Quantcast
Channel: Business Insider
Viewing all 103365 articles
Browse latest View live

Everything you ever wanted to know about MoviePass, the $10-a-month service that lets you see one movie per day in theaters

$
0
0

Moviepass

Though MoviePass has been around since 2011, it didn't break into the mainstream until August 2017, when the company announced it would slash the price of its all-you-can-watch movie service to $9.95 a month.

Since then, over 2 million people have subscribed to the service, and it now features an annual-fee subscription for new users that is advertised as costing $7.95 a month (with a processing fee). 

While the app is relatively easy to use, especially with its recent redesign, there are certain variables about it that have proved difficult for users. And the company has caught flack for its share of customer service difficulties

With that in mind, here are the answers to some of the most common questions about MoviePass:

Nick Vega contributed to an earlier version of this article.

SEE ALSO: Here's how to use MoviePass, the $10-a-month service that lets you see one movie per day in theaters

What exactly is MoviePass?

MoviePass is a subscription service that allows you to see up to one movie a day in theaters.



How much is it?

The standard fee for a subscription is a flat monthly fee of $9.95 a month, which is currently only available to sign up for through the MoviePass app (as opposed to its website). 

Earlier this month, MoviePass introduced an annual subscription for new users that includes free access to the streaming service Fandor, which it says costs $7.95 a month. However, with a $19.95 processing fee, it really equals out to a one-year total of $115.35, or around $9.61 a month. (This plan is available via the MoviePass website.)



How does it work?

When you sign up for MoviePass, you get a debit card mailed to you. When you're ready to see a movie, MoviePass will load that debit card with the full cost of the ticket, which you then pay the theater. The only cost you pay is your monthly or annual fee to MoviePass.

Here's a step-by-step explanation of how to use MoviePass »



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

Jimmy Kimmel called out Donald Trump Jr. for 'perpetuating' conspiracy theories about survivors of the Florida school shooting

$
0
0

Jimmy kimmel

  • Jimmy Kimmel called out Donald Trump Jr. for "perpetuating" conspiracy theories about one of the Florida school shooting survivors on Wednesday night. 
  • In his monologue, Kimmel blasted far-right conspiracy theorists for claiming that some of the survivors were really "crisis actors" advancing a liberal agenda.

 

Jimmy Kimmel addressed the activism of the Parkland, Florida school shooting survivors on Wednesday night's "Jimmy Kimmel Live!" The host also lashed out at those peddling conspiracy theories about the survivors, including Donald Trump Jr.

Kimmel began his monologue by discussing the class walkouts that the survivors orchestrated on Wednesday after the Florida state legislature refused to debate a bill banning assault weapons.

He then turned his attention to the far-right conspiracy theories that claim some of the survivors were really "crisis actors" advancing a liberal agenda. Kimmel called out Donald Trump Jr. for liking two conspiracy stories on Twitter that attacked one of the students.

"This is our president's son doing that," Kimmel said. "Liking a story that directly defames a student that survived a shooting."

Kimmel went on to call conspiracy theorists "crazy," and said that those who don't believe the conspiracies about the survivors "can't just sit there and let these scumbags spread these lies about these kids."

Watch the monologue:

SEE ALSO: Jimmy Kimmel gives emotional plea to Trump on gun control after Parkland school shooting: 'You've literally done nothing'

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: You can connect all 9 Best Picture Oscar nominees with actors they have in common — here's how

67-year-old actress Jane Seymour posed for Playboy and shared a story of Hollywood sexual harassment

$
0
0

Jane Seymour

  • 67-year-old actress Jane Seymour posed in Playboy for the third time.
  • She said she feels "much sexier" than when she was young.
  • Seymour also opened up about an incident in 1972 when she said a producer sexually harassed her, and drove her to temporarily quit acting.

 

At 67, Jane Seymour posed for Playboy for the third time.

Seymour, who's starred in "Live and Let Die," "Dr. Quinn, Medicine Woman," and "Wedding Crashers," previously posed for Playboy in the July 1973 issue and the January 1987 issue. 

Seymour told Playboy that she feels "much sexier" than she did when she was younger. "There’s an enormous freedom in having lived as long as I have," she said. "Like my father used to say, ‘I’m comfortable in my own skin.'"

Seymour posted an image of herself from the spread on Instagram. 

Seymour also opened up about her experience with sexual harassment.

Seymour told Playboy that in 1972, she was invited to a producer's house to discuss a role. Seymour said the producer made a move on her, expecting sexual favors in exchange for casting her in his movie. Seymour refused, and asked him to call her a cab. When she got in the cab, she said the producer told her that he'd make sure she'd never work again if she ever told anyone about what just happened.

The next day, Seymour lied to her agent, saying the meeting never happened. Her agent was relieved and said that the producer had a “bit of a reputation.”

Seymour said the incident temporarily drove her to quit acting.

"I got fat. I baked bread and ate a whole loaf every morning and did needlepoint," she said. "I decided I wasn’t going to do this anymore. I wasn’t prepared to do what had to be done."

Seymour told Playboy that she's speaking about it now because she believes "women should have a choice."

“I was put in a situation where I couldn’t show what I could do," she said. "And I’m a person who, when something bad happens, I get over it and move forward.”

SEE ALSO: Terry Crews opens up about his alleged sexual assault: 'I still have to send a check to my molester'

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: You can connect all 9 Best Picture Oscar nominees with actors they have in common — here's how

Billionaire Bill Gates failed miserably at guessing grocery prices in a quiz game on 'Ellen'

$
0
0

bill gates ellen

  • Microsoft cofounder Bill Gates failed miserably at guessing the price of common grocery items in a quiz game on "Ellen" Wednesday.
  • He thought a $20 container of Tide Pods cost $4 and gave a wildly exorbitant guess at the cost of a bag of Totino's Pizza Rolls.
  • He nailed the price of dental floss.

 

It may come as no surprise that Bill Gates, the second richest person in the world, has no clue what groceries cost. 

The billionaire Microsoft cofounder appeared on "Ellen" Wednesday and had a tough time guessing the prices of common consumer items in a quiz game.

"We're going to test your knowledge of some everyday items that you get at the supermarket," Ellen DeGeneres said to Gates. "When was the last time that you've been at a supermarket?"

"A long time ago," Gates replied. 

In the game, Gates guessed that $1 Rice-a-Roni cost $5. He thought a large container of Tide Pods cost $4, but it costs $19.97. He also gave a wildly exorbitant guess at the cost of a bag of Totino's Pizza Rolls ($22).

"This is my best chance, at this one," Gates said, as the game turned to guessing the price of a dental floss container.

After professing that he "absolutely" flosses, Gates nailed the price of floss at $4. 

