Quantcast
Channel: Business Insider
Viewing all 103365 articles
Browse latest View live

Time is running out — there is just one week left to nab your IGNITION early-bird ticket

$
0
0

henry and jeff bezos

We're only three months away from IGNITION, Business Insider's flagship conference on the future of digital.

Pick up your ticket now and save 25% with our early-bird pricing. These low rates expire next Wednesday, September 7, so act now to save big.

Don't miss the opportunity to hear from some of the greatest innovators in digital, including:

  • Sir Martin Sorrell, CEO, WPP
  • SY Lau, Sr. EVP; President, Tencent; Online Media Group
  • James Murdoch, CEO, 21st Century Fox
  • Mathias Döpfner, chairman and CEO, Axel Springer SE
  • Peter Moore, chief competition officer, EA
  • Kevin Lin, COO, Twitch
  • Randall L. Stephenson, chairman and CEO, AT&T
  • Jeff Bewkes, chairman and CEO, Time Warner Inc.
  • Julia Boorstin, senior media and entertainment correspondent, CNBC
  • Nathan Blecharczyk, cofounder and CTO, Airbnb
  • Barry Diller, chairman and senior executive, IAC and Expedia Inc.
  • David Kenny, general manager, IBM Watson
  • Ann Lewnes, EVP and CMO, Adobe
  • Miguel McKelvey, cofounder and CCO, WeWork
  • Adam Neumann, cofounder and CEO, WeWork
  • Raja Rajamannar, Global CMO, MasterCard
  • Chuck Robbins, CEO, Cisco
  • Dave Finocchio, founder and CEO, Bleacher Report
  • Andrew Bosworth, VP of engineering, Facebook
  • and more!

Get your tickets today to capture the early-bird rate before it expires!

  

Join the conversation about this story »


The 20 richest celebrities in the world

$
0
0

2x1 20 richest celebrities in the world

Between endorsement deals, royalty payments, fat salaries, and a multitude of side hustles, celebrities' net worths can skyrocket into the hundreds of millions.

Wealth-X, a firm that conducts research on the super-wealthy, culled its data to compile a list of the 20 richest celebrities, considering only actors, musicians, and professional athletes who are still working today. That means billionaires like Oprah and Michael Jordan — who are in more managerial roles rather than performance roles — weren't considered for this list, and neither were people who work primarily behind the scenes, like directors and producers.

Though no one on this list cracked billionaire status, the top two names — pop star Madonna and professional golfer Tiger Woods — are close, with $910 million and $900 million in the bank, respectively. Jerry Seinfeld came in at No. 3, with a net worth of $860 million, making him the wealthiest comedian and actor in the world.

From Academy Award-winning actors to rappers-turned-producers, here are the wealthiest celebrities still in the game:

SEE ALSO: The 50 richest people on earth

DON'T MISS: The 20 most common hobbies of the richest people in the world

20. Gloria Estefan

Age: 59

Net worth: $380 million

Profession: Musician

Country: US

Listeners across the US first took notice of Gloria Estefan in the mid-1980s as the face of Miami Sound Machine, the pop-disco-salsa fusion band started by her husband, Emilio Estefan.

The Estefans turned the Latin pop group, originally a Spanish wedding band, into a mainstream hit machine. Gloria eventually went solo, Emilio started a record label, and the pair earned a combined 26 Grammys throughout their careers.

Gloria and Emilio reside in a four-bedroom home in Miami complete with a library, gym, and separate guest villa — but it wasn't always that way. Both Estefans emigrated from Cuba as children during Fidel Castro's reign in the 1950s and '60s and grew up with nothing.

Their music careers brought the pair affluence, and other ventures have padded their net worth further, including their multimedia entertainment company Estefan Enterprises, a stake in the Miami Dolphins, and ownership of a string of hotels and restaurants across Florida.

In 2013, the Estefans' story also became permanently preserved in "On Your Feet!" — a Broadway musical the couple produced themselves.



19. Tyler Perry

Age: 46

Net worth: $390 million

Profession: Actor

Country: US

Playwright-turned-Hollywood-producer Tyler Perry is the creator of a popular stage play series he later adapted for film.

Perry has portrayed the frequent title character, Madea, an outspoken elderly black woman, in nearly two dozen plays and films since the late 1990s. To date, 16 Perry-branded films have grossed more than $765 million at the box office on budgets as low as $10 million.

Perry, who is based in Atlanta, established Tyler Perry Studios 10 years ago and is the creator of seven TV shows, four of which currently air on the Oprah Winfrey Network, including the hit drama "The Haves and the Have Nots" and the sitcom "Love Thy Neighbor."



18. Mel Gibson

Age: 60

Net worth: $400 million

Profession: Actor

Country: Australia

Born in New York but raised in Australia, Mel Gibson got his start acting when he attended the National Institute of Dramatic Art in Sydney.

After graduating in 1977, Gibson landed his first film role in "Summer City," a job that only paid him $400. He went on to act in a number of Australian plays and movies, including the "Mad Max" trilogy, before making a name for himself in the states.

A versatile actor, Gibson early on starred in films including "Hamlet" and the "Lethal Weapon" series, in which he received a $30 million paycheck for the fourth film.

In 1989, he expanded his résumé to include producer and director when he cofounded Icon Productions. He produced, directed, and acted in "Braveheart," which landed him two Academy Awards, for best picture and best director.

Gibson's biggest financial hit to date is "The Passion of the Christ," the 2004 religious epic he produced and directed. Though the film stirred some controversy, it only cost about $30 million to make and raked in nearly $612 million worldwide.



