Quantcast
Channel: Business Insider
Viewing all 103316 articles
Browse latest View live

All the 'Star Wars' movies, ranked from worst to best

$
0
0

rogue one

With a new "Star Wars" movie opening Friday, it's time for that perennial question: How do you rank all the "Star Wars" movies? And where does the latest fit in?

"Rogue One: A Star Wars Story" may be the first standalone movie from the franchise, but it's steeped in the mythology that the other seven movies revolve around.

Like all "Star Wars" movies after "Force Awakens," "Rogue One" has tremendous pressure not just to make a killing at the box office but to leave a lasting impression on the saga's huge fan base.

So how does "Rogue One" compare with the previous seven "Star Wars" movies? Here's how I rank them.

SEE ALSO: 'Rogue One' is the most original modern 'Star Wars' movie — and one of the most thrilling

8. "The Phantom Menace" (1999)

George Lucas has said from the beginning that "Star Wars" was made for kids, and he really took that to heart when he unveiled "Episode I: The Phantom Menace," 16 years after finishing the groundbreaking original trilogy. Introducing us to Anakin Skywalker at the age of 9 as he's plucked by Qui-Gon Jinn as the "chosen one" who will bring balance to the Force, the first prequel gives us a lot of tame action and unlikely scenarios for Anakin to be in, even in a galaxy far, far away.

Sadly, the best part of the movie is its villain, Darth Maul, who has an incredible duel with the Jedi at the end of the movie. It's one of the only goose-bump moments in the whole movie — heightened by John Williams' score — and you have to wait over an hour to get to it. And at this point, the less said about Jar Jar Binks, the better.



7. "Revenge of the Sith" (2005)

The conclusion of the prequel trilogy is one of the saga's darkest. A grown Anakin is seduced by the dark side of the Force and wipes out the Jedi, including the younglings (!). Padmé Amidala dies, but not before giving birth to their twins, Luke and Leia.

But the most agonizing thing to sit through is Hayden Christensen's performance as Skywalker conflicted with the dark side — more a sniveling 20-something than a disillusioned "chosen one." We wouldn't get a good performance of that pull to the dark side until Adam Driver came along to play Kylo Ren in "The Force Awakens." Though we can only partly blame Christensen: Lucas was never big on giving actors instructions, which proved here to be costly.



6. "Return of the Jedi" (1983)

The final film in the original trilogy accomplishes what we needed it to. It closes that chapter of the saga by answering many of the questions that were floating around for years. But as a standalone, years later, it doesn't have the same effect that "Episode IV" and "Episode V" have. That mostly has to do with the introduction of the Ewoks, which makes for deflating sequences in the movie. And it's still a bummer to see Boba Fett die in the first 20 minutes.



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

Celebrities are urging the Electoral College not to vote for Trump

$
0
0

martin sheen psa electoral college donald trump

As part of a last-ditch effort to block Donald Trump from becoming the next US president, a host of celebrities appear in a PSA encouraging members of the Electoral College not to cast their vote for the president-elect.

"The West Wing" star Martin Sheen starts the Unite for America-sponsored pitch to the Republican members of the Electoral College.

"As you know, our founding fathers built the Electoral College to safeguard the American people from the dangers of a demagogue and to ensure that the presidency only goes to someone who is 'to an eminent degree endowed with the requesite qualifications,'" Sheen said, quoting the Federalist Papers, a collection of essays by America's founding fathers from 1787 that both urge the ratification of the Constitution and explain its various parts.

Sheen is joined by several other celebrities, including "West Wing" costar Richard Schiff, "Will & Grace" actress Debra Messing, "Better Call Saul" star Bob Odenkirk, "ER" star Noah Wyle, and "Oz" alum B.D. Wong in explaining how the electors are able to vote for any eligible person who's fit to serve as president, despite the results of the election. They also make clear that they're not advocating that members throw their vote to Hillary Clinton.

It would take 37 Electoral College members to cancel out Trump's majority electoral votes. History is against this happening as it's been very rare that members have not voted for the winner in their state, but at least 20 Electoral College members are reportedly doing so this year. If neither Trump nor Clinton have a majority of the votes, then the House of Representatives would choose the president.

Watch the celebrity-packed PSA below:

SEE ALSO: Megan Mullally regrets helping Trump with a 'landslide' win: 'I'm not giving him any points'

DON'T MISS: Trevor Noah breaks down Trump's secretary of state pick and his 'friendship' with Russia

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: California governor: 'If Trump turns off the satellites, California will launch its own damn satellite'

We played the ridiculous Mario knockoff 'Super Plumber Run' — here's what it's like (AAPL, GOOG, GOOGL)

$
0
0

Mario on left, Plumber on right

Mario, the beloved jumping plumber and Nintendo character, made his debut on smartphones on Thursday with "Super Mario Run."

In "Super Mario Run," iPhone owners can run, jump, and stomp their way through 24 new levels for $10. Android owners are out of luck for now — Nintendo cut a deal with Apple so the game remains iOS-exclusive for some period of time.

"Super Mario Run" is coming to Android, eventually. But in the meantime, one enterprising game developer has created a game that to someone who has never played Mario before should be just as good: "Super Plumber Run."

"Super Plumber Run" doesn't have many reviews yet, so be careful when downloading it, but it should be safe because it's on the Google Play app store. 

Here's what it's like to play:

Unlike "Super Mario Run," "Super Plumber Run" is a free app on Google Play. "Super Mario Run" is free for the first few levels, but then you have to pay $10.



It actually shares a very similar concept with "Super Mario Run." Your character automatically moves forward, and players tap the screen to jump.



Super Plumber Run even has mushrooms!



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

You'll be able to play Nintendo's new game console starting in January

$
0
0

Nintendo's new game console, the Nintendo Switch, is almost here — it's set to launch in March 2017. That's just a few months away!

Nintendo Switch

But you wanna play it now, don't you? Yeah, we're with you. If Jimmy Fallon can play it on The Tonight Show, certainly we can play it in a mall or whatever, right?

