Quantcast
Channel: Business Insider
Viewing all 103365 articles
Browse latest View live

It turns out most Americans agree that 'Die Hard' is not a Christmas movie

$
0
0

die hard 20th Century Fox

Americans have decided on one of the country's most heated cinematic debates: "Die Hard" is not a Christmas movie.

That's the opinion of 62% of Americans who responded to a new Christmas-themed national poll of voters from Public Policy Polling. Only 13% of respondents believed Bruce Willis' pivotal 1988 action movie can be considered a Christmas movie.

"Americans have spoken and have an emphatic message: Die Hard is not a Christmas movie," PPP director Tom Jensen wrote.

Why this is even a debate: "Die Hard" is a popular, if slightly unconventional, pick around this time of year for Christmas-related viewing. It's recommended over and over again alongside more obvious picks like "It's a Wonderful Life" and "Home Alone." Business Insider even put "Die Hard" on our list of the 12 best holiday movies ever.

The primary reason for this is that "Die Hard" takes place over Christmas. New York Police Department officer John McClane (Willis) tries to save his wife and others who are taken hostage by German terrorists during a Christmas office party.

die hard bruce willisEven though he admits the plotline doesn't have that much more to do with the holiday, MovieFone writer Drew Taylor argued in his article, "Why 'Die Hard' Is the Greatest Christmas Movie Ever Made," that the film expresses certain notable Christmas motifs:

During the course of the movie, McClane is transformed. When he emerges, bloodied and burnt, at the end of the movie, his wife can barely recognize him. And how does she address him? "Jesus Christ," the kid whose birth we're ostensibly celebrating on Christmas Day. But his transformation is also spiritual. At the end of the movie, you get the sense that he's recommitted to being a fully present parent (and there is some evidence to suggest that he followed through, at least in the second movie).

Maybe, as time passes, more people will come to see Taylor's point and "Die Hard" will become widely accepted in the US as a Christmas classic like "A Christmas Carol" and "Miracle on 34th St."

But for now, Americans are pretty clearly against categorizing "Die Hard" as a Christmas movie.

SEE ALSO: RANKED: The 10 best movies of 2015

MORE: RANKED: The 10 best TV shows of 2015

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: The most popular Christmas traditions have nothing to do with Jesus


President Obama sunk an awesome golf shot on vacation

$
0
0

President Obama is currently on vacation with his family in Hawaii, where he's been indulging in his favorite pastime — golf.

If his display Monday during a round at the Mid Pacific Country Club in Kailua was any indication, he's pretty good.

On the 18th green, Obama set up for a nearly 40-foot chip shot, which is no easy task for any golfer. He lined the shot up perfectly, hit it with just the right amount of force, and sunk it.

Not bad, Mr. President.

Story by Allan Smith and editing by Carl Mueller

INSIDER is on Facebook: Follow us here

SEE ALSO: Here's the real story behind the Time photo shoot where a bald eagle attacked Donald Trump

Join the conversation about this story »

Jennifer Lawrence saves her latest Oscar-hopeful movie 'Joy' from being a total disaster

$
0
0

Joy 20th Century Fox final

There are a couple things we know about director David O. Russell. He's fueled by dysfunction, and, more recently, the talents of Jennifer Lawrence.

Dysfunction has been in his storytelling (likely) all his life. Sometimes his stories have been hits ("Flirting with Disaster") and other times misses ("I Heart Huckabees"). But now with the addition of Lawrence, even if he's off the mark, the effort is still a worthwhile experience.

"Joy" is not Russell at his finest. But teaming with Lawrence for the third consecutive time (previously "Silver Linings Playbook" and "American Hustle"), he gives the story completely over to his lead's abilities — and it saves the movie.

Lawrence plays the real-life Joy Mangano, a divorcee who still lives with her ex (Édgar Ramírez) and their two kids, along with her mother (Virginia Madsen), grandmother (Diane Ladd), and father (Robert De Niro). Barely able to make ends meet, she's also faced with solving the problems of everyone under her roof.

Joy FoxAlways inventing things since she was a child, Joy grabs onto that million-dollar idea every inventor dreams of. While mopping up broken glass and cutting up her hands wringing it out, she comes up with the revolutionary "Miracle Mop." It would become one of the biggest hits on the newly created QVC channel (run by Neil, played matter-of-factly by Bradley Cooper).

Family turmoil continues, Joy gets hustled by her manufacturer, and basically Joy can't catch a break until she fights back, and that's when Lawrence shines.

From insisting on wearing a casual white blouse and slacks on QVC (instead of a dress) to a Michael Corleone-like showdown with her half-sister, Lawrence plays Joy as a headstrong woman who has vowed not to end up like her mother, watching soap operas all day in bed.

Joy YouTube Fox final"Joy" is not a true biopic, as once Russell got involved in the project he reworked the script heavily and combined many female entrepreneur rags-to-riches stories into his Joy. But that's standard operating procedure for Russell.

Though the cast is great on paper and Russell has been successful with recent ensembles, outside of some strong scenes between Lawrence and De Niro, there are few highlights for the whole group.

Then again, this was always Lawrence's show. "Joy" is as much a movie about the actress standing her ground in the Hollywood system that regards women as second-class as it is a look at a female entrepreneur taking on the world.

"Joy" opens in theaters everywhere on Christmas Day.

SEE ALSO: Meet Jennifer Lawrence's small but powerful squad that's taking over Hollywood

Join the conversation about this story »

Johnny Depp tops Forbes list of the most overpaid actors — here's who else is on it

$
0
0

johnny depp

Some actors still demand big paychecks even when their box office isn't necessarily delivering on the promise of their casting.

Forbes released its list of Hollywood's most overpaid actors. It includes some big names like Jonny Depp (at No.1 ), Will Smith, and Brad Pitt. And everyone on the list is a man.

While Depp helmed one of the most profitable movie franchises in "Pirates of the Caribbean," his more recent efforts like "Mortdecai" and "Transcendence" have bombed.

How did the magazine come up with this list?

It took the rough operating incomes of the actors' last three significant films (box office minus budget), then divided those numbers by the stars' estimated salaries for the films. The resulting numbers estimate how much the actors returned on the investment into them.

Here's who's on the Forbes list of Hollywood's most overpaid movie actors.

SEE ALSO: RANKED: The 10 best TV shows of 2015

MORE: THE A-LIST: The 30 coolest, most famous people in Hollywood right now

10. Tom Cruise



9. Ben Affleck



8. Brad Pitt



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

There's a conspiracy theory that the Miss Universe disaster wasn't really Steve Harvey's fault

$
0
0

In the aftermath of the Miss Universe debacle, in which host Steve Harvey mistakenly announced Miss Colombia as the winner before giving the crown to Miss Philippines, a theory has emerged that would absolve Harvey of responsibility.