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

The 'Stranger Things' kids reunite on 'The Tonight Show' to settle Barb's fate

$
0
0

barb returns to stranger things tonight show with jimmy fallon nbc

Warning: Spoilers if you haven't watched Netflix's "Stranger Things."

Jimmy Fallon joined the cast of Netflix's hit series "Stranger Things" on Tuesday's "Tonight Show" to hear what the departed character Barb thinks of her fate.

Played by Shannon Purser on the show, Barb was Nancy's (Natalia Dyer) best friend. She accompanied Nancy on a secret night out with Steve (Joe Keery) and ended up becoming a victim of the show's monster.

One can imagine she would feel a lot of resentment about being captured by the monster while helping her friend, and about the fact that the search for her played second fiddle to the saving of Will (Noah Schnapp).

In the "Tonight Show" sketch, Fallon played Steve, and one of the show's writers, AD Miles, played a returned (and angry) Barb. They were joined by show stars Finn Wolfhard (Mike), Gaten Matarazzo (Dustin), Caleb McLaughlin (Lucas), and Millie Bobby Brown (Eleven).

"What the f---! You forget about something? You forget about ol' Barb?" Miles' Barb yells at the kids.

"There were two people down there, and you rescued one of them," she continues, flashing her middle finger. "Do the math, a-------."

The kids take turns trying to explain why they didn't prioritize saving her. But in this version, Barb gets the last laugh.

After confirming she won't be back for the show's recently announced second season, she has bigger news.

"Barb's getting her own Netflix spinoff: 'Orange Is the New B----,'" she says.

Watch "Barb" return to "Stranger Things":

SEE ALSO: Bill Nye is getting his own Netflix show that will bust common science myths

DON'T MISS: The 10 best and worst TV shows this summer

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Netflix just dropped a new 'Luke Cage' trailer and it looks incredible

One of Nintendo's best games ever is getting a new version

$
0
0

One of the best games that Nintendo's ever made is heading to one of Nintendo's most popular platforms: the 3DS.

Super Mario

Nintendo announced on Thursday morning that its beloved "Super Mario Maker" game is heading to the Nintendo 3DS, the Japanese game company's handheld console. 

You remember "Super Mario Maker," don't you? It's the incredible game for Nintendo's Wii U game console that lets you create and play Super Mario levels from the original game through to the latest iteration of the series. 

It's basically infinite Super Mario, and now it's heading to a handheld you can bring anywhere with you!

Super Mario Maker for Nintendo 3DS

The game lets you play and create Mario levels from the following classic Mario games:

  • "Super Mario Bros." (the original on NES)
  • "Super Mario Bros. 3"
  • "Super Mario World"
  • "New Super Mario Bros."

As seen in the image above, you can place individual Super Mario items in the world using the 3DS stylus. From there, you can easily playtest your levels as you're going. 

After creating your masterpiece, you can upload that level for the world to play! Or you can spend time playing other peoples' levels! Or you can play one of the over 100 levels that Nintendo's making for the game!

Super Mario Maker for Nintendo 3DS

In the move from Nintendo's Wii U to the 3DS, Nintendo is subtracting a few features from the game. You can't search by Course ID anymore, meaning you'll have to leave it up to the game to select new levels for you to play. This also means that if you create a course, you can't easily share it with your friends online. And that's a bummer!

Super Mario Maker for Nintendo 3DS

The game also won't function with every level that was created in the Wii U game, though the majority of those levels will work on the 3DS game as well. On the upside, you're able to share incomplete levels with friends locally and collaborate on a level together! And that's pretty rad!

The game arrives on December 2, 2016, on the Nintendo 3DS handheld console.

SEE ALSO: RANKED: The 10 best Super Mario games of all time

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: The 11 best games from the '90s

Michael Fassbender's great new movie is exactly what Hollywood needs to make more of

$
0
0

Michael Fassbender and Alicia Vikander in The Light Between Oceans

At first glance, "The Light Between Oceans" is just another tearjerker.

It's a sad story about a couple who fall in love and live alone in a lighthouse, but aren't able to have a child. Its sadness seems calculated.

But it isn’t. Directed by Derek Cianfrance — who made the most devastating romance in the past decade, “Blue Valentine” — it’s a deep, nuanced, and sincere love story and morality tale.

And it has exactly the type of authenticity Hollywood is missing in most of its movies.

“The Light Between Oceans” is based on the best-selling book of the same name by M. L. Stedman. It stars Michael Fassbender as Tom Sherbourne, a British World War I veteran who looks for some peace and quiet after the war by working alone at a lighthouse in Australia. There, he falls in love with Isabel, a local played by Alicia Vikander, whose two brothers died in the war.

The two try to have a baby. Twice. Both attempts end in miscarriages. It’s hard to give birth when you’re alone on an island, without any doctors around. Though Vikander has never been pregnant in her life, her devastation is real. I can’t remember the last studio movie that deals with the intimacy of pregnancy, and its potential failure, so vividly.

Shortly after the death of their second child, a small boat drifts toward the shore of their lighthouse peninsula. It’s holding a baby girl, who’s still alive, and her father, who is dead. Here, the movie turns into not just a film about a relationship, but a moral dilemma. Should they bring the child into their lives? Or should they report her to the authorities to send her to an orphanage?

The Light Between Oceans

“The Light Between Oceans” has the beauty of a big studio movie, but little of the artifice. It was made by DreamWorks, and it’s utterly gorgeous. It’s shot on a real lighthouse peninsula off the coast of New Zealand, and the costumes and sets are delightfully detailed. But despite the sheen, it has the complexity and moral ambiguity usually associated with independently produced movies.