Watch the segment:

SEE ALSO: Bill and Melinda Gates say it’s unfair they are so rich

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: You can connect all 9 Best Picture Oscar nominees with actors they have in common — here's how

Psy, Five For Fighting, and 15 other 2-hit wonders who have all but disappeared

$
0
0

Psy Gangnam Style

• Everyone talks about one-hit wonders in the music business, but two-hit wonders also exist.

• These artists managed to put out two chart-topping hits, but failed to consistently repeat that success later on.

• The list includes the artists behind hits like "Bust a Move" and "Gangnam Style."



For some musical acts, a lasting string of hits just isn't in the cards.

Everyone talks about one-hit wonders, but there are two-hit wonders out there, too. These artists were able to put out two smash hits, and then failed to match that chart-topping glory later on.

Of course, declaring someone a "two-hit wonder" is inherently subjective. A band or an artist can have a brief brush with the mainstream, but continue to appeal to a niche audience or maintain a lasting influence in a specific genre.

This particular list is also focuses on US charts, and only draws upon the Billboard Hot 100 chart. The chart measures the physical and digital sales, radio play, and online streaming of singles in the United States. Plenty of the people mentioned within the article found — or continue to find — consistent success in Europe, Asia, and beyond. They've just been largely forgotten by American audiences.

What's more, putting out two hit singles is more than most of us can say.

So here's a look at some famous two-hit wonders across the years:

SEE ALSO: The 'Irish little boy' from 'Titanic' reveals how much he still makes from the film 20 years later

DON'T MISS: 14 ex-celebrities who ended up with completely different careers

Tone-Loc

The American rapper had back-to-back hits in the late 1980s.

Best-known songs:

• "Wild Thing" (1988): Hit #2 on Billboard Hot 100

• "Funky Cold Medina" (1989): Hit #3 on Billboard Hot 100



Owl City

The American electronica project has seen two major smash successes.

Best-known songs:

• "Fireflies" (2009): Hit #1 on Billboard Hot 100

• "Good Time" (2012): Hit #18 on Billboard Hot 100



Men Without Hats

The Canadian New Wave band peaked in the 1980s.

Best-known songs:

• "The Safety Dance" (1983): Hit #3 on Billboard Hot 100

• "Pop Goes the World" (1987): Hit #20 on Billboard Hot 100



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

Snap is sliding after Kylie Jenner tweets she doesn't use the app anymore (SNAP)

$
0
0

Kylie Jenner

  • Snap is down 8.48% after Kylie Jenner tweeted about how she doesn't use Snapchat after the app's new redesign.
  • Jenner is one of the biggest influencers on the app. 
  • Snap has been downgraded on Wall Street because of the redesign.


Snap is sliding Thursday, down 8.48% at $17.06 a share, after Kylie Jenner suggested her days of using its Snapchat app are over

"Sooo does anyone else not open Snapchat anymore?" she asked her Twitter followers. "Or is it just me... ugh this is so sad." She followed up with another tweet: "Still love you tho snap ... my first love."

The photo-sharing company has seen a boatload of user backlash in the wake of the rollout of its redesigned app. More than 1.2 million people have signed a petition on Change.org called "Remove the new Snapchat Update."

The wave of negativity surrounding the rollout has caused Wall Street firms to downgrade the stock. In January, Raymond James downgraded the stock and just two days ago Citigroup followed suit by lowering their price target to $14 a share. 

"While the recent redesign of [Snap's] flagship app could produce positive long-term benefits, [there is a] significant jump in negative app reviews since the redesign was pushed out a few weeks, which could result in a decline in users and user engagement, and could negatively impact financial results," Citigroup analysts Mark May and Hao Yan wrote on Tuesday. 

Snapchat users who are calling for the old ways are out of luck. In a statement released Wednesday, the company said the new app is here to stay, with some adjustments on the way.

"Beginning soon on iOS, and with Android in the coming weeks, we are introducing tabs in Friends and Discover, which will make it easier to find the Stories that you want, when you want them," the release said. 

Shares of Snap are up 14.6% this year. 

Snap

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Microsoft President Brad Smith says the US shouldn't get 'too isolationist'

There's a new dilemma in modern romance: What to do if your date doesn't have MoviePass

$
0
0

MoviePass

  • MoviePass is a $10-per-month subscription service for going to the movie theater. It comes with plenty of positives, but it also raises some dilemmas.
  • One of those is how to navigate a relationship when your significant other doesn't use the service.
  • There's even a comment thread on Reddit dedicated to "MoviePass dating tips."

 

MoviePass, the $10-a-month movie theater subscription service, has emerged as a cost-saving mechanism for millions of moviegoers — but it has some drawbacks.

Users have complained about delayed cards and subpar customer service, and that their accounts have been suspended without warning. But even when everything goes smoothly technically, there's one social issue I've faced that you may have experienced as well: Dating someone who doesn't have MoviePass.

For $10 a month, MoviePass allows you to see up to one movie per day in theaters. You simply check into the movie on the app, within 100 yards of the theater, and use the MoviePass MasterCard to purchase the ticket. The company pays the movie theater full price for the ticket.

For film buffs like me, it's a no-brainer, and even for casual moviegoers it can save money, which has helped the company snag over two million subscribers.

But here's a problem: My significant other doesn't use MoviePass.

It raises a bevy of moral dilemmas: Is it appropriate to use it right in front of her? Should I be discreet, even if we agreed to pay for ourselves? Granted, these may be bigger questions for newer couples, but if you have MoviePass and have entered the theater with someone who doesn't, I'm sure you've thought about it.

Many of these questions stem from the simple fact that when you have MoviePass, there is no marginal cost to seeing one more movie. In one sense, you aren't paying for a movie, and your date is. That could even come up when you are suggesting that you go to the movies for the date. Are you choosing a movie night because it's "free" for you? Should you pay for half their ticket?

In my case, I go to the movies a lot, and many of those times it's alone. My girlfriend doesn't live with me or even in the same city, and it's just super convenient to go to the movies whenever I want. That means I don't see a lot of movies with her.

But for the ones I do, MoviePass has actually provided an unexpected benefit. With MoviePass, I feel even more comfortable seeing movies a second time in theaters. In fact, I saw Oscar frontrunner "Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri" a second time with my girlfriend. I don't even like the movie all that much, but that's okay because with MoviePass, I saw it for "free."

As to her paying full price for her ticket, most of the time when we go together, I'm not "inviting" her; she wants to see the movie as well, and we've been in a relationship long enough where we can pay for ourselves.

But not everyone's boyfriend or girlfriend loves the high ticket prices in theaters. My colleague Carrie Wittmer shared a different experience with me.