The theory rests on a deleted video that briefly appeared on the Miss Universe Snapchat channel in the aftermath of the incident. In that video, Harvey purportedly tells someone backstage that the teleprompter had the wrong name on it. The snap was saved by people online before it could be deleted, and Miss Alabama tweeted about it at the time.

While this is certainly a mystery, all signs suggest that the official story for what happened — Harvey misreading the ballot card and announcing the wrong contestant as the winner — is legitimate. For one, Harvey immediately took full responsibility and hasn't wavered from the idea that he's to blame.

In addition, Miss Australia — who was standing at the back of the stage during the crowning and had a view of the teleprompter — told "Sunrise" that the prompter had the correct winner on it right after Miss Colombia wrongly took the crown.

Story by Tony Manfred and editing by Jeremy Dreyfuss.

INSIDER is on Facebook: Follow us here

SEE ALSO: Adele has a perfect explanation for why everyone is releasing surprise albums now

Join the conversation about this story »

The trailer for Richard Linklater's long-awaited 'sequel' to 'Dazed and Confused' is here

$
0
0

everybody wants some final

In 2013, director Richard Linklater told the world that he was starting work on a "spiritual sequel" to his 1993 film, the cult hit "Dazed and Confused." 

Now titled "Everybody Wants Some," that movie's trailer premiered on Tuesday, and it looks very similar to "Dazed" indeed, and not just because of the cast of unknowns running around getting drunk and partying.

As "Dazed and Confused" looked at life for high school teens in the late 1970s, "Everybody Wants Some" is set in the 1980s and explores a group of college kids getting their first taste of adulthood. And if the trailer is any indication, its plot will have a similarly loose, fun shape, with the characters often simply hanging out.

The title of the new film would seem to be a nod to the Van Halen song, which plays in the trailer. Here's hoping for a soundtrack that's as great as the one featured in "Dazed and Confused" (but here's also hoping that, as with "Dazed," the title song is curiously left out).

"Everybody Wants Some" opens April 15, 2016.

Watch the trailer:

 

SEE ALSO: The 50 most successful movies of 2015

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Scientists discovered the dirtiest places on an airplane

The guy who designed the computers in 'Iron Man' says Elon Musk is wrong to worry about killer AI

$
0
0

iron man jarvis

The coolest part of the "Iron Man" movies is, well, the Iron Man armor.

The second coolest part, though, is the sweet holographic computer interface that Tony Stark uses to control it. No mouse, no keyboard, just hand gestures and voice controls. 

Designed by Oblong Industries CEO and award-winning interface expert John Underkoffler — who also created the similarly memorable gesture-based computers from Steven Spielberg's 2012 sci-fi flick "Minority Report" —  Tony Stark's systems provide a tantalizing look at a way of computing that seems so close, and yet so far away. 

But, as Underkoffler tells Business Insider, we're missing something really vital and intentional about the computers in both "Minority Report" and "Iron Man."

And that's the fact that there's "explicitly and purposely" no all-seeing, all-knowing artificial intelligence that gives "Minority Report" and "Iron Man" stars Tom Cruise and Robert Downey Jr. the answers they need. It's down to human intelligence.

In "Minority Report," those cool computers are a "cognitive ecosystem" for investigators to share evidence and work together on a murder case, Underkoffler says. Meanwhile, up until 2015's "Avengers: Age of Ultron," Tony Stark's "JARVIS" artificial intelligence is more of a supercapable Siri, not a real autonomous character in its own right. minority report

Which is why Underkoffler thinks that Elon Musk is on the wrong track with his new company OpenAI and its foundational mission to keep artificial intelligence from destroying the world.

“Elon Musk should know better," Underkoffler says. 

Underkoffler's thesis is simple. There just isn't enough investment in building so-called "strong AI" to warrant the handwringing.

We're building cool and useful tools, like Apple Siri or Microsoft Cortana, that can predict our needs and wants. And just like JARVIS helps Iron Man by doing data analysis, taking simple orders, and presenting information at crucial times, we're building systems that can anticipate our needs and help us get more stuff done, faster.

john underkoffler oblong industries

In fact, Underkoffler's Oblong Industries is building the so-called Mezzanine, a "Minority Report"-inspired computer, but in real life, designed to use these kinds of technologies to help people work together in the same room, in the same virtual space.

Predictive intelligence can do things as simple as placing the buttons you most often use closer to hand, or as complex as telling you the likely outcome of what might happen when you push any given button. 

But nothing we're building, at least so far, is cognitively advanced enough to really gain sentience, let alone decide that humanity must be destroyed. 

“It’s just not plausible, because it’s not going to wake up," Underkoffler says.

SEE ALSO: Elon Musk just founded a new company to make sure artificial intelligence doesn't destroy the world

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: The visionary behind the mind-blowing technology of ‘Minority Report' has built it for real

Disney may be bailing on Fusion

$
0
0

fusion

Disney is reportedly in talks to release its stake in Fusion, the media venture it shares with Spanish-language broadcaster Univision, according to a report from The Wall Street Journal.

Disney could be eyeing an exit as early as the end of this year, The Journal reported, with Univision potentially buying out Disney's stake.

Fusion launched in 2013 as a multiplatform media enterprise, which includes a TV network and website geared toward English-speaking Hispanic millennials.

The network was expected to serve some 50 million viewers in this demographic when it first launched.

The network has since opted to go after all millennials, with specific focuses on news, pop culture, and technology.

Reports suggested that Fusion's digital property, Fusion.net, had not seen much success since launch. It was reportedly down on pageviews, according to a report published by Gawker earlier this year, which showed alleged screenshots of the traffic-measurement website Chartbeat that appeared to show Fusion's internal-traffic metrics.

Pageviews fell as low as 23,000 on some days, The New York Times reported.

A Fusion representative says that Fusion.net measures its traffic via ComScore, and that the site marked steady growth for the year.

According to a statement from Fusion CEO Isaac Lee, the outlet saw its website traffic triple within the span of eight months to 8.5 million unique monthly visitors.

Fusion's television property also appears to be on the rise, reaching more than 40 million households to date, according to the same statement from Fusion. The network's viewership has exploded higher — with increases in primetime and total-day viewership up 179% and 183%, respectively, as of the end of summer.

Fusion Univision newsroom

Disney apparently had high hopes for the venture, evidenced by the additional $30 million it pumped into the business recently. In May, Disney/ABC Television Group President Ben Sherwood told The Times that "you have to take the long view when you're building a multiplatform service," and said that Fusion is "going to be a big success."

The Times noted, however, that a culture clash was brewing between camps at Fusion and Disney.

