z" in Amazon — symbolizing the huge selection available on the online retailer. So it's a smile, and a sales pitch, all in one.

Check it out:

 

amazon com logo

SEE ALSO: See The Hidden Meanings Inside 17 Tech Company Logos

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: The end of the iPhone X cycle could send Apple's stock tumbling

Sean Hannity scoffs at reports that Trump tried to fire Mueller, then backpedals after a Fox News correspondent confirms it

$
0
0

Screen Shot 2018 01 25 at 8.41.45 PM

  • Fox News host Sean Hannity backpedaled on a rant against a bombshell New York Times report that said President Donald Trump tried to fire special counsel Robert Mueller.
  • After railing against The Times's story, Hannity appeared to concede once a Fox News correspondent confirmed the details.


Following a New York Times' report that President Donald Trump had ordered special counsel Robert Mueller fired one month after he was chosen to oversee the Russia investigation, Fox News host Sean Hannity came out swinging on his program Thursday night.

"They're trying to change the story," Hannity said, referring to The Times's report. "At this hour, The New York Times is trying to distract you."

"And our sources, and I've checked in with many of them, they're not confirming that tonight," Hannity continued. "And the president's attorney dismissed the story, and says, 'Nope, no comment. We're not going there.' And how many times has The New York Times and others gotten it wrong."

Hannity then opened the floor for commentary from former Trump aide Sebastian Gorka and former Republican Party presidential candidate Herman Cain, both of whom discussed news of the text messages exchanged between FBI agent Peter Strzok and lawyer Lisa Page instead.

Later during the segment, Hannity appeared to concede to The Times's earlier reporting.

"All right, so we have sources tonight just confirming ... that yeah, maybe Donald Trump wanted to fire the special counsel for a conflict," the Fox News host said. "Does he not have the right to raise those questions?"

"You know, we'll deal with this tomorrow night," Hannity said, before discussing a high-speed police chase in Arizona.

In addition to the news that Trump wanted to fire Mueller, The Times, which first broke the story, reported that White House counsel Don McGahn threatened to resign over the request, and argued that Mueller's firing would bring about consequences for the Trump administration.

Watch an edited clip of Hannity's Thursday night program:

SEE ALSO: Trump reportedly ordered Robert Mueller fired the month after he was appointed special counsel over the Russia investigation

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: This congressman wants to target the USPS to help stop the opioid crisis

The recent drastic moves by MoviePass make one analyst believe it's 'skating on thin ice' (HMNY, AMC)

$
0
0

4d movie theater movie goers

  • The movie-theater subscription service MoviePass is getting into the distribution business, as it has teamed with The Orchard to acquire a Sundance Film Festival title.
  • A day after the buy at Sundance, MoviePass announced its service would no longer be available at some AMC theaters.
  • A media analyst believes MoviePass is "skating on thin ice."


It's been a roller-coaster ride this week for MoviePass.

On Wednesday, the movie-theater subscription service announced that it was teaming with a distribution company, The Orchard, to take the North American rights for "American Animals," a heist movie that premiered at the Sundance Film Festival. Then on Thursday, MoviePass revealed that it was pulling its service from some AMC theaters.

Entering the acquisition game with MoviePass Ventures, the company hopes that by investing in movies it can share in their box-office success. Such investments could help counter losses from the company's main business model, in which it pays the full price for tickets at most theaters where MoviePass subscribers use the app.

There's skepticism, however, that this is the right move for MoviePass.

"It's a diversion from their focus and a loss, as most film investments are," Hal Vogel, a media analyst who founded Vogel Capital Management, told Business Insider. "In my opinion, they're skating on thin ice."

AMC theater

Another move that will not be universally praised is MoviePass’ decision to pull its service from some theaters owned by AMC, the largest movie chain in the US. Subscribers will no longer be able to use the app at major theaters like Empire 25 in New York City, Universal CityWalk in Los Angeles, and AMC Loews Boston Common, according to Deadline.

In all, 10 AMC theaters have been pulled from the service, according to Ted Farnsworth, the CEO of Helios and Matheson Analytics, the parent company of MoviePass, in a statement to Business Insider.

In a statement about the move obtained by Business Insider, MoviePass CEO Mitch Lowe said: "As we continue to strive for mutually beneficial relationships with theaters, the list of theaters we work with is subject to change."

MoviePass covers over $2 million in ticket sales weekly to AMC, according to Deadline.

Though AMC is the country's biggest chain, MoviePass probably anticipated problems early on. Ever since the company decided to change its model in the summer to a $9.95-a-month subscription plan, a big price cut that in some cases would cause the company to lose money on subscribers who see just one movie a month, AMC has been lukewarm about being supportive.

The chain initially announced it was looking into whether it could block the service from its theaters, saying it would create unrealistic expectations about ticket prices, but it eventually decided to continue accepting MoviePass.

Lowe has said the company's goals going forward include making deals with exhibitors to get discounted tickets in exchange for promotion and using its data to help market movies. But that never seemed likely to happen with AMC.

On a earnings call in November, AMC CEO Adam Aron said: "AMC has absolutely no intention, I repeat no intention, of sharing any — I repeat, any — of our admissions revenue or our concessions revenue with MoviePass."

Farnsworth's statement to Business Insider, however, suggests MoviePass sees itself as having some leverage in relationships with theaters.

"We already know in past testing that MoviePass subscribers are not theater-loyal," Farnsworth said. "They're happy to drive by a theater that may be closer to a theater that will accept MoviePass — because of the MoviePass value."

At the same time, Vogel believes pulling out of some AMC theaters in major cities represents a "significant loss of traction."

"AMC has taken no action to block the acceptance of MoviePass at our theatres," a spokesperson told Business Insider on Friday. "We have no further comment about MoviePass’ unilateral actions. We are, however, disappointed that MoviePass continues to make false statements about AMC, including today when MoviePass greatly exaggerated its contributions to AMC’s profitability."

