Quantcast
Channel: Business Insider
Viewing all 103267 articles
Browse latest View live

Analyst: AMC's TV triumph is getting torn apart by services like Netflix (NFLX)

$
0
0

Don Draper, Mad MenNetflix giveth and Netflix taketh away.

That’s the thrust of a recent Pacific Crest analyst note, in which Andy Hargreaves and Evan Wingren wrote that cable TV network AMC’s prospects are looking dire.

AMC is a network that has built its recent success out of high-quality dramas like “Breaking Bad,” “Mad Men,” and “The Walking Dead.” AMC execs have also credited Netflix viewers for helping launch “Breaking Bad” as a cultural phenomenon. "I think Netflix kept us on the air," "Breaking Bad" creator Vince Gilligan once said.

But now the rise of streaming services like Netflix might be tearing AMC down.

“Average audiences for almost every returning AMC original in 2016 are down double-digits versus 2015,” the Pacific Crest analysts wrote. “This highlights the increase in competition for viewer time. In particular, the explosion in high-quality original dramas driven by [streaming video on demand] companies [like Netflix] has commoditized an area of programming that AMC helped popularize and represents the core of the network's brand.”

Here is a chart of the performance of AMC's returning shows:

Screen Shot 2016 10 20 at 10.22.37 AM

Not good! And here's a chart of AMC's new shows:

Screen Shot 2016 10 20 at 10.22.51 AM

Pacific Crest's thesis is that there are simply too many good serialized dramas being produced, especially by streaming services, and AMC is suffering from the glut. Pacific Crest had been hopeful that AMC’s strength of programming would continue to help it prosper, but now the analysts are significantly lowering their ad revenue estimates going forward, and think “continued declines for existing AMC programming are likely.”   

There was one bright spot according to Pacific Crest, however.

“Despite very weak trends in original performance overall in 2016, we expect the premiere of The Walking Dead Season 7 this Sunday night (Oct. 23) to perform relatively well. The show demonstrated evidence of stability in average audience through the second half of Season 6, and a notable cliffhanger around who Negan killed should fuel viewership for the new season.”

But that is cold comfort for a business they believe will continue to bleed.

SEE ALSO: Why Netflix shouldn't be scared of the 'Netflix of China' and its splashy US debut — yet

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: The 7 best TV shows on Netflix you've probably never heard of


Nintendo has a new game console called ‘Switch’ — here’s how its past consoles have fared

$
0
0

Nintendo has a new gaming console. It’s called the Switch, and true to its name, it can alternate between a device you play on your TV and a device you play on the road. While we have few details on how much it’ll cost, how well it’ll perform, and what games it’ll launch with, it’s already making the gaming world very excited.

That’s good for Nintendo, since, as this chart from Statista shows, the company’s latest consoles haven’t done so hot. The most recent Wii U has long been a bomb, and while the current 3DS handheld has been fine, it hasn’t driven the kind of sales as the DS before it.

So far, the Switch looks to be avoiding the mistakes of the predecessor, whose tablet controller always felt a bit half-baked, and whose name often confused everyday consumers. Whether or not that’ll help it approach the success of the Wii, though, is a question we won’t begin to know until next March, when the console becomes available.

nintendo console sales chart

SEE ALSO: Tesla burns way more cash on R&D than traditional car makers

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Why your iPhone alarm snooze is automatically set to 9 minutes

This is why Nintendo's new Switch console is such a genius move for the struggling games legend (AAPL)

$
0
0

Nintendo Switch

It's official: The Nintendo Switch is real, it's coming in March 2017 and it looks like it will be a pretty crazy gaming device.

The Switch is a portable console like the current Nintendo 3DS. But it also has a dock that connects to a TV so you can play games on the big screen, like with the Nintendo Wii U. 

It's an unusual approach, especially when you consider previous rumors that Nintendo might be using Google Android as the core of the Switch's operating system (which we still can't conclusively confirm or debunk). The finished product will stand out on the shelves, if for no other reason than it'll be like nothing else before it.

Nintendo is taking a big risk by putting all its chips on such an unorthodox gaming machine.

But the struggling video game pioneer needs a hit more than ever before.

And there's one gigantic reason why Nintendo might want to go down this road: To borrow a phrase from former Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer, it can be summed up as "developers, developers, developers." And it speaks to a trend that's sweeping the tech industry.

Fading superpower

Nintendo is no longer the superpower in video games that it used to be.