DreamWorks was wise to hire Cianfrance. He knows how to build up a relationship and then find the cracks that’ll tear it down. Ryan Gosling and Michelle Williams were beautiful together in “Blue Valentine,” but then the differences in their characters' personalities and ambitions made their relationship unsustainable. Gosling and Eva Mendes were perfectly believable as a couple in “The Place Beyond the Pines,” but differed over how to raise their son.

Cianfrance is the most convincing romance director of our time. Even the actors buy it. Mendes and Gosling became a real-life couple on the set of “The Place Beyond the Pines” and now have two daughters together. Fassbender and Vikander started dating on the set of “The Light Between Oceans,” and they’re still together.

“The Light Between Oceans” demonstrates exactly how studios should approach hiring directors for big movies. In the past few years, we’ve seen major Hollywood studios hire (always male) filmmakers with one or two low-budget movies under their belts to direct blockbusters. Colin Trevorrow made just “Safety Not Guaranteed” before helming “Jurassic World.” Josh Trank made the low-budget “Chronicle” before the disastrous “Fantastic Four.” Hollywood hires young directors, then imposes its will upon them, barely letting the filmmakers' own voices leak through.

The Light Between Oceans Michael Fassbender moustache

With “The Light Between Oceans,” DreamWorks let Cianfrance flex his muscles. To be sure, there are some elements that feel forced. Alexandre Desplat’s score weighs too heavily on the movie, threatening some of the nuance. There’s an epilogue scene that’s just an enormous, sentimental mistake.

But even though Cianfrance is now working within the studio system instead of making scrappy, uncompromised indie movies, he has found ways to grow as an artist. He is still a master at communicating an idea or emotion with a twitch of a mouth, a well-placed laugh, or a turn of the head. While his main characters in “Blue Valentine” and “Pines” were largely uneducated, he's now working with characters who are actually articulate. The actors use more complicated, if spare, dialogue, not just the nuances of body language.

He does this all while pushing the ideas he’s worked on in his earlier movies. Cianfrance’s great themes are how relationships build and break down, and how people try to fit in or escape their past. In “The Light Between Oceans,” Fassbender was a British soldier on the Western Front of World War I, killing Germans. When he finds out that the daughter he adopted is half-German, his feelings toward her become messy. And when he finds out her German father is dead while her mother is still alive, he feels the guilt of his killings weighing on him. As with all of Cianfrance’s movies, the characters don’t anticipate how their pasts will creep up on them.

DreamWorks can let Cianfrance do what he wants because the budget for “The Light Between Oceans” is a relatively low $20 million, rather than the $200 million required for a superhero movie. And that’s fine. The movie is a great representation of how a big studio can be a patron for great, popular art.

SEE ALSO: Cianfrance is the most convincing romance director of our time.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: This popular fan theory perfectly explains 'Stranger Things'

How much more expensive can Netflix get? (NFLX)

$
0
0

Netflix Pricing PowerThis story was delivered to BI Intelligence "Digital Media Briefing" subscribers. To learn more and subscribe, please click here.

A new study from Tivo-owned technology company Digitalsmiths gives insights into Netflix’s pricing power and the strengths of the subscription video on-demand (SVOD) platform in the eyes of consumer.

Netflix’s subscriber growth disappointed in Q2 2016, and the company attributed this underperformance to the $2 price increase from $7.99 t0 $9.99 for its service and associated media coverage around this price hike.Digitalsmiths’ survey was posed to 3,114 respondents in the US, aged 18 and above.

Netflix’s most appealing features for consumers are price (58.9%), the ability to create custom profiles in a single account (55.1%), and its search functionalities (49%). The amount of respondents listing price as an appealing feature decreased by almost 4% since last year, which is not surprising given Netflix’s price hike.

On the other hand, the ability to create multiple profiles (enabling multiple users to use a single subscription) increased by over 2%. Taking these two movements together – price as an appealing feature going down, and custom profiles as an appealing feature going up – helps illustrate consumers' aversion to higher subscription prices.

Finding out just how much consumers would be willing to pay for Netflix is thus a valuable question. Nearly 30% of respondents are not willing to pay more than Netflix's price. About 40%, meanwhile, would acquiesce to an additional $2 to $5 hike from the current $9.99 monthly rate. This constitutes the largest segment of the survey’s population, demonstrating that Netflix still retains strong pricing power, despite the lackluster Q2 2016 performance.

As we move into more expensive price ranges, however, consumers become increasingly unwilling to spend for a subscription, suggesting that Netflix should not venture beyond the $15-a-month threshold.

Over the last few years, there’s been much talk about the “death of TV.” However, television is not dying so much as it's evolving: extending beyond the traditional television screen and broadening to include programming from new sources accessed in new ways.

It's strikingly evident that more consumers are shifting their media time away from live TV, while opting for services that allow them to watch what they want, when they want. Indeed, we are seeing a migration toward original digital video such as YouTube Originals, SVOD services such as Netflix, and live streaming on social platforms.

However, not all is lost for legacy media companies. Amid this rapidly shifting TV landscape, traditional media companies are making moves across a number of different fronts — trying out new distribution channels, creating new types of programming aimed at a mobile-first audience, and partnering with innovate digital media companies. In addition, cable providers have begun offering alternatives for consumers who may no longer be willing to pay for a full TV package.

Dylan Mortensen, senior research analyst for BI Intelligence, has compiled a detailed report on the future of TV that looks at how TV viewer, subscriber, and advertising trends are shifting, and where and what audiences are watching as they turn away from traditional TV. 