"I've been trying to get my boyfriend to get MoviePass, too," she told me. "He doesn't go as often as me, and complains about how expensive it is. But even if he saw one movie a month, he would probably save over ten bucks. He hasn't gotten it yet, but complains about how expensive tickets are every time we go. I tell him to get MoviePass, he doesn't, and the cycle continues."

There's even a Reddit thread named "Dating with moviepass tips," in which Redditors suggest ways to make a date at the theater go smoothly if your date does not have MoviePass. Some of the responses are ... not exactly productive.

"No time for dates," one commenter wrote. "Only have time for movies."

But one commenter posed a somewhat compelling argument: "Make them pay for themselves, but tell them they could have saved a lot of money if only they had Moviepass. Then get them to sign up using your referral link."

Problem solved.

SEE ALSO: Everything you ever wanted to know about MoviePass, the $10-a-month service that lets you see one movie per day in theaters

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Henry Blodget: This could be exactly what the start of a major correction looks like

Music legend Quincy Jones apologizes for the 'wordvomit' of his recent viral interviews, citing a 'family intervention' from his daughters

$
0
0

quincy jones

  • Legendary music producer Quincy Jones apologized Thursday for two recent viral interviews that he gave to Vulture and GQ.
  • Jones, citing a "family intervention" from his daughters, apologized for his "wordvomit" and "bad-mouthing" in the interviews.
  • In his interview with Vulture, Jones claimed that he "used to date" Ivanka Trump, and that Marlon Brando and comedian Richard Pryor had a sexual relationship.

 

Music legend Quincy Jones apologized Thursday for two wild interviews he gave to GQ and Vulture that went viral in recent weeks. 

The 85-year-old producer shared a note on Twitter saying that his six daughters gave him a "family intervention" over the interviews.

In his Vulture Q&A, among many other quotable responses, Jones claimed that he "used to date" Ivanka Trump 12 years ago, and that Marlon Brando and comedian Richard Pryor had a sexual relationship.

"It’s apparent that 'wordvomit' & bad-mouthing is inexcusable," Jones wrote in the note. "I am sorry to anyone whom my words offended & I'm especially sorry to my friends who are still here with me & to those who aren't."

Read the full text of his statement below:

SEE ALSO: The 50 best-selling albums of all time

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: You can connect all 9 Best Picture Oscar nominees with actors they have in common — here's how


47 documentaries on Netflix right now that will make you smarter

$
0
0

Jim and Andy Francois Duhamel Netflix final

One of the great things about Netflix is that it has brought thoughtful, compelling documentaries to a much wider audience — something filmmakers could only dream of a decade ago.

And with binge-worthy titles like Netflix original "Jim & Andy: The Great Beyond" and Oscar-nominated "Last Men in Aleppo" a click away, you can get a lot of great nonfiction viewing any night of the week.

You'll learn a lot more about the world, but don't worry — you'll also be entertained.

Here are 47 documentaries we think you should stream right away on Netflix.

Note: Numerous Netflix titles drop off the streaming service monthly, so the availability of titles below may change.

SEE ALSO: All the 'Avengers' and Marvel fans who nailed their cosplay at Comic-Con

1. "13th"

Director Ava DuVernay looks at the history of the US prison system and how it relates to the nation's history of racial inequality.



2. "Amanda Knox"

The murder trial in Italy of the American exchange student Amanda Knox, who is now free, captivated the world in the early 2000s. This Netflix original looks back at the case and gets the perspective of Knox and others closely involved.



3. "The Battered Bastards of Baseball"

In a fascinating look at one of the more colorful stories in baseball lore, directors Chapman and Maclain Way follow the Portland Mavericks, an independent baseball team owned by the movie star Bing Russell (Kurt Russell's father) who threw out all the conventions of the national pastime to build a regional sensation in the late 1970s.



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

Trump seemed to place part of the blame for school shootings on violent video games and movies — and a Parkland survivor called it a 'pathetic excuse'

$
0
0

Donald Trump AP

  • In the wake of the school shooting in Florida last week, President Trump said on Thursday that violence in video games and movies were affecting kids.
  • One Florida school shooting survivor called the President's remarks "pathetic" when asked about them on CNN.


At a moment when many are trying to figure out how to prevent another school shooting, President Trump believes we need to look at video games and movies that young people are consuming.

During a meeting in the White House about school safety on Thursday, President Trump said that today's video games and movies are "so violent," and that the rating systems for both need to be reexamined.

"The level of violence on video games is really shaping young people’s thoughts, and then you go the further step, and that’s the movies," Trump said. "You see these movies, they’re so violent, and yet a kid is able to see the movie. If sex isn’t involved, but killing is involved. And maybe they have to put a rating system for that, and you get into a whole very complicated, very big deal.”

There are currently rating systems for both movies and video games. The Motion Picture Association of America has a rating system that's used at movie theaters nationwide. For video games, they are conducted by the Entertainment Software Rating Board.

"We know that's not how life is"

This is hardly the first time both mediums have come under fire after a violent act. But it's the victims of this latest school shooting that are coming out to say it's not the content that's causing the violence.

"My friends and I have been playing video games our whole lives, and seen, of course, violent movies, but never have we ever felt driven or provoked by those action in those games to do something as horrible as this," Samuel Zeif, a Stoneman Douglas High School shooting survivor, said on CNN soon after Trump made the remarks. "It's a video game, something happens you restart, we know that's not how life is. I think it's a distraction, the president is trying to distract us."

Fellow survivor, Chris Grady, gave stronger words about Trump's comments.

“That’s just a really pathetic excuse on behalf of the president," he told CNN. "I grew up playing video games — 'Call of Duty,' those first-person shooter games — and I would never, ever dream of taking the lives of any of my peers. So it’s just pathetic."

Since the Florida shooting, students across the country have rallied for stricter gun-control measures. Protests have been held, and there's a planned national school walkout on March 14, and a "March for Our Lives" protest on March 24.

The National Association of Theatre Owners declined to comment for this story. The Motion Picture Association of America and Entertainment Software Rating Board did not respond to Business Insider's request for comment.

Here's President Trump's comments on there being too much violence in video games and movies:

 

SEE ALSO: 47 documentaries on Netflix right now that will make you smarter

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: You can connect all 9 Best Picture Oscar nominees with actors they have in common — here's how

'Black Panther' is one of 2 reasons a Wall Street analyst is optimistic about the movie business in early 2018

$
0
0

landscape 1515170651 black panther poster

  • RBC raised its forecast for the movie-theater business in the first quarter of 2018.
  • The success of "Black Panther" and of 2017 releases was the reason.
  • However, RBC warns that the second half of 2018 might not be as rosy.


“Black Panther” is shattering records at the box office, and it has one Wall Street analyst rosy about the entire movie-theater business.