The Wii U console is a veritable flop, selling only 13.3 million consoles worldwide in the almost four years since release. The Nintendo 3DS is faring better, with 59.8 million systems sold, but that's still about a third as much as its predecessor, the Nintendo DS, which was Nintendo's best-selling device ever with 154.9 million units.

It has meant that Nintendo has entered into kind of a death spiral from which it's very difficult to recover.

While both the 3DS and the Wii U have been the recipients of some of Nintendo's finest-made games to date, there isn't a ton of support on either console for non-Nintendo game developers. It's one of the biggest complaints people have with both consoles, especially the Wii U.

Nintendo Wii U and 3DS

With Nintendo only able to deliver a meager handful of those top-shelf games itself per year, it needs outside developers to keep a steady stream of new titles coming in to keep existing console-owners happy and attract new ones.

With Nintendo's console sales so low, though, there's not much incentive for those developers to put in the effort to bring their games to Nintendo's camp. And without those games, consumers won't buy more systems. It's a vicious cycle with little hope for recovery.

Meanwhile, the Sony PlayStation and Microsoft Xbox product lines are happy to pick up Nintendo's slack in the mainstream market, making themselves the platforms of choice for modern blockbusters from outside studios like "Call of Duty" and "Grand Theft Auto."

Playing with power

This is why building one system that's both portable and for the TV is a really smart move.

Sony and Microsoft might have the TV console market locked up to the point where it would be a serious uphill struggle for Nintendo to regain any lost ground with developers and consumers alike.

But portable gaming has long been Nintendo's strength, going back to the phenomenal success of the original Game Boy. While it's true that sales of the 3DS aren't as strong as the preceding DS, they're still a lot stronger than Sony's current PlayStation Vita portable console, which has sold 14.2 million units.

Nintendo Switch

That means there's far less competition for Nintendo to attract first-tier portable game developers, combined with its much stronger reputation and track record in that market.

The beauty of this plan is that it means Nintendo gets kind of a twofer deal with developers: Hook 'em with the portable gaming aspect, and suddenly it has a robust library of TV-based games, too.

The developer doesn't have to do much, if any, extra work. Build the game once, and it works both ways. If it turns out that the Switch is based on the Android OS, even better, because developers already know how to work with Android. It's all about knocking down the barriers to making games for the Switch.

Once those games start attracting customers, it'll keep that flywheel spinning. More games appear for the Switch; more people buy it. 

Ta-da. Death spiral escaped. And we're already seeing some early signs that this might work — mega-publisher Bethesda is bringing its blockbuster "The Elder Scrolls: Skryim" to the NX, marking the series debut on a Nintendo console

The Microsoft-Apple connection

What Nintendo is doing here is actually similar in a lot of ways to what both Microsoft and Google are trying to accomplish, as the lines between phones, PCs, and tablets start to blur.

As people look to use their devices in different ways, they don't care about the underlying operating system so much as they care that their apps or games are available when and how they want them.

With Windows 10, Microsoft introduced a new Universal Windows Platform app standard — basically a way to sell apps once and have them work on Windows-powered smartphones, tablets, and PCs. By pooling those different devices, Microsoft holds, it can make for a tremendous audience that developers can't ignore.

microsoft universal windows platform

"The fundamental truth for developers is they will build if there are users," Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella said in 2015.

Similarly, Google is working to combine its Android and ChromeOS operating systems in an effort to make an uber-operating-system that can work on laptops, tablets, and smartphones — and win over more developers.

The real holdout here is Apple, which still maintains four different operating systems — MacOS, iOS, tvOS, and WatchOS — with no plans to unify.

When the Nintendo Switch launches in 2017, it'll be a big indication of which philosophy is right. If Nintendo can turn a unified platform into a position of strength after its current period of lagging, it'll go a long way toward proving the concept.

SEE ALSO: Nintendo just announced a new game console — here's everything we know

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: This is what a ridiculously souped-up $500 Nintendo looks like

Here's everything leaving Netflix in November that you need to watch before it disappears

$
0
0

can't hardly wait embry

November is almost here, so it's time to say bye to some titles on Netflix.

A whole lot of classics are leaving the streaming giant.

Movies we're sad to see go include "E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial," "Deliverance," "Fatal Attraction," and "Major League," and there are only a few weeks left to watch the teen classic "Can't Hardly Wait" (you know you'll miss it).

Here's the full list of everything leaving Netflix in November. We've highlighted some of the titles you should check out one more time before they disappear.