In one instance, the newspaper cited unnamed senior Fusion employees who said that Disney warned them about news coverage "that might dent its standing with consumers." That warning allegedly stemmed from Fusion's reporting on documents obtained from the Sony hack.

Fusion employs more than 250 people in four offices throughout the US, including New York and California.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: HENRY BLODGET: This is where digital media is headed next


The remarkable story of the World War II 'Ghost Army' that duped Hitler

$
0
0

ghost army

From the summer of 1944 till the end of the war in Europe, the US fielded a unique 'Ghost Army' throughout France and the Rhine Valley in order to deceive the Third Reich into over estimating the strength of the Allied forces. 

The Ghost Army, which consisted of 1,100 handpicked men and a number of phony inflatable tanks and weapons, were part of the 23rd Headquarters Special Troops.

The unit's sole responsibility was to create illusions and spread disinformation about the strength and location of Allied forces. 

ghost armyAccording to PBS documentary "The Ghost Army," these masters of deception saw action dangerously close to the front lines in France, Belgium, Luxembourg, and Germany throughout the war.

In total, the unit was responsible for over 20 illusions that befuddled German military planning and masked actual Allied troop movements and deployments. 

To the Nazis, the Ghost Army appeared as real units and soldiers.

However, these men were a combination of artists, audio technicians, actors, and designers who, through a commitment to their craft, created inflatable mock-ups of military vehicles, tanks, and artillery.

inflatable tank ghost army GIFArriving in France just after the D-Day invasion, the Ghost Army set to work creating numerous illusions both on and off the battlefield.

On the battlefield, the unit fielded imperfectly camouflaged tanks, planes, and guns in order to convince the Nazis that there were 30,000 more Allied troops on the field than were actually present. 

ghost army

These visual illusions were compounded by the use of audio recordings that could be heard over 9 miles away.

The recordings featured sound effects that mimicked the movement of large armored divisions.

ghost army audio recording

Off the battlefield, actors within the Ghost Army would impersonate US generals and officers in towns throughout France.

These actors, aware that German agents may be spying on them, would flippantly discuss fake military plans and deployments over wine in order to better spread false information. 

ghost army

Earlier this year, American Sniper actor Bradley Cooper announced he will produce Warner Brothers upcoming "Ghost Army" film.

Here's the trailer of the PBS documentary:

SEE ALSO: Bradley Cooper's new movie tells the crazy-but-true story behind inflatable artillery used to trick the Nazis

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Researchers say the Nazi gold train — supposedly discovered by amateur treasure hunters — doesn’t exist

John Legend tells us his favorite holiday songs — and why he wants to make a Christmas album

$
0
0

john legend

John Legend is ready to make a Christmas album. 

Music plays a significant role in his celebration of the holidays, the musician recently told Business Insider at an event for his new song "Under the Stars."

"I look forward to doing a full Christmas album. That would be fun," Legend said. "When I'm with my side of the family, we sing every Christmas. We stand around the piano, we have a good time, so music is an important part of Christmas."

Some of his favorite holiday songs are the classics, including "Silent Night" and "O Holy Night," but he also said he loves "This Christmas" by Donny Hathaway from 1970.

Though he sang with Mariah Carey in 2011 for her single "When Christmas Comes," Legend hasn't recorded any of his own holiday music — until this year.

He wrote and recorded "Under the Stars," which incorporates sounds from real stars, as part of Stella Artois' Give Beautifully campaign and turned to what he finds meaningful about Christmas for inspiration.

"Being with people you love, spreading love to other people who might need help, being generous and being kind and loving," he said of the song's theme. "It's about thinking about what it means to love each other and to be giving and connected to each other." 

You can listen to three of Legend's favorite holiday songs as well as his own new one below:

SEE ALSO: John Legend explains his fascination with space and new song made from star sounds

Bing Crosby - "Silent Night"

Youtube Embed:
http://www.youtube.com/embed/6GUnfLPpjLs
Width: 800px
Height: 600px

 



Mariah Carey - "O Holy Night"

Youtube Embed:
http://www.youtube.com/embed/GMkRMiO8FIU
Width: 800px
Height: 600px

 



Donny Hathaway - "This Christmas"

Youtube Embed:
http://www.youtube.com/embed/pj1mVUEHeUE
Width: 800px
Height: 600px

 



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

We asked Michael Moore about the gun-violence epidemic, his new movie, and why Donald Trump will get the Republican nomination

$
0
0

Michael Moore TBI Interview illustrationOscar-winning documentary filmmaker Michael Moore is in a good mood. And it's not because he thinks the country is in good shape. But as he gets on the phone with Business Insider, he can't contain himself, as he's just left Trump Tower in Manhattan, where he stood with a sign that read "We Are All Muslim" until the police asked him to leave.

"We've just left the grounds," Moore said with a fiendish giggle. He would later post an open letter online telling Trump that if he wants to ban Muslims from entering the US, "you are first going to have to ban me. And everyone else."

It's the kind of headline-grabbing move for which Moore is known, going all the way back to his 1989 debut film "Roger & Me," which looked at laid-off autoworkers in his hometown of Flint, Michigan.

The Trump stunt also comes as Moore's first movie in six years hits theaters, "Where to Invade Next" — opening in New York and LA on December 23 and wider February 12. In it, he travels around the world, showcasing what he says other countries are doing better than the US, from healthcare and school lunches to treatment of prisoners.

We talked to Moore about what led him to make the movie, why Trump is so popular, and what it will take for America to have strict gun laws.

(This interview has been edited for length and clarity.)

Jason Guerrasio: You've said on numerous occasions that you were intentionally secretive about making this film. Why was that?

Michael Moore: It was more, I would say, personal and artistic reasons than really to hide. Because, first of all, it's really hard for me to hide. But myself and the crew, I said, "Why don't we make a film and unplug ourselves from the machine?" We stayed off social media. We didn't have a publicist and anyone issuing press releases. What if we just focused on our art and the film we wanted to make?

And why don't we make this as if this is the last film we're ever going to make? What would that film look like? So we unplugged ourselves and went about our work. It had more to do with that than anything else.

Guerrasio: And how liberating was that?

Moore: It was incredible. It felt like I was back making "Roger & Me." It was a small crew. We hopped in the van after we got off the plane, and we were very lean about it. We wanted to make it for a little bit of money. The budget was two-thirds less than my last two movies [which were budgeted around $10 million]. I work for union scale. The crew and I are all friends and some of us have been doing this since "Roger & Me" for 25 years. So it had a great feeling to it. And we didn't get production offices. We did all of the preproduction in my living room, and then we went and shot for 35 continuous days.

Guerrasio: And is it true the idea for this movie has been with you for many years?

