Quantcast
Channel: Business Insider
Viewing all 102919 articles
Browse latest View live

HBO has bought explosive Sundance hit film 'The Tale' starring Laura Dern, reportedly for $7 million

$
0
0

The Tale Sundance Institute

  • HBO has bought the rights to "The Tale," a hit at Sundance, reportedly for $7 million.
  • In the film, director Jennifer Fox recounts being sexually abused at the age of 13.
  • Laura Dern plays Fox, who after coming across a story she wrote at 13, begins to uncover her "special" relationship with two adult coaches.
  • The movie got an incredible response at the Sundance Film Festival.

 

HBO has picked up the worldwide rights to Sundance hit "The Tale" starring Laura Dern for $7 million, according to The Hollywood Reporter.

As THR notes, it's rare for HBO to buy a finished narrative film out of a festival. The company usually prefers to develop in-house.

The movie comes from director Jennifer Fox, who has spent her career making documentaries. With this movie, Fox turned to narrative storytelling and uses the structure to explore her experience with sexual abuse.

In the era of the #MeToo and Time’s Up movements, “The Tale” is a project that has shown up right when everyone in Hollywood is publicly grappling with sexual misconduct. But the process of making "The Tale" started long before the Harvey Weinstein sexual misconduct allegations kick-started the conversation.

Unlike documentaries, which can be shot and edited at a quick pace (while a hot-button issue is in the zeitgeist), narrative storytelling takes a lot longer. You have to develop a script, get the money, cast it, shoot it, edit it, and so on. It takes years, and can lead to movies with a social pulse feeling dated when finally released.

Fox didn’t anticipate our culture’s current examination of sexual misconduct when she decided to make “The Tale,” but sometimes a story and an issue link up.

"The Tale"

At 13 years old, Fox wrote a story titled “The Tale” for a school project. It addressed a girl talking about her “special” relationship with two adult coaches — one male, one female. She said the work was fiction, but in fact it was all too true. Fox has now taken it and adapted it into a movie.

In the film, Laura Dern plays Jennifer. Like Fox, she’s a thriving documentarian. But when her mother (Ellen Burstyn) comes across “The Tale” story she wrote at 13, she sends it to her daughter as she realizes, reading between the lines, that what Jennifer wrote was truth not fiction.

Jennifer Fox Nicholas Hunt GettyAt first, Jennifer deflects her mother’s theory. Reading the story she composed 40 years ago, she doesn’t see anything that would suggest that the relationships she had with her coaches (the female, her horse riding coach; the male, her running and conditioning coach) were inappropriate. But quickly her childhood memories return, and eventually Jennifer heads out on a fact-finding mission that leads to her confronting the two coaches (played by Frances Conroy and the late John Heard in the present day, and Jason Ritter/Elizabeth Debicki in flashbacks).

But what is striking about “The Tale” is the unconventional way the story is told.

Flashbacks and unreliable memories

Fox uses flashbacks to recount her 13-year-old self in the 1970s. But she often replays scenes and sequences numerous times, as the character receives revelations from friends and family that change what she thought happened. This dramatizes how memory can never be 100% reliable, and shows how the brain can alter facts to cope with bad memories.

Fox also uses her documentary style, setting up scenes in which grown-up Jennifer asks questions to her younger self, and the two coaches, as if the scenes were revealing one-on-ones for a doc.

However, the part of the movie that’s going to get the biggest reaction is the graphic nature of the sexual content. Fox doesn’t hold back in showing how the coaches manipulate Jennifer into a sexual relationship with the male coach, with scenes depicting the coach having sexual encounters with her, even taking her virginity.

The scenes are very tough to watch, but they are essential to the movie. They are not there to glorify or titillate, but to lay out to the audience how the coaches made Jennifer feel she was the one with the power, and was becoming a woman through their guidance, when in fact she was just their pleasure toy.

Dern gives a powerhouse performance as a strong-willed woman who has to reexamine her life. Child actress Isabelle Nélisse plays 13-year-old Jennifer with a maturity that’s astounding to watch. Burstyn, Ritter, Debicki, Conroy, and Heard all give strong supporting performances (Common plays Jennifer’s boyfriend — but it’s not his best work).

“The Tale” is the first movie that really epitomizes the #MeToo movement. Though there will likely be a lot of talk about the sex scenes in the movie, this is a story that needs to show the horrors to tell it correctly.

The powerful stories of victims revealed in newspapers, magazines, and websites since last October is what has made the country take notice. This is not the time to water things down.

SEE ALSO: Nicolas Cage's movie at Sundance, "Mandy," uses his vintage, insane acting style to prefection and has all the makings of a cult classic

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: An exercise scientist reveals exactly how long you need to work out to get in great shape


The first trailer for Bill Simmons' 'Andre the Giant' documentary is here and it shows the dark side of being one of the world's most famous athletes

$
0
0

Andre the Giant

  • HBO has released the first full-length trailer for the upcoming documentary, "Andre the Giant."
  • The film is on the life of André Roussimoff, a professional wrestler who suffered from gigantism.
  • Andre the Giant was listed as 7-foot-4 and over 500 pounds and was a long-time rival of Hulk Hogan.
  • The trailer depicts Roussimoff's rise to becoming one of the most famous athletes in the world, but also the dark side of being Andre the Giant.
  • This is the first HBO documentary produced by the Bill Simmons Media Group.
  • Simmons, a huge pro wrestling fan, has long wanted to do a documentary on the wrestling giant.
  • The film will debut on April 10.


Watch the trailer below:

 

SEE ALSO: 2018 NFL MOCK DRAFT: Here's what the experts are predicting for all 32 first-round picks

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: JIM ROSS: Here's who will take over WWE after Vince McMahon

The eSports competitive video gaming market continues to grow revenues & attract investors

$
0
0

eSports Advertising and Sponsorships

This is a preview of a research report from BI Intelligence, Business Insider's premium research service. To learn more about BI Intelligence, click here.

What is eSports? History & Rise of Video Game Tournaments

Years ago, eSports was a community of video gamers who would gather at conventions to play Counter Strike, Call of Duty, or League of Legends.

These multiplayer video game competitions would determine League of Legends champions, the greatest shooters in Call of Duty, the cream of the crop of Street Fighter players, the elite Dota 2 competitors, and more.

But today, as the history of eSports continue to unfold, media giants such as ESPN and Turner are broadcasting eSports tournaments and competitions. And in 2014, Amazon acquired Twitch, the live streaming video platform that has been and continues to be the leader in online gaming broadcasts. And YouTube also wanted to jump on the live streaming gaming community with the creation of YouTube Gaming.

eSports Market Growth Booming

To put in perspective how big eSports is becoming, a Google search for "lol" does not produce "laughing out loud" as the top result. Instead, it points to League of Legends, one of the most popular competitive games in existence. The game has spawned a worldwide community called the League of Legends Championship Series, more commonly known as LCS or LOL eSports.