SEE ALSO: The 23 scariest horror movies on Netflix you need to watch for Halloween

Leaving November 1

“The Addams Family”
“Almost Famous”
“Angel Heart”
“Barnyard” “Bratz: The Movie”
“The 'Burbs”
“Can't Hardly Wait”
“Chuck” (Seasons 1-5)
“The Core”
“Deliverance”
“E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial”
“Echelon Conspiracy”
“Eight Crazy Nights”
“Empire State”
“Equilibrium”
“Escape to Witch Mountain”
“The Family Man”
“Fatal Attraction”
“Fresh”
“Get Rich or Die Tryin’”
“The Holiday”
“Into the Wild”
”Kangaroo Jack”
“Legally Blonde”
“Legally Blonde 2: Red, White & Blonde”
“Major League”
“Mansfield Park”
“Meet Joe Black”
“Mel Brooks: Make a Noise”
“Open Season”
“Open Season 2”
“Open Season 3”
“Patton Oswalt: My Weakness Is Strong”
“Powerpuff Girls” (Seasons 1-6)
“Rounders”
“Scream 2”
“Sex: My British Job”
“Shameless” (Seasons 1-10)
“Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow”
“Something's Gotta Give”
“The SpongeBob SquarePants Movie”
“Spy Game”
“The Sum of All Fears”
“Total Drama World Tour”
“Underground: The Julian Assange Story”
“Urban Cowboy”
“Varsity Blues”
“What Women Want”



Leaving November 2

“The English Teacher”



Leaving November 4

“Gigli”



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

Ethan Hawke and his costar and director talk about the biggest problem plaguing Hollywood

$
0
0

in the valley of violence focus world

Director Ti West has built a loyal fan base over the last decade by making unique horror movies like "The House of the Devil" and "The Innkeepers" that appeal to horror fanatics while challenging them with unconventional stories that delve into internal fears, rather than going for over-the-top gore.

With his latest movie “In a Valley of Violence” (opening Friday), West veers further from his horror roots. The Western follows a man (Ethan Hawke) who arrives in a town and instantly becomes a threat to the local marshal (John Travolta) and his annoying son (James Ransone of "The Wire"). There are certainly thrills (and blood) but the movie also shows West’s comedic talent and ability to work with a bigger production (the movie was produced by Blumhouse Productions, which is behind the “Insidious” and “Paranormal Activity” franchises) and bigger stars.

Business Insider sat down with West, Hawke, and Ransone in New York City to talk about the movie, their awe of Travolta, and the scene-stealing talents of the dog in the movie. And the three also got candid about the challenges that come when you want to make art in an industry that is concerned only with box-office grosses.

Jason Guerrasio: Was this story something you wrote recently or was it on the shelf for a while?

Ti West: No, your first part was correct. I had made “The Sacrament,” which was a movie heavily steeped in realism and it was about confronting unpleasant violence using a real brand and a documentary style and a real tragedy. And that was great, but by the end I was burnt on that and wanted to do something traditionally cinematic. For me the most traditionally cinematic genre is the Western. And I thought it's not so far removed, because there is violence in it, that it would be a relatively reasonable step. I had been talking to [Blumhouse head] Jason Blum for years about movies and I had mentioned it to him and I also mentioned that I was a fan of Ethan's and he said, “Go to New York and talk to Ethan about it.” I went and Ethan was doing "Macbeth" at Lincoln Center and I pitched him the idea for the movie and he kind of dug it. He gave me the date of when the play was ending and I said I'll send you a script and if you don't like it we don't have to talk about it, but if you do let's try to get it made. And I think it was the day after you wrapped, you read it on the plane and you were like, "This is cool."

Ethan Hawke: We met in December and we were on set in June. There was no script in December when we met — that has never happened in my life. 

Guerrasio: Ti works quickly. 

Hawke: It was unbelievable. It went from concept to reality incredibly fast. And people can work quick, but there's a confluence of things that went right. I have met tons of people who wrote a script in a week, but for it to get made...

West: I got a stack of them if you want to read them. [Laughs]

Hawke: Just the idea that all the dominoes kept falling to that we actually got to go into production was awesome. 

Ethan Hawke Ti West Jack Plunkett APGuerrasio: With Blum, did you have to pitch it with a horror angle to sell him, since that's what you're known for?

West: I think for Jason the idea of doing a Western was a little outside of the box. He said go talk to Ethan first.

Hawke: Because Jason and I had a conversation, the way Jason explained it to me anyway, he was talking to Ti, he  wanted to make a Western, and I said the same thing and Jason was like, "F--k, you guys should get together." So we didn't have to sell it.