Nintendo agrees, and is bringing its Switch console on a tour of North America starting in January. The first stop is New York City on January 13, with the tour concluding in Los Angeles on March 5.

In total, the Switch tour will hit six cities, from New York to Toronto to LA.

Nintendo Switch

Here's the full schedule:

  • New York – Jan. 13-15
  • Toronto – Jan. 27-29
  • Washington, D.C. – Feb. 10-12
  • Chicago – Feb. 17-19
  • San Francisco – Feb. 24-26
  • Los Angeles – March 3-5

Not in or near any of those six cities? It looks like Mario may have a few more dates hidden behind this curtain.

Super Mario

Perhaps you're heading to PAX South in San Antonio, or PAX East in Boston? Or maybe you'll be at South by Southwest in March? Nintendo's also rolling out the Switch to that trio of events — here are the specific dates:

  • PAX South in San Antonio – Jan. 27-29
  • PAX East in Boston – March 10-12
  • SXSW in Austin, Texas — March 16-18

The Nintendo Switch has a March 2017 launch window, and we know a bit about how it's both a home game console and a portable one. Outside of that information, though, we still have a lot to learn about Nintendo's new console. What games will it launch with in March, for instance? And how much does it cost?

It looks like we'll learn a bunch more when Nintendo holds a major presentation— live from Tokyo — on January 12. The following day, Nintendo's North American tour kicks off!

SEE ALSO: We just got our first look at Nintendo’s new console working in real life

DON'T MISS: Nintendo Switch is coming: Here are 6 of the biggest rumors we’ve heard

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Nintendo just showed off the Nintendo Switch — an entirely new console

Stephen Colbert mocks Putin's 'lame' reason for hacking the presidential campaign

$
0
0

stephen colbert putin clinton election hack late show cbs

Stephen Colbert mocked Russian President Vladimir Putin's reported personal involvement in the hacking of the US presidential campaign to help Donald Trump.

US intelligence agencies have said that Putin personally directed how hacked material from Democrats was leaked.

"It's kind of flattering that he wanted to do it himself, don't you think?" the host joked on Thursday's episode of CBS's "Late Show." "It's handcrafted. It's an artisanal hack."

Furthermore, Colbert got a chuckle out of the supposed reason Putin ordered and then took a personal role in the hack. Hillary Clinton told campaign donors during a speech in New York City on Thursday that the hack was a result of a grudge the Russian president held against her for suggesting Russia's 2011 parliamentary elections weren't "free and fair" when she was secretary of state. Putin then blamed her for protest riots after the election.

"So Putin hacked the election because of a grudge against Hillary? That is so lame," Colbert said. "There are so many better reasons to get revenge on America: economic sanctions, NATO expansion, Sean Connery's accent in 'The Hunt for Red October.'"

Watch Colbert mock Putin's alleged motivation for the US election hacking below:

SEE ALSO: Celebrities are urging the Electoral College not to vote for Trump

DON'T MISS: Megan Mullally regrets helping Trump with a 'landslide' win: 'I'm not giving him any points'

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Obama on Russia hacking the US election: 'We need to take action and we will'

2 millennials watched the original ‘Star Wars’ for the first time

Felicity Jones was paid way more than her 'Rogue One' male costars

$
0
0

jyn rogue one

As actresses continue to get paid less than their male costars in Hollywood, it looks like one of the biggest movies of the year bucked the trend. 

Sources tell The Hollywood Reporter that "Rogue One: A Star Wars Story" star Felicity Jones was the highest-paid cast member on the movie, having negotiated a seven-figure upfront salary.

Her male costars like Diego Luna and Ben Mendelsohn were paid significantly less, below mid-six-figures, according to THR.

Jones, who received a best actress Oscar nomination for 2014's "The Theory of Everything," deserves to make the most out of the cast as her character, Jyn Erso, is the focus of the movie. But that doesn't mean it's automatically the case.

The public got a glimpse of what actresses have to deal with when Jennifer Lawrence wrote an essay last year about why she gets paid less than her male costars. The inspiration to speak out came when she learned from the Sony hacks that her male costars on "American Hustle" were paid more than she and costar Amy Adams.

The news of Jones' salary on "Rogue One" is a sign that Hollywood may finally be changing its ways in regard to the wage gap in the industry. But it also might be just pain old ambition by Jones and her team.

Business Insider spoke to Jessica Chastain about the Hollywood wag gap last month and she believes all females in all lines of work should be more aggressive in getting equal pay.

"I started reading a lot about it and you realize women don't ask for more but they don't ask for promotions, and knowing that I've completely changed," Chastain said. "When I join a production, I want to make sure that the male actor isn't making four times my salary, which has been true, or seven times my salary. If that's true you go, 'You know what, I don't need this job.'"

SEE ALSO: All the "Star Wars" movies, ranked from worst to best

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Here are all the major clues in 'Westworld' that hint to the identity of the 'Man in Black'

There's a hint that there may be a sequel to the new 'Star Wars' movie 'Rogue One' after all

$
0
0

rogue one trailer k2so and jyn

Though Disney and Lucasfilm have been adamant that "Rogue One: A Star Wars Story" is a one-and-done film and that there will be no sequel, one actor has a clause in her contract that could change things.

The movie's star, Felicity Jones, has a sequel option in her contract, according to The Hollywood Reporter. Now, whether that will ever become a reality is anyone's guess. But having Jones available opens up some possibilities.

There's the upcoming young Han Solo movie, which is to take place before the events of "Rogue One," so perhaps Han and Lando bump into Jyn (Jones) in their travels. THR points out that there's talk of a standalone young Luke Skywalker movie, so perhaps she shows up there.

A lot of this depends on the performance of "Rogue One" in theaters. The sequel option becomes more in play if the movie becomes a box-office hit and if the fan base really takes to Jyn. And don't be surprised if another character from "Rogue One" suddenly appears in a future movie.

Droid K-2SO (voiced by Alan Tudyk) has quickly become a fan favorite and could easily be plugged into a movie if needed.