SEE ALSO: The 15 Oscar best-picture winners that made the most money at the US box office

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: An exercise scientist reveals the exercise regime that will burn the most fat

How Danny McBride helped a 26-year veteran assistant director finally get his first shot in the director's chair

$
0
0

Arizona Sundance Institute

  • Jonathan Watson directed the Sundance movie, "Arizona."
  • It marks his directorial debut after over two decades being an assistant director for movies and TV.
  • A big reason he got to make the movie was because Danny McBride passed on "Arizona," which was going to be his debut as a director.


For over two decades, Jonathan Watson has worked as an assistant director on some of the biggest movies to come out of Hollywood. On “Bad Boys,” “The Truman Show,” “21 Jump Street,” “The Disaster Artist,” and many more, he was the man responsible for not just managing the sets, but also assisting in the vision of high-profile directors. 

But with the extremely dark comedy, “Arizona,” which had its world premiere at the Sundance Film Festival last week, Watson has finally made it to the director’s chair, and a big assist by Danny McBride made it happen. 

Screenwriter Luke Del Tredici wrote the project as a vehicle for McBride. The story is set in Arizona during the midst of the housing crisis, and follows a single mother named Cassie who is tormented by a character called Sonny after she witnesses him commit a murder. This leads to a violent cat-and-mouse chase as Cassie tries to flee from Sonny in their neighborhood that is pretty much abandoned due to the housing crash.

Two year ago, McBride considered taking on “Arizona” as his directorial debut, and cast Seth Rogen in the role of Sonny. But after disagreements with the financier on who should play the lead actress, and Rogen admitting that McBride was more suited for the role of Sonny, McBride decided to pass the directing baton to his friend Watson. This gave the veteran AD his long-awaited opportunity to direct.

Baptism into the industry working on movies like "Bad Boys" and "The Truman Show"

Watson began working as an assistant director at 24, and in just a few years found himself on the biggest movie sets Hollywood had to offer.

He was a 2nd AD on “Bad Boys,” Michael Bay’s box-office smash debut, and looking back on it now he calls the experience a “baptism under fire.”

“Those movies are as tough as they get because if you run that set and you set something wrong people die — literally,” Watson told Business Insider.

He recalls setting up a shot on the movie where an actor driving a vehicle had to race past a row of cameras. But Watson got worried when he saw a group of guys rigging explosions nearby the shot. He told the guys to move. When the scene was shot, the actor mistakenly hit the gas instead of the brake and crashed. Everyone was fine, Watson said, but where the crash occurred was right were the guys had been setting up.

Bad Boys II Sony“I realized, don’t think that somebody else is going to ask those questions,” Watson said. “Trust your gut.”

A few years later, he took over the 1st AD role on director Peter Weir’s “The Truman Show,” and once again found that anticipating all scenarios is a requirement of the job. This was especially true when scenes needed 300 extras, and had specific places everyone needed to hit to display the made-for-television world Jim Carrey’s Truman Burbank character was unwittingly living in.

Then there was anticipating the mind of Carrey.

“It was intimidating,” Watson said of working with the actor. “When he would go there would be this explosion of energy, you just had to have everything ready. In one scene I realized I had to have stunt men in the shot, not extras. It was a scene that has some physicality in it, and I thought they can't just be extras because he's going to go at them full tilt like a linebacker.”

More 1st AD jobs would come — “The Thomas Crown Affair,” “Reign of Fire,” “Bruce Almighty” — and in many of those instances, he was also directing second unit. But he had to keep any aspirations of directing his own movies to himself. He learned the reality of being a good assistant director is to be ready whenever your director calls on you.

“When you get hooked up with a team, you don't say no,” Watson said. “I know guys who work for Steven Spielberg, when he's ready for prep, the people he needs, whatever movie they’re on, they are off to go work with Spielberg. That's how it is with a lot of big directors. And once you say 'no' to them you're off the train forever.”

Watson was getting steady work with a couple of directors, and it was pretty clear: “Most directors don’t want to hear the first AD talking about how he wants to direct,” Watson said.

Finally getting into the director's chair

Watson did almost direct movies a few times. In one instance, a script he wrote made the rounds but ended up in development hell. Another time he was all set to direct a project, with the full blessing of the big-name director he had worked with for numerous projects. However, when that big-name director’s (who Watson declined to name) latest movie bombed at the box office, Watson’s hopes to do the movie suddenly vanished.

“I would just put my hopes aside and go back to the day job,” Watson said.

Watson found his way to working with McBride, and his pals Jody Hill and David Gordon Green, at their Roughhouse Pictures shingle by first working with Seth Rogen and Evan Goldberg on “The Green Hornet.”

Jonathan Watson Ernesto Distefano GettySony’s 2011 movie about the beloved masked crime fighter, which starred Rogen in the lead (he also cowrote the script with Goldberg), was a box-office bomb. It was one of those instances, Watson said, that he was called at the last second to be the 1st AD. Sony didn’t like director Michel Gondry’s longtime AD and replaced him with Watson.

“It was a crazy shoot,” Watson said, but Rogen and Goldberg liked Watson and had him come and be 1st AD on their directorial debut, “This Is the End,” which McBride starred in. McBride and Hill then nabbed Watson to be 1st AD on the second season of “Eastbound & Down.”

“There’s a lot of joy in getting a big movie completed,” Watson said. “And working with Danny and Jody you get a similar joy because they create a real bond with everyone working with them because they want to make great movies.”

But working with Watson on season 2 of “Eastbound,” followed by "Vice Principals," in which Watson was a producer and shot second unit, McBride could tell Watson wanted more.

“I remember Danny asked me, ‘You want to direct, right?’” Watson recalled. “And in the past I would play it off but in reality, at that point, I was slowly thinking about it more and more. So I said I did and he handed me the script to ‘Arizona.’”

“Helping anybody who has talent get an opportunity to execute is rewarding," McBride told Business Insider in an email about passing the project to Watson. "Helping a friend and a good person who has seen and done as much as he has in the industry is a no brainer."

With McBride playing the Sonny role, Rosemarie DeWitt as Cassie, and a supporting cast made up of Kaitlin Olson, Luke Wilson, and David Alan Grier, “Arizona” is certainly an attractive title for buyers at Sundance. And now with the first one out of the way, Watson thinks he’s ready to quit his day job and stay put in the director’s chair.