In its opening weekend, “Black Panther” was expected to earn $165-170 million domestically. It ended up snagging a whopping $242 million— even beating the latest “Star Wars” movie.

That's good news for the movie-theater business, which has had to combat the narrative that it’s in a slow, secular decline for quite some time. In fact, it’s such good news that RBC analyst Leo Kulp has updated his box-office forecast upward, and wrote in a note Thursday that the outlook for the first quarter had “improved dramatically.”

We had been expecting a 12% decline but it looks like 1Q could end up closer to flat,” Kulp wrote.

He cited two reasons:

“First, Black Panther substantially outperformed our expectations. We now expect a $500mm+ domestic gross, more than double our previous $220mm estimate. Second, the flow through from late 2017 releases was much stronger than we anticipated. While Star Wars: Last Jedi ended up being light, Jumanji and The Greatest Showman were particularly strong. Several Oscar contenders like The Shape of Water, Darkest Hour, Three Billboards, etc. also contributed.”

And Kulp isn't the only one in the industry who has taken notice of what the success of "Black Panther" means for the business, and particularly how it might hint at strong first quarters to come.

"The industry is certainly moving towards a more balanced release calendar," Jeff Bock, a senior analyst for Exhibitor Relations, told Business Insider recently. "Old Hollywood adages are being thrown out the window because audiences, no matter what season, have an insatiable appetite for event films — provided they deliver the goods."

Beyond the first quarter

Kulp also said the second quarter was looking “even stronger” than it had been for the movie-theater business.

But Kulp’s optimism doesn’t extend to the second half of the year.

He wrote that much of the content in the second half of 2018 is “either untested content designed to appeal to younger audiences (like Peter Jackson's steam punk film Mortal Engines) or remakes of older IP that we aren't convinced resonates.”

SEE ALSO: The official numbers are in, and 'Black Panther' soared past the latest 'Star Wars' for a historic $242 million opening weekend

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Inflation is the market's biggest fear — here's how to protect yourself

Disney World union: Our $1,000 bonuses from the Trump tax cut are being held hostage

$
0
0

mickey mouse disney world

  • A union representing employees of Walt Disney World is accusing Disney of withholding $1,000 bonuses the company is offering as a result of the GOP tax law.
  • Union members voted against a $0.50 per-hour pay increase in December and now say Disney is keeping the bonuses as leverage in an attempt to get employees to support the deal.
  • Disney informed the union that the bonuses will expire if no deal is reached by August 31.


The union that represents employees at Disney World is accusing the company of essentially taking hostage promised $1,000 bonuses from the recently passed GOP tax law as part of contract negotiations.

The Service Trades Council Union — a coalition of various smaller unions that represents workers at Disney World — officially filed a complaint with the National Labor Relations Board over the withheld bonuses on Monday.

Members of the union overwhelmingly voted down an offer from Disney that included a $0.50 per-hour pay increase and a $200 signing bonus in December.

When the company announced the tax cut bonus in January, it told the union that the pay would not be distributed until a deal was signed. It said that if no deal was signed by August 31, the offer would expire.

The union leaders say Disney is unfairly discriminating against the employees, or "cast members," because they are engaged in contract negotiations and using the bonuses as leverage to accept a substandard pay increase.

"At a time when Disney expects a yearly windfall of $1.6 billion, Disney is discriminating against 38,000 of some of its lowest paid Cast Members,” said Angie McKinnon, a leader of one of the unions lodging the complaint. "Using the $1,000 bonus to force Cast Members to accept low wages amounts to extortion."

Disney maintains that including the bonuses as a part of the negotiations over a new contract is a fair practice.

"Our offer to increase pay by 6-10 percent over the next two years reflects our ongoing commitment to our Cast Members. Wages and bonuses are part of our negotiation process," a Disney spokesperson told The Washington Post. "We will continue to meet with the Union to move toward a ratified agreement."

According to the union, the average pay for cast members is $10.71 an hour.

SEE ALSO: Americans are starting to love the GOP tax law — and they haven't even noticed its benefits

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: How to make America great — according to one of the three cofounders of Black Lives Matter

Stephen Fry announces that he was diagnosed with prostate cancer

$
0
0

Screen Shot 2018 02 23 at 12.03.51

  • British actor and comedian Stephen Fry released a video on Friday morning describing his experience with prostate cancer.
  • He said a tumour was found late last year, and he had his prostate removed in January.
  • Fry said he hopes the operation means the cancer is now gone, but needs more information to be sure.


Stephen Fry has announced that he was diagnosed and treated for prostate cancer.

The actor, author, presenter, and comedian, considered a national treasure in Britain, made the announcement in a 12-minute video published on YouTube on Friday morning.

Fry, who is 60, said he was diagnosed in December last year after a routine check-up. After more scans and checks, Fry had an operation to remove his prostate in January.

He said he hopes that the operation means the cancer is gone for good, but needs more test results to be entirely sure.

Fry described his cancer as "an aggressive little bugger," and said that his Gleason score, used to measure the severity of prostate cancer, was a nine out of 10.

He said he decided to make the announcement because "rumours had started to swirl," and that a newspaper had contacted him to ask about his health.

He used the video to urge other men of his age to have themselves checked, as early diagnosis gives a much better chance of survival.

Fry is a prolific figure in the creative industries and, in addition to his writing and presenting, he has starred in films including "The Hobbit" and "Alice in Wonderland."

He went on British television just weeks after his operation, appearing as a guest on Channel 4's live topical chat show "The Last Leg" on February 4, during which he made no mention of his illness.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: You can connect all 9 Best Picture Oscar nominees with actors they have in common — here's how

The Oscar-nominated director of Netflix's 'Heroin(e)' talks about exploring a side of the opioid epidemic that the media ignores

$
0
0

HEROINE netflix

  • Director Elaine McMillion Sheldon's Oscar-nominated documentary "Heroin(e)" follows three women fighting the opioid epidemic in the town of Huntington, West Virginia. 
  • Sheldon spoke to Business Insider about the challenges of the drug crisis, her collaboration with Netflix on the film, and the film's life as a tool for community outreach. 

 

In her striking, Oscar-nominated documentary, "Heroin(e)," director Elaine McMillion Sheldon depicts the personal, social, and medical challenges of the opioid epidemic through the lens of Huntington, West Virginia — a town that suffers an overdose rate ten times the national average.

A documentarian and native West Virginian, Sheldon followed three Huntington women — the state's first female fire chief, a drug-court judge, and a street missionary — who are each combatting their town's opioid crisis with what Sheldon called in our interview a "kindness" and "inner-resilience."