SEE ALSO: Meet Felicity Jones, the breakout star of the new "Star Wars" movie

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: 7 details you may have missed on episode 9 of 'Westworld'


Viewership for Netflix's 'Fuller House' season 2 is tanking, according to a research company

$
0
0

full house season two ratings netflix

Netflix comedy "Fuller House" is beginning to show some cracks in its foundation. Its recent season-two premiere ratings are reportedly tanking.

According to SymphonyAM, which has an app that listens to sounds from users' televisions and takes that data to extrapolate viewership, the premiere ratings for "Fuller House" season two have fallen 67% from its first season, which made the spin-off Netflix's highest-rated show.

The research company measured viewing of the show's new season opening episode from its premiere date on December 9 plus the following three days among the audience advertisers desire most, adults under the age of 50. It found a dramatic decrease from the first season premiere episode's 10.2 rating to the season two's premiere rating of 3.2.

SymphonyAM reports that only 9% of viewers who watched the first season premiere episode returned for season two's premiere.

Binging of the entire second season also saw a huge decrease for the same period from a 5.3 rating for the first season to a 2.0 — a 62% decrease.

That's how season-two did compared to its own previous season. But the show fares well against other Netflix originals. Currently, the second season of "Fuller House" is ranked No. 6. Beating it are the fourth season of "Orange Is the New Black," the "Gimore Girls" miniseries, and the first season of Marvel's "Luke Cage" and the second season of "Daredevil."

"Fuller House" does beat out some buzzy shows with its second season premiere, including the premieres for "Stranger Things," the fourth season of "House of Cards," and the second season of "Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt."

Famous for refusing to reveal its viewership data, Netflix has called SymponyAM's ratings "remarkably inaccurate."

But "Fuller House" creator Jeff Franklin told Business Insider in an interview ahead of the second season premiere that he accepted independent ratings numbers about his show, even though Netflix never confirmed them to him personally.

"If these independent research numbers are to be believed, and there’s no reason for me not to believe them, it’s not only the No. 1 show on Netflix, but it’s the most-watched show on television," he told us of "Fuller House's" first season.

Aside from Netflix claiming SymphonyAm's ratings aren't correct, there are a couple more caveats to this data.

First, Netflix's business model is based on subscriptions, not advertising, so the 18-to-49 ratings really just place their series in context with the broadcast networks.

And second, Netflix's originals are offered internationally and SymphonyAM only measures US viewership.

Netflix didn't immediately respond to Business Insider's request for comment on these ratings numbers.

See SymphonyAM's infographic showing the steep ratings decline for "Fuller House" below:

 

fuller house season 2 ratings symphonyam

SEE ALSO: Watch the trailer for Netflix's trippy new mystery show called 'The OA'

DON'T MISS: The 17 best TV shows right now, according to critics

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: The 7 best horror movies you can stream on Netflix right now

'Rogue One' earned the biggest Thursday preview of any movie this year

$
0
0

Star Wars Rogue One Disney

The first standalone "Star Wars" movie, "Rogue One: A Star Wars Story," is proving to live up to the hype. 

In its Thursday preview screenings the movie took in $29 million, according to The Hollywood Reporter, the largest Thursday earner of the year. Yes, beating out "Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice" ($27.7 million) and "Captain America: Civil War" ($25 million).

Opening in over 4,000 screens in North America beginning Friday, the movie is projected to earn between $135 million and $150 million over the weekend.

That would give the movie the third best opening of the year, behind "Batman v Superman" ($166 million) and "Captain America: Civil War" ($179 million).

Though Rogue One" is expecting a big figure, it won't come close to what "Star Wars: The Force Awakens" made last year.

The seventh episode in the "Star Wars" saga took in $57 million in its Thursday preview and went on to earn a record-breaking $247.9 million domestically in its opening weekend.

SEE ALSO: The 25 worst movies of 2016, according to critics

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Psychiatrists studied 400 movies to find the most realistic psychopath

It sure looks like Nintendo's next video game console will support virtual reality

$
0
0

Just over 20 years ago, Nintendo released its least successful game console ever: the Virtual Boy. It was a red and black monstrosity with mostly terrible games.

Nintendo Virtual Boy

The console was quickly scrapped in favor of more traditional hardware like the Nintendo 64 and GameCube. 

But in the past few years, virtual reality has re-emerged as a viable medium. Headsets from Google, Facebook, and Samsung are all commercially available; most notably, Nintendo's two main competitors, Sony and Microsoft, are making major investments in VR. 

  • Sony's PlayStation VR headset launched in October — it's powered by the most popular game console in the world, the PlayStation 4.
  • In 2017, Microsoft is planning to launch a far more powerful Xbox One, currently dubbed "Project Scorpio." That console will be capable of powering high-end VR headsets; the expectation is that Facebook's Oculus Rift headset will work with Project Scorpio, but nothing specific has been announced just yet.

So that leaves Nintendo.

Nintendo Switch

The company's next console, the Nintendo Switch (above), is set to arrive in March 2017. It's a home console/portable console hybrid — the idea is you can play the same games at home as you do on, say, the bus to work. It's rumored to be nearly as powerful as the PlayStation 4 and Xbox One.

The gimmick of the Switch is its detachable screen. The screen itself is the console, processing and all — it's basically a tablet with a bunch of peripherals.

Nintendo Switch

You attach the screen to two "Joy-Con" controllers and it becomes a portable console. Or you slide out the kickstand and use the controllers as gamepads, one in each hand. Or you slide the screen into a dock at home and it becomes a home console. 

Or, apparently, you slide the screen into a VR headset and it becomes a full-on virtual reality head-mounted display:

Nintendo Switch (VR patent)

That image comes from a recently published patent, which Nintendo filed back in June 2016. The patent seemingly details the tablet at the heart of Nintendo Switch: the way it connects to a home console dock, and the way it connects to the Joy-Con controllers to become a portable gamepad. 

And then, in the final example images of how the device could work, a headset is shown with a Switch tablet being slid into it (above). The corresponding text is fascinating:

"Fig. 60 [the headset patent drawing] is a diagram showing an example HMD [head-mounted display] accessory to which the main unit can be attached. An HMD accessory to be described below as an example accessory can be used as a so-called HMD (head-mounted display) with the main unit attached thereto."