“There’s something with Seth and Evan I might direct, Danny has a script, I don’t fully know yet, but I think the new dawn is here,” Watson said.

SEE ALSO: The 17 biggest Oscar snubs of 2018

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Here's how easy it is for the US president to launch a nuclear weapon

Daymond John reveals how he started a $350 million business out of his mom's house, became a 'Shark Tank' star, and gained a new perspective after beating cancer

$
0
0

BI Graphics_Success! How I did it_Banner

daymond john

  • Daymond John grew his clothing line FUBU from a few sewing machines in his mother's house into a $350 million company.
  • In 2009 he became one of the original celebrity investors on the hit TV show "Shark Tank."
  • He's invested millions in a variety of companies, written books, and opened a coworking space in Manhattan.
  • His newest title, "Rise and Grind," looks at examples of people who succeeded despite the odds.



Daymond John grew up in Queens, New York, where he dreamed of making clothes for the coolest, most famous rappers. That dream became a reality in the 1990s when FUBU became one of hip-hop's hottest brands.

He started off with nothing, turning his mom's house into a factory, using graffiti as marketing, and talking his way on to the sets of music videos.

John built FUBU into a global brand that brought in $350 million in annual sales at its peak. In 2009, he became one of the celebrity investors on "Shark Tank," which started a new chapter in his career.

He's authored four books, invested in dozens of companies, and opened the coworking space Blueprint + co. in Manhattan. His newest title, "Rise and Grind," profiles people who succeeded against the odds.

The title of that book has taken on a new meaning for him. John was diagnosed with stage two thyroid cancer in 2016, which is where Business Insider senior strategy reporter Richard Feloni started their conversation on this week's episode of "Success! How I Did It."

Listen to the full episode:

Subscribe to "Success! How I Did It" on Apple Podcasts, Google Play, or your favorite app. Check out previous episodes with:

Following is a transcript, which has been edited for clarity.

Overcoming cancer and finding a new source of motivation

Daymond John

Feloni: I, like many other people, was really relieved to hear that you had recovered from the thyroid cancer. When you were diagnosed last year, that was shocking news.

John: Yeah, it was shocking to me as well, but not in the way most people would think about it. Most people may say they were feeling ill or something wasn't right in their body. But, you know, me, knowing that I have a lot of great doctors around, and I go to normal physicals and everything else, found out that there was a tumor in my throat the size of a marble for probably about five years.

When I had it removed, then they found out it was stage two cancer. So thank God I didn't have the worrying part all the way up to it. And then after it was removed, they found out that my lymph nodes were reacting to the surgery, like they naturally should. But now there's something else swollen in my body. And then my doctor was saying, you know, "I don't know if this is going to spread to your brain, or if we have to do this again." I was, like, "Holy crap." And they find out that that was just my lymph nodes reacting, but that was the scariest part, after you find out what you're facing, you know?

But thank God. I'm cancer-free. I'm here. I'm hanging out. The reason why I went public about it is so that everybody else can go out there and get early detection and be able to hangout and drink and party like me.

Feloni: Did that really change your perspective on things, when you were confronted with that?

John: You know, I think that it reinvigorated my purpose to do things, because, you know, people always say, "What's your drive?" You find your drive, and I find my drive every day, like my daughters and my staff and the people that I get to invest in.

But when you realize that your new definition of "Maybe the reason why" — I'm somewhat of a spiritual person — that God put me on a public stage is that, now I get to tell people about early detection, and now I'm saving lives because people coming back to me, telling me that they either went out and got early detection or they told their parents, and now that's driving me more. That's defining my life even more. Maybe everything I did in my life was to save somebody's life tomorrow.

Feloni: And with that drive that you're talking about, that ties into the title of your new book, "Rise and Grind."

John: It does.

Feloni: That's become like a mantra for you, right? What does it mean?

John: I didn't have this message crafted, but my mantra of "Rise and Grind" is how do you maximize the same 24 hours that we all have in a day.

John followed his mother's example — even if he didn't know it

daymond john

Feloni: And I've seen you talk a lot about getting your work ethic from your mother.

John: Well, my mother and my dad were both very hardworking people, but then my father had left when I was 10 years old. And my mother, you know — I look back and I say, "You know? I didn't really listen to my mother when I was growing up, but I ended up doing everything she did." She had a little cab service that she was driving. She was working part-time here and trying to work on her dream at night.

Feloni: Just always working?

John: Always working and always trying to find like-minded people around her. Always educating herself, at that time she was going to the library. Reading The Wall Street Journal. Looking in encyclopedias. And she was traveling as much as she could, she actually got a job, part-time, working for American Airlines so she could see the world, so she could broaden her view of life.

And as I look at my success, and I look back, I did everything she did, even though when I was a kid I was like, "My mother's the stupidest person on the planet." Right? Just like my kids think that I'm the stupidest person on the planet, but you do what you see your parents do and not what they say.

Listen, I'm a self-proclaimed mama's boy. I say it now, but I wasn't going to tell you that at 15, 16, 20 years old, when I was trying to be cool. I'm a mama's boy.

Feloni: But her influence was still affecting you, even if it wasn't cool to admit it.

John: Yeah — exactly.

Feloni: Didn't she have a sign that would say "THINK BIG" in your house?

John: She had a can opener that was over our refrigerator cabinets, and it was a — I want to say 3 feet, maybe 2 1/2, 3 feet — can opener that said "THINK BIG." It was this long! I didn't know what the hell was wrong with her. It looked like a long back-scratcher, right?

Feloni: Yeah.

John: I was wondering, "When the hell are we going to open anything with this can opener?" I didn't think about it until years later, when I was, like, "Think big" — I get it now.

Feloni: What was your version of the lemonade-stand thing? Because you said you always had these small hustles as a kid.

John: I had plenty of versions of that. I used to scour the whole neighborhood looking for bike parts that people would throw out or whatever. Abandoned, you know? You would go around New York City and see the bikes that are all taken apart but still left on the chain?

Feloni: Yeah.