Produced by Netflix, "Heroin(e)" premiered at the Telluride Film Festival in August 2017. Netflix released the film in September, and The New York Times called it a frontrunner in the Oscar category of best documentary (short subject), for which it is nominated.

Sheldon spoke to Business Insider about the myriad challenges and misconceptions of the drug crisis, her collaboration with Netflix, and the film's life as a tool for community outreach. 

John Lynch: As a West Virginia native, how did you decide to take on this crisis that's particularly prevalent in your home state?

Elaine McMillon Sheldon: I grew up in West Virginia. Certainly this is a crisis that makes headlines all across the nation, but my home state's been particularly hard hit. We lead the nation in overdose death rates. It's just been a topic that, as a journalist and documentary filmmaker, has come up in a lot of the stories that I've been documenting over the past eight years. And I've seen a lot of media come out of my home state that's really focused on the use and abuse, and oftentimes the victim side of the story. We wanted to try and find a story that was around solutions and the inner-resilience that people have to overcome this problem. We did an initial reporting trip down to Huntington and met [Huntington fire chief] Jan Rader, and then from there she introduced us to a lot of amazing people across the city that were working really hard with very few resources.

Lynch: Jan Rader is one of three women you tell this story through, including a drug-court judge and street missionary. How did you settle on these three women to provide your film's perspectives of the crisis?

Sheldon: Well, Jan Rader is the first female fire chief in West Virginia's history. She's a person that's very well connected in the community. She grew up right across the river in Ohio, and she herself was an obvious candidate because she leads a group of nearly 100 men in a fire department who every single day see the worst part of this, which is the overdoses. They on the front lines rarely have a positive experience; six to seven overdoses a day is not positive for these first responders. And she just seemed so optimistic, I guess I would say, which surprised me and interested me. And I wondered how she found that resilience within herself to lead in a more empathetic way. 

The other two women are friends of Jan's. Like I said, Jan probably introduced us to 20 people across Huntington, but Necia Freeman and Patricia Keller stood out because they're three women who work across different strata of society. The three of them actually work with the same people, just at different parts of their life. Jan's the one that's reviving them, Nisha's often the one that's getting them into rehab or into a homeless shelter or place to sleep, and oftentimes they go through the drug court if they've committed a crime or felony related to their drug use. So they oftentimes work with the same people but with very different approaches, but all treating people as human beings and not as junkies. So they have a lot in common but they all represent more kindness in the fight against drugs. They were pretty obvious people to feature, but certainly there are a lot of people on the ground that could have been featured as well. 

Lynch: Pulling back, what do you think is the biggest misconception people have about the opioid epidemic?

Sheldon: There are a lot of misconceptions. I think it's important that we talk about addiction as a whole. Addiction to any substance can ruin someone's life and burn bridges and isolate them from society. Right now, we're talking about opioids and heroin, but this could easily be any other substance that is tearing apart communities. The prevalence of opioids that were dumped into Appalachia by distribution companies really helped create a perfect storm. People have described it as like an "addiction of misery," but the problem with describing it as such is that it seems to say that those who aren't in misery, those with good jobs and a good standing in society are exempt from addiction, which just isn't the case. I think America has pushed addiction off as a largely lower-class or a very racialized issue. And addiction doesn't see color. It doesn't see gender.

So there's this huge misconception about who can become addicted. And unfortunately, I think it has taken the opioid crisis, which first started in the form of a pill, to penetrate parts and classes of society that thought they were exempt from addiction, to now become part of that conversation. There's a lot of stigma associated with addiction and a lot of misconceptions around who uses heroin and who doesn't. It's been studied that four out of five heroin users actually started with a pill, Oxycontin or a synthetic opiate. This is unfortunately an addiction crisis in America  that we can't just point fingers at and say, "It's not in our community." It's everywhere. So while that's a very negative thing, it's good that we're actually talking about addiction now, and we're talking about it very differently. In the past, we've said, especially for communities of color, "Lock them up and throw away the key. They're moral failures. There are no second chances." And now that other classes and other races have become impacted by this, our eyes are being opened. And that's very unfortunate for our history, but it's time that we don't make the same mistakes we've made in the past. 

heroine netflix

Lynch: The depiction of the antidote Narcan in the film was striking to see. Here in New York there are subway ads that advocate the use of it in the home — if you know someone who's a user, this is something that can revive them in an overdose situation. In your film, someone poses in a community meeting that's it's possibly enabling for addicts to have Narcan. How do you weigh the pros and cons of that issue?

Sheldon: Yeah, I think all American communities right now are trying to figure out: A) how can we pay for this drug, especially if pharmaceutical companies keep raising prices? And B) what are the ethical choices? Because the stigma of addiction has narrowed it down to being a moral failure, people often bring that "three strikes, you're out" opinion to it. You know, "We'll revive you three times, but after that you don't deserve another chance." And that unfortunately has been sort of the idea behind Naloxone. A lot of people have seen syringe exchanges, harm reduction programs, and Naloxone training as enabling, and unfortunately now we're seeing higher rates of HIV and hepatitis C. We're not actually enabling people to use drugs, we're allowing them to live healthier lives with these harm reduction programs. They are going to use no matter if there's a clean needle or not. They are addicted to a substance that completely alters the brain, and not providing them with those services is not going to in some way, all of a sudden, make them decide to go to rehab. Going to seek out recovery options comes at a different point in everyone's life. 

And in Cabell County, the county that Huntington's in, with six to seven overdoses a day, there are less than ten detox beds in the entire county. The problem with that is that rehabs oftentimes won't accept people unless they've gone through that really brutal detox, and there's a bottleneck of people even getting help. So we have to change our thinking around harm reduction. We have to see it as a public health issue. If we think the opioid crisis is expensive in and of itself, rising rates of hepatitis C and HIV are only further costs on healthcare that we just can't afford. It's just changing though, the conversation around it. Especially in a place like West Virginia, in media portrayals you wouldn't think of West Virginia as a place that's leading a progressive way forward and treating people differently, but Huntington was one of the first places in the state to have this syringe exchange. And it was important for us as native West Virginians to show that we're part of the solution, too. Yeah, it's a problem here, but the people here have come together and decided, we're not enabling, but we have to do something because it's a public health crisis.

Lynch: If I could ask quickly about the production side of the film, how did you get involved with Netflix to tell this story?

Sheldon: Well, my husband and I shot the film together. We were the only two on the ground, and we shot with the women from February 2016 until May of 2017, about 38 days total, on and off. The Center for Investigative Reporting was actually the first funder in, through their Glassbreaker initiative. Once we started thinking about editing and taking it into post-production, that's when we approached Netflix, and they came on board and really helped us creatively approach these stories and craft it into the film that it became.