What started as friends gathering in each other's homes to host LAN parties and play into the night has become an official network of pro gaming tournaments and leagues with legitimate teams, some of which are even sponsored and have international reach. Organizations such as Denial, AHQ, and MLG have multiple eSports leagues.

And to really understand the scope of all this, consider that the prize pool for the latest Dota 2 tournament was more than $20 million.

Websites even exist for eSports live scores to let people track the competitions in real time if they are unable to watch. There are even fantasy eSports leagues similar to fantasy football, along with the large and growing scene of eSports betting and gambling.

So it's understandable why traditional media companies would want to capitalize on this growing trend just before it floods into the mainstream. Approximately 300 million people worldwide tune in to eSports today, and that number is growing rapidly. By 2020, that number will be closer to 500 million.

eSports Industry Analysis - The Future of the Competitive Gaming Market

Financial institutions are starting to take notice. Goldman Sachs valued eSports at $500 million in 2016 and expects the market will grow at 22% annually compounded over the next three years into a more than $1 billion opportunity.

And industry statistics are already backing this valuation and demonstrating the potential for massive earnings. To illustrate the market value, market growth, and potential earnings for eSports, consider Swedish media company Modern Times Group's $87 million acquisition of Turtle Entertainment, the holding company for ESL. YouTube has made its biggest eSports investment to date by signing a multiyear broadcasting deal with Faceit to stream the latter's Esports Championship Series. And the NBA will launch its own eSports league in 2018.

Of course, as with any growing phenomenon, the question becomes: How do advertisers capitalize? This is especially tricky for eSports because of its audience demographics, which is young, passionate, male-dominated, and digital-first. They live online and on social media, are avid ad-blockers, and don't watch traditional TV or respond to conventional advertising.

So what will the future of eSports look like? How high can it climb? Could it reach the mainstream popularity of baseball or football? How will advertisers be able to reach an audience that does its best to shield itself from advertising?

Robert Elder, research analyst for BI Intelligence, Business Insider's premium research service, has compiled an unparalleled report on the eSports ecosystem that dissects the growing market for competitive gaming. This comprehensive, industry-defining report contains more than 30 charts and figures that forecast audience growth, average revenue per user, and revenue growth.

Companies and organizations mentioned in the report include: NFL, NBA, English Premier League, La Liga, Bundesliga, NHL, Paris Saint-Germain, Ligue 1, Ligue de Football, Twitch, Amazon, YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, ESPN, Electronic Arts, EA Sports, Valve, Riot Games, Activision Blizzard, ESL, Turtle Entertainment, Dreamhack, Modern Times Group, Turner Broadcasting, TBS Network, Vivendi, Canal Plus, Dailymotion, Disney, BAMTech, Intel, Coca Cola, Red Bull, HTC, Mikonet

Here are some eSports industry facts and statistics from the report:

  • eSports is a still nascent industry filled with commercial opportunity.
  • There are a variety of revenue streams that companies can tap into.
  • The market is presently undervalued and has significant room to grow.
  • The dynamism of this market distinguishes it from traditional sports.
  • The audience is high-value and global, and its numbers are rising.
  • Brands can prosper in eSports by following the appropriate game plan.
  • Game publishers approach their Esport ecosystems in different ways.  
  • Successful esport games are comprised of the same basic ingredients.
  • Digital streaming platforms are spearheading the popularity of eSports.
  • Legacy media are investing into eSports, and seeing encouraging results.
  • Traditional sports franchises have a clear opportunity to seize in eSports.
  • Virtual and augmented reality firms also stand to benefit from eSports.  

In full, the report illuminates the business of eSports from four angles:

  • The gaming nucleus of eSports, including an overview of popular esport genres and games; the influence of game publishers, and the spectrum of strategies they adopt toward their respective esport scenes; the role of eSports event producers and the tournaments they operate.
  • The eSports audience profile, its size, global reach, and demographic, psychographic, and behavioral attributes; the underlying factors driving its growth; why they are an attractive target for brands and broadcasters; and the significant audience and commercial crossover with traditional sports.
  • eSports media broadcasters, including digital avant-garde like Twitch and YouTube, newer digital entrants like Facebook and traditional media outlets like Turner’s TBS Network, ESPN, and Canal Plus; their strategies and successes in this space; and the virtual reality opportunity.
  • eSports market economics, with a market sizing, growth forecasts, and regional analyses; an evaluation of the eSports spectacle and its revenue generators, some of which are idiosyncratic to this industry; strategic planning for brand marketers, with case studies; and an exploration of the infinite dynamism and immense potential of the eSports economy.

Interested in getting the full report? Here are two ways to access it:

  1. Subscribe to an All-Access pass to BI Intelligence and gain immediate access to this report and over 100 other expertly researched reports. As an added bonus, you'll also gain access to all future reports and daily newsletters to ensure you stay ahead of the curve and benefit personally and professionally. >> START A MEMBERSHIP
  2. Purchase & download the full report from our research store. >> BUY THE REPORT

Join the conversation about this story »

I spent an hour with Apple's new HomePod smart speaker — here's what it's like (AAPL)

$
0
0

HomePod

  • I got a chance to demo Apple's new HomePod smart speaker.
  • The $350 device went on sale Friday and will begin shipping February 9. 
  • In a short demo, HomePod sounds impressive, but had a few drawbacks: a hefty price tag, limited "smart" abilities, and a reliance on Apple Music. 


After spending an hour demoing Apple's new HomePod smart speaker, I can say one thing with confidence: it sounds incredible. 

I wasn't sure what to expect from the new $350 device, which became available for presale on Friday and starts shipping February 9. After all, HomePod was delayed by several months, and Apple is late to the game on the device in the first place — Sonos, Google, and Amazon have already beaten it to the punch. 

But in my limited time with HomePod, I was impressed. It sounds fantastic on its own, and even better when compared to other high-end smart speakers on the market. From all outward appearances, HomePod is an excellent speaker. 

The only problem is, that might be all that HomePod is. 

Sounds great — and it's loud, too

When HomePod first debuted in June, I was disappointed by how unoriginal the design seemed. It looked to me like a very symmetrical marshmallow, or a chubby, upright Beats Pill. Months later, I'm still not wowed, but I'm coming to understand the advantages of the design. 

From an aesthetic standpoint, there was one design touch I loved. When you activate Siri — either a long touch or a "Hey Siri" — a glowing, multicolored orb will appear, just like Siri on your iPhone. It's a fun little design touch that helps tie in HomePod to Apple's product lineup, plus it adds a little character.