John: Before you know it, I would assemble bikes and I would sell them. I would have kids working for me in the yard. If I didn't have enough parts to put the bike together, it would be a go-kart or something of that nature. I had kids working out of my garage doing that. I used to sell pencils when I was a kid. I sold everything. I sold candy bars. I went to Catholic school for seven years, and, you know, they had this chocolate sale.

Feloni: I had one of those.

John: Actually, I'm thinking about it. I remember making enough sales where I bought a TV. A little black-and-white television set. That's when I used to watch all the Met games, my favorite team at the time. I found them on that TV. And I remember, I broke the TV, cause I was so excited I knocked it over when the Amazin' Mets won the championship.

Feloni: Yeah.

John: So I was selling everything. I think that's great what the Catholic school did to me, to make me go door-to-door and sell things.

Feloni: So entrepreneurialism was in your blood?

John: I think entrepreneurship is in everybody's blood. It's just sometimes the people in the surroundings around us, or society, tells us that we can't do what we are dreaming about doing. But as a kid none of us sit there and go, "It can't be done." We all go "I'm going to be Superman." We grow up dreaming, right?

It's the people around us who stop us from dreaming, and sometimes they do it because they care about us, and maybe they grew up in a generation where one parent could go to work, the other one can stay at home, and you worked at a good place where you retired at 60 years old and Social Security was around, and things of that nature. But we're not in the Industrial Age anymore, and we're not in the Agricultural Age anymore. We're not at that time. Now is a different time.

Learning that entrepreneurship is more than 'chasing money'

daymond john

Feloni: Yeah. When you were starting to come into your own, you came across a book, Napoleon Hill's "Think and Grow Rich."

John: I still read the book every other year. I read it probably three times until I caught on to the definition of the book. I started to activate the tactics they taught about goal setting.

And goal setting is, by far, the most important aspect you could do in your life to become whoever you want to be, right? You're goal setting one way, whether you like it or not. So if you're goal setting that you'll never find a great man or a great woman, you're always going to be in a abusive relationship, you're setting a goal for that.

I set the goals that Napoleon Hill told me to set and visualize, and I read them every day at the time, and I became the person that I wanted to be, that I envisioned myself being, by the time I was 30 years old.

But it wasn't that easy. It got so, so dark in between those times of my life. I don't want to paint this picture of, "Set a goal and all of a sudden you're going to get this magic-carpet ride." I just don't know what gave me the faith to keep reading those goals as it got darker before it got brighter.

Feloni: Were you doubting yourself? Did you question whether you could ever be successful?

John: I wasn't doubting myself. I was making the wrong moves. I started doing things for money. I started to buy crashed cars and sell crashed cars. I figured that I had this, you know, I buy it at $5,000 ...

Feloni: A crashed car? Just the scraps?

John: Yeah, you buy it at auctions. I buy it at $5,000, I put $2,500 into it, and I sell it at $10,000 or $12,000. I did the numbers, because I was so brilliant, and if I sold X amount and they started compounding, I would be a millionaire by 21.

All right, so, well, that didn't work out quite well, and I was a waiter in Red Lobster at 21 years old. I was miserable trying to do that. I can't do anything with my hands, in regard to manual labor like that. I don't like that type of stuff. But I was just trying to do that for money.

And I did various things for money. I opened up my delivery service, which I had a good time doing it, but I literally worked 18 hours a day. By the time I paid for all the insurance, the Department of Transportation, fines, and maintenance, and everything else, at the end of the year, I literally was leaving with a $30,000 net, but I was making $300, $400 a day. I was bringing in the van, but everything else was going every place else.

I did that for three years. I was extremely heavy at the time from eating fast food, sitting on the road. I was tired. I did two or three things like that. I turned around and I said, "I don't think I'm going to be that millionaire, whatever the case is. Let me stop chasing money."

And during my downtime, I said, "Let me go back to Red Lobster. I'm not going to take that job home with me. I just want to get my head straight." And I picked up this hobby called FUBU, where I wanted to just dress people on the side, because of this love of rap music and the culture and fashion.

Founding FUBU out of his mother's house

daymond john mom

Feloni: So FUBU was just a hobby, to start. And that was what, 1992?

John: First time was '89.

Feloni: And how old were you?

John: In '89 I was 20. I closed it three times, from 1989 to 1992, because I ran out of money.

But the important point is that I took affordable steps. I ran out of $1,000, $2,000, $5,000. And every time I'd run out of money, let's say, the six months that I wasn't doing FUBU anymore, somebody would say, "Man, what's going on with those shirts?” or “I bought that shirt from you at an expo. I been looking for you all year!" And I'd always go, "All right. I'll make a couple more." I'll wear them and they'll go, "Hey. Where you get that shirt?"

Feloni: So it was just side cash at first?

John: Yeah. It just made me feel good. Also, another reason I was doing it is that I needed reasons to stop getting kicked off the video set. If I can go to the video set and say, "Hey — I'm dressing that person over there." They be like, "That person? That caterer?"

Feloni: Just finding your way into LL Cool J videos and stuff?

John: "I'm the wardrobe person over here, sir. Excuse me."

I was going on video sets. I was dressing people once in a while. I was getting to talk to all the video chicks. I was eating all the free food that they had over there, and I was watching LL Cool J, or Salt-N-Pepa, or Run-DMC, or Biggie Smalls perform. I'd have paid money to go there! I was hanging out there all day.

Feloni: How'd you even get yourself in the room? How'd you get them aware of this brand?

John: Because I live in New York. At that time video sets weren't huge. They were these small things being shot on damn near camcorders. And once, growing up in Hollis, Queens, I mean, listen — everybody's from Queens. There's Run-DMC, A Tribe Called Quest, Lost Boyz, Ja Rule, 50 Cent, you know, Salt-N-Pepa, LL Cool J., Nas.

Feloni: Yeah.

daymond john ll cool j

John: Once you knew one person, and then you get to see their homie, and you get to know their homie, and then you get to know the buddy-guard — not the bodyguard— and the friend, and you go, "Hey, what's going on tomorrow?" "Next week we're going to Latifah 's set!" "I'll see you there!" "All right!" It's the same thing as networking, right? It's what we do every single day in bars and in conferences. I was just doing it on a different set.