To quickly translate that jargon into English, the text description of the headset image directly identifies it as a VR headset (an "HMD") that can be used by slotting the Switch tablet into the front. For comparison, Samsung's Gear VR works similarly: Your Galaxy phone becomes the device powering VR and the screen used to see it, through the lenses of a peripheral headset.

gear vr galaxy s7

There's a ton more text about the headset in the patent, from how it can detect movement using the sensors already built into the Switch tablet, to how the Joy-Con gamepads can be used as controllers for the headset, and how the headset has lenses built in that will widen images for VR use.

All that said, patents aren't necessarily plans. Hardware companies like Apple and Nintendo publish patents regularly, and often those patents lead to nothing. It's entirely possible that this is little more than an idea. If nothing else, it hints at a potential unannounced feature of the Switch — everything else detailed in the patent has already been revealed as actual plans by Nintendo for the Switch.

A representative for Nintendo offered the following statement to Business Insider: "We have no comment regarding this patent matter."

SEE ALSO: We just got our first look at Nintendo’s new console working in real life

DON'T MISS: Nintendo Switch is coming: Here are 6 of the biggest rumors we’ve heard

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Nintendo just showed off the Nintendo Switch — an entirely new console

An exclusive sneak peek of the game show 'The Wall' from LeBron James

$
0
0

the wall christ hardwick

NBA superstar LeBron James is making moves in the entertainment business, and his latest is a game show for NBC called "The Wall."

James' and Maverick Carter’s SpringHill Entertainment and Glassman Media are behind the series, hosted by comedian Chris Hardwick, which will premiere Tuesday, January 3 at 8 p.m. EST.

"What’s so great about ‘The Wall’ is that it’s giving these everyday, hard-working people the opportunity to change their lives in an hour," Carter, who's serving as an executive producer, recently told Business Insider of the show. "Over the course of one episode, you get to know these people and you hear their amazing stories, so you find yourself really pulling for them. It’s emotional, it’s intense, it’s exciting, and we can’t wait for people to experience it."

Watch a first look at the first episode of "The Wall" below:

 

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: ‘The Walking Dead’ fans think they uncovered something huge in this scene from the latest episode

Adam Savage from 'MythBusters' built props for the 'Star Wars' franchise — here's what he worked on

$
0
0

Adam Savage, former co-host of "MythBusters" has a very hands-on connection to the Star Wars franchise. He also is very passionate about which of the films deserve to be called true "Star Wars" films. 

Editor's Note: This was video was originally posted in 2014.

Follow BI Video: On Twitter

Join the conversation about this story »

This guy combined photos of celebrities to create portraits of flawless superhumans

12 TV shows you're not watching that you need to see

$
0
0

high maintenance_HBO

There are so many factors that go into making a TV show a hit that have little to do with its quality.

It can depend on timing, the size of the network, the size of the network's marketing budget, and whether that show is up against sizable competition. Great shows can get lost in the midst of all these factors.

Some would argue that ratings are an effective way of deciphering quality, but truthfully it's a flawed system at best that overwhelmingly rewards the shows that win the lottery or get caught in a perfect storm.

That's where critics come in. We can advocate for the shows we believe deserve your attention.

Here's a list of the shows you're probably not watching, but we believe you should be:

SEE ALSO: 20 TV shows you're watching that are probably going to be canceled

DON'T MISS: The 17 best TV shows right now, according to critics

"The Exorcist" (Fox)

Yes, there was (and continues to be) a flood of TV remakes. But "The Exorcist" is a standout. It's well-written, well-acted, and it doesn't appear like Fox skimped on the budget. But alas, it's Fox's lowest-rated new show.



"Good Girls Revolt" (Amazon)

Amazon has already canceled feminist drama "Good Girls Revolt," but it's actively looking for a new home. That doesn't mean it's still not worth watching the first season. It's a really compelling look at the role of women in journalism in the late-'60s. It's inspired by the real female employees who took on Newsweek for its unfair hiring practices and promotion practices for women in the newsroom.



"Superstore" (NBC)

Once the home of "Seinfeld," "Friends," and "The Office," NBC hit a comedy dry spell in recent years. But the network has vowed to rebuild its comedy offerings, with big-box-store comedy "Superstore" as its cornerstone. The honor is well-deserved.

"Superstore" stars two talented actors, America Ferrera ("Ugly Betty") and Ben Feldman ("Silicon Valley," "Mad Men"), part of an ensemble cast playing retail employees. The sad part is that NBC is not only in the hole for ratings but it doesn't really have the programming to push "Superstore." But "Superstore" is well worth the visit.



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

Sorry, Nintendo: Here's why 'Super Mario Run' isn't the next 'Pokémon Go'

$
0
0

"Super Mario Run," Nintendo's very first iPhone game, finally arrived on Thursday.

It's a clever, fun game that will make long-time Mario fanboys very happy. That said, if you were expecting it to have the same kind of impact "Pokémon Go" had earlier this year, you'd be sorely mistaken.

super mario run icon

Let's be clear: "Super Mario Run" is a fun game, but it will not change your actual lifestyle like "Pokémon Go" does.

You might ask your friends how far along they are in "Super Mario Run" compared to your own progress, but unlike "Pokémon Go," this game won't encourage you to go outside more, or meet up with other people to play the game together, or keep the game open in your pocket while you're not playing it.

"Super Mario Run" does have a social aspect — a mode called "Toad Rally" is the closest approximation to a multiplayer experience, where you can compete and run against the best performances recorded by other players — but the game isn't inherently social like "Pokémon Go" is.

pokemon go

When you think about it, the actual game of "Pokémon Go" is secondary to the social experience. The game itself is incredibly simple and repetitive — throw a ball at a creature, catch enough creatures (or walk with them long enough) and they evolve, thus giving you a new Pokémon to add to your collection. Complete your collection. That's it.