Lynch: As absorbed as I was in the film, and I found the brevity of it very impactful, I also thought, you know, I could watch like a couple episodes or hours of this. How did you determine that the 39-minute length was appropriate?

Sheldon: The length for us was a really smart way to use it as a tool for education. What's been incredible is that the film's under 40 minutes, within another 20 minute discussion packed on to that, and within an hour, a community can have this film be a conversation starter for them. There's a screening this week in Sitka, Alaska. There have been screenings almost in every state in the country now where communities who are experiencing the crisis — and it may look different in their community than what you see in "Heroin(e)" — but the fact is, they're able to start a conversation with this film. And that's the hardest part is starting to talk about this, so I think the short allows the film to travel really well. It's good that you have an appetite to learn more I think, because that's where the discussion comes in and that's where further research comes in. So we've just been able to see it travel in a way that is really incredible for education and outreach. We've created a field guide for people that want to host their own screenings. There's been screenings hosted at prisons and rehabs and medical schools. At heroinethefilm.com, under the resources page, we made this guide that gives you actual questions you can lead an audience with through a proper discussion. So yeah, it's a great length for that particular educational tool.

HEROINE netflix

Lynch: The film really illustrates how prevention and rehabilitation can work at a local level. What steps do you think we need to take to curb this nationally, at the federal level?

Sheldon: It's kind of hard to say what should happen from the federal level. Certainly these small communities, especially rural communities, cannot afford to provide the resources they need to help people. And I think it actually all changes on a grassroots level. I'd like every politician to watch the film and see what people on the front lines deal with on a daily basis, and make policies that are based on informed decisions of what the front lines look like. I think that every community's response to this is going to look different. What's happening in Huntington, West Virginia, is different than what's happening in Portland, Oregon. And the entities that are there to solve it, whether it's the faith-based community, the medical community, the criminal justice and court system, they can all come together and decide to change this.

But unfortunately, it's very hard to do that without funding. So I'd like to see more effort go towards — well, obviously, not taking away the expansion of Medicaid would help a lot — but making sure that people are able to access resources on a local level. Most people that want help in West Virginia are on a three-to-four month waiting list and are often overdosing while on that waiting list. One of the guys that we filmed was actually going to rehab that week, and you see that a lot. A lot of people aren't using because it's fun or exciting for them anymore, they're using because they'll be dope-sick if they don't, and they're just waiting until they can get in some places, so it's very complicated. I don't think there's one solution that's a silver bullet. Jan Rader, if she were on this call, would say it starts with kindness, it starts with being more perceptive to what's happening in your own community and seeing how you can help in being kinder to one another, and trying to see how we, on an individual level, can help improve each other's lives.

Lynch: Going into the film, did you personally have any preconceived notions or background on the subject matter that shifted after the process of making it?

Sheldon: Well, just looking at my middle school and high-school graduating class, I mean, it's kind of unreal to look at how many people I've gone to school with have overdosed and died. Or who are currently in long-term recovery, which is really incredible to see — friends who I know have struggled, getting their life back together and getting their kids back. So I always had experience through those connections but never personally. And I think the biggest surprise and the biggest concern for me was learning that the people on the front lines also need care. The first responders that are quite exhausted from this, they have this exhaustion from being compassionate and being able to help. And they feel helpless in that they're bringing back the same person several times in one week, and they're not feeling like they're doing their job helping people. I think the biggest thing any community member can do, if you're in long-term recovery, I think that people in recovery and first responders need to speak and be in touch more often, because I think these first responders are getting really burnt out on what they're doing, because they don't feel like they're helping. And if they could just meet people in long-term recovery and see that people have changed their lives, I think that would really help morale on the ground, which is really waning at this time.

Lynch: With the Oscars coming up, I have to ask. I've seen your film listed as a frontrunner. What would an Oscar win mean to you and to the cause?

Sheldon: Just being nominated has already been so positive for the community outreach. We had a lot of people doing the educational screenings beforehand, but now that it's an Oscar nominee, they can get more people out. You know, "We're doing our own private screening of this Oscar-nominated film." And Netflix has made it available for educational streaming unlimited, so as long as people aren't charging admission, they can screen it to as many people as often as they like. So with that, in and of itself, we've seen an uptick in community screenings since the Oscar nomination. I would just hope that it continues to add to the conversation that's ongoing, that it continues to help find new solutions.

Certainly, the three women and I and my husband are all going to be going to the Oscars together, bringing attention to people on the front lines and to those who are suffering from substance abuse disorder, so that we can actually have a full-on conversation reducing the stigma around how we can help people. Because while we're looking at this current generation, my generation, what we're not thinking about is the kids that are coming up behind us that are orphaned, that are often left in situations that are beyond their control. So that's my biggest fear is that we're having this conversation now about saving people and getting them into rehab, but we have a younger generation that's suffering from our really zeroed in vision on this current generation. I would like the conversation to expand into that: how we can help the next generation avoid falling into this.

SEE ALSO: 47 documentaries on Netflix right now that will make you smarter

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: You can connect all 9 Best Picture Oscar nominees with actors they have in common — here's how

The 11 best true-crime documentaries on Netflix delve into real-life murders and cold cases

$
0
0

Making a Murderer steven avery

  • The true crime genre has grown in popularity in recent years, thanks to shows like Netflix's "Making a Murderer."
  • Netflix has plenty of true crime documentaries available to stream. We picked 11 of the best ones for you.

 

The true crime genre was popular before Netflix's "Making a Murderer," but the success of that show (and podcast Serial), has propelled the entire genre since it landed on Netflix in 2015.

Since then, Netflix has released several more original true crime documentaries, and there are a bevy of others to choose from on the service if you're eager to dive into the world of real mysteries and cold cases.

From last year's "The Keepers," about a murdered nun in 1960s Baltimore; to "Amanda Knox," about the murder conviction of the American exchange student in Italy in 2007, Netflix offers plenty of shows and movies about real-life crimes. 

Below are 11 of the best true crime documentaries streaming on Netflix:

SEE ALSO: Here are all the confirmed original shows coming to Netflix in 2018

"Amanda Knox" (2016)

The Netflix original documentary follows the American foreign exchange student in Italy who was convicted and then released after an appeal years later. In this doc, those closest to her reflect on the harrowing ordeal. 



"The Keepers" (2017)

"The Keepers" follows two former students of a nun as they search for answers to her murder in 1960s Baltimore. 



"Audrie and Daisy" (2016)

A Netflix original documentary, "Audrie and Daisy" tells the story of two teenage girls from different parts of America who were both sexually assaulted by male friends, and the distress both faced in the aftermath.



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

No one is talking about the latest game in the blockbuster ‘Metal Gear’ franchise — but it’s actually pretty great

$
0
0

A new "Metal Gear" game launched this week on PlayStation 4, Xbox One, and PC. It's called "Metal Gear Survive," and it's pretty good!