Feloni: At what point did it go from just having a shirt with something that you had just sewn onto it to it being this is a piece of clothing that people want.

John: Well, they started talking about it very shortly after ‘89, probably about 1990. By '92, I decided to make a real run at it. And '92, they started talking about it a little bit more, from the levels of Queens. And I got with someone named Ralph McDaniels who had a show, a long-lasting show, called "Video Music Box." It was a video show. He did a little piece on me in his local show, which he's still got even till today. He talked about FUBU being the next brand.

And so ‘93, ‘94 was went people really started checking for me. And around ‘95 is when it all culminated to me writing $300,000 of orders at the MAGIC trade show. I came back and I turned my house into a factory.

That almost went bust. By ‘96, I had signed my first distribution deal. That's when we started to go global, '97 to 2000.

Feloni: The name FUBU — "For Us By Us" — what did it mean for you? What were you looking to accomplish?

John: So the name For Us By Us has always been an acronym for "us." "Us" has always been a culture and not a color.

And the reason why is there was a boot company that made a comment, saying, "We don't sell our boots to drug dealers," in The New York Times, I think. Or Wall Street Journal. And it had already pissed me off because I was so busy buying Tommy Hilfiger, Ralph Lauren. I was buying ski jackets that cost $1,200. I said, "Who's ever going to respect and value the people that love the brand?" So I created FUBU, For Us By Us. And I didn’t want it to be — I wanted to be inclusive. I didn't want it to be a brand that also rejected people because their color. Because you just had to be cool and love hip-hop. I would have dressed the Beastie Boys just as quick as I would have dressed Run-DMC. I would have dressed 3rd Bass just as quick as anybody else. And I would definitely, if he was around. I think is one of the greatest rappers of all. Eminem would have been my first, right?

But it started to spread as a brand that was only made for a certain color, which I think was wrong. It was made by a generation and a color of people that started a movement of something of called hip-hop, absolutely. But it would move on to be a global brand that, in Korea, and other places, they appreciated because they respected hip-hop. That was always the For Us By Us.

Feloni: Didn't you have like, basically, this guerrilla-marketing thing of just like spraying graffiti throughout New York?

John: Yeah. Well, it wasn't spraying graffiti. We weren't violating any laws. But we went to old stores that we could find, that had the gates pulled down, the storm gates, and we would ask them, can we whitewash their gates, and can we put "authorized FUBU dealer" on the gates? They could be selling Chinese food. I didn't care what they were. They weren't an authorized FUBU dealer. Actually, there was no authorized FUBU dealer.

But we spray-painted those gates. We spray-painted like 300 of them from New York to New Jersey. Those gates would be down early in the morning and down early in the evening, and they would look like billboards. We would just do anything and everything we could, and we had a really great following.

Feloni: Your mom — she moved to Manhattan and left you the house in Queens, right? You kind of turned it into a factory?

John: Correct. Mom got out. She said, "You guys are crazy,” and my friends all moved in. We burned all the furniture that we couldn't sell. We moved all these commercial sewing machines into the house. We had a bunch seamstresses sewing the clothes.

Feloni: Weren’t you renting out rooms, too.

John: I was renting out the rooms to my friends. It was all about $75 a room. It was just a big Airbnb. There were strangers in the house.

Feloni: Like a sweatshop or something?

John: It wasn't a sweatshop. We were paying the women good money. I had to take a second mortgage on my home, which is about $100,000. I have no idea how we got that mortgage because my house is worth $75,000.

It was a crazy time. We were manufacturing about a year and a half. We were burning polo fleece in the backyard, the excess polo fleece, so the whole neighborhood was purple. The fire department would come and kick down the door.

Feloni: Just burning things, yeah.

John: Yeah. We had to get rid of the extra goods. I wasn't paying to get it carted away, right?

Feloni: Oh. So you saved money on garbage?

John: On burning the extra fabric, right? Why not? My neighbors weren't really happy about it. The firemen would come and kick down the door. We would jump the back fence and leave. The fines would be there. We'd just be known as the guys just burning crap in the backyard. We just didn't care. We had the eye of the tiger. We were focused, man.

daymond john

Feloni: Well, when did it go from this scrappy startup to a legitimate business? I mean, by 1998, it was like the hip-hop brand.

John: Yeah, '95 and '96 was when we were doing the factory thing. In '96 we ended up putting an ad in the paper because we ran out of capital. This was our version of Kickstarter. It said "$1 million in sales. Need financing."

Feloni: Straightforward.

John: Straight up. Thirty-three people called the ad. Thirty of them were loan sharks. Three were real, and one was Samsung's textiles division. They said to us, "We have a deal. You're going to have to sell $5 million worth of clothes in three years to keep this level of distribution." And, um, because we had already made all our own mistakes small, and was there from 1989 to 1996, and knew our customers and knew what worked and didn't work.

We sold $30 million in three months. Then FUBU really just took off. And I was able to do what we do best, which was guerrilla marketing, sales, and branding, and deal with all the artists. We had back-of-house logistics who could handle manufacturing and logistics.

Feloni: You've said that part of your success as an entrepreneur has to do with you being dyslexic. What does that mean for you? When did it go from being something to be ashamed of to being proud of?

John: I was never ashamed of it because I didn't know I had it. My mother treated me so well and loved me so much and made me feel like there was something special I had, but I had to work on all the things I was weak about.

But as I look back and I try to address people about dyslexia — and I believe the stat is over 40% of entrepreneurs are dyslexic. Out of the Sharks, add all the Sharks together, and the guest sharks, there are 12 of us, and eight of us are dyslexic.

Feloni: Really?

John: Yeah.

Feloni: Wow.

John: As I look at, it was always a workaround. I would read something, I had to read it three times, then I'd have to go and try to do anything in there that I read because I don't know if I grasped the information correctly. So it always made me take action.