Moore: Yeah, when I was 19 years old I got a youth hostel card, got a year-round pass, and went back-packing around Europe for two months. Over and over I would see things and I would go, "How come we don't do that in the US? Why don't we have that?"

"How come we don't do that in the US? Why don't we have that?"

And every time I have traveled since in my life — you've done this, I'm sure — you run into things and you go, "That's a great idea. Why don't we do that?"

Guerrasio: So what took so long for you to get this project off the ground?

Moore: I would just come up with another idea. And this would move to the back burner. It moved to the front burner in the beginning of this year when all the negotiations were going on over the Iran deal and conservatives in this country were talking about [how] we shouldn't be signing a deal with Iran, we should be bombing them. And I'm like, "Are you serious?" [Laughs] For the last decade and a half, we've been bombing and invading countries and I just thought I have to do [this film] now and I'm going to make it as an invasion film, in fact. The kind of invasions I would like us to participate in from now on. Invasions of ideas with nonviolence.

michael moore_moore's worksGuerrasio: It seems like since you premiered the film at the Toronto International Film Festival, it's gotten a very positive response, more so than your other recent ones. Do you feel that?

Moore: Absolutely.

Guerrasio: Why do you think that is?

Moore:[Laughs] That's a very good question because it's one I've been asking myself. I've been trying to analyze it and figure it out. I don't know what the exact answer is — I can give you a bunch of answers.

It's my first movie in six years. The last six years, I got a lot of fan mail from people asking, "When is the next film coming out?" I think that's part of it. I purposely stayed off television for the last two years. Last time I appeared as a guest on a TV show was October of 2013. That was part of the unplugging. And then in the beginning of 2014, my father passed away and I went through a divorce. There were a lot of things going on.

Also, I think people are feeling more and more that we've moved back into a darker time. Donald Trump is absolutely going to be the Republican candidate for president of the United States. It's going from being a joke to being a serious reality.

Donald Trump is absolutely going to be the Republican candidate for president of the United States. It's going from being a joke to being a serious reality.

And I think the enthusiasm for this film and people wanting to see it is partly based on this election year we're in now and the various tragedies that have occurred recently and what do we do? Are we going to get dragged down the rabbit hole again? Are we going to lose another decade of making our country a better place and the world a better place because we're so caught up in violence and war? I think those are all probably part of why people are exited to see this movie.

Guerrasio: You have stated numerous times while doing Q&As at screenings recently that a majority of Americans are in a demographic that should not support Donald Trump, then why are his poll numbers so big?

Moore: Yes, 81% of the country is either women, people of color, or youth between the ages 18 to 31.

His numbers are high because they are polling Republican voters, or likely Republican voters in the primary. But when they poll him against [Democratic primary candidates] Hillary [Clinton] or Bernie [Sanders], he still does quite well. I think that's in part because my side of of the political fence is the slacker side of the fence. That even though statistically there's no way Trump can win, because he's alienated those three main groups that make up 81% of the country, the difference is his side always shows up to vote. My side, not so much. Then it becomes incumbent upon picking the candidate who will mostly inspire women, people of color, and young people to come out and vote. I think obviously Hillary is going to inspire a lot of women to come out and vote. I think Bernie has inspired a lot of young people to come out and vote. And the African-Americans and Hispanics, probably a split between the two is my guess. When people ask me, "Who should we vote in the primaries?" I say, "You should vote for who you think should be president." Don't vote for who has a better chance, because whoever has a "D" by their name on the ballot is going to win, assuming we get the vote out.

My biggest concern about Hillary right now is her lack of inspiration. She doesn't get big crowds. There's not a lot of excitement about her. Too many young people see her as the same-old, same-old politics. So she is going to have to have a bit of what Obama had and a bit of what Bernie has if she's going to be the candidate. I honestly believe that Bernie Sanders could be elected president of the United States. I think people will pour out in droves to elect him and there's just not enough angry white guys anymore over the age of 35 to put Trump in office.

Guerrasio: You mention Bernie Sanders. I remember in the first Democratic debate he brought up Denmark, and it reminded me of your film. What are your thoughts on how he uses Denmark as an example of how we should live our lives in the US?

Moore: I say it differently than the way he said it. Also, when Bernie said that, Hillary ridiculed him and I thought, "Wow, Hillary, first of all, by making that statement she's relying on the ignorance of the American public not knowing how well off their lives would be if they lived in Denmark."

There's nobody in Denmark that needs to work a second job. There's nobody in Germany that needs to work a second job. Pencil makers make enough money to have a great life. And I asked them all there if they had a second job and they all laughed at me. They laughed at that question. The way I put it in the film, and the way Bernie didn't, it's not that Denmark has these good ideas — it's that Denmark and Norway and Germany and France, they took a lot of our great ideas and made them a reality.

It's that Denmark and Norway and Germany and France, they took a lot of our great ideas and made them a reality.

I mean, every country we went to, they kept saying to me, "Why don't you do this or do that, because you were the ones that came up with this idea."

Look, everybody my age or older knows that the world was envious of our public-education system. We were the top in the world. We had the best schools in the world for public schools and anybody, regardless of their economic status, got a good education in the United States of America. And they would say to me over there, "Why did you guys give up on that? You just flushed your great education system down the toilet and we just picked up what you were doing." And they did it better. The sense that we started to have is that the whole thing about the American Dream was alive and well over there and here it is exactly what the term implies — a dream. Over there it's an American reality. But they have made it a Danish reality, a German reality, an Italian reality.

There are more laughs in this movie than any of my other movies since "Roger & Me," but you also feel, and I have seen the movie now with various regular audiences, there's a slow burn that rises throughout the movie of people sitting in the audience going, "How come we don't have that? Why don't I have any time off?" Why is it that there's no French word for copay or deductible? They don't even know what those words mean when you ask a French person who has been to a doctor. [Laughs]

Guerrasio: With all the examples you show in the movie, is there one that you believe could be established in this country right now?

Moore: In terms of what can happen the soonest, parents and local school districts can stop poisoning their children at lunch now. They can literally get the PTA and the school board together and say we are going to do lunch differently from now on. I think [universal] paid maternity leave, that's within a year or two of happening. Certainly in the next administration. The decriminalizing of drugs, already happening. Obama's new drug czar on "60 Minutes" declared the war on drugs over. So these things are happening.

The things that are going to take a little longer will be returning our schools to the progressive liberal education that they used to have 50, 60 years ago. Post-World War II America. I think the thing that would make people the happiest, if you were polling people — guaranteeing at least a four-week paid vacation every year would go well with everybody.

Guerrasio: Looking at the other side of the coin, the big criticism of your movie is, to take the example of Italy, yes, the country has this amazing universal vacation package for its workers, but look at their economy. How do you respond to that?

michael moore_the invasions 2Moore: I wouldn't want to live there. I don't consider it a criticism — they are talking about a film that I didn't make. I'm making a film about the United States, not a film about Italy. I'm just using Italy to show Americans the way things could be and how our dream has been deferred to other countries.