The real magic in "Pokémon Go," however, is how it plays into everyone's psychology — the need to catch them all and finish a collection is a very powerful drive — and how it creates unique social experiences in the real world.

Do you remember this video? When "Pokémon Go" first launched this summer, we witnessed several occasions where hundreds of people would swarm a public area— New York City's Central Park, for example — just to catch a rare Pokémon. That's because when you play "Pokémon Go," you can see all the same Pokémon in the wild that everyone else can, making it easier to compare your respective libraries with other people, and easier to coordinate with others for things like group hunts and safaris, which my colleague Alex Heath tried (and enjoyed) earlier this year.

"Pokémon Go" is all about finding Pokémon in the real world— meaning, you can only play this game while out in the real world. You can't just play it on your couch all day — well, you could, but it'd be really boring and unproductive, since you only get items and encounter new Pokémon when you're walking. That's partly why you hear so many amazing stories about people, particularly those who are depressed, feeling a renewed urge to go outside thanks to "Pokémon Go."

With "Super Mario Run," however, you can totally play on your couch all day. You don't need to walk around or explore the real world to access parts of the game. You don't need to interact with other people. It's just a game. You play it and you're done.

Pokemon GO

Also worth noting: As my colleague Ben Gilbert discovered, "Super Mario Run" can be completed in about three hours. Sure, you can play levels over and over again, but nothing special happens when you do those things.

"Pokémon Go," meanwhile, doesn't take hours to complete; it takes days. To finish your Pokémon collection is to literally spend dozens of hours, if not hundreds, while playing the game, walking around to catch and evolve monsters. My colleague Chris Snyder actually caught all original 142 Pokémon in the game, but spent about 37 straight days doing it.

Super mario run

Finally, a big reason "Super Mario Run" won't catch "Pokémon Go" is because of the way it makes money. "Pokémon Go" is a free game — thus making it more accessible to a broader audience — that's powered by microtransactions, which means you can continuously pay to unlock items that help you in the game, but you don't have to. (I've played dozens of hours of "Pokémon Go," and I've never spent a single dime.)

"Super Mario Run" has a free demo that lets you play the first three levels, and excludes two of the game's three modes, but requires you pay $10 if you want the full experience. There will be plenty of people who won't pay $10 for an app, thus limiting the overall number of players who will pick up this game, and diminishing the possibility of it becoming a cultural phenomenon like "Pokémon Go."

Both of these mobile games have generated a ton of hype this year; after all, Mario and Pokémon are two of the biggest video game franchises of all time. But if you think "Super Mario Run" has a chance at eclipsing "Pokémon Go" — in terms of downloads, or money grossed, or cultural impact — think again.

SEE ALSO: Nintendo's first 'Super Mario' game for the iPhone is out today — I already played it, and it's very good!

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: 7 places you can’t find on Google Maps

Tips and tricks to master 'Super Mario Run,' the first ever Mario game for iPhone

$
0
0

Nintendo's first "Super Mario" game for the iPhone is delightfully simple on the surface. Tap the screen! Little Mario will run by himself! He'll even hop over enemies for you! 

What could go wrong?

Super Mario Run

As it turns out, there's a deeper level to "Super Mario Run" that's far more challenging than what the initial game lets on. Everything from the game's five coin system to the Toad Rally mode is secretly aimed at the most dedicated Super Mario players among us.

That could be you too! We put together our best tips and tricks to get you started:

 

SEE ALSO: The first 'Super Mario' game for iPhone is now available — download it here

DON'T MISS: Our review of 'Super Mario Run'!

Let's start with the basics: create or sign in to a Nintendo Account!

If you're not signed in to this, you're missing out on extra goodies — like playing as Toad! With your Nintendo Account signed in, you can complete "missions" which will reward you with points. Those points can then be used for various things, like unlocking Toad as a playable character.

Better yet, the missions are often things you're already doing, like playing Toad Rally or completing sets of levels in World Tour mode.



Having trouble collecting the five coins? Here are some tricks:

Sometimes, the coins are hidden in boxes that you punch (question marks boxes and regular bricks).

Sometimes, the coins are down at the bottom of a pit and it looks like certain death if you jump for them — but all you need to do is slide down the wall, which Mario will automatically do if you fall into a pit. As you collect the coin, tap the screen to hop from wall to wall, until you're out of the pit.

Sometimes, the coins are hidden inside of a Boo (the ghosts!). If you jump backwards over them while they're moving, they'll drop the coin and disappear. Jump backwards by jumping into a wall and wall-jumping off of it.

Sometimes, the coins require you jumping further backwards than it seems possible — if you use Princess Peach, you can float after jumping backwards (which extends the distance traveled). 

Sometimes, you keep missing the last coin on a level and just want another shot. Tap the bubble icon in the top of the screen and you'll use one of your "lives" to enter a bubble. Since you're floated backwards while in the bubble, you can simply rewind part of the level by using one.

Most of the time, though, you just have to time your jumps really carefully and plan a route. And for that, there are no tips or tricks — just practice.



The game's three modes are deeply intertwined — finding the right balance of the three is crucial.

Playing World Tour gets you Toad Rally tickets. Playing Toad Rally gets you new Toad followers for the rebuilding of the Mushroom Kingdom — the more followers, the higher your kingdom "level." The higher your kingdom's level, the larger it becomes. The larger it becomes, the more spaces you have to build things. Building houses for your Toads makes them happy, and they produce coins every day. The more stuff you put in your kingdom, the more stuff you unlock to put in your kingdom.

And so the cycle goes.

Focusing on the kingdom is important because it unlocks playable characters for the World Tour and Toad Rally modes. Want to play through World Tour as Toadette? Keep growing that kingdom (by crushing Toad Rally mode)!



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

How an award-winning documentary was allegedly blacklisted by Netflix

$
0
0

VANISH_DNR_swat

In just four years, Netflix has become by far the most watched destination for documentaries, beaming titles to 190 countries and an astounding 83 million global subscribes.

That has given Netflix a lot of power in a relatively small corner of Hollywood to make or break titles — and for one director, that meant a dramatic setback in his movie's release.