I took something called the co-op course, in high school, where I got to go to work one week and get credit for it, and go to school one week. I ended up working on 55th Street, I think, or 53rd Street, at First Boston — happened to be a venture firm. I started to see how people were dealing with venture capital at that time. I was a messenger, though. I was walking the streets all the time.

But anyway, the cheat and the workaround, dyslexia got me around to some area of doing something else that ended up becoming entrepreneurial.

Feloni: So then FUBU. It's bringing in, like, $350 million in sales in '98. But then, in your 2014 book, "The Power of Broke," you refer to this period in the early 2000s or so where you had all of this excess inventory, and then, also around this time, your investment in Heatherette, this fashion company, lost you millions of dollars. I think it was $6 million, you said?

John: Yeah.

Feloni: Was this a dark time in your career?

John: No. You know, listen. It definitely wasn't dark. I already had the resources behind me that I never had to work again. I was now, like, what all business owners face. I was in, “What am I going to do for my staff? How am I going to move forward? I was trying to find my way. So was it a dark time? No. It was a frustrating time.

Becoming a surprise TV star on 'Shark Tank,' and being busier than ever in 'early retirement'

daymond john barbara corcoran kevin o'leary

Feloni: But then you got a call from Mark Burnett, with this invitation to be on "Shark Tank" in 2008, this was basically right after the great recession.

John: No. It was right in the middle ... It was starting.

Feloni: So "Shark Tank," this opportunity comes along during the recession. Was this something that you jumped on, like a good opportunity?

John: No, no. When I got the call it was a waste of my time. I was, like, "This crappy show? Nobody will ever watch it. Who the hell is going to watch five business people talking? But I wanted to go out to LA and hang out for a little while. See some friends. So I'll take the flight out to LA. I'll shoot the crappy little pilot. One condition: I get to sit with you, with Mark Burnett, and I get to pitch him my three smoking-hot TV-show ideas that will change the entire world."

Feloni: So you saw it as an opportunity for yourself, not "This is going to be a good show"?

John: Yeah. At that time I was probably about 35, 36. And I go out there and I'm so just like not interested in the show that I'm going out to a club that night. I wear my earrings. I'm like, "I'm going to wear the suit. I'm going to wear my earrings. I got to hurry up and change. I go out to the club and I have to have some bling-bling on at the time."

The damn show gets picked up and they tell me, at that point: "Well now, for continuity, you got to keep your earrings in all the time." Now I got to keep the earrings in. Now I'm 48 years old still wearing the goddamn earrings because I'm no longer the "Shark Tank" guy if I don't wear the earrings.

That's what happened. I did go and tell Mark. I go to breakfast, I go and pitch him my three great ideas on TV shows. I swear to you, before the eggs came, he shot down all the ideas. Now that I think about them, they were pretty crappy.

Feloni: The show ended being a phenomenon. But yeah, season one, no one could have predicted that. We had Barbara Corcoran in here, your fellow Shark. She was saying how, when Lori came on to the cast, she felt great that she didn't have to be the token woman of the show. Were you ever uncomfortable being the only nonwhite person when they were casting this?

John: I'm not white?

Feloni: [Laughs]

John: Um. No. Not at all. I've always been confident in who I am. I think that the cast is extremely diverse in the way of thinking. You know, I'll be very honest, prior to that, I'd had some run-ins in Hollywood. I've dealt with a lot of Hollywood people. I'll be very honest, the people over at ABC, and at Mark Burnett's office, have always been the most solid people I've ever worked with.

Feloni: So it ended up going from something that was on the brink of being canceled to this cultural phenomenon, essentially.

John: It is amazing.

Feloni: When did you realize that it had become that?

John: I think when Mark Cuban came on and he started to do the analysis on his own and said, "This is the top show watched, kids 5 to 15 years old, and the top show watched, parents and kids together." This is not going anywhere if you look at the data on how it has — it's on the 17th year in London. I don't know what year in Japan. Every city it goes to, it pops after three years. You know, we realized we're part of something special.

Feloni: With "Shark Tank," renewed for a 10th season. Even something that is so popular can't just go on forever. But you've tied so much of your brand into it. You've got The Shark Group, which is one of your companies. You're TheSharkDaymond on social. What happens if the show weren't around anymore?

daymond john

John: Nothing, I’m still a Shark, you know? I didn't build around those things. "TheSharkDaymond," yes, because it was easy to separate my name from all the Daymonds out there, but The Shark Group was initially the "Stealth Branding" I used to have before Shark, then people started calling it "shark branding" when they called. Then I changed it to "Shark Group" because we do way more than just branding.

Feloni: And outside of "Shark Tank" you launched Blueprint + co. last year, which is like your spin on coworking space, but also kind of incubator and creative studio, right?

John: No. It's incubator, creative, but it's for established companies. People who already have 100 people working someplace else, but they want to just maximize their talent and their staff, but they also don't want somebody at the water cooler getting pitched by somebody else for a $5,000 investment. These people aren't looking for funding. They already are established.

Feloni: In "Rise and Grind" you say that you've never been busier or more ambitious in your life.

John: I was telling my friend the other day, I said, "Technically, I'm retired." I've been retired for about six, seven years because I haven't had to worry about my 300, 400 people at FUBU. I've licensed most of the brands out, so I didn't have to necessarily go to work and have this big infrastructure.

But then, all of a sudden, now that "Shark Tank" has taken off, and I'm investing in all these companies, and we're doing a lot of branding and marketing, I'm busier now than when I was working, right? And I love it. I love every aspect of it.

Now I wanted to put out a book, because I see another book about what's going on and how to be more productive, because so many people get the wrong information. So many people are sold insecurities. There's so many people out there making money to make you feel insecure. "You need this pill. You need this funding. You need me to give you consulting."

So I decided to come out with "Rise and Grind" and highlight these amazing people, because there's so many people that are more successful than me in various different ways. And I look at success as not for money. I have people in the book who may not have money.

daymond john mo's bows

Feloni: Some of our listeners, if they're early in their careers and they're looking to aspire to a career like yours, what is a piece of advice that you'd give them?