As I say in the beginning of the film, I went there to pick the flowers, not the weeds. Every country has problems. But to dismiss the good things that they do because they don't do other things well, it would be — let's say, an Italian documentary filmmaker went to Silicon Valley to make a documentary on the genius of the iPhone and then an Italian said to him, "You made this whole film about the iPhone and the genius of it and Silicon Valley and you failed to mention that in the US, they have had 315 mass shootings in the US this year." Well, yes, but it's apples and oranges. I wouldn't want other countries to dismiss our good ideas because we have so many messed-up things going on and I'm not going to dismiss their good ideas because they have messed-up things going on.

Guerrasio: Well, speaking of the bad things going on here, the number of mass shootings in this country has been staggering this year. You won an Academy Award for your movie "Bowling for Columbine," which showed why the current gun laws in the US aren't working, yet things haven't improved. How does that make you feel?

Moore: Well, I feel pretty bad. Because I made that movie to try and stop it. I was appealing the "R" rating for "Where to Invade Next" to the MPAA a couple of weeks ago and I said, "I was here 13 years ago with 'Bowling for Columbine' and you gave me an R rating and back then there was a school shooting a year. You said you didn't want to upset teenagers who watch a movie, that it would make them think about school shootings." Well, how has that worked out? We're never better off as a society when you try to limit information. Or limit discussion. So the limiting and censoring at that time didn't help the problem, it didn't go away, it only got worse.

I'm not going to dismiss their good ideas because they have messed-up things going on.

Guerrasio: Are you concerned that "Where to Invade Next" will have the same fate as "Bowling for Columbine," where no change happens?

Moore: No, because sometimes you have to play the long game. I made a film in the '90s called "The Big One." I go to see [Nike cofounder] Phil Knight and I said, "You got 12-year-olds working in your factories in Indonesia," and he said, "They aren't 12; they are 14." Oh, I feel so much better, thank you. But within a week of that movie coming out, he raised the age limit of his workers to 18. He just immediately decided not to use child labor. And I've had little things happen in other films once I put it out there. But obviously, yes, the gun problem has gotten much worse.

WTIN1What I had to say about General Motors and industrial America in "Roger & Me," I don't think anyone disagrees with anymore, but that film was too far ahead of the curve, like 20 years ahead of General Motors going bankrupt when I was trying to warn people about it. I think the reason why I'm more optimistic with this film having an impact is that I'm not 20 years ahead of the curve on these issues I'm raising in the film. I'm on the curve. It's already happening, some of it. And what isn't happening is boiling just beneath the surface and it's ready to come up.

Guerrasio: So what will we see first in this country: one of the ideas in your movie that are boiling to the surface, or a strict gun law?

Moore: You'll see a strict gun law passed when someone releases the crime-scene photos of the next school where 20 young people's children's faces have been blown away.

You'll see a strict gun law passed when someone releases the crime scene photos of the next school where 20 young people's children's faces have been blown away.

During the Vietnam War, you saw what was happening over there on the 6:30 news — that did more to turn people against the war than anything else. A 3-year-old washes ashore in Turkey three months ago, and it galvanized all of Europe and they opened their doors to the Syrian refugees. One photo of the 3-year-old dead. I don't want the parents to suffer through it, but if the crime-scene photos from the next mass shooting were ever released, that night the NRA, they might as well shutter their doors and windows, because they are done. That's what it will probably take.

Guerrasio: That's a horrific thought, to think that's how far we need to go.

Moore: Well, that's who we are. In the end we're human beings, we have a conscience, we have a heart, and you think of Sandy Hook and those 20 6-year-olds all shot at point-blank range by this lunatic. Who, by the way, the NRA says, "This is a mental-health issue." Yeah, the issue was that his mom bought him guns that neither he nor anyone else should have access to. That guy was seeing two shrinks, first of all, I just want to make this point. His father is vice president of General Electric. OK. This wasn't just some crazy guy out in the woods. This was a guy who had means, who had help, who had a great health-insurance policy. But he also had easy access to guns.

Guerrasio: Are you surprised by how people have reacted to the optimism of "Where to Invade Next"? This is a lighter side of you that you're showing.

Moore:[Laughs] I hear people say that and I notice it, too. I watch the movie and think maybe I don't let that side out enough. So maybe this movie is closer to the real me as I'm experiencing these things in these countries. Maybe I'm just happy to see that there is a solution to a lot of these problems. You would feel good if you're sitting there and this German guy on the board of Lufthansa is telling you that they now have a law in Germany where it's against the law for the boss to bother you while you're on vacation.

And now companies have expanded that and they are getting ready to pass new laws that would make it illegal for the boss to contact you after you go home for the day, unless it's an emergency. You can turn your phone off and have a life. You see happy Germans — when have you seen a happy German? It's a population of very happy people.

Guerrasio: Why is the theatrical experience still vital to you? In a world where audiences want more content to stream, why are you steadfast about going the traditional route?

Moore: I love Netflix. When you get a cold, that's everyone's go-to, you just binge-watch the latest things. I'm in the middle of "Master of None" right now. This is a much longer conversation, but I'll say this: It is critical that documentaries that are made for a theatrical audience have theatrical distribution. I think for the audience it's much better to see some of these films with 200 other people in the dark than home alone. It's a whole different experience.

I think for the audience it's much better to see some of these films with 200 other people in the dark than home alone.

I have to be honest, when I'm watching a movie on television or my computer, I don't really in my head think that I'm watching a movie. I don't know what the name of it should be, but in the same way that they issue the "Mona Lisa" postage stamp, that wasn't the "Mona Lisa," that was a stamp with a picture of the "Mona Lisa" on it. "Mona Lisa" is over in the Louvre. I and the others that make these movies for theaters, we make them for a 50-foot screen. We make them to be experienced with others, because you're going to have a different emotional response. The laughter, the crying, the anger, whatever it is. And I think there's something very valuable about that.

Do I like the accessibility that there are computers and iPhones and Netflix and all of that? Absolutely. Because I'm for reaching people whatever way they want to be reached, but I want to encourage people, when they can, to see these movies in theaters. And I think to go to the movies is an active thing, it's not a passive activity. You have to actually commit. You have to get a babysitter, you have to leave the house, you have to spend money. When it's just noise on in the background, when you're working at home or cleaning the house or making dinner, it's something else. It's not really a movie.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: One of the most incredible stunts in history has inspired a generation of daredevils and outlaws on Instagram and YouTube

Miss Colombia responds to Miss Universe mistake with heartfelt message: 'My destiny was this'

$
0
0

miss colombia miss universe mistake

Miss Colombia is staying gracious with a message to her supporters in the aftermath of being mistakenly crowned Miss Universe on Sunday, and then having the crown removed.