I was pushing Jason to expand his idea of what a genre film was because a lot of people think horror is just the genre but Roger Corman exploited all the genres to great effect and I was encouraging Jason, why isn't he doing creature features? Spaghetti Westerns? Crazy sci-fi?

James Ransone: It's weird because when you think about it, it's only been a recent phenomenon where it's this compartmentalization of genres being so specific. “The Exorcist” is a horror movie, but that was one of the most beloved movies, they didn't think of it as just a horror —

Hawke:“The Shining.”

Ransone:“Rosemary's Baby” is a horror movie. It's not trying to define the Western as being something different, it's just there used to be movies that had a certain thing and now it's sort of, "Well, our shop doesn't do that." 

Hawke: People are so into branding.

Guerrasio: It all comes down to how it can be marketed, and if the company doesn't know how to pull it off, it's not worth their time. 

Hawke: And it's true, perception creates reality, right? It is very difficult to sell a Western overseas. It's hard to make your money back. 

Guerrasio: Was this before you did “Magnificent Seven,” Ethan?

Hawke: This was before. It's just coincidental that these came out when they did. It turned out I was on a horse for two years. 

Guerrasio:James, what did you like about your character, Gilly? What made you get on board?

Ransone: I don't really like anything about Gilly. [Laughs]

Guerrasio: But it has to be fun to play a bad guy.

Ransone: Yeah. Ti wrote to the strengths I think in playing some tragic clown character that is pretty easy for me to do. It was just Ti and I had met many years ago and we were looking for something to do for a while and then I think he wrote the character with me in mind hoping that I would be so lucky to do it.

Guerrasio: When did Travolta sign on?

West: Ethan went on vacation, wrote me a nice note that he loved the script, Jason said he was in, and then very soon after Jason sent me an email that said, "What about John Travolta as the marshal?" Which was a very inspired kind of out-of-nowhere idea. We hadn't gotten really too far, and I was just like yeah, and before I even finished saying that he was like, "Good news, he already read the script and loves it and wants to meet." And so Jason and I went and had this surreal, incredible dinner with John Travolta and he embraced the project —

Hawke: Completely. 

West: I mean, it was a very odd experience to sit down with John Travolta and have him so eloquently be so excited and so specific about what he loved about the movie, the character, him as a character actor, what the movie's subtext was saying. It was just like, "How could it be anyone other than him?"

Hawke: It was outside his wheelhouse, independent cinema is not something he does often, though he's done a few to great acclaim, but —

Guerrasio: He's not as active in it as you are.

Hawke: Yeah. You know, doing movies without trailers and going down and dirty, it was kind of a surprise to all of us that he was all in and he understood it completely. And it was a great role Ti wrote him and he was smart enough to know that. 

Ransone: And it's not the '90s. You used to get 40 days for a movie this big, and we had half the amount of that time.

Hawke: You start to wonder what they did with all that time?

West: It does sound crazy. People ask if you had enough time, and you go no, maybe one more day would have been good, but if we had another week —

Hawke: What would we have done? And technology has changed, you can work so much faster, lighting is so much less an issue. 

Guerrasio: But you gave yourself a potential problem, you wrote in a part for a dog. Ti, did you panic a little before production started? Because if you didn't get the right one that could have held you up. 

West: There was a moment when I was like, wow, Ethan and Travolta want to do this movie and then I was like, "Oh no, the dog!” If I can't find the dog what are we going to do? And I literally Googled "talented dogs" and the first thing that came up was this YouTube video about Jumpy.

Hawke: He's like the Justin Bieber of dogs.

West: It's true. And I remember being like, "I wonder where this dog is?" I'm thinking in Florida or something, no, the Valley [in Los Angeles]. So we tracked down the trainer, Omar Von Muller, he's a nice guy. I took him out to lunch and I met Jumpy. And in the course of that I learned that Omar trained Uggy, the dog in “The Artist,” which gave me a great deal of confidence. Uggy was actually on our set the whole time hanging out. But we go to this park and Jumpy is there and Omar showed me what Jumpy could do and the world came to halt. I mean, forget the tricks, which are insane and we could talk for days about that, but you literally put a mark down, like for any actor, and Omar would say, "Jumpy, go to your mark," and he put his paw on the mark and would stay there until you say cut. And not one out of ten times, every time. 

Ransone:
I've never met a human actor who has done that, by the way. [Laughs]

West: So we just figured out how to incorporate him more into the film. There's a point, and I think we joked about this on set, we were doing over-the-shoulder shots with the dog and I was just like this is so strange: Ethan and Jumpy were seriously acting together.