John: If they happen to be working right now to pay the bills, which we all have to do, don't quit your day job. Never do that. Start setting goals to put in one hour, six hours, nine hours a week on whatever that dream is. Go out and surround yourself with like-minded people. Try to network as much as you can. Find people who are mentors, who don't have any interest in your company or your product. Take affordable steps. Don't go bet the house. Instead of going to Vegas and playing a $1,000 a hand blackjack, play 1,000 hands of $1 a hand blackjack until you get to learn the groove and don't risk it all. Then you'll understand. And true entrepreneurs act, learn, and repeat. Learn every single thing you need. If you don't know how to sell online, then you go and start learning how to be a social-media expert. You start learning coding so at least you know the basics. Then you know when you can hire people.

But the biggest investment is always going to be yourself. Nobody else is going to do it for you. I'm not going to come to your house and grab you off the couch. Tell you to put down that Sega or whatever the hell you're doing. "Come on. I'm going to make you successful." Nobody's going to do anything for you. I promise.

And don't tell people your problems. Bottom line. Walk in the room happy. Twenty percent of people don't care about your problems. The other 80% are happy you have them.

Feloni: Thank you so much, Daymond. Really appreciate it.

John: Appreciate it.

Feloni: Thank you.

SEE ALSO: Daymond John of 'Shark Tank' says his best investment — which brought in $50 million at profit last year — contains a lesson for all startups

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: 'Shark Tank' star Daymond John reveals the advantages of being broke


Wynn Resorts is tanking after CEO Steve Wynn is accused of sexual misconduct (WYNN)

$
0
0

steve wynn

  • Wynn Resorts CEO Steve Wynn was accused of sexual misconduct by dozens of employees in a story by the Wall Street Journal on Friday.
  • Shares of the company plummeted after the report.
  • Wynn is alleged to have forced at least one employee into sex against their will and to have over-sexualized the workplace.
  • Watch shares of the company trade in real time on Markets Insider.


Shares of Wynn Resorts are tanking after allegations of sexual misconduct against CEO Steve Wynn were reported by the Wall Street Journal.

The company is trading 6.39% lower on Friday to $188.00 after the report, which cited multiple women accusing the Las Vegas magnate of pressuring them into sex and sexualizing the workplace.

Wynn has denied the allegations, calling them "preposterous."

Wynn owns a 12% stake in the company, worth about $2.4 billion, according to WSJ. The company cited him as an integral piece of the business, saying the company would be "significantly impaired" without him.

The allegations against Wynn come from dozens of employees and include at least one who received a $7.5 million settlement after Wynn allegedly had sex with the employee against their will, according to the Journal report.

Women — particularly manicurists and massage therapists — described Wynn requesting private appointments with them and pressuring them into sex acts with him. Several of these women said they reported the harassment to supervisors and casino executives.

Wynn built the Mirage, Treasure Island, Bellagio, Wynn, and Encore casinos in Las Vegas and joined the Republican National Committee as its top fundraiser following President Donald Trump's election.

This story is developing, check back for more.

wynn resorts stock price

SEE ALSO: 

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Microsoft President Brad Smith says the US shouldn't get 'too isolationist'

MoviePass is likely playing hardball by kicking 10 AMC theaters off its service, and what happens next could have big implications for its business (AMC)

$
0
0

kill bill

  • MoviePass, the $9.95-a-month movie theater subscription service, kicked 10 big AMC theaters off its app.
  • It's likely because AMC has refused to give MoviePass discounted tickets or other preferential treatment.
  • Whether or not AMC caves will have big implications for MoviePass' long-term financial viability.



This week, the cold war between MoviePass and AMC saw actual direct conflict, with the movie-subscription app removing 10 big AMC locations from its service.

The CEO of MoviePass’ majority shareholder, Ted Farnsworth (of Helios and Matheson), pointed out that this represented “less than 2% of theaters" (AMC has 380 total locations). But it still raises concerns for users and investors, and is worth examining.

So why is MoviePass kicking some AMC theaters off its platform?

The most likely explanation is that AMC still refuses to give MoviePass discounted tickets, and MoviePass is trying to play hardball in negotiations.

The looming critique of MoviePass is that by charging a monthly subscription of $9.95, and paying movie theaters full price for tickets, it is essentially selling you $1 for $0.50. The thinking goes like this: Of course it’s signed up 1.5 million people, but eventually it will collapse under its own weight because it’s financially unsustainable.

This is a view that’s been expressed, publicly and privately, by some movie-theater execs and industry analysts. They think that if MoviePass can’t negotiate discounted tickets and a cut of concessions, it is doomed to failure.

moviepass graphic samantha lee

MoviePass has a plan for this. When I talked to MoviePass CEO Mitch Lowe last year, he said the company was heavily focused on getting theaters on its side and into its system. The idea was that in exchange for promotion in the MoviePass app and other perks, theaters would give MoviePass a discount on tickets. The figure quoted at the time by Lowe was a 20% lower ticket price (though that could have changed).

But AMC has never been interested.

On a earnings call in November, AMC CEO Adam Aron said: "AMC has absolutely no intention, I repeat no intention, of sharing any — I repeat, any — of our admissions revenue or our concessions revenue with MoviePass."

Farnsworth expressed this stance in another way in a statement Friday: “Since the get-go, AMC has not been interested in collaborating with MoviePass.”

So AMC doesn’t want to give MoviePass any special treatment (though it will still accept the full-price ticket sales from MoviePass members).

Now by booting 10 AMC theaters from its app, MoviePass seems to be flexing its muscles, likely trying to prove that its 1.5 million subscriber base can do some real damage to the bottom line of the top US theater chain.

"We already know in past testing that MoviePass subscribers are not theater-loyal," Farnsworth said. "They're happy to drive by a theater that may be closer to a theater that will accept MoviePass — because of the MoviePass value."

It’s probably no accident that the theaters getting thrown out of MoviePass are in major markets — New York, Boston, Los Angeles — places where people have a choice of whether to go to AMC or somewhere else.

Will AMC feel that pain and cave? The answer to that question will have huge implications for the long-term financial viability of MoviePass.