"Your destiny is written for you. And my destiny was this," Miss Colombia Ariadna Gutierrez wrote of Sunday's debacle on Instagram.

"I was able to bring happiness to my country after becoming Miss Universe for only a couple of minutes," she continued. "Today because of that COLOMBIA and the LATIN COMMUNITY are being talked about in every corner of the world."

Gutierrez also said she is "fortunate" and "thankful" for the support from her country, as well as the rest of the world.

miss philippines miss colombia miss universe 2015  steve harveyGutierrez has been caught in a media scandal since Miss Universe host Steve Harvey incorrectly read her name off a ballot card. In the middle of her winner's walk and already crowned, Harvey returned to the stage to announce his error. Gutierrez was stripped of the crown and sash, so that the rightful winner, Miss Philippines Pia Alonzo Wurtzbach, could be crowned.

The 21-year-old beauty queen referenced Wurtzbach's country in her comments: "I also want to congratulate the Philippines for their new Miss Universe. The happiness that you must be feeling must be incredible."

Before these statements and just moments after the mix-up, Gutierrez similarly showed grace in adversity when she wiped away a tear backstage and said, "Everything happens for a reason."

Gutierrez's kind words are in contrast with those of her angry supporters. A Change.org petition asking for the crown to be returned to Miss Colombia currently has more than 45,000 signatures. And a Colombian law firm says it's preparing a lawsuit against the pageant.

See Miss Colombia's Instagram post below:

After the storm comes the calm. I want to thank each and everyone of you who have sent messages of support and strength. Every one of you has become an incredible human being in my book and I am the most fortunate and thankful for having the support not only from one country but from the whole entire world. Your destiny is written for you. And my destiny was this. I was able to bring happiness to my country after becoming Miss Universe for only a couple of minutes... Today because of that COLOMBIA and the LATIN COMMUNITY are being talked about in every corner of the world. I also want to congratulate the Philippines for their new Miss Universe 🙏🏼. The happiness that you must be feeling must be incredible. Life continues and in the future we will find out why things happen the way they happen. Thank you all for your LOVE SUPPORT and KINDNESS. ❤️

A photo posted by Ariadna Gutierrez Arevalo (@gutierrezary) on

SEE ALSO: Steve Harvey is 'absolutely' welcome back to host Miss Universe despite gaffe

MORE: Fewer people watched Miss Universe this year, even with the winner mix-up going viral

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: There's a conspiracy theory that the Miss Universe disaster wasn't really Steve Harvey's fault

Here's why Will Smith's new movie 'Concussion' can legally use NFL logos without the league's consent

$
0
0

will smith concussion

"Concussion," out Friday, stars Will Smith as Dr. Bennet Omalu, a Nigerian doctor who discovered the brain disease chronic traumatic encephalopathy, better known as CTE, which has become a hot-button topic related to football in the past few years. More and more of the game's players (from professional to recreational) have described having symptoms associated with CTE. In "Concussion," Omalu attempts to raise awareness of the disease as the NFL tries to cover it up.

For the sake of authenticity, the movie is filled with shots of boardrooms with the NFL logo and authentic team logos prominently displayed.

concussion_NFL_skitch finalNFL is clearly not outwardly endorsing a movie that shows it attempting to sweep away an issue that could cripple its business. So why is "Concussion" legally allowed to show copyrighted material without the league's consent?

According to entertainment lawyer Michael C. Donaldson, as long as the use of the NFL trademark and team logos does not in and of itself disparage or misrepresent the brands, there is no need to ask for permission.

Donaldson, who has over 30 years of experience in copyright and entertainment issues, told Business Insider the NFL "browbeat a lot of people into paying fees that don't have to be paid." He added: "They extract those fees from filmmakers who are either nervous or not completely aware of their rights under the law."

Donaldson gave this example in how to understand trademark law:

"It's all right to say, 'This Coca-Cola tastes awful.' You can say, 'I hate Coca-Cola.' What you can't say is something that misrepresents it, such as you drink a Coke and you drop dead and someone says, 'That happens all the time.'"

What causes the confusion, Donaldson said, is what goes on at the networks. Because they air NFL games, they have broadcast rights. You may notice the disclaimer during games that says in part, "Any pictures, descriptions, or accounts of the game without the NFL's consent is prohibited."

"So people think, 'Oh, the networks pay for the use of logos, obviously I have to,'" Donaldson said.

But that is different from trademark rights.

For example, in this scene in "Concussion," the NFL logo is prominently shown as a backdrop during a news conference:

concussion_NFL_2_skitch finalBut because the logo is shown in a way that does not misrepresent its real-life use, the depiction is completely legal.

The issue of using material copyrighted by the NFL also came up earlier this year during the premiere of HBO's new show "Ballers," starring Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson as an NFL player turned agent. As with "Concussion," the show uses the NFL logo and team logos throughout.

In the opening scene of "Ballers," we see Johnson's character, Spencer Strasmore, having flashbacks from his days on the gridiron as a Miami Dolphin. He's wearing a Dolphins uniform with the team's logo in plain view. He's chasing down a Buffalo Bills quarterback, whose helmet logo is also clearly visible.

ballers logo finalDonaldson said the show's depiction was legal.

According to Donaldson's partner at his practice, Chris Perez, the show can go even further, and the NFL could still not have a case.

"One thing that we can say for sure about players in the NFL in the last few years is that fights happen on the field every so often and then they get broken up by referees or coaches," Perez said. "Players have engaged in domestic violence and then been convicted of that, and NFL players have committed murder. So you can create a show that uses NFL logos and create a fictional situation where all of those things happen."

Later in that episode, the show does depict a player in a negative light. A fictional star receiver for the Green Bay Packers, Ricky Jerret (John David Washington), gets into an altercation with another man at a nightclub and beats him to the ground in front of everyone.

ballers12Though the NFL surely doesn't like that scene, Perez says the show is within its rights to air it.

"Where you can get into trouble," Perez said, "is portraying how the NFL reacts to it. The response has to be consistent to how the NFL would react in real life."

According to Donaldson, if there were a scene in which someone playing the NFL commissioner held a news conference and said the NFL wanted players to get into fights at bars, the show would "get into big trouble." (The NFL had "no comment" for this story.)

Jerret's actions in the episode do not go unpunished. Following the altercation, with the Packers logo in full view, we see the general manager say "cut him."