Hawke: It was really cool. It was so remarkable that things in another movie that would be outlandish became commonplace in this movie. There's a shot in the movie where Jumpy is leading the horse, he's got the reins of the horse and pulling it, but the audience is so used to Jumpy doing amazing things at that point that they are like, “Of course he would do that!” 

violence jumpy
Guerrasio: James, was it intimidating at all to work alongside Travolta? Most of your scenes are with him. Did you two have to break the ice before working?

Ransone: I have been a journeyman actor for 15 years and I have been lucky enough to work with Ethan — this is our third thing to be on together — but my experiences with other movie stars have not been that great and then you get one of the biggest movie stars in the entire world. I was like, "This is going to be terrible." So in some ways to galvanize myself for that I was trying to keep as much distance between us as possible, but I ended up feeling like an asshole because truth be told he was one of the most gracious and sweet actors that I've worked with. And I don't say that with lip service, he’s amazing —

Hawke: He's a warm person. 

Ransone: I was like, "You're just a really sweet dude." He would talk about flying. I mean, this is a person that has been famous since he was 17, so you don't know what you're going to get, but after meeting him I was like, this is a really solid dude. And he's so insanely meticulous about every choice that he's making about his character from the costume, the subtext of the lines, and that's inspiring for an actor. You see the bad habits you have.

Guerrasio: Speaking of meticulous, people including myself are always fascinated by the Travolta facial hair choices in his roles. Did you guys talk about what he wanted to do for this movie?

West: We talked about it. He's very interested in the period, so we talked about that for a while. He's got this great quote, in all his movies he wants to be "watchable," and it's such a simple but brilliantly articulate thing, and with him being a movie star he's like, "That's all great, but as long as its watchable." 

Hawke: The choice can be true, but if it isn't watchable who cares?

in a valley of violence john travolta james ransoneWest: Exactly. I think it was cool where he was playing a character that was very much his age and the authoritative, older, wiser character in the movie, but it was great to see John Travolta with an older, gray vibe.

Hawke: It's hard for guys who have been world famous for as long as he's been —

Guerrasio: And a sex symbol.

Hawke: Look, he was one of the first male sex symbols of his era, so to let yourself change and evolve is really tough and he's realizing he's evolving into having to play characters, like what he did on the O.J. show to this. The people who have a long career evolve. 

Guerrasio: Has that been the same for you? You tell yourself you can't play a certain role anymore?

Hawke: I haven't had a relationship with the audience the way that he does. Like Harrison Ford, I remember when he did this great Kathryn Bigelow submarine movie.

Guerrasio: “K-19: The Widowmaker.”

Hawke: You can tell he did a lot of work, he did a pretty good Russian accent. But the audience has no desire to see Harrison Ford in that. He could be Daniel Day-Lewis great with that accent, but he's still Harrison Ford to us and he has a relationship with the audience that is more powerful than that relationship to that character. So I have never had that and for those who have that, it's a great resource and a great burden. Vincent D’Onofrio can change in every movie. People don't know it's the same dude. My dad's like, "That's the same guy that was in ‘Daredevil’?” 

Guerrasio: And what he does in “The Magnificent Seven,” you do a double take.

Hawke: Yeah, what the f--k? But he's an old-school actor and that's different than a genuine first ballot hall of fame movie star.

Guerrasio: Ti, you were working in a larger machine with Blumhouse compared to your previous films. Did you like it?

West: I mean there wasn't much of a machine to it. It just felt the same as making any other movie. I'm in my sort of bubble with it with the same group of people, from the ADs to the ACs down, that's what helps get these smaller movies to look a little bit more expensive than they are. But it was a good experience. It didn't feel like a grind, it didn't feel hard or confusing, it really felt like we were in the right place at the right time. I would be in Santa Fe and look at Ethan on a horse with Jumpy next to him and Travolta. It was like, how did we get here? That's not always how it is. 

Hawke: I've spent my life trying to be in that position. Where you can work from a place of gratitude.

Guerrasio: Ti, the way I see things progressing for you, the next logical step is the superhero movies. Does that interest you?

West: I’m not anti-it — it's just not really in my wheelhouse. My goal is what Ethan just said, to be at another place having another experience like that. It's one thing making these independent films that yes, it's a career, but it's also a bit of a lifestyle. We all moved to Santa Fe for a while and had this experience we take with our life. I think there's a part of that where you're making a movie that's two years at best, that's the fastest it's going to go, that's a big commitment, and you need to be able to believe in it and you need to believe in it enough to sit in front of you now being enthusiastically talking about it. Maybe there's a version of a superhero movie where that happens, but typically it's got to be something that you're excited about when you do it and you're excited years later. 