Netflix's decision to come in early on documentaries like "The Square," "Virunga," "What Happened, Miss Simone?" and "Winter on Fire" led to Oscar nominations, while recent titles like "Making a Murderer" and "Amanda Knox" have fed subscribers' addiction for true-crime stories.

As Netflix's chief content officer, Ted Sarandos, boasted in 2015, "People who have never watched a documentary in their life are watching them on Netflix." And the Netflix Original branding has become an instant stamp of legitimacy for filmmakers.

But what's less talked about, beyond the mountains of cash Netflix dishes out for premium content, is when a filmmaker inevitably decides he or she doesn't want to make a deal with Netflix.

It may not happen often, but in one case, turning down a Netflix Original deal seemingly led a filmmaker's movie to be blacklisted from ever being shown on the streaming giant.

A Netflix deal gone bad

Much of what you hear about Netflix's nonfiction (as opposed to the TV series division) is that it gives immense freedom to artists. Werner Herzog told Business Insider of making "Into the Inferno" for Netflix: "They saw the film and liked it and that was that. They trusted me in a way that was very, very pleasant." The "Amanda Knox" codirectors told Business Insider that the leeway Netflix gave them was a "giant luxury."

So when Craig Atkinson got the attention of Netflix, he thought he had made it to the big time.

Best known for working as a cinematographer with Oscar-nominated filmmakers Heidi Ewing and Rachel Grady, Atkinson in 2013 decided to embark on his directorial debut, "Do Not Resist," in which he examines the militarization of the police in the US. Atkinson spent three years shooting around the country, gaining the trust of law enforcement so he could tell a vérité story.

But the protests in Ferguson, Missouri, following the shooting of Michael Brown by the police changed everything. Atkinson, 34, and his producer Laura Hartrick, 28, visited and captured footage of the tactics used by riot-gear-dressed officers that was more raw and unfiltered than what the evening news had been showing.

"Do Not Resist" was suddenly covering a topical story. And as Atkinson was in postproduction before the movie's world premiere at the Tribeca Film Festival in April, Netflix came calling.

"The Saturday before the premiere I got a call from one of the executives at Netflix," Atkinson told Business Insider. (He asked that the Netflix executive remain anonymous for this story.) "We spoke at great length about the project, the person said it was an incredibly timely film, and they were interested in it."

CraigAtkinson_HeadshotThe next day, Atkinson got a call from the same executive saying that Netflix wanted to make an offer to buy the film and brand it as a Netflix Original title, but the person asked whether Atkinson would be open to making changes to his film.

"I was still unsure about the film," Atkinson said. "I didn't think we made a perfect film, so I was open to collaboration, but the person told me the deal couldn't be made until I said I was open to this, so I said OK because I wanted to see what the deal was going to be."

On Monday, Atkinson received the offer from Netflix. He and his team were going to premiere at Tribeca on Thursday, and if they were to accept the deal, the offer stated they would have to agree by noon on the day of the film's premiere or the offer would be null and void.

The deal for worldwide rights to the film was in the mid-six figures, and the agreement stated that Netflix would retain all creative approvals over the final cut and the film's title. It also had a budget line of $70,000 for "finishing" (money for additional editing or other changes Netflix saw fit).

These are general terms most first-time filmmakers will encounter at any company looking to buy their film. Numerous filmmakers told Business Insider, however, that there's often an open dialogue between the filmmaker and the buyer about suggested changes before signing an agreement. Negotiations can, of course, vary from filmmaker to filmmaker, especially based on someone's experience and profile.

"So I'm reading the deal and it doesn't specify changes," Atkinson said. "It says that they have full control and they can change the title. The deal is time-stamped for high noon on the day of our premiere, so now the clock is ticking. In my mind I'm thinking maybe they are catering to a certain audience and they want to change the film. I was so overwhelmed and unprepared to be in this position."

'Trust us'

Atkinson was unable to land a sales rep, which at this point in a movie's life is an essential ingredient (though he was able to get an entertainment lawyer).

Sales reps have an understanding of the marketplace and use their connections within the industry to get the film they're representing the best deal both domestically and internationally. A rep would have told Atkinson that the figure he was offered was substantially higher than what he would get from any of the independent film distributors that would be tracking his film at the Tribeca Film Festival, or from a documentary-heavy network like HBO or A&E.

Atkinson told Business Insider that colleagues in the industry who have either worked with Netflix or know people who have worked with the company told him that Netflix was giving him a low offer.

Business Insider spoke with documentary insiders and sales agents who agreed that it was a low offer by Netflix standards but respectable for a first-time filmmaker (some filmmakers Business Insider spoke with said they would have taken the deal in a heartbeat).

With the deadline for the deal quickly approaching, Atkinson's lawyer, Jody Simon, a partner at the firm Fox Rothschild, was able to negotiate the price of the movie up $100,000 more, but the lawyer also relayed to Atkinson a sobering fact about how Netflix negotiates.

"During the course of the conversation our lawyer had with the Netflix lawyer, he got a lecture, as he described it, from the Netflix lawyer about the fee because he was pushing back about how it seemed incredibly low for an all-rights deal," Atkinson said. "The Netflix lawyer lectured him on how it was their algorithm that determined the price of the film and that there's really no discussion to be had because this algorithm determined how much the film should be worth and that basically was the end of discussion."

Simon confirmed the content of the conversation with Netflix's lawyer to Business Insider, adding that it was the first time he'd encountered a deal figure put together by an algorithm. Still, he said, he's not surprised by it.

"I find it as a culture clash between the tech people and the creative people," Simon said. "They really just do things differently — Hulu and Amazon and Netflix. They draft differently. A lot of it is inside baseball and pretty subtle, but it's a different approach and a different way of thinking."

When asked for a comment about Atkinson's recounting of events, a Netflix representative told Business Insider: "Every deal at Netflix is unique — we have no comment about the specifics of our deal negotiations."