Inside HomePod are seven tweeters spaced evenly around the base of the device and a woofer on top. Apple was aiming for a consistent sound all the way around — whether you're standing next to, in front of, or behind HomePod, it should sound the exact same. I found that to be mostly true, although the shape of the room and proximity of the walls tended to affect the sound in a few instances. 

Overall, HomePod is both louder and better-sounding than I expected. The bass was strong without being too heavy, vocals were crisp and clear, and the overall sound felt somehow bright and energized. I also got a demo of a stereo setup using two HomePods — that functionality is coming later on through a free update — and was blown away. So while I can't give a definitive verdict until testing it for myself, I will say that HomePod gives a great first impression. 

HomePod

A "smart" speaker with limitations

HomePod may be billed as a competitor to Amazon's Echo devices or a Google Home, but it may not be in the same league.  HomePod only works if you have an iOS device. Android users must look elsewhere for a smart speaker.

HomePod uses Siri as its smart assistant, and I will say that it worked almost perfectly throughout the demo (save for a moment when Siri took it upon herself to start playing a podcast). 

But Apple purposefully limited Siri's capabilities on the HomePod. The device only works with a handful of (Apple) apps, like weather, maps, and reminders. The device can do things like tell you the traffic, send and read messages, and set an alarm or timer, but it doesn't work with the calendar or email. You can't ask Siri to read you your appointments or make an event. And while you can make calls using the speaker, you can only do so by dialing on your phone. 

HomePodThere's also the major, almost crippling, limitation on the music side: The device can work with any music streaming service as a typical Bluetooth speaker would, but the Siri part — the "smart" part — only works with Apple Music.

For Apple Music users, this is fantastic. The device learns your musical preferences and picks music it thinks you'll like when you give it a vague direction like, "Hey Siri, play party music." It can also provide information about what you're listening to, like the artist, year the song was released, or more background about the album. 

But for anyone who isn't an Apple Music user, you'll have to control the music from your phone. You can still use HomePod for its other features, but you'll lose out on about half the device's capabilities. 

Oh, and HomePod is tied to its owner's iOS device and Apple Music account, and can't differentiate between voices. This is a bit of a bummer for families or people with roommates, since there's no way to set up multiple user accounts or tailor the music choices to each individual's Apple Music account. 

A new hub for HomeKit

The final piece of the HomePod puzzle is its smart home functionality. For anyone already using HomeKit, the device can serve as your HomeKit hub, and you can use it to control the other smart devices in your home. 

One neat trick is the ability to set up a morning routine. In the demo I saw, saying "Hey Siri, good morning," would trigger a synchronized ballet: the coffee maker turned on, the blinds went up, and the heat turned on in one fell swoop. Asking Siri to then play the news then provided a morning digest from the news source of your choosing. 

None of this is particularly new technology — Google and Amazon devices can do this too — but it certainly makes HomePod more appealing, especially given its other limitations. 

Apple HomePod

An exciting product — so far

After only one hour of seeing HomePod in action, I can't definitively say whether it's worth buying.

But I walked away feeling impressed and surprised by how much I liked how it sounded, and found myself imagining how it would fit into my home life. Still, HomePod seems to have a few obvious limitations: its marriage to Apple Music, its limited functionality, and its steep price.

Until we're able to test it further, there's no way to know whether HomePod's fantastic sound quality outweighs the downsides. 

SEE ALSO: All the new Animojis coming to your iPhone X

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: These inventions will help save the earth

People are using creepy, cutting-edge AI technology to splice Nick Cage into every movie they can think of

$
0
0

nicolas cage james bond ai

  • People are using cutting-edge artificial intelligence technology to splice actor Nicolas Cage's face into a wide assortment movies and TV shows, creating surreal mash-up clips.
  • The same technology has also been used recently to insert the images of female celebrities into pornographic videos without their consent.
  • As the technology improves, it could lead to new forms of art, but it could also be used to attempt to blackmail people or to create fake news stories.


The future is here — and it looks like Nicolas Cage.

Some online users are taking a new kind of artificial intelligence technology and using it to insert the hammy actor into films and TV shows he didn't actually star in — basically into anything and everything they can imagine, from classic James Bond films to scenes from "Game of Thrones." Reddit users began posting about and running with the idea on Thursday after one wondered how long it would be before the AI technology, which has already been put to more unscrupulous uses, was used to create a "full Nic Cage movie"

"That's actually a very very good idea," another Reddit user responded.

While humorous, the clips point to the growing sophistication of the technology — and its potential uses, both good and bad.

The name's Cage, Nicolas Cage

You can now find an assortment of Nick Cage-enhanced clips on the online forum site. In one, Cage becomes James Bond, replacing Sean Connery in the vintage Bond movie "Dr. No."

In another, the actor is transformed into the dour-faced Stannis Baratheon from "Game of Thrones," in place of actor Stephen Dillane.

In yet another, Cage replaces Harrison Ford as Indiana Jones in a pivotal scene from "Raiders of the Lost Ark."

And in a particularly meta video, the fake-Cage appears alongside the real Cage on an episode of Saturday Night Live, replacing actor Andy Sandberg — who was already impersonating the real Cage.

What could be the pièce de résistance, however, is still just an idea: Some Reddit users are discussing recreating fantasy epic "Lord of the Rings" with Cage playing every single character.

(Business Insider isn't linking to the Reddit community where these clips are being shared, because they are intermixed with videos that are objectionable or pose ethical concerns.)

The technology behind the videos is also being used in more nefarious ways

To create their Cage-enhanced videos, Redditors are using a freely available app called FakeApp. They feed it photos of Cage and the video into which they want him inserted. The app uses AI to digitally overlay his face on the video.

Due to variations in face shape, lighting, movement, and the like, some results are more realistic than others — as you can see above. But generally, the more images the app has to work with, the better the results.

But why Nicolas Cage? The actor is famous for his over-the-top performances and has become a meme of sorts in recent years in some corners of the internet. The deliberate incongruity of putting his image in unlikely places offers obvious opportunities for subversive humor.

Nick Cage isn't the first celebrity to get the FakeApp treatment. It's been used on many different ones to place them in videos they didn't actually appear in, often creating highly realistic mash-ups, as Motherboard first reported last month.

It's also been frequently used in much more disturbing ways than having Nick Cage turn into James Bond. In many cases, people have used to FakeApp to insert images of female celebrities into pornographic videos without their consent.

Indeed, in the Reddit community being used to share FakeApp clips, the overwhelming majority of videos being posted are these pornographic ones — not Nicolas Cage videos or other surreal experiments. These explicit videos are akin to "revenge porn" and have to the potential to be humiliating for their unwitting subjects.