Sinister Ethan HawkeGuerrasio: Do the superhero movies ever excite you enough that you'd want to be in one, Ethan?

Hawke: If somebody had passion and an idea behind their superhero movie I would consider it. I had no desire to make a horror movie and then I met Scott Derrikson (“Sinister”) and he had a very clear idea of the horror movie he wanted to make and he had a really cool character for me to play and so I didn't feel like I was making a "horror" movie, I thought I was working with a filmmaker who had an idea and it was a character that was perfect for me at that time. I was just turning 40 and playing a guy who felt he was more famous before, I could really sink my teeth into that. If somebody came at me with “The Pink Panther” and I related to it like that I could imagine doing it. I'm not working my life to get to do it. The thing that's great for me to do “Magnificent Seven” is to get to be in a movie that plays at the mall that I get to be an actor in. It's a victory for me because I'm not in a cape. I wanted to be a dramatic actor when I was a kid, so to be a dramatic actor in a movie that plays at the multiplex, if I don't do that every few years, I don't get to do this movie. It's a giant balancing act. So to do it in a way that doesn't offend me is always the goal. 

Ransone: Here's the deal —

Guerrasio: And you would be a great villain in a superhero movie, by the way, James. 

Ransone: I have been up for like five different incarnations of Marvel things, going through all the auditions and then it's gone. It happened five times in a row to me this year. 

Guerrasio: Some of the bigger characters?

Ransone: Yeah, some of the bigger characters on the TV shows and a couple of the smaller villains in the movies. Here's the thing with what it's like to be working and being an artist. We're all freelance, there's no place we have to show up, if we don't audition or hustle we don't work. And that provides a continuum of fear throughout the longevity of our careers. It's like "What's the next one going to be?" and the sexy thing about the commercialism in that you get this false consciousness of a breath of okay, I'm going to be okay for a minute. 

Guerrasio: Those movies, you're likely set for a few years. 

Ransone: That's what makes those roles so attractive. 

Hawke: If you can make people money you basically have a hall pass for three years. You're at the party for three years. 

Ransone: My experience is if I've always made the decisions that were based on my creative gut, they are always more fulfilling. And I have gotten a few paydays, and I cannot tell you what cashing those checks felt like, but I can tell you how rich the depths of my experiences were on the times when I felt I was operating at full potential creatively. And those are much more important experiences.

Hawke: I mean, I'll remember my whole life you doing that monologue on Main Street challenging me to fight that's in this movie. It was so fun, it's why you want to be an actor. 

Ransone: So with the comic-book thing, it provides something that feels safe that is inherently not. That's the weird part about the whole thing. 

Hawke: I didn't know I had to be on this treadmill going so fast forever or else I'm perceived as a loser. 

Ransone: I would venture to guess that even Travolta to this day still doesn't feel safe. I don't think he's like, "Got it, this is fine now. The money is going to keep coming in." He's like, what do I have to do to preserve whatever I did to be here?

Hawke: I got to work with Jack Lemmon when I was 18 and he was probably in his 70s and somebody asked him, "Why do you work so much?" and he said, "I'm convinced every job is the last one," and people laugh but I really think he was right. 

tom cruiseRansone: If you could hang with Tom Cruise long enough, I bet if you got down to that place —

Hawke: What makes him go to the gym every morning.

Ransone: Yeah, because it could all go away at some point. This “Jack Reacher” movie may be the last thing. 

West: And then there's this thought that if your movie doesn't make a billion dollars, it's a failure. It's no longer a movie, it's just content. 

Ransone: And it would be false for me to say that capital isn't a reflection of the quality or success of a movie, but it can't be the only metric and that's where we are now. 

Hawke: We are in a funny place where literally in my lifetime I've watched the rules completely change. When I was a kid, you had no idea how much money a movie made. And then you started to find out how much a movie made at the box office, they would put it in USA Today or something, and that would be interesting. I never saw it as a competition. Then came the internet and the metric of reviews, and it's America making everything into a competition.

West: Jason, you and I have talked about this before, and I said that I can give you all the reasons why it's good to be transparent, however I can also tell you why the weekend box-office stats and the ranking on Rotten Tomatoes has made everything worse because it has turned movies into sports. And I love sports, but it's a different thing. 

Hawke: I love sports, too, but I want one thing in my life where there is room for opinion. In sports, you either got a touchdown or you didn't.