SEE ALSO: RANKED: The 10 best movies of 2015

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Forget 'True Detective' — HBO's new show 'Ballers' featuring The Rock looks like the hit of the summer

Jennifer Lawrence was told she was 'too pretty' for the role that made her famous

$
0
0

Jennifer Lawrence's breakout role was in 2010's "Winter's Bone." It was the role that earned her fame, as well as her first Oscar nomination.

However, she almost didn't get the part because producers thought she was "too pretty."

In a recent interview on NPR's "Fresh Air," host Terry Gross asked her about it. 

"Well they... turned me down and then they moved casting to New York, and I put myself on a red-eye to just show up to casting the next day in New York," Lawrence explained. 

This ended up helping her in a big way.

"So that always helps. Red-eye. Not showering. No makeup. Eventually they went, 'Oh, she's right. She's not cute!'" she said. 

Her persistence paid off, as she ended up getting the role.

You can see Lawrence in the upcoming movie "Joy," which comes out in theaters on December 25th.

Story by Ian Phillips and editing by Andrew Fowler

INSIDER is on Facebook: Follow us here

SEE ALSO: Kelly Rowland talked about being a new mother after losing her own

Join the conversation about this story »

RANKED: Every Quentin Tarantino movie from best to worst

$
0
0

the hateful 8 1

Since his feature debut "Reservoir Dogs" came out in 1992, Quentin Tarantino has established himself as one of the greatest filmmakers of all time — if not always the most varied.

From "Pulp Fiction" to "Django Unchained," his style is defined by a mix of shocking violence and humor.

His latest film, "The Hateful Eight," comes out on Christmas Day. At long last, Tarantino decided to do a full-blown, traditional (or traditional-ish) western.

But where does "The Hateful Eight" fit in with the rest of his filmography?

Here is a ranking of all of Tarantino's films, starting from the worst and going to the best. But hey, even the worst ones are still pretty great:

SEE ALSO: RANKED: The 10 best movies of 2015

9. "Death Proof" (2007)

Tarantino’s worst outing as a director requires some context. “Death Proof” was one half of “Grindhouse” (the other was Robert Rodriguez’s “Planet Terror”), an experimental double feature meant to recreate the experience of the schlocky B-movies of the 1970s.

The problem with “Death Proof” is that it feels half-assed. Tarantino is so good with homage, but this still feels lazy. Tarantino’s signature long conversations don’t work for a film this short. Even with a stellar ending and a great performance from Kurt Russell, “Death Proof” feels like the first time in Tarantino’s career when he didn’t just go for it.



8. "Jackie Brown" (1997)

“Jackie Brown” had the unfortunate timing of being Tarantino’s follow-up to “Pulp Fiction.”

No matter what he did next, it was bound to not live up to monumental expectations. When “Jackie Brown” first came out in 1997, people missed one of Tarantino’s smartest and most understated movies, if not his most thrilling.



7. "Django Unchained" (2012)

“Django Unchained” is Tarantino’s most polarizing work to date, and for good reason. It asks a lot of challenging questions about slavery and whether it gives the right answers is entirely up to the viewer.

"Django" is boosted by some strong work from Jamie Foxx, Christoph Waltz, Leonardo DiCaprio, and Samuel L. Jackson. Maybe the biggest thing running against it is that, at two hours and 45 minutes, it would have been much better if the filmmakers trimmed it down by about an hour.



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

This guy executed an insane fire-breathing backflip

Julia Louis-Dreyfus' giggle attacks were infectious while shooting the 'Seinfeld' Festivus-dinner episode

$
0
0

the strike festivus julie louis dreyfus giggled

It was apparently well-known among the "Seinfeld" cast and crew that star Julia Louis-Dreyfus struggled with giggle fits when shoots ran late, and that they could become quite infectious.

Apparently, that's exactly what happened during the episode that brought the world Festivus.

Titled "The Strike," the December 1997 episode would join all the main characters (and some unwanted guests) at a dinner at George's (Jason Alexander) parents' house in honor of Festivus, a holiday meant to be secular and inclusive during the Christmas season.

“When shooting ‘The Strike,’ one of my favorite things, in hindsight, that used to happen is when it was very late at night Julia Louis-Dreyfus would get the giggles and it was usually the last or second to last scene of the night,” writer Alec Berg told Uproxx in a new interview.

He continued, “She would start to laugh and part of me was like, ‘Ugh, dammit, we gotta get this done so we can go home and get a few hours of sleep before we have to come back tomorrow morning and start all over again.’ But her laugh is so infectious and so enjoyable that everybody else would just start laughing."

In trying to find the perfect "scuzzy scumbag" for Louis-Dreyfus to play off of, the show hired Colin Malone. He hosted a cable-access show called "Colin's Sleazy Friends," in which "he would hang out with porn stars."

the strike festivus julie louis dreyfus giggled 2

"We thought he was such a hilarious scuzzy scumbag guy," Berg said. "I can’t remember what the line was but she was supposed to turn to him and say something and we must have tried to do that line 30 times and she just kept breaking.”

Watch Louis-Dreyfus break into laughter while shooting the memorable scene below:

SEE ALSO: President Obama — who's never allowed to drive — got to ride around in a Corvette for Jerry Seinfeld's web show

MORE: Jennifer Lawrence told Seth Meyers she used to have a secret crush on him and almost asked him out

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: The 'Seinfeld' cast recorded these awesome birthday wishes for a terminally ill fan

How 'The Big Short' director turned the financial collapse into a big, celebrity-stacked comedy

$
0
0

the big short

Adam McKay is best known for directing some of Will Ferrell’s biggest movies — “Anchorman: The Legend of Ron Burgundy,” “Talladega Nights: The Ballad of Ricky Bobby,” “Step Brothers.” But with the release of “The Big Short” this weekend, McKay has stepped away from Ferrell’s large shadow.

But he needed his comedy talents to tell the story of one of the largest financial collapses in history.

Based on the Michael Lewis best-selling book of the same name, “The Big Short” looks at the housing bubble during the 2000s. It stars Christian Bale, Ryan Gosling, Steve Carell, and Brad Pitt as a handful of the few people in the financial world who saw it coming.

But to connect with moviegoing audiences while tackling such a complex subject, McKay decided to add a little sugar to his medicine. Not to mention brief flashes of pop culture, including an interlude featuring celebrities Margot Robbie, Anthony Bourdain, and Selena Gomez explaining financial terminology (which will no doubt rankle Wall Street).

“I feel if you do this movie like, say, ‘The Insider' — which I think is a great movie — you wouldn’t be doing this story justice,” McKay told Business Insider, referring to the more somber Russell Crowe film about a tobacco-industry whistleblower. “I wouldn’t want to see that movie.”

But McKay admits he didn’t write the script intending on getting laughs. It came from the material in Lewis’ book that is so outlandish you can only help but laugh, which McKay did while reading it in one sitting in 2010.