Technology such as FakeApp has lots of potential — for good and bad

These videos — both the good and the bad — can be thought of as initial, rudimentary experiments with the technology. But they offer hints of what may come.

On the positive side, experts have predicted that technology such as FakeApp could lead to exciting new forms of art and contribute to the internet's long-established "remix culture." Indeed, it could be used to create whole new genres of media — and lots of new legal conundrums, Francis Tseng, the copublisher of New Inquiry, told Business Insider last summer.

"There could be a lot of interesting [intellectual property] cases if amateur filmmakers start synthesizing films using the likenesses of celebrities and start profiting off that," Teng said. "I can imagine a whole culture of bootleg films produced in this way."

On the flip side, as the technology improves, it will likely be used in more dangerous and antisocial ways. For example, it has the potential to turbo-charge fake news. When paired with technology that can synthesize real people's voices, apps such as FakeApp could make it extremely difficult for ordinary people to distinguish what's real from what's fake.

And such technology could well be used to harass and blackmail people, putting them — virtually — in compromising situations. 

The technology could "lift cyberbullying to a whole new level," Justin Thies, who helped develop Face2face, an earlier experiment in the field, told Business Insider.

At its worst, technology such as FakeApp could undermine the very concept of truth. And all the Nicolas Cages in the world won't be able to save us.

SEE ALSO: AI and CGI will transform information warfare, boost hoaxes, and escalate revenge porn

NOW READ: CGI and AI are going to turbocharge 'fake news' and make it far harder to tell what's real

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: The best phones of 2017 that you can buy right now

'Blue Planet II' producers discovered life where we didn’t know it could exist — here's what that was like

$
0
0

BPII_EP02_The Deep_7 blue planet ii

  • While the "Blue Planet II" team was exploring the Mariana Trench, they managed to film an ethereal snailfish approximately 5,000 meters underwater.
  • No one knew before then that creatures as complex as fish could live in water that deep, surrounded by so much pressure.
  • "The deep is always going to surprise us," said the episode's producer.


The most otherworldly and alien parts of the ocean are in the depths — the Mariana Trench could easily bury Mount Everest.

There's no light when you get into the hadal zone, the deepest part of the ocean. And as narrator Sir David Attenborough says in "The Deep," episode two of the BBC natural history documentary series "Blue Planet II," the pressure at the bottom is equivalent to the force of having 50 jumbo jets stacked on top of one another. Several sea slugs and starfish are somehow able to withstand the pressure, but few creatures can survive down there.

But as the "Blue Planet II" team was filming the episode, they discovered something they'd never expected to see: a fish. Using a remote camera, they captured footage of an ethereal snailfish, a translucent creature slowly swimming through the deep water.

"It's extraordinary" that such a complex animal could exist down there, Orla Doherty, the producer of the episode, told Business Insider. "I feel like we've pushed the boundary of what we know about the ocean just that little bit more."

BPII_EP02_The Deep_5 blue planet

While filming the series, the team spent more than 6,000 hours underwater over four years, visiting 39 countries on 125 expeditions. At least 12 of the discoveries made throughout the filming are being written up in new academic papers.

"As filmmakers, it has been unbelievably exciting to make these films in collaboration and true unity with the scientists who can unlock the secrets to this magical world," said Doherty.

They captured the footage of the snailfish at approximately 8,000 meters down, almost five miles underwater. It was the deepest a fish had been spotted until another team filmed a Mariana snailfish just recently 8,178 meters deep.

According to Doherty, there are probably many more surprises awaiting us down below.

"The deep is the final frontier for discovery here on this planet and there's stuff going on down there that makes you believe you've gone to another planet," she said. "The deep is always going to surprise us."

"Blue Planet II" airs on Saturdays at 9 pm ET on BBC America.

SEE ALSO: The 23 best science movies and shows streaming on Netflix that will make you smarter

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: SpaceX is about to launch its monster Mars rocket for the first time — here's how it stacks up against other rockets

I’m not buying Apple’s HomePod for two main reasons

$
0
0

Apple HomePod

  • Apple's latest major product is about to launch. It's called the HomePod, and it costs $350.
  • The HomePod is a Siri-powered smart speaker, similar to Amazon Echo and Google Home, but it touts sound quality comparable to premium speakers.
  • There are some huge problems with Apple's proposition that limit HomePod's potential appeal.


Apple's HomePod is almost here — you can pre-order one for $350 right now, and Apple says it'll arrive on February 9.

But should you? For me, the answer is an easy no. 

It's not just the high price, or the Sonos Play:3 speaker I own that I'm quite happy with. The problem with Apple's new HomePod for me boils down to two main threads:

  1. The HomePod is only intended for people who use Apple Music, Apple Mail, Apple Maps, and Apple everything else.
  2. Siri, as we all know, is not good. And Siri is the way you interact with HomePod.

HomePod

Like most people, I use a menagerie of electronic devices and services from various companies.

My phone is a Google Pixel, my laptop is a MacBook Air, and my TV is a TCL — it's got a Roku built into it. I have a PC for gaming, which runs Windows 10, and game consoles from Microsoft, Sony, and Nintendo. (Yes, I own too many electronics. I know.)

I use a variety of Google services for mail, and calendar, and maps. I pay for Amazon Prime, and Spotify, and Netflix. I'm kinda all over the place. And that makes Apple's HomePod more or less useless to me. 

Don't use Apple Music? Don't maintain your calendar, mail, maps, and everything else through Apple's version of that service? The HomePod probably isn't very useful to you either.

That's because Apple's intentionally limiting the way the HomePod works with so-called "third-party" apps. If you're, say, a Spotify user, you can use Spotify on the HomePod through AirPlay2. What that means is you go to the app on your phone and manually push it to the HomePod — you can't say, "Hey Siri, play the Black Panther soundtrack." There's no way to set HomePod to default to Spotify, or Tidal, or whatever other service you'd like to use with voice control. The only way to use them — if they're supported, that is — is through manual input.

And doesn't that kind of defeat the purpose of having a voice-controlled smart speaker?

Apple HomePod

Perhaps more worrying is the fact that Siri, in general, is pretty terrible at its intended function: hearing human speech and translating it into actions. 

In fairness to Apple, no one really has voice recognition figured out completely. Amazon's Echo (with its voice assistant "Alexa") and Google's Home (with "Google Assistant") have many similar faults, whether we're talking about mishearing commands, not understanding them, or not being able to do what you want them to do. And none of these so-called "digital assistants" functions like an actual assistant— proactively adding structure and organization to your life — so much as they're executing commands by voice. 