Ransone: And what's even more terrifying is when you crack the nut on how things get made, they are so concerned about that final number that they don't actually want to do it cheaper or in a different way and that's what scares me is you're jumping in place. Couldn't we take less and take some creative risks? “Absolutely not because the bar is up here.” 

West: It's not a time when someone makes $10 million on a movie and goes, "Someone had a good day," it's "Hm, could have done better." Billion is the number now.

SEE ALSO: 100 movies on Netflix that everyone needs to watch in their lifetime

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: The final trailer for the Harry Potter spinoff ‘Fantastic Beasts’ is here

The new game from the team behind 'Grand Theft Auto' is drop dead gorgeous

$
0
0

In 2010, a new video game classic was born.

"Red Dead Redemption" is widely regarded as one of the finest games made in the past 10 years. It takes the open-world environment of "Grand Theft Auto" and twists it into something entirely unique: a third-person, open-world action game set in the Old West — it's even made by the same folks behind "GTA"! We're talking mid-1800s, Reconstruction-era America, as it transitioned from a lawless frontier to modern civilization. This is not stuff that video games tackle.

And that's part of why people are so incredibly excited for "Red Dead Redemption 2," which was announced this week. We got our first look at the game on Thursday and, well, it's drop dead gorgeous.

Red Dead Redemption 2

Right? Let's dive in.

SEE ALSO: Nintendo just announced a new game console — here's everything we know

If these graphics look too good to be true, think again: These incredible visuals were captured on a PlayStation 4.



Like the first "Red Dead Redemption," the sequel takes place in the American Old West.



More specifically, the game is set in "America’s unforgiving heartland."



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

Hillary Clinton email shows Christiane Amanpour was 'appalled' at CNN and Anderson Cooper 'fiasco'

$
0
0

christiane amanpour anderson cooper journal

CNN host Christiane Amanpour didn't approve of the cable news network and colleague Anderson Cooper's reporting from a journal belonging to a murdered ambassador.

That's according to an email from Amanpour's husband, James P. Rubin, to Hillary Clinton.

Rubin, a journalist, was the US assistant secretary of state for public affairs in the Bill Clinton administration from 1997 to 2000.

In an email from the State Department's release of information from Hillary Clinton's private server in March, Rubin pitches a meeting between Clinton and notable writers and journalists in New York City in order to clarify the "difficulties and complexities" of Clinton's service as secretary of state as a primer for when they decide to describe her service in the position.

While that is the main purpose of the email, a sidenote apparently disclosed Amanpour's feelings and includes a backhanded compliment for CNN.

Rubin wrote: "p.s. my wife was appalled at the Anderson Cooper diary fiasco; unfortunately, cnn is still the best of a declining industry..."

HIllary Clinton Anderson Cooper CNN James P. Rubin Christiane Amanpour Christopher stevens journal

Rubin was referring to the 2012 controversy that CNN found itself in after using the contents of a journal it found belonging to a slain US ambassador and failing to disclose that the journal was its source for subsequent reporting.

The ambassador to Libya, Christopher Stevens, was killed at the US consulate after an attack by Libyan rebels. A CNN reporter found his journal among the ruins. It was revealed later that CNN made notes about items from the journal before handing it over to Libyan officials and contacting Stevens' family. Later, Cooper would use the information from the journal in a report on his CNN show, "Anderson Cooper 360," but he didn't reveal that the information originated from Stevens' journal.

When CNN's use of the journal came to light two days after Cooper's report, the State Department said CNN's actions were "disgusting" and a breach of the news outlet's promise to Stevens' family that it wouldn't use the journal in its reporting.

CNN countered that reporting the important information from the journal was its responsibility as a news organization. That became the subject of heated debate in the days that followed.

As a result of Rubin's email, we now know at least one major CNN reporter, Amanpour, was strongly against CNN and Cooper's use of the journal.

CNN and Amanpour have not responded to Business Insider's request for comment. Attempts to contact Rubin went unanswered.

Read the full email exchange between Rubin and Clinton below:

Hillary Clinton Email Archive anderson cooper cnn

SEE ALSO: Seth Meyers rips apart Donald Trump for a 'baseless' accusation against Hillary Clinton

DON'T MISS: Jimmy Fallon mocks his Donald Trump interview by gifting Hillary Clinton actual softballs

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Hillary Clinton's campaign chair John Podesta is obsessed with UFOs and aliens

Ewan McGregor recalls green-screen effects on 'Star Wars' prequels: 'It was a shame'

$
0
0

phantom menace submarine

While promoting his directorial debut "American Pastoral" (opening on Friday), an adaptation of Philip Roth’s Pulitzer Prize-winning 1997 novel, Ewan McGregor couldn't escape looking back on his work on the "Star Wars" prequels.