SEE ALSO: MoviePass has had 'staggering' growth to 1.5 million subscribers — and an analyst says online ticket sites must be 'shaking in their boots'

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: An exercise scientist explains what everyone gets wrong about stretching

Steven Soderbergh wants to shoot on iPhones from now on — 'This is a game changer to me'

$
0
0

Steven Soderbergh AP

  • Steven Soderbergh's next movie, "Unsane," was shot with just an iPhone.
  • The director might never go back to traditional cameras again.


Steven Soderbergh has spent his career making maverick moves when it comes to how he shoots his projects. In the early 2000s he was a major promoter of shooting on digital film, now he's using iPhones.

For his next movie, "Unsane," in which Claire Foy (Netflix's "The Crown") plays a character who is involuntarily committed to a mental institution, the Oscar-winning director shot the entire movie on an iPhone. And it sounds like he loved it so much he wants to do it exclusively for now on.

“I think this is the future,” Soderbergh told Indiewire. “Anybody going to see this movie who has no idea of the backstory to the production will have no idea this was shot on the phone. That’s not part of the conceit.”

Unsane Fingerprint ReleasingSoderbergh has loved to mess with new technology over his career. In 2005 he was one of the biggest directors to shoot on HD video with the low budget movie "Bubble." For many years he's shot using the RED camera, because it complemented his fast-paced workflow (the director is known for having scenes he shot in a day completely edited by that evening). Now it looks like the iPhone is his latest tech love affair.

“People forget, this is a 4k capture,” Soderbergh said of the iPhone. “I’ve seen ['Unsane'] 40 feet tall. It looks like velvet. This is a game changer to me.”

Soderbergh is hardly the first filmmaker to shoot a movie with a phone. Before making "The Florida Project," director Sean Baker used only iPhones to shoot "Tangerine." But to completely ditch traditional cameras for an iPhone would be a revolutionary next step in filmmaking, especially for someone of Soderbergh's caliber.

"There’s a philosophical obstacle a lot of people have about the size of the capture device," Soderbergh told Indiewire of shooting with an iPhone. "I don’t have that problem. I look at this as potentially one of the most liberating experiences that I’ve ever had as a filmmaker, and that I continue having. The gets that I felt moment to moment were so significant that this is, to me, a new chapter.”

You will get to see for yourself what Soderbergh is talking about when "Unsane" opens in theaters March 23.

SEE ALSO: How Danny McBride helped a 26-year veteran assistant director finally get his first shot in the director's chair

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: I tried the 7-minute workout for a month — here's what happened

'Game of Thrones' star Maisie Williams says the show will return in April 2019

$
0
0

arya stark game of thrones season seven premiere

  • "Game of Thrones" star Maisie Williams may have accidentally said when the eighth and final season will premiere on 2019.
  • According to an interview with Williams in the UK publication Metro, the show will return in April 2019.
  • A rep for HBO told Business Insider said that a premiere date and month cannot be confirmed at this time. 

 

We have a long way to go until "Game of Thrones" returns for its eighth and final season. But now, thanks to Maisie Williams (who plays Arya Stark), we might know what month to expect its return in 2019.

In an interview with the UK publication Metro, Williams said the show would air its first episode of the last season in April 2019.

“We wrap in December and we air our first episode in April [2019]," she said. "That’s a four-month turnaround for these huge episodes. There’s a lot that goes into the final edit. You would not want to rush this season at all. We owe it to our audience and our fans to really do this final season to the best of our abilities.”

So according to Williams, shooting for season eight will end in December 2018, with the season premiere airing sometime in April. Season eight will only have six episodes, but they'll be feature length. (Season seven aired in the summer of 2017, but the previous six seasons had their premieres in April as well.)

As for Williams' feelings about the show ending, she told Metro, "It’s going to be really odd not seeing the cast regularly. We all get on so well and we are such a tight-knit group."

As badly as we want to see what happens, we still don't want the show to end. But it will, and more characters will probably die, because that's how "Game of Thrones" works. 

In a response to Business Insider's request for comment, a representative said that HBO can't confirm an air date or month at this time, only that it is returning in 2019. 

SEE ALSO: Reese Witherspoon seems to have 3 legs in a Vanity Fair cover that people think is disastrously Photoshopped

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: An exercise scientist explains what everyone gets wrong about stretching

MoviePass's parent company is slipping after dropping some AMC theaters (HMNY)

$
0
0

movie theater



Helios and Matheson Information Technology, perhaps best known for its majority stake in MoviePass, is slipping after MoviePass announced it would be pulling its service from several AMC theaters.

Shares of Helios and Matheson are down 3.58% to $8.61 after the reports. AMC was also down about 3.04% on Friday.

In what is only the latest blow in an ongoing battle with the movie theater chain, MoviePass decided to pull its service from 10 AMC-run theaters without prior notice to the company or its customers.

In a statement to Markets Insider, Ted Farnsworth, CEO of Helios and Matheson, claimed that MoviePass currently represents 62% of AMC's operating income, not including concession sales. Including concessions, Farnsworth said MoviePass customers could represent as much as $203.4 million of annual revenue for AMC.

"We already know in past testing that MoviePass subscribers are not theater-loyal; they're happy to drive by a theater that may be closer to a theater that will accept MoviePass -because of the MoviePass value," Farnsworth said.

To customers complaining about the closures on Twitter, AMC had a scripted response that hints at the suddenness of the theater restrictions.

"AMC has not restricted MoviePass acceptance at our theatres, nor have we heard from MoviePass about this. MoviePass customers should contact MoviePass for clarification," the tweets say.

MoviePass argues it's boosting sales and revitalizing a dying movie theater industry while some theater chains, like AMC, argue the $9.95 a month price of a MoviePass subscription sets a ceiling that doesn't allow for the companies to set their own prices. AMC has previously tried to block the service but failed.

Read more about MoviePass's plan to dominate the theater industry here.

helios and matheson stock price

SEE ALSO: The recent drastic moves by MoviePass make one analyst believe it's 'skating on thin ice'

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Microsoft President Brad Smith says the US shouldn't get 'too isolationist'

Viewing all 103316 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images