All that said, based on my experience with Apple's Siri across several iPhones, I don't have much faith in the HomePod version of Siri to accurately recognize my voice every time. It doesn't always work when I'm carefully holding an iPhone next to my face — why should it work any better across a large room, potentially filled with other noises?

siri

Maybe Apple will add support for more third-party services, like Spotify and Uber. Maybe Apple will add the ability to set Google services as your default mail, calendar, map, and weather service. Maybe.

My guess is that stuff isn't changing any time soon, but I'd love to be wrong about that.

What's more likely is that Siri will get better over time. The HomePod will assuredly help Apple improve Siri's functionality as users spend more and more time speaking to their new smart speakers. 

But without support for a wider range of services — one that recognizes the reality we live in where most people use a variety of different services and devices from many different companies — the HomePod makes no sense for me. 

SEE ALSO: 7 reasons you shouldn't buy Apple's HomePod right now

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Here are the best iPhone apps of 2017

All 49 of Netflix's notable original movies, ranked from worst to best

$
0
0

netflix brightAs Netflix will be releasing 80 new original films over the course of 2018, it's worthwhile to take stock of all that the service currently offers. 

While the company's first entry into the realm of big-budget films, the Will Smith-led "Bright," has been scorched by critics, Netflix CEO Reed Hastings has hailed the fantasy-action thriller as a commercial success that critics are "disconnected" from. 

On the opposite end of the critical spectrum, Dee Rees' period drama "Mudbound" recently earned the company four Oscar nominations in a record haul that appears to have legitimized Netflix as an awards season contender for feature films.

To figure out which Netflix original films are actually worth watching, we turned to the reviews aggregator Rotten Tomatoes to rank each release by its composite critical reception. We excluded documentaries and any film that didn't have enough reviews to receive a designation of "Rotten" or "Fresh," and we used audience scores to break ties.

Here are 49 of Netflix's original films, ranked from worst to best, according to critics:

SEE ALSO: All 54 of Netflix's notable original shows, ranked from worst to best

49. “The Ridiculous 6” — 0%

Critic score: 0%

Audience score: 31%

Netflix description: "When his outlaw dad is kidnapped, Tommy 'White Knife' Stockburn sets off across the West on a rescue mission with five brothers he never knew he had."



48. “The True Memoirs of an International Assassin” — 0%

Critic score: 0%

Audience score: 42%

Netflix description: "After his publisher markets his crime novel as a memoir, a novice author finds himself forcibly recruited into a deadly political plot in Venezuela."



47. “The Do-Over” — 5%

Critic score: 5%

Audience score: 42%

Netflix description: "The life of a bank manager is turned upside down when a friend from his past manipulates him into faking his own death and taking off on an adventure."



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

The 15 Oscar best-picture winners that made the most money at the US box office

$
0
0

forrest gump

As the 2018 Academy Awards draw closer, it's time to dive into the numbers and check out which of the best-picture winners are the biggest moneymakers of all time at the box office.

There are some obvious ones here, but thanks to inflation, there are a few titles that may surprise you.

Here are the top 15.

Note: All box-office figures are domestic grosses only and include any earnings from rereleases. All figures are from Box Office Mojo.

SEE ALSO: 5 reasons "Wonder Woman" was one of the most important films of 2017, and deserved a best picture Oscar nomination

15. "The Best Years of Our Lives" (1946) — $504.9 million

Unadjusted: $24 million



14. “Rocky” (1976) — $505 million

Unadjusted: $117 million



13. “Lawrence of Arabia (1962) — $508 million

Unadjusted: $45 million



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

Rapper 50 Cent reportedly made millions selling his album for bitcoin

$
0
0

50 cent cantor fitzgerald

  • The rapper 50 Cent accepted bitcoin as payment for his 2014 album, "Animal Ambition," according to TMZ.
  • The 700 bitcoins he is said to have raked in are now worth $7 million to $8.5 million, and he reportedly hasn't offloaded his stake yet.


50 Cent looks to have figured out a way to make a killing in the struggling music industry, and it involves everyone's favorite cryptocurrency.

The rapper, best known for his string of chart-topping hits in the early 2000s, accepted bitcoin as payment for his 2014 album, "Animal Ambition," according to a report from TMZ. The digital currency was worth roughly $662 a coin back then, and TMZ cited sources as saying 50 Cent was able to rake in 700 bitcoins.

Now that the red-hot cryptocurrency has exploded higher, trading at about $11,300, a 700-bitcoin stash would be worth $7 million to $8.5 million, TMZ calculates.

This wouldn't be 50 Cent's first time finding himself in a lucrative investment situation. About a decade ago, he became a minority shareholder and celebrity spokesman for VitaminWater, only to make a whopping $100 million after taxes after its parent company was purchased for $4.1 billion, according to Forbes.

While 50 Cent certainly seems to have been ahead of the curve in terms of transacting bitcoin, he would not be alone. In a recent op-ed article for Business Insider, the Seattle Seahawks superstar Richard Sherman said his online store started accepting the cryptocurrency "long before people were campaigning for Amazon to allow virtual currencies as a payment method."

Screen Shot 2018 01 24 at 9.19.05 AM

SEE ALSO: One of Wall Street's best stock pickers shares his secrets for crushing the market

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Microsoft President Brad Smith says the US shouldn't get 'too isolationist'

The 15 most beloved best-picture nominees that got robbed of their Oscars by mediocre movies

$
0
0

There will be blood

The Oscars determine the best in filmmaking. 

Or do they? Often, best picture winners don't line up with the most beloved movie of the year by fans, or even critics. 

Although many of the most iconic movies in American cinema have been nominated for best picture, some didn't win. But they're loved so much and held in such high regard that you might assume they did. 

Some years were competitive — which is why "There Will Be Blood" lost the best picture win to "No Country for Old Men."

But some votes made by the Academy don't make any sense at all. Some years, the best picture winner was a movie you've probably never heard of. Or worse, sometimes it was a movie that's now considered terrible, like 2005 when "Crash" was awarded best picture instead of "Brokeback Mountain."

Here are the most beloved best picture nominees that didn't actually win:

SEE ALSO: 5 reasons 'Wonder Woman' was one of the most important films of 2017, and deserved a best picture Oscar nomination

"Citizen Kane"

Year: 1942, at the 14th Academy Awards

What beat it: "How Green Was My Valley"

"Citizen Kane," even to those who have not seen it, is one of the most recognizable films of all time, and it didn't even win best picture. A film doesn't have to have "best picture winner" next to its name in order to be iconic, and this movie is a great example. 



"The Graduate"

Year: 1968, at the 40th Academy Awards

What beat it: "In the Heat of the Night"

"The Graduate" is one of the most iconic films in American cinema. From the Simon & Garfunkel soundtrack, to the cinematography, to its performances, it quickly became one of those movies that is studied in film class, and is still quoted today. 