Highlights include Michael Burry (Bale) only listening to heavy metal music and Mark Baum (Carrel) who is so attached to his phone that he takes a call in the middle of asking a question at a major public conference in Las Vegas.

Shooting the film with a handheld, documentary-like atmosphere, and allowing his actors to improvise, McKay shaped a film that would turn out to be very different from how Hollywood had previously looked at the financial collapse (“The Company Men,” “Too Big to Fail”). Could audiences still get the underlying message?

Adam McKay Michael Bowles Getty“I thought the film was really starting to fit well in rough assembly, which never happens,” McKay said. “So we got 300 people and did a screening, for us, not for the studio. This was at a running time of two hours and twenty minutes. It was long, but sitting there, I could feel the energy. The audience understood what we were talking about.”

McKay’s enthusiasm and proof that “real people” appreciated the movie caused Paramount Pictures to set its release date smack in the middle of awards consideration.

The film has become a frontrunner of the season, having recently received Golden Globes nominations for Best Actor in a Comedy for both Carell and Bale and Best Screenplay for McKay and his co-writer Charles Randoph.

But McKay does admit there is one line in the movie that he purposely wrote for a laugh.

“I almost cut it out of the movie,” McKay said, “but it’s where the Vinny (Jeremy Strong) character says, ‘It looks like someone hit a pinata of white guys who suck at golf.’ I knew that line would get a laugh.”

“The Big Short” opens in limited release Friday and everywhere December 23.

SEE ALSO: The crazy story of how "The Big Short" got Led Zeppelin to approve song rights

Join the conversation about this story »

Feast your eyes on the stunning pictures that just won the iPhone Photography Awards (AAPL)

$
0
0

06 Christian Frank–1stPlace Architecture


If you think you need a fancy camera to capture stunning pictures, think again. 

The iPhone Photography Awards just announced the winners of their eighth annual contest.  

Judges sorted through thousands of entries to pick the three best photos, as well as category-specific highlights.

"This year’s entries were especially impressive, ranging from intimate, thought-provoking moments to stunning, captivating imagery,” said IPP Awards creator Kenan Aktulun in a statement.

Check out the winning photographs in each category, and then the overall winners at the end.

And yes, you may need to keep reminding yourself that they were really taken on an iPhone.

SEE ALSO: Here's what 23 tech stars have on their home screens

This haunting image by Seattle-based Ben Schuyler won first place in the "Abstract" category.



Light and shadows distinguish this gorgeous first place portrait by Daniele Colombera.



"I take photographs with my telephone because it's the future," Jesse Alkire writes on his photography site. This picture won first place in the news and events category.

Check out his site



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

How an ugly Christmas-sweater company became Robert Herjavec's best 'Shark Tank' investment

$
0
0

the night before

It's the most wonderful time of the year for retailers — and for "Shark Tank" investor Robert Herjavec.

He has consistently said that his favorite investment from the show is goofy holiday-apparel company Tipsy Elves. He invested $100,000 for 10% equity in the business two seasons ago in 2013.

Cofounder Nick Morton said that part of it has to do with the friendship he and his business partner, Evan Mendelsohn, have developed with Herjavec.

"We get along really well," Morton said.

"I'm pretty busy, so I like to invest in people that I like to hang with," Herjavec told Business Insider last year. "For me, I always want to invest in somebody who's incredibly, deeply passionate about the business, and these guys wanted to run a business. I mean they wanted to be there 24/7."

But beyond being good guys to hang with, Morton and Mendelsohn are making Herjavec a good chunk of money.

Herjavec made back his investment after just a few months, and he said that it's been his most profitable venture from the show. Tipsy Elves has been lucrative since launching in 2011 and continues to grow steadily. Morton said that he expects the company to end the year with $10 million to $15 million in sales, up from $7 million last year.

Before they became kings of the ugly Christmas-sweater movement in the US and Canada, Mendelsohn was a lawyer and Morton a dental surgeon, with six college degrees between them.

In 2011, Mendelsohn noticed a trend of young adults wearing gaudy sweaters to holiday parties, as an ironic nod to bad gifts they received as kids. He figured that there was a perfect opening for a company to own this market and called Morton, an old friend from their undergraduate years at the University of California at San Diego, to see if he wanted to participate in a fun side project.

tipsy elvesMendelsohn built websites for companies as a way to make extra money, but joked that ultimately Tipsy Elves was a dentist partnering with an attorney who knew a little bit about search-engine optimization starting an online-retail company.

Despite not really knowing what they were doing, Mendelsohn said, they used $140,000 of their own money to launch the business, sought advice from business-school friends, and used Morton's family ties in China to secure an affordable supplier.

They created all of the sweater designs on their own, differentiating their product by favoring irreverent and silly designs over tacky ones and using materials of a much higher quality than competitors in the novelty space. And as an extra incentive to themselves and customers, they partnered with Save the Children to dedicate a portion of their profits to providing underprivileged American children with winter clothing.

The two founders sold $380,000 worth of sweaters by the end of the first year, and then sold $900,000 the next. Mendelsohn committed full-time to Tipsy Elves in 2012, and Morton followed in 2014.

When Herjavec signed on, he told Mendelsohn and Morton that even though he trusted their judgment that the ugly-sweater trend had legs, they needed to become a year-round company to weather any sudden shift in taste.

This year, Tipsy Elves offered clothing and accessories for Christmas, Hanukkah, Valentine's Day, St. Patrick's Day, July Fourth, Halloween, and college-football season. It most recently expanded into ski gear, bringing its total product offerings to around 500.

tipsy elves

It helped raise the company's profile enough to secure a deal with Sony Pictures for product placement in this year's Seth Rogen holiday comedy "The Night Before," as well as a product-giveaway campaign in partnership with Uber. But it came with growing pains, too.

Tipsy Elves had what Morton called "by far the biggest challenge we've faced in five years" when the New Jersey fulfillment center it partnered with failed to deliver 7,000 orders on time to customers, resulting in hundreds of frustrated customer-service calls and a handful of damaging reviews on their Facebook ads.

The two cofounders took a flight to the factory and found it teeming with management problems, Morton said. They will most likely be moving order fulfillment in-house beginning in 2016.

"On the whole, we're very happy with our growth, but we didn't maximize potential," Morton said, citing this delivery problem.

But ultimately, he sees it as a learning experience that will make the business stronger than ever.

"With the way this thing's ramped up so quickly, we've decided if you want something done right, you have to do it yourself," Morton said. "It's the missing piece, I think."

SEE ALSO: The 15 biggest 'Shark Tank' success stories of all time

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: 'Shark Tank' star Robert Herjavec on the challenges standing in the way of entrepreneurs

Viewing all 103365 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images