Here are some key points from the report:

  • Increased competition from digital services like Netflix and Hulu as well as new hardware to access content are shifting consumers' attention away from live TV programming.
  • Across the board, the numbers for live TV are bad. US adults are watching traditional TV on average 18 minutes fewer per day versus two years ago, a drop of 6%. In keeping with this, cable subscriptions are down, and TV ad revenue is stagnant.
  • People are consuming more media content than ever before, but how they're doing so is changing. Half of US TV households now subscribe to SVOD services, like Netflix, Amazon, and Hulu, and viewing of original digital video content is on the rise.
  • Legacy TV companies are recognizing these shifts and beginning to pivot their business models to keep pace with the changes. They are launching branded apps and sites to move their programming beyond the TV glass, distributing on social platforms to reach massive, young audiences, and forming partnerships with digital media brands to create new content.
  • The TV ad industry is also taking a cue from digital. Programmatic TV ad buying represented just 4% (or $2.5 billion) of US TV ad budgets in 2015 but is expected to grow to 17% ($10 billion) by 2019. Meanwhile, networks are also developing branded TV content, similar to publishers' push into sponsored content.

In full, the report: 

  • Outlines the shift in consumer viewing habits, specifically the younger generation.
  • Explores the rise of subscription streaming services and the importance of original digital video content.
  • Breaks down ways in which legacy media companies are shifting their content and advertising strategies.
  • And Discusses new technology that will more effectively measure audiences across screens and platforms. 

Interested in getting the full report? Here are two ways to access it:

  1. Subscribe to an All-Access pass to BI Intelligence and gain immediate access to this report and over 100 other expertly researched reports. As an added bonus, you'll also gain access to all future reports and daily newsletters to ensure you stay ahead of the curve and benefit personally and professionally. » START A MEMBERSHIP
  2. Purchase & download the full report from our research store. »BUY THE REPORT

Join the conversation about this story »

Stephen Colbert skewers Donald Trump's gaffe in his visit to Mexico

$
0
0

stephen colbert

In the wake of Donald Trump's meeting with Mexican President Enrique Peña Nieto, "Late Show" host Stephen Colbert has come to two conclusions.

While only Trump and Peña Nieto can say what actually happened during their private meeting (thus the disagreement over discussing who would pay for the Mexican border wall), Colbert joked that he had exclusive footage of their summit. He then played a clip of two women fighting on a telenovela.

“That’s rough stuff,” the host said. “But, you know, that’s what Trump gets for sleeping with Peña Nieto’s lover while he was in a coma.”

Colbert's second conclusion comes from the televised press conference after the meeting, and it was definitely difficult for the host to admit.

"Here's the crazy thing about this trip. Trump looked presi ...," Colbert said, while faking as if he were going to vomit.

He then continued, while audience members booed, "Here's the deal. There he was. There was a podium and another president. And 'A' equals 'B' equals si, si, senor, and you can actually see him doing that again, but with the training wheels off, the big-boy pants, the launch codes. I mean the whole world saw Donald Trump do something he's never done before: stay quiet while somebody else is talking."

The consolation for Colbert is that while the visuals worked in Trump's favor, the words were still classic Trump.

In particular, he went after one misstep in the way Donald Trump referred to Americans of Mexican descent.

The real-estate mogul complimented first-, second-, and third-generation "Mexicans," which led Colbert to point out, "Yes, Trump is a big fan of second- and third-generation Mexicans, or as they’re known in America, Americans."

Watch Colbert's take on Trump's visit to Mexico below:

SEE ALSO: Jimmy Kimmel says voting for Donald Trump is like buying a ridiculous, wacky shirt

DON'T MISS: Stephen Colbert explains what Donald Trump's 'softening' on immigration is really all about

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Who is paying for the wall? Trump and Mexico's president contradict each other

The gorgeous new game 'Paragon' is worth trying — and it's totally free

$
0
0

Paragon screenshot

Does the mere mention of the word "eSport" send you running in the opposite direction? You're not alone.

Most eSports are totally inscrutable for the uninitiated, but there's a new game called "Paragon" coming to PlayStation 4 and PC that makes an effort to broaden its appeal.

I've spent the last few days with this new MOBA — that's short for "multiplayer online battle arena" — that will be totally free to play once it makes its official debut.

Good news: Coming from someone who typically doesn't venture into the eSports world, "Paragon" is really fun.

Here's what it's like.

SEE ALSO: The most popular game in the world is incredibly complex — here's how to play it

The first thing to know is that "Paragon" makes no apologies about being a multiplayer online battle-arena (MOBA) game. It doesn't dumb itself down.



But it's also really effective at teaching newbies how to play, with video tutorials and helpful tools built right into the game.



Like other MOBAs, two teams of five will compete against each other in a contest to see who can destroy the other team's base first.



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

'The Simpsons' is making an epic parody of Donald Trump's failed university

$
0
0

Simpson Donald Trump

After mocking Donald Trump's candidacy in a series of digitalshorts over the past year, "The Simpsons" showrunners now plan to feature a slant parody of Trump's failed for-profit college, Trump University, in its upcoming 28th season, according to The Wall Street Journal

In an episode titled "The Caper Chase," Mr. Burns starts his own for-profit university and forcibly employs his workers at the Springfield Nuclear Power Plant as teachers for the school.

Though the episode, which is slated to air in 2017, reportedly has no direct references to Trump, "The Simpsons" showrunner Al Jean said the show's writers made changes to the episode following the news of the Trump University scandal earlier this year. 