"2001: A Space Odyssey"

Year: 1969, at the 41st Academy Awards

What beat it: "Oliver!"

To this day, Stanley Kubrick's revolutionary space odyssey film looks decades ahead of its time. And a mediocre musical beat it. 



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

Trump strikes back at Jay-Z after the rapper criticized his vulgar reference to black-majority countries

$
0
0

jay z

  • President Donald Trump tweeted at Jay-Z on Sunday morning, telling him that the unemployment rate among Black Americans is at a record low.
  • Trump's comment came a day after Jay-Z criticized the president's use of a vulgar term to describe African countries, Haiti, and El Salvador during immigration negotiations.


President Donald Trump tweeted at hip-hop icon Shawn "Jay-Z" Carter on Sunday morning, telling him that the unemployment rate among Black Americans is at a record low.

"Somebody please inform Jay-Z that because of my policies, Black Unemployment has just been reported to be at the LOWEST RATE EVER RECORDED!" Trump wrote.

Trump's tweet was apparently in response to comments Jay-Z made during a CNN interview on Saturday that were critical of the president's reported use of a vulgar term to describe African countries, Haiti, and El Salvador during immigration negotiations earlier this month.

"Everyone feels anger, but after the anger it's really hurtful because he's looking down on a whole population of people and he's so misinformed because these places have beautiful people," the mogul told CNN host Van Jones.

Trump's January 11 remark, in which he asked a bipartisan group of senators why the US wants "all these people from shithole countries coming here," sparked widespread criticism from leaders on both sides of the aisle and around the world. Many accused the president of being a racist.

Jay-Z called Trump's comment, first reported by the Washington Post, "disappointing and hurtful."

Jones asked Jay Z whether it was okay for the president "to say terrible things but put money in our pockets," referring to Trump's claims about the black unemployment rate. Jay-Z said it is not.

"It's not about money at the end of the day," the rapper said. "Money doesn't equate to happiness. It doesn't. That's missing the whole point. You treat people like human beings. That's the main point."

Jones shot back at Trump on Twitter, saying he "ALREADY asked Jay Z whether black employment figures redeem Trump’s presidency," and that Jay-Z's answer was "POWERFUL."

SEE ALSO: 'Your mouth is the foulest shithole in the world': Trump's comments ignite fire and fury from officials

DON'T MISS: How Jay-Z's 'absolutely contagious' entrepreneurial spirit turned him into a mogul worth over $800 million

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: The biggest risks facing the world in 2018

'Maze Runner: The Death Cure' has no trouble winning the weekend box office (FOXA)

$
0
0

maze runner death cure 20th Century Fox

  • Fox's "Maze Runner: The Death Cure" won the weekend box office.
  • It was also a strong weekend for Fox's Oscar-nominated movies.


Just in case you haven't been keeping track, we've now hit movie number three in the "Maze Runner" franchise.

20th Century Fox's YA dystopian sci-fi franchise opened "Maze Runner: The Death Cure" this weekend in theaters and won the weekend box office with an estimated $23.5 million, according to boxofficepro.com.

Despite the lowest opening of the three movies in the franchise, all three opened at No. 1 domestically.

That knocked off Sony's "Jumanji: Welcome to the Jungle," which had been atop the domestic box office for weeks.

The actioner led by Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson and Kevin Hart came in second place with $16.4 million. It's now taken in over $338 million in North America, that's third best all-time for a Sony release, passing 2007's "Spider-Man 3" ($336.5 million).

Playing on over 3,700 screens, "The Death Cure" didn't have much competition to worry about. Besides "Jumanji," mostly audiences are catching up on watching the Oscar-nominated titles, as most have finally begun to play in wide release.

But an Oscar contender that was shut out of this year's nominations came in third place this weekend, the Christian Bale Western, "Hostiles," which took in $10.2 million.

"The Death Cure" wasn't the only strong performer for Fox. "The Greatest Showman" ($9.5 million) and "The Post" ($8.85 million) ended in fourth and fifth place, respectively.

And the Oscar nominated titles from Fox Searchlight also performed well as "The Shape of Water" took in $5.7 million and "Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri" earned $3.6 million. Both were up over 80% in ticket sales (161% for "Shape of Water") compared to last week.

SEE ALSO: How Danny McBride helped a 26-year veteran assistant director finally get his first shot in the director's chair

DON'T MISS: Here's the complete list of the 2018 Oscar nominations

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: 7 science-backed ways for a happier and healthier 2018 — this is what you do the very first week

How the 'Blue Planet II' production team dealt with a leak when their sub was 1,500 feet deep in Antarctic waters

$
0
0

BPII_EP02_The Deep_BTS_5 blue planet ii

  • The "Blue Planet II" production team's submersible sprung a leak when they were almost 1,500 feet deep in Antarctic waters.
  • Fortunately, they were able to discover the cause and to conduct repairs underwater.
  • Pushing the envelope is necessary to discover something new and show unseen parts of the world, according to one of the show's producers, but they managed to do that without anyone getting hurt.


Water started to pool on the submersible floor almost 1,500 feet deep into the first dive the "Blue Planet II" production team took in Antarctic waters.

A quick taste revealed it was salty, leaking in from the frigid seas outside.

"That wasn't on the schedule for that day," Orla Doherty, producer of the episode examining life in "the deep," told Business Insider.

As Doherty said in a behind-the-scenes featurette from the episode, it's a bit concerning to discover that half an hour into a dive — when it takes 30 minutes to get back to the surface — that there's water coming in.

Fortunately, within 20 minutes, the sub's pilot was able to trace the problem to a faulty pressure gauge, which allowed them to repair the leak and resume their examination of the underwater world.

BPII_EP02_The Deep_BTS_7 blue planet ii

"The way I see it is that I thought it was our duty to put ourselves in extraordinary situations because we wanted to show the extraordinary and you can't do that from your desk in the UK, you've got to get out there and go to these places," said Doherty.

And show the extraordinary they did. The team dove deeper than anyone else ever had in those waters, and revealed that the freezing seas below the most remote and extreme environment on the planet teem with life.

"To film in Antarctica, to really try and do something that humans haven't done before, there's going to be risks," said Doherty.

But it's not risk for the sake of risk, she said.

"Never think that we're just saying, 'oh let's get out there and do something wild.'"

In spending 6,000 hours underwater over four years, traveling to 39 countries to mount 125 expeditions,  and covering every ocean in the world, there were no serious injuries, according to Doherty.

"We're not out there to push the envelope just for the sake of it, we're out there to do it to tell a new story, but as importantly, to do it with safety as the number one priority," she said.

"Blue Planet II" airs at 9 pm ET on Saturdays on BBC America.