Metal Gear Survive

You're forgiven if this is the first you're hearing. Due to a variety of factors, the game has launched to little fanfare. The marketing push has been nearly non-existent. In short, nothing about this game's arrival feels like your typical, major "Metal Gear" game launch.

And that's a shame, because the time I've spent with it so far has been largely positive. It's far from a standard "Metal Gear" game, but that's not necessarily a bad thing. Take a look:

SEE ALSO: The legendary creator of ‘Metal Gear Solid’ responds to its controversial sequel

If it's not a traditional-style "Metal Gear" game, then what is "Metal Gear Survive"?

First and foremost, "Metal Gear Survive" is a super, super weird game. It's set in the same timeline as the last major "Metal Gear" game, "Metal Gear Solid 5: The Phantom Pain." But instead of continuing that game's story, it branches into an alternate, paranormal version of events. 

The game's main character — one you've molded in the game's character creation tool, and named something silly — is one of dozens of random soldiers involved in a paranormal incident. A wormhole in the sky opens over the base you're stationed at, and you're swept into an alternate dimension: An bizarro version of Earth named "Dite" (dee-tay) that's full of horrific, zombie-like creatures.

Metal Gear Survive

Thus marks the beginning of the story of "Metal Gear Survive." 

What's your main mission in this new, grotesque dimension? Survival!



Don't get it twisted: This isn't the next main series "Metal Gear Solid" game. "Metal Gear Survive" is a survival game — a spinoff — set in the world of "Metal Gear."

As the game's name implies, "Metal Gear Survive" is a literal mash-up of the main "Metal Gear" concept of tactical, third-person espionage and survival.

As a soldier in the world of "Metal Gear," you're equipped with the usual arsenal of military armaments and goofy gadgets as previous games: knives, guns, and, uh, entire walls of fencing (which are conjured out of nowhere into the world in front of you, naturally). Instead of the traditional cardboard box, used in previous "Metal Gear" games to great effect for silly sneaking, you're far more likely to erect a wall of fencing in "Metal Gear Survive."

There's a practical reason for this: "Metal Gear Survive" is full of zombies (called "Wanderers"). There are loads of them, and you're in no position to fight off hordes of zombies. Your best bet, most of the time, is to either block off zombies temporarily with a wall of fence, or to simply run away.

I mentioned that this game has the word "survive" in its title, right? If you're looking for a traditional "Metal Gear Solid" game, you're looking in the wrong place. "Metal Gear Survive" takes the guts of the most recent "MGS" game, "The Phantom Pain," and gives them new purpose. 



Forget about taking down governments: You're just trying to stay alive.

Traditionally, "Metal Gear" games focus on an ongoing cast of characters as they grapple with international political dynamics and philosophize on the nature of man. It's quite a series.

In "Metal Gear Survive," the focus is on collecting materials, crafting those materials into usable resources, and staying alive.

You need to feed yourself, and quench your thirst. You need to build shelter, and new crafting stations to create better stuff. As your hunger increases, your overall health declines. As your thirst increases, your stamina declines (meaning you can only run for so long, etc.). It's tough!

If you've ever played games like "Don't Starve" and "State of Decay," you're already familiar with the core gameplay loop of "Metal Gear Survive." You'll spend a lot of time picking up as much stuff as possible simply so you can stay above water. That's before we start talking about actually progressing the game's story or completing missions.



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

Mo'Nique and Whoopi Goldberg clashed on 'The View' during a conversation about boycotting Netflix and equal pay

$
0
0

Mo'Nique the view

  • On "The View" Thursday, comedian and actress Mo'Nique discussed her boycott of Netflix over equal pay.
  • Mo'Nique also said that she felt like Oprah Winfrey, Lee Daniels, and Tyler Perry (the producers on her 2009 movie "Precious") ruined her career.
  • This led to a heated conversation between Mo'Nique and co-host Whoopi Goldberg.

 

Mo'Nique thinks that her struggle for equal pay has something to do with Oprah Winfrey, Lee Daniels, and Tyler Perry. But Whoopi Goldberg does not agree.

On "The View" Thursday, comedian and actress Mo'Nique discussed her boycott of Netflix over equal pay. She's boycotting the streaming service because she says it didn't offer her a deal for a comedy special in the same ball park as Amy Schumer, who has a similar resume. (Mo'Nique has both a Golden Globe and an Oscar.)

Mo'Nique told the hosts of "The View" that she asked for equal pay to Schumer's deal, but was told it wasn't about resumes.

"Then what was it about?" Mo'Nique said. 

Mo'Nique believes her struggle in the industry might have something to do with her 2009 film, "Precious." The film was produced by Oprah Winfrey, Lee Daniels, and Tyler Perry. Mo'Nique won the Oscar for best supporting actress for her role. 

Mo'Nique said she felt like she was "punished" by Winfrey, Daniels, and Perry because she didn't promote the movie overseas. She chose not to promote the movie overseas because there would be no additional pay, and since it wasn't in her contract she thought she was done with the movie. "This is what happens, in my humble opinion, when you don't go up to the hotel room," Mo'Nique said. 

But "The View" co-host Whoopi Goldberg did not like what Mo'Nique had to say. 

“I’m going to stop you because contractually, when you make a movie, regardless of who you sign the deal with, your job is to go and promote said movie," Goldberg said, to some applause. 

Mo'Nique responded by saying she believes actors should get paid for doing publicity. "If I had done something wrong contractually, they could've sued me."

“So for eight years my family has suffered and my career has suffered," Mo'Nique said, "because I would not allow those entities [Winfrey, Daniels, and Perry] to bully me. And because I did not allow the bullying to happen, this is what I sit in.”

You can watch the full clip below:

SEE ALSO: The 11 best true-crime documentaries on Netflix delve into real-life murders and cold cases

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: You can connect all 9 Best Picture Oscar nominees with actors they have in common — here's how

Brendan Fraser says he was groped by a Hollywood executive and that it made him 'retreat' from his acting career

$
0
0

brendan fraser

  • Actor Brendan Fraser said in a recent interview with GQ that he was groped in 2003 by Philip Berk, a former president of the Hollywood Foreign Press.
  • Fraser said that the incident made him "retreat" from the Hollywood spotlight. 
  • Berk, who previously described the incident in a memoir as being done in jest, told GQ that Fraser's version of the incident was a "total fabrication." He also admitted to writing an "apology" letter to Fraser.
  • The HFPA said on Friday that it was "previously unaware" of the incident as Fraser alleged it, and that it is currently investigating the matter.