"I think it holds up if you've heard of Trump University or not," Jean told The Wall Street Journal. "The for-profit colleges aren't going away. We try to do things that are funny to people watching them then, but I always try to think of things that will be funny five years from now."

The episode will feature a star-studded cast, including Neil deGrasse Tyson, Suze Orman, former "Jeopardy!" champion Ken Jennings, and "Seinfeld" star Jason Alexander — all of whom will appear as themselves. It seems to be in the grand tradition of the show's more elaborate satirical episodes with marquee stars. 

Watch the show's previous Trump parodies below:

SEE ALSO: 'The Simpsons' just unleashed the most brutal attack on Donald Trump yet

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: This incredibly detailed Batman costume just set a Guinness World Record

Why hundreds of musicians are supporting Pharrell and Robin Thicke in 'Blurred Lines' appeal

$
0
0

blurred lines

Composer Hans Zimmer, crooner R. Kelly, and members of such bands as the Go-Go's, the Black Crowes, Linkin Park, and Three 6 Mafia are supporting Pharrell Williams, Robin Thicke, and T.I. in their appeal in the ongoing legal dispute over the hit song "Blurred Lines."

More than 200 musicians filed a brief with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in Los Angeles on Tuesday to express concern about the ruling last year in a case brought by the children of Marvin Gaye, who sued for copyright infringement claiming "Blurred Lines" copied Gaye's hit "Got to Give it Up."

The musicians said the ruling could have "adverse impact on their own creativity, on the creativity of future artists, and on the music industry in general."

Gaye's descendants won a $7.4 million verdict, which a judge reduced to $5.3 million.

The judgment is one of the largest damages awards in music-copyright history, and if it stands, it could have long-lasting effects on the music industry.

Rather than hinging on a particular set of notes, "Blurred Lines" was found in violation of copyright based purely on the atmospheric similarity to Gaye's "Got to Give It Up" — a "vibe" that's a result of production choices and the rhythm pattern.

That distinction could set up a new legal precedent for what's stealing in music, rather than simple stylistic influence. And as the new brief attests, many in the music industry have concerns about possible detriment to creativity and a wave of more litigation.

"I think that saying that Pharrell and Thicke were inspired by a genre or a feeling that they gleaned somehow from Marvin Gaye is definitely new territory in copyright infringement," Josh Kaplan, a lawyer and manager of musicians, told Business Insider in 2015. "They were taking testimony from both Pharrell and Thicke saying that they were inspired or they wanted to come up with a sound similar to [Gaye], and that's a stretch."

Here's the original "Blurred Lines" as well as a mashup of the Thicke/Pharrell song with Gaye's "Got to Give It Up":

 

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: 7 things you missed in the new Star Wars Rogue One trailer

How Hurricane Katrina inspired these millionaire twins to invest in small businesses

$
0
0

discovery channel

It took a tragic event to drive the business of millionaire twins Cain and Cam Roberds, stars of "Blue Collar Backers."

The Roberds brothers began their construction company in 2009. After completing several buildings from churches to retail spaces, the twins decided to add something new to the mix.

"Now, we're combining our construction skills and our business know-how to help back small business owners and help them realize their dreams," Cain says in a new video from the Discovery Channel series that Business Insider is exclusively premiering. "To be able to go out there and help someone else, I think it's just in our blood."

Being in business with a sibling isn't always easy, the brothers admit, because they're very competitive with each other. But they can agree on the importance of community, which was tested in 2005 when Hurricane Katrina hit. The guys explain that the towns that were hit by the hurricane are still struggling to rebuild the Mississippi coast.

"We're looking to be pioneers of rebuilding this area," Cain said. "So we're keeping our eyes open for any investment opportunities out ther."

On "Blue Collar Backers," which airs Fridays at 10 p.m., investors try to help save small businesses that have been denied loans by the big banks. But they don't just invest money into the businesses — they invest their time and sweat.

For more on the show's investors, visit the show's Facebook page.

Learn more about the Roberds brothers in the exclusive video below:

SEE ALSO: 'Blue Collar Backers' is a new kind of business show combining cash and sweat

DON'T MISS: The 10 best and worst TV shows this summer

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: 'Shark Tank' investor reveals the biggest mistake you can make in the office

Seth Meyers rips apart Donald Trump for hypocrisy over alleged illegal hiring of foreigners

$
0
0

Seth Meyers YouTube NBC final

A report in Mother Jones magazine alleges that Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump's modeling agency, Trump Modeling Management, has illegally employed foreign models in the US.

The story reports that the models, many of them younger than 18, were encouraged by the company to lie on their customs forms about where they intended to live, as they were housed in a cramped basement apartment in New York City's East Village.

On Wednesday night's "Late Night with Seth Meyers," the host used this news to dig in on Trump.

"If you've been thinking to yourself, 'the only way Hillary Clinton can win this election is if it turns out Donald Trump has been keeping underage girls in a basement,' good news!" Meyers said.

He also pointed out the apparent hypocrisy of Donald Trump's messaging if the allegations are true.

"Are you the 'law and order' candidate, or the 'Law and Order: SVU' candidate?" he said. "Your whole candidacy is built on the single issue of keeping immigrants out of the country."

Watch Meyers roast Trump in the video below:

SEE ALSO: Inside the many lavish, multimillion-dollar homes of Taylor Swift

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Who is paying for the wall? Trump and Mexico's president contradict each other

John Legend calls the national anthem 'weak' in support of Colin Kaepernick

$
0
0

John Legend

R&B singer John Legend took to Twitter recently to voice his support for San Francisco 49ers quarterback Colin Kaepernick, who has controversially refused to stand for the US national anthem as a protest against racial oppression.