SEE ALSO: The 23 best science movies and shows streaming on Netflix that will make you smarter

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: 5 common 'facts' about Earth that everyone gets wrong

JIM ROSS: Here's who will take over WWE after Vince McMahon

$
0
0

For decades, WWE has ruled supreme as the world's number-one "sports entertainment" company.

In 1982, Vince McMahon bought the company that would eventually become WWE from his father, and he's run the empire ever since. Today he is the Chairman and CEO, and he also occasionally appears on television as his "Mr. McMahon" character. 

Now 72, McMahon still oversees every aspect of the company, but some have begun to speculate regarding who might take over his role, assuming he ever decides to step down. We asked WWE Hall of Famer Jim Ross, a part-time WWE employee whose relationship with the company spans decades, what he sees as the most likely outcome.

Ross is currently promoting the release of his new book 
"Slobberknocker: My Life in Wrestling," which he wrote with Paul O'Brien. Following is a transcript of the video.

Jim Ross
: I have an opinion on where
the company will go. I will say this — you know, Vince is very healthy. He still works out like a crazy man. He really takes care of himself. So, he ain't going anywhere soon. We don't want him to go anywhere soon. He's the rock that built that thing. He's the rudder in the water. It's an amazing company.

[Jim Ross is a legendary WWE announcer and executive. He wrote a new memoir about his career in wrestling]

I think that, if I'm guessing, and it's gonna strictly be a guess — that the money would be on, probably, Paul Levesque to be Vince's successor.

[Paul Levesque is better known as "Triple H." He's one of the most popular WWE superstars in history. And he's married to Vince's daughter Stephanie McMahon.]

I think Vince is kind of 
preparing him for that in a lot of ways. You always knew that he was different from the other guys because he was very studious, and very – under control. He didn’t drink. No drugs. He looked to be a lifer early on, and he got a lot of that from being a fan all his life growing up in the northeast — New Hampshire. Then, getting trained by Killer Kowalski who was a great, old-school guy. So, I think he's probably the heir apparent.

[Levesque is WWE's EVP of Talent, Live Events, and Creative. He also runs WWE's developmental promotion known as NXT]

Stephanie is very involved and, you know, is really more of a face of WWE. She does a lot of charity work.  And she's great at that. And you've got to have that in that world.

[Stephanie's older brother Shane also works for WWE]

I think Shane seems to be, apparently, content with being a TV character. I don't know where his role's gonna be going forward or what he wants it to be. But, I think that Paul Levesque is the one that seems to be earmarked to be the next guy, if and when Vince is not in that role. 

But Vince is a — he's a unique cat, man. For him to get a publicly traded company in wrestling — are you kidding? Think of the image that wrestling has had for so many years. And I will tell you that if Vince had not rehabilitated the image of sports entertainment and made it a global brand, there's just no way in hell I'd even be sitting here talking to you. I wouldn't even —I would be unknown!

He made all of us known and he created a Walt Disney empire with bodyslams and headlocks and the actors playing the role of their own stuntmen. It's been an amazing metamorphosis, how that's evolved. And I don't believe that there's ever been a more brilliant entrepreneur than Vince McMahon in any walk of life. Think about it. Smokey old arenas — the image that wrestling had. "Oh, that rasslin' stuff’s all fake! Aw, nobody watch rasslin’.”

All of a sudden, he's in over a hundred countries and 40 languages or something and it’s big-time. And I just think that what he's done, without me kissing his behind – I've done that, too, on television. In the world that he was managing and pulling out of, he had to be tough. You know, he's a brilliant man.

Join the conversation about this story »


LIVE: Here are all the winners of the 2018 Grammy Awards

$
0
0

Kendrick Lamar

The 60th Grammy Awards take place Sunday night at Madison Square Garden in New York City.

James Corden is hosting the show for the second year in a row, while rappers Jay-Z and Kendrick Lamar lead the field of nominees with eight and seven nominations, respectively. 

Below are all the winners from Sunday night's live broadcast, which we'll update as the show goes on: 

SEE ALSO: The 21 music artists with the most Grammy awards of all time

Best Rap/Sung Performance:

"PRBLMS" — 6LACK
"Crew" — Goldlink Featuring Brent Faiyaz & Shy Glizzy
"Family Feud" — Jay-Z Featuring Beyoncé
"LOYALTY." — Kendrick Lamar Featuring Rihanna - WINNER
"Love Galore" — SZA Featuring Travis Scott



Album Of The Year:

“Awaken, My Love!” — Childish Gambino
"4:44" — Jay-Z
"DAMN." — Kendrick Lamar
"Melodrama" — Lorde
"24K Magic" — Bruno Mars



Record Of The Year:

“Redbone” — Childish Gambino
“Despacito” — Luis Fonsi & Daddy Yankee Featuring Justin Bieber
“The Story Of O.J.” — Jay-Z
“HUMBLE.” — Kendrick Lamar
“24K Magic” — Bruno Mars



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

Hillary Clinton read an excerpt of 'Fire and Fury' in a Grammys skit mocking Trump, and Nikki Haley was furious about it

$
0
0

hillary clinton

  • Hillary Clinton read an excerpt of Michael Wolff's "Fire and Fury" book on the Trump administration in a skit at the Grammy Awards on Sunday.
  • She joined artists Snoop Dogg, Cardi B, and DJ Khaled in the pre-recorded skit.
  • Watch the clip below.

 

Hillary Clinton made an appearance in a pre-recorded skit at the Grammy Awards that mocked President Trump. 

In the skit, the former Democratic presidential candidate read passages from Michael Wolff's controversial book "Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House." Music artists like Snoop Dogg, Cardi B, and DJ Khaled also read excerpts.

Among the many reacting to the segment on social media, US Ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley was quick to criticize the "Fire and Fury" skit on Twitter.

"I have always loved the Grammys but to have artists read the Fire and Fury book killed it. Don’t ruin great music with trash. Some of us love music without the politics thrown in it," Haley wrote. She also wrote "that part ruined the Grammys. Such a shame."

Last week, Haley shot down a rumor that she was having an affair with Trump that stemmed from Wolff's book.

Wolff told HBO's Bill Maher that in writing his book he was "absolutely sure" Trump was having an affair, and Politico readers zeroed in on a single sentence in the text that mentioned Trump "spending a notable amount of time with Haley on Air Force One." Haley called the rumor "highly offensive" and "disgusting" in a Politico interview on Friday.

Watch Clinton's cameo in the skit below:

SEE ALSO: Here are all the winners of the 2018 Grammy Awards

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Here's how easy it is for the US president to launch a nuclear weapon

Nikki Haley, who recently shot down a ‘disgusting rumor’ about her and Trump spawned by Michael Wolff, was not a fan of the Grammy’s 'Fire and Fury’ skit

$
0
0

Clinton grammys

  • The Grammys featured Hillary Clinton among others reading sections from explosive Trump administration book, "Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House."
  • US Ambassador to the UN, Nikki Haley, tweeted that she was upset to see the Michael Wolff book and politics brought up during the awards show.
  • Wolff has suggested that Haley had an affair with Trump, something which Haley vigorously denies and finds offensive.