 

Actor Brendan Fraser said in a recent interview with GQ that he was groped by a former president of the Hollywood Foreign Press Association, Philip Berk, after an HFPA luncheon in 2003. Fraser said that the incident played a part in his decision to "retreat" from the Hollywood spotlight.

Fraser, who starred in a number of leading roles in successful movies throughout the 1990s, including "The Mummy," has been largely absent from the same leading film roles since the early 2000s.

The 49-year-old actor told GQ that the incident was one of the sources of his career's standstill. Fraser recounted the incident in detail, which GQ reported that Berk had previously described in a memoir as being done in jest.

"His left hand reaches around, grabs my ass cheek, and one of his fingers touches me in the taint. And he starts moving it around," Fraser said. "I felt ill. I felt like a little kid. I felt like there was a ball in my throat. I thought I was going to cry."

Fraser said the experience "made me retreat. It made me feel reclusive." He said that he wondered if the HFPA had blacklisted him, as he was rarely invited to the Golden Globe Awards after the incident. 

Berk responded to GQ in an email, saying that Fraser's account of the incident was "a total fabrication."

Fraser also said that his representatives asked the HFPA for a written apology. Berk acknowledged to GQ that he wrote an "apology" letter to Fraser, but said that it "admitted no wrongdoing, the usual 'If I've done anything that upset Mr. Fraser, it was not intended and I apologize.'"

The HFPA responded to the story in a statement to Deadline on Friday, saying that it was "ppreviously unaware" of the incident as Fraser alleged it, and is currently "investigating further details surrounding the incident."

SEE ALSO: The best current TV show on each network — from ABC to FX to Netflix

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: You can connect all 9 Best Picture Oscar nominees with actors they have in common — here's how

Rapper Lupe Fiasco says cryptocurrencies are like 'baseball cards,' but that blockchain can 'revolutionize' the music industry

$
0
0

lupe fiasco

  • In an interview with Business Insider, rapper Lupe Fiasco compared cryptocurrencies to speculative commodities like "baseball cards," while expounding on the ways blockchain technologies could "revolutionize" the music industry.
  • Fiasco noted how artists could use blockchain applications to skirt the low payouts that streaming companies like Spotify have drawn criticism for.
  • He joins artists like Gramatik and Imogen Heap in exploring the possibilities of blockchain as a source of income for artists.

 

Rapper Lupe Fiasco has had a notable history of contention with the corporate structures of the record industry. But like a growing number of musicians, he sees blockchain technology as a form that could revolutionize the music industry by helping artists profit off their work to a greater degree. 

In an interview with Business Insider this week, following his participation in a technology summit with Autodesk, we asked Fiasco if he had any thoughts on the subject of cryptocurrency. 

While he referred to cryptocurrencies like bitcoin as "any other kind of speculative commodity" — comparing them to collector's items like "baseball cards" and vintage troll dolls that one could accumulate money through over time — Fiasco zeroed in on blockchain technologies as an application that could specifically benefit artists. 

"People are going to find a way to speculate and value things no matter what it is. I mean, whether it was troll kids, or flowers, or baseball cards, or it's digital currency, you're always going to have that regardless. And I think there's going to be a time to win in that and then a time to lose in that," Fiasco said of cryptocurrency. "But I think the difference between those things, the cryptocurrency, specifically bitcoin now, is that the technology and the implications and applications for the blockchain side of it is going to be so massive."

He went on to describe how blockchain could "revolutionize music" in its ability to pay artists more money, and he contrasted it with the approach of Spotify, the streaming giant that has drawn criticism for its low payouts to artists. 

"It's a disagreement that I've always had with Spotify, which was, they're saying, you can never get rid of piracy. And that's the reason we can charge .00000 nothing for a song, and completely devalue music," he said. "But then you have blockchain technology coming around, where you say, 'Ah, now we're able to kind of reverse that process,' by implementing a blockchain strategy when it comes to licensing music."

A BI Intelligence report from November describes how the company SingularDTV is working with musicians to utilize blockchain, in order to "tokenize" their intellectual property (their music) and turn it into a direct financial asset through blockchain apps. The process potentially allows musicians to bypass middle-men like record labels in raising money to fund their music.

"Artists can raise money through a token launch, which is similar to an initial coin offering (ICO). Here, anyone can buy the tokens upfront," writes BI's Robert Elder. "The majority of the windfall will go the artist, and the token launch platform-provider (such as SingularDTV) will retain a service fee."

The producer Gramatik signed on with Singular DTV's tokenization program in November, describing it as "something artists have been dreaming about since the beginning of time, to be free of gatekeepers, and to communicate freely."

The singer-producer Imogen Heap has also written extensively on the subject of blockchain and music in an essay for the Harvard Business Review, published in June. 

SEE ALSO: 'Black Panther' is one of 2 reasons a Wall Street analyst is optimistic about the movie business in early 2018

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Inflation is the market's biggest fear — here's how to protect yourself

Jennifer Lawrence says she felt empowered doing nudity in her new movie following her 2014 nude photo hack

$
0
0

60 Minutes Jennifer Lawrence CBS

  • Jennifer Lawrence explained to "60 Minutes" why it was important for her to have nude scenes in her new movie, "Red Sparrow."
  • She said she felt "empowered" to do the racy scenes following nude photos of her being leaked online in 2014 after her phone was hacked.


Jennifer Lawrence's new movie "Red Sparrow" is a spy movie filled with violence, sex, and nudity, the latter of which the Oscar-winning actress was worried about taking on, according to her upcoming interview on Sunday for "60 Minutes."

In 2014, Lawrence was the victim of a photo hack that led to nude photos of her being leaked online. Late last year, she said it was something that she was still processing, however, she told "60 Minutes" correspondent Bill Whitaker that she ended up feeling "empowered" doing the nude scene in the movie.

“I realized that there was a difference between consent and not and I showed up for the first day and I did it and I felt empowered,” Lawrence said. “I feel like something that was taken from me I got back and am using in my art.”

In "Red Sparrow," Lawrence plays a Russian ballerina-turned-assassin who goes through some unique training: her expertise is to use seduction and manipulation.

Business Insider has seen the movie, and Lawrence is involved in a few sexually graphic scenes and in one scene she gets fully undressed for a training scene in which she uses her sexuality to intimidate a man.

In the interview, she also discussed dropping out of middle school. "I wanted to forge my own path," she said. "I found what I wanted to do and I didn't want anything getting in the way of it."

Lawrence's "60 Minutes" interview will air on Sunday at 7 p.m. EST. "Red Sparrow" opens in theaters on March 2.

 

 

SEE ALSO: 47 documentaries on Netflix right now that will make you smarter

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: You can connect all 9 Best Picture Oscar nominees with actors they have in common — here's how

Viewing all 103365 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images