The negotiation with Netflix was a sobering reality for Atkinson, who was getting his first taste of the way the company uses its analytics to make decisions that at traditional distributors often come through gut instinct and decades of trial and error. (Numerous sources in the acquisitions field told Business Insider they did have data they refer to when choosing movies to acquire but did not rely on it heavily.)

It wasn't just the money that concerned Atkinson, however. He could never get the Netflix executive to give him specifics on what the company wanted to change in his film.

Craig Shot Ferguson Vanish Films final"I have student loans to pay off, so the money would have been great," Atkinson said. "But the bottom line was if we couldn't put in some kind of provision where we mutually agree on changes, it's a deal-breaker."

Atkinson's inability to relinquish control of his film had to do greatly with the way he got access to make "Do Not Resist." Atkinson, the son of a police officer, and Hartrick promised the multiple law-enforcement agencies featured in the movie that the film would be an authentic portrayal of their job and that only the two filmmakers would edit the movie.

"So here we are again looking at this contract where I have to make a decision," Atkinson said. "If I'm going to compromise myself and say I don't care what I told these cops, just so I can get the deal. And I thought we were going to have a sympathetic ear because of the severity of the situation and it has to do with people's safety, and when we asked to just put in the contract specific changes you want so we can go forward, they wouldn't do that."

"Their response to that was basically, 'Trust us,'" Simon said.

After two sleepless nights, Atkinson finally told Simon on Wednesday to tell Netflix he was declining the offer. Atkinson would see what kind of offers the film would get from playing at Tribeca.

'There's only one way in'

"Do Not Resist" had five sold-out screenings at the Tribeca Film Festival and was beginning to find interest from distributors. Atkinson still couldn't find a sales agent to take it on (he later found a sales rep to handle his international sales).

Craig Atkinson Cindy Ord Getty

During the festival, Atkinson sat down with companies like Magnolia Pictures and Samuel Goldwyn Films to discuss potentially acquiring "Do Not Resist." The possibility of the movie still getting on Netflix wasn't dead, as any company that acquired the movie would have service deals with Netflix to make it available to stream on the service following its theatrical and home-video release.

On top of that, the movie won the best documentary prize at the festival: a $20,000 cash prize sponsored by ... Netflix.

But Atkinson came back down to earth when he learned after the festival that suddenly all the prospective buyers of the movie pulled out. He said he was told that Netflix blocks any service deals for movies on the streaming platform after they have turned down Netflix Original deals. Buyers told Atkinson that in today's market, in which being on Netflix and other streaming services is so important, his movie was no longer an attractive title because a company could no longer own all revenue streams.

Netflix did not comment when asked by Business Insider about a policy of blacklisting titles that reject an Original deal, or whether requiring creative control over its Original documentaries was standard.

"Around that time I saw the [Netflix] executive at a party and I said, 'What happened?' And the person answered, 'Yep, there's only one way in,'" Atkinson said.

'Is this how it goes down?'

Two months after the Tribeca Film Festival, and still trying to forget the bad taste from the Netflix experience, Atkinson moved forward by putting together a self-distribution theatrical release for "Do Not Resist." He also began a conversation with Amazon to be the film's home for a streaming release afterward.

Then suddenly Netflix contacted him again.

"I get a text from the Netflix executive," Atkinson said. "The person wanted to know if I had sold the rights to the film yet because they are still interested. The person felt bad for how everything went down and saw how great the film was doing on the festival circuit."

Atkinson and the executive came to an understanding, with the executive agreeing to relinquish some of the creative control, according to Atkinson.

But when Atkinson went back to Netflix's lawyer to hammer out the financial side of the new agreement, the lawyer had no idea of the new conversation.

"He said, 'We would never give up that control — I don't know what you're talking about.' Basically that the deal was still the original deal," Atkinson said. "He thought that I was coming back to Netflix begging to make a deal."

When Atkinson tried to get back in touch with the Netflix executive, he said, his texts and calls were never returned. He hasn't heard from the executive since.

"As a first-time filmmaker I was like, 'Is this how it goes down?'" Atkinson said. "Netflix can say they respect the artist all they want, but you can tell where their loyalties are, and it's not with the artists."

Atkinson moved forward with his own theatrical release. He said the $20,000 cash prize that Netflix sponsored at Tribeca helped greatly. And he signed a streaming deal with Amazon (for about a third of the amount he would have gotten from the Netflix deal). "Do Not Resist" will be available on Amazon on Wednesday.

'We dodged a bullet not taking the deal'

Atkinson said he wanted to go public with his experience because he wanted filmmakers and fans of Netflix to understand that for as much good as Netflix was providing mass audiences with exceptional content, he believed himself to be living proof of some cracks in its process.

"This will be a concern for filmmakers because Netflix are the titans," a major figure in the documentary industry who asked to remain anonymous told Business Insider after hearing of Atkinson's experience. "If the documentary community is to remain vital, it needs a multiplicity of voices and points of view, and by narrowing the pipeline Netflix is privileging a very few voices."

Prominent documentary filmmaker Robert Greene ("Kate Plays Christine"), however, isn't surprised at all by Atkinson's story.

"Netflix helped the video store to go out of business, and they have now replaced it with a fairly absurd business model that seems to only value certain kinds of things, and it's just depressing," Greene told Business Insider. "It has always been difficult to get films with a voice seen, and it used to be that Netflix represented something better. Another choice. Another possibility. But that seems to be going away, and I would just tell young filmmakers don't make decisions based on what's going to get on Netflix, because art survives and eventually Netflix is going to get boring."

Atkinson said that looking back, he had no regrets about turning down the more lucrative Netflix offer.

The film has played around the US, often in theaters filled with active police officers, who take part in Q&A sessions and interact with their communities, an experience that would have been lost if the film played only on Netflix.

"It's fantastic business by Netflix," Atkinson said. "Tell a filmmaker it's the most timely film you've ever seen, make an offer, and if you can't get it, do what you can so the film's not seen by anyone."

Atkinson pauses for a moment to compose himself.

"We dodged a bullet not taking the deal," he said. "They would have destroyed three years of work."