The 60th Grammy Awards took place in New York City on Sunday night, and while much of the world saw the most popular musicians and performers make light of the event, US Ambassador to the UN Nikki Haley was not impressed.

"Every year, the Recording Academy has honored the best spoken word album," comedian James Corden, the host of the event explained. "Bill Clinton has won a Grammy. Barack Obama has won a Grammy. Hillary Clinton, Jimmy Carter, and Al Gore all have Grammys," Corden said.

"We know that our current President does love winning awards and the good news for him is he may just be the subject of next year's winner," said Corden, referencing the explosive "Fire and Fury" tell-all from reporter Michael Wolff. The book made waves early this year for claiming President Donald Trump's campaign was woefully unprepared for office.

"The question I've got is, who will be the narrator?” asked Corden before cutting to a clip of auditions for the role of narrator, wherein he settles on Hillary Clinton for the part.

"He had a longtime fear of being poisoned. One reason why he likes to eat at McDonald's. Nobody knew he was coming and the food was safely pre-made," Clinton read from the book.

While the excerpts shared at the awards ceremony were mainly lighthearted quips about Trump's hair or food preference, one viewer was decidedly offended: Haley.

"I have always loved the Grammys but to have artists read the Fire and Fury book killed it. Don’t ruin great music with trash. Some of us love music without the politics thrown in it," tweeted Haley

FILE PHOTO: U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley speaks at UN headquarters in New York, NY, U.S., January 2, 2018. REUTERS/Lucas Jackson/File Photo

But Haley may have a personal reason for her disgust. 

In a recent interview with Politico, Haley was confronted by a thin rumor put forth by Wolff following the release of his book, namely that she had an affair with Trump, and he, a political neophyte, was training her, a career public servant, "for a national political future."

Haley dismissed the rumor as "highly offensive" and "disgusting."

When Haley was picked one of Trump's top diplomats in December, 2016, the Washington Post reported Trump had made his cabinet decisions, both men and women, largely based on looks.

SEE ALSO: Here are all the winners of the 2018 Grammy Awards

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: A Georgetown professor explains how Martin Luther King Jr. 'has been severely whitewashed'

The hottest 30 video games you shouldn't miss in 2018

$
0
0

Between "Super Mario Odyssey," "PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds," "Horizon Zero Dawn," and "The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild," it's going to be hard to top 2017's game line-up.

But 2018 has some massive games of its own.

Red Dead Redemption 2

From major new Nintendo games to highly-anticipated sequels, 2018 is full of promising new games. As such, we've put together a thorough list of games that should officially be on your radar in the coming months.

Perhaps we forgot your favorite game? Let us know! This list will be updated over time, and your contribution is much appreciated!

SEE ALSO: A ton of great games came out in 2017 — these are the 10 best

1. "Dragon Ball Fighter Z"

If you even remotely care about the "Dragon Ball" universe, you probably already know what "Dragon Ball Fighter Z" is. Even if you don't, you should: It's a gorgeous, unique fighting game that doesn't require a burning passion for anime to enjoy.

The game plays out similarly to the "Marvel vs Capcom" franchise, with each player selecting a team of three to fight as. You can switch between that trio during a match — matches play out in 2.5D, where the fight is on a 2D plane but the visuals are in gorgeous 3D. If you're a "Dragon Ball" fan you'll enjoy it more, but this one looks like a delight for anyone who enjoys a good fighting game period.

Release Date: January 26, 2018

Platforms: Xbox One, PlayStation 4, PC



2. "Monster Hunter: World"

"Monster Hunter: World" is the latest major entry in the long-running, cult-classic "Monster Hunter" series. 

If you're wondering what the game is about, look no further than the on-the-nose name: You hunt monsters, repeatedly, in the third-person. This is a game about exploring a massive world and taking down its massive monsters. You can do that alone, or you can do that with up to four friends, but the goal remains the same: Murder monsters, take the loot you get from those monsters, and use it to take down more monsters. 

Release Date: January 26, 2018

Platforms: Xbox One, PlayStation 4, PC (release date unknown for PC version)



3. "Shadow of the Colossus"

In 2018, the best game from 2005 arrives on the PlayStation 4. It's called "Shadow of the Colossus," and it's getting a gorgeous remake on the PlayStation 4.

When the game originally launched on the PlayStation 2 in 2005, it was a revelation for PlayStation 2 owners. Though it may look like a standard video game, "Shadow of the Colossus" is anything but — the diminutive character you see above is who you play as, and he's got an objective: Take down gigantic monsters. But why? And what are these "monsters"? Are they monsters, or is he, for murdering them? 

Release Date: February 6

Platforms: PlayStation 4



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

Alec Baldwin defended Woody Allen by comparing Dylan Farrow to a character in 'To Kill a Mockingbird' who lies about being raped

$
0
0

Alec Baldwin

  • Alec Baldwin has come to director Woody Allen's defense on Twitter.
  • Allen's adopted daughter Dylan Farrow has long accused him of sexually abusing her when she was a child. 
  • In a series of tweets, Baldwin compared Dylan to a character in the novel "To Kill a Mockingbird" who lies about being raped. 

 

As more actors denounce director Woody Allen, Alec Baldwin is publicly standing with him.

Dylan Farrow, Allen's adopted daughter, has long accused Allen of sexually abusing her when she was seven years old. And since the #MeToo movement has come to prominence in Hollywood, many actors have either said they would never work with Allen again, or in some cases, donated their salaries from his movies to charity.

But not Alec Baldwin.

Baldwin, who has starred in several of Allen's films including "To Rome with Love" and "Blue Jasmine," posted a series of tweets on Sunday in support of Allen. In the tweets, Baldwin compared Dylan to Mayella Ewell, a character in the classic novel "To Kill a Mockingbird" who lies about being raped. 

Allen has always denied the allegations from Dylan Farrow. Allen and Dylan's brother Moses  whom Baldwin mentions in one of the tweets — say that Dylan's mother, Mia Farrow, brainwashed her into telling this story to get revenge on Allen for cheating on her with their other adopted daughter, Soon-Yi. Allen had an affair with Soon-Yi and has been married to her for 20 years.

SEE ALSO: Dylan Farrow gave emotional, disturbingly detailed allegations of sexual assault by Woody Allen in her first TV interview

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: An exercise scientist explains what everyone gets wrong about stretching

Viewing all 102919 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images