Linking to an article about how an unsung verse in "The Star Spangled Banner" represents a "celebration of slavery," Legend called the song "weak" and proposed that the US adopt "America the Beautiful" as its national anthem instead.

The 37-year-old singer went on to further criticize the national anthem, asking his followers, "For those defending the current anthem, do you really truly love that song? I don't and I'm very good at singing it. Like, one of the best."

Kaepernick's protest of the anthem during a preseason game has since drawn the ire of many NFL executives, who reportedly have suggested that Kaepernick's political move (coupled with his subpar performances on the field) could mean the end of his playing career. 

SEE ALSO: Colin Kaepernick's national anthem protest has reportedly enraged NFL executives to the point where his career could be over

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: How Donald Trump helped destroy a pro football league in the '80s

The team behind Pokémon Go assures US senator that the game isn't violating your privacy

$
0
0

Remember when people were worried that Pokémon Go was stealing their Google information? It happened way back in July, soon after the game launched in North America. We were so young!

Pokemon Go

Things got so serious that Minnesota Sen. Al Franken wrote a letter to the game's developer, Niantic Labs, demanding answers about how the game handles user privacy.

What stuck out to him was how the game directly integrates with Google services; it initially asked for more access to those Google services than was necessary. Niantic quickly issued an update to the game that rolled back how much the game was allowed to access.

Specifically, Franken asked for information on "what user data 'Pokémon Go' collects, how the data is used, and with what third party service providers that data may be shared." And now, over a month later, Niantic finally issued a response letter to Franken.

"The app collects and stores certain information and interacts with various settings on the Trainer's mobile device in order to provide that core game functionality and sense of immersion," Niantic general counsel Courtney Greene Power wrote.

"For example, Niantic collects and stores information about a Trainer's location in order to place the Trainer on the map, and to position her in relation to Pokémon, Pokéstops, and Gyms. Network provider information is also collected, as that data helps to provide better quality geolocation."

Pokemon Go

Niantic says it collects only data that's pertinent to the game operating and shares data only in an effort to make the game work more effectively — except in the instance of sponsored locations.

Here's part of the letter (emphasis ours):

"Niantic does not and has no plans to sell 'Pokémon Go' user data — aggregated, de-identified or otherwise — to any third party. As we continue to develop our sponsored locations program, we will provide certain reports to sponsors about visits and game actions (such as redeeming a promotion at the location), but those reports will contain aggregated data only."

While the game's maker isn't sharing your information with third parties in exchange for cash, it is sharing aggregated player information with retail partners that pay for sponsorship deals with Niantic. That doesn't mean Niantic is sharing your personal Google information, but that it's sharing your actions (along with the actions of many other users).

Pokemon GO launch Japan

For instance, Niantic partnered with McDonald's in Japan to turn all McDonald's locations into Pokémon Go gyms. In this example (and we have no idea if this is what's actually happening), Niantic may share how many Pokémon Go players visited a given McDonald's location, or how many people playing the game at that location redeemed a promotion tied to Pokémon Go.

This is the trade-off for playing free games: You pay with your personal information, however removed it is from information that personally identifies you.

Check out Niantic's full letter to Franken »

SEE ALSO: Pokemon Go asks for 'full access' to your Google account

DON'T MISS: U.S. senator probes Pokemon GO maker over data privacy concerns

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: This new update in 'Pokémon GO' will change how you play the game

Lindsay Lohan doesn't look like anyone in 'Grand Theft Auto V,' rules New York State court

$
0
0

"Grand Theft Auto" is the ultimate parody series. Each game in the wildly popular franchise has gone deeper into satire of American culture. But sometimes that satire butts up against reality.

Grand Theft Auto 5 (Lindsey Lohan thing)

Such is the case with one advertisement for "Grand Theft Auto V," seen above, which Lindsay Lohan took as an image of her.

Yes, the same Lindsay Lohan who was in "Mean Girls" and has repeatedly had run-ins with the law. The same Lindsay Lohan who doesn't have blonde hair on a regular basis.

In fairness to her, there's a photo of her looking distinctly like the woman you see above:

Lindsay Lohan GTA ad

As a result, Lohan went after "Grand Theft Auto" publisher Take-Two Interactive in court. The court documents describe the suit as such: "The images are not of Lohan herself, but merely the avatar in the game that Lohan claims is a depiction of her."

The suit was thrown out on Thursday by New York State.

According to the court's decision, since publisher Rockstar Games "never referred to Lohan by name or used her actual name in the video game, never used Lohan herself as an actor for the video game, and never used a photograph of Lohan," the suit is being dismissed.

The court contends that "Grand Theft Auto V" is a "work of fiction and satire," and that the "images are not of Lohan herself, but merely the avatar in the game that Lohan claims is a depiction of her."

In so many words, since "Grand Theft Auto V" is protected as a creative work, its fictional depiction of people — even partially based in reality — is considered free speech.

Sorry, Lindsay!

We first saw this story on Kotaku.

SEE ALSO: The world's biggest YouTube celebrity just got kicked off Twitter for saying he's joining ISIS

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: The 'Michael Jordan' of eSports just won the biggest gaming championship in the world


Netflix's latest original movie 'ARQ' looks like an epic sci-fi thriller

$
0
0

ARQ netflix

Netflix has released the first trailer for its latest original film, the sci-fi thriller "ARQ."

The movie stars Robbie Amell (CW's "The Flash") and Rachael Taylor (ABC's "Jessica Jones") and features a dark twist on the "Groundhog Day"-style conceit, in which events repeatedly reoccur. 