SEE ALSO: The 5 biggest winners and losers at the box office in 2016

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: 7 details you may have missed on episode 9 of 'Westworld'

This beautiful 'Rogue One' concept art shows off early designs for the characters

$
0
0

rogue one art book

"Rogue One" is now in theaters. The film introduces "Star Wars" fans to a lot of new characters, but that's not how they always looked. 

"The Art of Rogue One: A Star Wars Story" goes behind-the-scenes with beautiful illustrations showing off the expanded "Star Wars" universe in great detail.

The 256-page is a perfect companion for any fan who's seeing the movie. Not only is it filled with tons of concept art showcasing the development of locations and characters from Jyn Erso to the many, many designs that imperial droid K-2SO underwent, but there is also a great deal of commentary from the artists and costume designer who worked on the film.

Abrams Books shared several pieces of concept designs from artist and co-costume designer Glyn Dillon with INSIDER from the newly-released book. Keep reading to see some of the early designs for character looks in the movie.

Among the designs for Director Krennic are ones with various hats. This one appears to show him a little roughed up.



Ben Mendelsohn looks much more debonair in the role.



Originally, the story wasn't supposed to be framed so heavily around the Rogue One leader, Jyn Erso (Felicity Jones).



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

Why I've never seen a 'Star Wars' movie

$
0
0

star wars rogue one

"You're kidding, right?" "What is wrong with you?" "Do you hate fun?" — these are just a few of the stunned responses I get when I confess I've never seen a "Star Wars" movie.

Yes, I've never seen even a few minutes of a "Star Wars" movie. I know, it's one of the most popular series of all time — a franchise that could be worth an estimated $10 billion to its parent company, Disney — spawning an industry of merchandise and becoming a pop-culture phenomenon that persists after nearly 40 years.

But it's not just "Star Wars." I've also avoided other cultural touchstones like "The Lord of the Rings" and "Harry Potter.”

As the first film in the Star Wars Anthology, "Rogue One: A Star Wars Story," is set to premiere Friday, I've had to defend my decision anew. Here's why I've never seen the galactic saga and have no intention to.

What I know

When someone mentions "Star Wars," here's what comes to mind: space, galaxies, Princess Leia's braided buns, lightsabers, and the phrase "Luke, I am your father" (which is basically the crux of an entire plot line, I've been told).

But even without seeing the movies, I'm still privy to a few longstanding references. Every year on May 4, I roll my eyes at the puns on "Star Wars" day; I'm familiar with the opening crawl; and don't worry, I know who Chewbacca is (I think).

I'm not the only one

Apparently there's a community of us. In the UK, there's a BBC radio and TV series called "I've Never Seen Star Wars" in which celebrity guests try out common things they've never done before, like eating with chopsticks or practicing yoga. It was created in 2008 by a guy who had never seen a "Star Wars" movie and decided to capitalize on that cultural oddity.

Last year, amid the chaos of the "Star Wars: The Force Awakens" reboot, a Fox News contributor acknowledged that she wasn't buying the hype around "Star Wars," joking that she'd never seen a movie because she's been "too busy liking cool things and being attractive" (which ultimately served as my model for how not to confess, especially to a group of loyal "Star Wars" fans).

Star Tours ride at Disneyland

The time I saved

When I asked my parents why I never watched "Star Wars" as a kid, my mom said, "I never liked science fiction," and my dad said, "I only watched the first two movies as a kid and never had a desire to watch the others." No real concrete aversions here, just a general distaste for space odysseys.

The same goes for "Harry Potter" and "Lord of the Rings." When my friends talked about the movies in high school and college, I'd have no commentary or I'd casually confess that I hadn't watched or read most of the series (I'll admit I finally cracked open the first two "Harry Potter" books this year after my kid sister urged me to read them with her).

I'd elicit stunned reactions, but within minutes the conversation would move to some other facet of cultural importance that I'd have the knowledge to contribute to. And if any of the movies came on TV while I was hanging out with friends in my dorm or apartment, I'd decide it was time to catch up on my reading or watch Netflix episodes of some other show that effectively held my attention.

And that's something of a victory in the digital age, when my social-media feeds are constantly demanding that I watch this movie or listen to that song, lest I miss out on what everyone is talking about (e.g., the current hype surrounding the new "Star Wars"). Alas, my curiosity has never proved strong enough to sit down and spend hours committed to these franchises with the potential of hours and hours of subsequent obsession.

Actually, I've spent so much time not watching "Star Wars," "Harry Potter," and "The Lord of the Rings" that I decided to calculate the hours I've saved. Between the eight "Harry Potter" movies, three "Lord of the Rings" movies and three "Hobbit" films, plus the seven "Star Wars" episodes that have premiered to date, I've saved 56 hours. That's more than two days. And if you consider that most fans have watched these movies at least twice, that's 112 hours saved.

In 56 hours, I could read two to three books, or I could watch 37 Academy Award-winning best pictures back to back. I could even hike from California's Big Sur to San Francisco with a couple of hours to nap. And in 112 hours, I could train and run a marathon. In that same amount of time, I could also climb more than halfway to Mount Everest base camp.

Harry Potter

What am I missing?

Despite the pride I harbor from successfully avoiding the biggest box-office franchises of our time, I occasionally wonder what I'm missing.

I can't seem to shake the feeling that simply because my family and I weren't interested in the "Star Wars" story and none of my adult friends forced me into a "Star Wars" or "Harry Potter" movie marathon, I may have subjected myself to lifelong ridicule.

It at least comforts me to know that some of the films, despite sky-high profits, weren't actually that great. A Los Angeles Times article last year chronicled every one of the paper's "Star Wars" film reviews dating back to the first in 1977. It notes that while some were "frankly irresistible," others were "noticeably lacking in warmth and humor."

So as I sit among the chatter of the latest installment, a pop-cultural mainstay looming over my head, I continue to ask, Is it really worth all the hype?

SEE ALSO: 'Star Wars' spin-off 'Rogue One' definitely isn't getting a sequel, and that could be a hint

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: 2 millennials watched the original ‘Star Wars’ for the first time

Viewing all 103316 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images