Here's how Netflix described the movie in a statement:

"In a dystopian future, an engineer trapped in a house and surrounded by a mysterious gang of masked intruders must protect a technology that could deliver unlimited energy and end the wars that have consumed the world."

Amell and Taylor were cast in the film in January, and filming for the reportedly low-budget picture took place in Toronto during the winter months, according to The Hollywood Reporter

Written and directed by "Orphan Black" writer Tony Elliot, "ARQ" is set to premiere at the Toronto International Film Festival on September 9, before it begins streaming on Netflix on September 16. 

Watch the trailer below:

SEE ALSO: Here's what investors don't realize about Netflix's future

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: I waited in line for 9 hours to see 'Hamilton' — here's what it was like

The 26 best action movies you can stream on Netflix right now

$
0
0

Jaws

There's never a bad time to sit back and watch a good action movie. 

The nonexistent (or besides-the-point) plot, the constant explosions, the muscular heroes doing what needs doing: What better way to take time out from the daily grind?

Thankfully, Netflix has a great collection of action movies right now, including the addition in September of classics like "Top Gun" and "Jaws."

Here are 27 action movies we highly recommend that you can stream on Netflix:

SEE ALSO: 100 movies on Netflix that everyone needs to watch in their lifetime

“Armageddon” (1998)

Bruce Willis and Ben Affleck go to space to save the world from a hurtling asteroid. With "Bad Boys" and "The Rock" already under his belt, director Michael Bay became the top action director going into the 2000s with this film.



“Back to the Future” (1985)

This classic is filled with machine gun-toting Libyans and a race to make it in time for a lightning storm that will keep you antsy (in a good way) the whole running time.



“Battle Royale” (2000)

In the future, kids are forced to an island and must kill one another until only one is left standing. The Japanese title has been hugely influential on genre filmmaking in the 2000s.



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

Matthew McConaughey's new movie is a certified dud that's only made $2,730 in one week

$
0
0

The Sea Of Trees YouTube A24 final

Things were looking grim early on for the new Matthew McConaughey movie "The Sea of Trees."

It premiered at the Cannes Film Festival in 2015 and was flooded with boos during the end credits.

Then shortly after, for unknown reasons (though you can take a guess), its US distributors Roadside Attractions and Lionsgate backed out of releasing the movie. Not exactly a good sign.

A24, which has been on a great streak in its four-year existence and always has an eye out for unique stories ("Spring Breakers," "Ex Machina," "Room," "The Lobster") ultimately nabbed the "The Sea of Trees."

But the company wasn't able to weave any magic with it.

With only an 8% rating on Rotten Tomatoes, the latest movie from the usually acclaimed director Gus Van Sant ("Milk," "Good Will Hunting") isn't getting any breaks.

Starring McConaughey as a man contemplating death in the woods, it's ironically suffering a quick death at the box office. It's taken in only $2,730 in its first week in theaters.  

A24 obviously knew it wasn't going to pull off a miracle. The company did almost no marketing for the movie and only released it in two theaters, where it had an average per-screen earning of $939 (not a good figure for any size of release).

In the end, however, no one will get hurt too badly from this forgettable movie. A24 is focused on the four titles it has playing at the Toronto International Film Festival, which kicks off next week. Van Sant is focused on producing and directing the minseries "When We Rise" about the gay rights movement and McConaughey is working off the 40 pounds he gained for his next movie, "Gold" (out Christmas Day), which is gathering talk of Oscars.

Business Insider reached out to A24 for comment but did not receive an immediate response.

SEE ALSO: The 26 best action movies you can watch on Netflix right now

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: 7 things you missed in the new Star Wars Rogue One trailer

An aspiring police officer who went undercover in a jail for 2 months describes why 'violence is almost necessary' behind bars

$
0
0

60 days in ryan

In jail, violence is always around the corner.

Inmates strategically use fights to settle disputes and climb the political ladder. And if inexperienced inmates can't adapt to their dangerous surroundings, they'll live in constant fear of another beating.

That's what one participant on the A&E documentary show "60 Days In" learned during his stay at Clark County Jail in Jeffersonville, Indiana. The show follows eight volunteers who go undercover as inmates to expose problems within the system.

One of the volunteers, Ryan, observed that a strict social hierarchy governed his pod of inmates. Fights broke out between members of different social groups over virtually any perceived slight — from spreading gossip or talking too loudly at night to reneging on a deal to trade hash browns. 

Ryan, who did not use his last name on the show, further explained what purpose violence serves behind bars:

"One thing the public doesn't know about is that in jail, violence is almost necessary. It's a way that that society, if you will, keeps peace. It's instilling fear. It's something along the lines of a political party, and violence is almost like the campaign platform they run upon. It keeps everything in check if anyone steps out of line."

In some cases, clique leaders even arranged the fights as calculated moves to address the shifting dynamics of the pod.

"If there is a white guy that happens to be in disagreement with a Hispanic guy or a black guy, instead of those guys fighting, which could potentially cause a race riot to just break out, some other people would fight," Ryan told Business Insider. "A black guy will fight the black guy or a white guy would fight the white guy to prevent a lot of stuff from going down."

60 days in fightThose higher on the ladder constantly test new inmates, according to Ryan. A new inmate can gain trust by performing "gofer" tasks, like obtaining information from corrections officers or collecting debts from other inmates, usually in the form of food or commissary money.

Inmates are sometimes asked to leave secret notes for officers or other inmates, a practice known as "flying a kite." If they're caught by members of a different social group, however the consequences can be severe.

"There are internal groups that become judge, jury, and executioner all rolled into one," Ryan said. "You're judged by a jury of your peers, and violence is the sentence no matter what. It's never like, 'You owe me packs of ramen noodles.' That's nothing."

Merely accepting the challenge of a fight is enough to earn the respect of other inmates, regardless of the outcome, Ryan explained. But refusing to participate is considered the ultimate act of cowardice among inmates. Failure to adapt to the jail's unwritten rules can be devastating to an inmate's chances of a relatively peaceful stint behind bars.

"If you don't pick up those rules, you become an example, and you're what they call 'bad business.' You're labeled as a b----, and you never live that down," Ryan explained. "If you are labeled anything negative, you stay like that until you prove otherwise. The burden of proof is inverted — it's on you to prove that you're not that person, and if you don't, you will remain that person."

60 days inRyan, an aspiring police officer and former Army Reserve medic, managed to avoid any physical confrontations during his two months at Clark County Jail. He said he surprised his fellow inmates with his experience in various martial arts, including jiu jitsu and aikido, and because of his small frame, became known as a "sleeper."

Still, Ryan learned countless tips every inmate must internalize to stay afloat: Memorize the layout of every cell. Fight behind the bathroom curtain, so cameras can't capture the action. Use the heel of your palm to strike other inmates — guards can point to teeth marks on a closed fist as proof of involvement. In a pinch, a Bic pen makes "a very sturdy makeshift weapon."

"You should never fear violence, though," Ryan said. "If you take that beating, you're more respected. So it's something people shouldn't be afraid of."

The next episode of "60 Days In" airs Thursday on A&E at 9:00 p.m. Eastern Time.

SEE ALSO: 7 undercover inmates spent 2 months in jail — here are the most outrageous things they witnessed

DON'T MISS: An undercover inmate discovered a disturbing truth about veterans who are locked up

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: How Dwayne 'The Rock' Johnson makes and spends his millions

A bunch of famous YouTubers are furious at YouTube right now — here's why (GOOG, GOOGL)

$
0
0

Philip DeFranco YouTube

When you click on a YouTube video, there's a good chance you'll see a 15-second advertisement before it for Febreeze, Purina, or whatever.

But maybe you've noticed that only some videos have these pre-roll advertisements.

YouTubers have to manually opt-in to monetizing their channels, meaning that ads will roll before their videos and they'll get a portion of the ad revenue generated from people like you and me as we sit helplessly waiting for the "Skip Ad" option to appear.

In most cases, the amount of money this generates is pretty inconsequential, but for YouTube's most popular content creators, the amount of money their channels generate can be a significant portion of their income.

Starting Thursday morning, many YouTubers were finding that they'd received emails notifying them that one or more of their videos violate its "advertiser-friendly content guidelines." According to YouTube's terms of service, videos are considered ineligible for monetization if they are not "advertiser-friendly," which includes content that has any of the following qualities:

  • Sexually suggestive content, including partial nudity and sexual humor
  • Violence, including display of serious injury and events related to violent extremism
  • Inappropriate language, including harassment, profanity and vulgar language
  • Promotion of drugs and regulated substances, including selling, use and abuse of such items
  • Controversial or sensitive subjects and events, including subjects related to war, political conflicts, natural disasters and tragedies, even if graphic imagery is not shown

It's crucial to note that YouTube offers a caveat to these rules, saying if a video contains inappropriate content, it may still be eligible for monetization if "the context is usually newsworthy or comedic and the creator’s intent is to inform or entertain (not offend or shock)."

These guidelines have existed for a long time, but many YouTubers seem to be finding that more and more of their videos are being flagged for not meeting its guidelines. Or, rather, they're just talking about it more. As of Thursday afternoon, the hashtag #YouTubeIsOverParty was trending in response to this controversy.

YouTube insists it isn't flagging more videos than usual. In a statement provided to Business Insider, a YouTube spokesperson said, "While our policy of demonetizing videos due to advertiser-friendly concerns hasn’t changed, we’ve recently improved the notification and appeal process to ensure better communication to our creators."

One YouTuber, Philip DeFranco — who has over 4.5 million subscribers — called this de-monetization a "form of censorship" in his most recent video, hyperbolically titled, "YouTube Is Shutting Down My Channel and I'm Not Sure What To Do."

While YouTube is unequivocally not shutting down his channel, they did recently improve "the notification and appeal process to ensure better communication," according to the aforementioned statement provided to Business Insider, which is likely what's causing the increased conversation around the de-monetization of videos.

Of course, since YouTube is a private platform, it has the right to regulate its content in any way that it chooses, but perhaps there's room for improvement in terms of how advertisers target their ads. Rather than step in on behalf of advertisers and forbid all age-restricted content from being monetized (as is currently the case), perhaps YouTube could improve the tools advertisers have at their disposal so that they can control what types of videos in which their ads appear.

In a post on Medium, Freddie Wong — whose YouTube channel has over 7.75 million subscribers — explains why he thinks crying "censorship" is the wrong approach, and calls instead for a more nuanced conversation around advertisement.

"It’s not just semantics  —  the flippant use of that word immediately degrades the conversation into platitudes when there is real nuanced discourse that should be happening, and that can lead to better informed creators and viewers," he said.

Until the situation develops further, YouTubers can appeal the decision to de-monetize their video if they feel it has been flagged unjustly. For prominent YouTuber Hank Green, that process seems to have already reversed the decision on one of his videos.

We have reached out to YouTube for further comment.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: How different camera lenses affect how you appear in photos

Viewing all 103365 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images