Talking to The Hollywood Reporter for its Masters interview series, McGregor took us back to one of his most embarrassing moments: his first meeting with franchise creator George Lucas.

"I remember going there, meeting George, and being allowed to read the script," McGregor said, referring to his first visit to the north London studio where they'd shoot "Star Wars: Episode 1 - The Phantom Menace." "I had to read it in the producer’s office — like, literally, being almost locked in with the script, so that it doesn’t get leaked — and then being shown around the sets with George. There was a great big submarine thing that I end up in with Liam [Neeson] and Jar Jar Binks.  And I remember looking at this huge polystyrene thing [that had been made to look like a] submarine, and there was a cockpit. And I looked at it and I went, ‘Will we go under?’ He looked at me and went, ‘What?’ I said, ‘Will we go underwater with it?’ And he looked at me like I was insane. He said, ‘None of that is real, you know.’ And I went, ‘Oh. Yeah.’”   

Though the submarine scene would be shot in a studio with green screen, McGregor said "Phantom Menace" did have some practical sets.

"There was like an environment to work in and as we got into episode two and three, they moved the shoot to Australia, and by that point it became more and more blue screen and green screen," he said. "I thought it was a shame."

McGregor recalls working alongside a puppet of Yoda in "Phantom Menace."

"I worked with Yoda, like it was on set," he said. "Frank Oz I think was operating him with his team of people... It was amazing. You’d be really in the moment with Yoda and then they would go cut and all the puppeteers would stop... And then by episode two and three, he was, and R2D2 was the same way. It was computer-generated. It was a shame not to be sort of working with the real thing."

Watch the complete interview with McGregor below:

SEE ALSO: Why Michael Moore's surprise movie about Donald Trump is a convincing ad for Hillary Clinton

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: The extraordinary life of former fugitive and eccentric cybersecurity legend John McAfee


Here's everything coming to Netflix in November that you need to watch

$
0
0

the crown netflix

While it's sad to see some memorable titles leaving Netflix in November, there's also some great stuff coming to the streaming giant.

Richard Linklater’s Oscar-winning “Boyhood” is coming, as well as Oliver Stone’s classic “The Doors,” the lovable “Paddington,” and a notable Coen brothers black comedy, "Burn After Reading."

And Netflix has no shortage of originals on the way. New ones coming next month include “The Crown” and “Gilmore Girls: A Year in the Life,” the continuation of the show.

Here's the full list of everything coming to Netflix in November, and we've highlighted some of the titles you should check out in bold:

SEE ALSO: Here's everything leaving Netflix in November that you need to watch before it disappears

Available November 1

“The African Queen”

“Alfie” (2004)

“Bob the Builder: White Christmas”
“Candyman 2: Farewell to the Flesh”

“The Confessions of Thomas Quick”

“Cujo” (1983)

“The Doors”

“The Heartbreak Kid”

“Jetsons: The Movie”

“King's Faith”

“Love, Now”

“Norman Lear: Just Another Version of You”
“Pervert Park”

“Ravenous”

“Stephen King's Thinner”
“Tales from the Darkside: The Movie”
“Thomas & Friends: A Very Thomas Christmas”
“Thomas & Friends: Holiday Express”
“Thomas & Friends: Merry Winter Wish”
“Thomas & Friends: The Christmas Engines”
“Thomas & Friends: Ultimate Christmas”



Available November 2

“Dough”
“Food Choices”
“Meet the Blacks”



Available November 4

“The Crown” (Season 1 - NETFLIX ORIGINAL)
“Dana Carvey: Straight White Male, 60” (NETFLIX ORIGINAL)
“The Ivory Game” (NETFLIX ORIGINAL)
“Just Friends”
“World of Winx” (Season 1 - NETFLIX ORIGINAL)



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

Snoopy has been fired as the mascot of MetLife insurance

$
0
0

snoopy parade

It's a sad day for Snoopy: The "Peanuts" character is being fired as a mascot for MetLife, a relationship that has lasted more than 30 years.

MetLife announced Thursday that it's phasing out use of Snoopy to promote the brand, Bloomberg News reports.

The insurance company first looked to the character in the 1980s when it wanted a lovable character to appeal to individual customers. Together, the two created some iconic advertising that few might've previously expected from the realm of insurance.

"We have a lot of affection for Snoopy," Chief Marketing Officer Esther Lee told Bloomberg of the transition. "He’s rated very high as a good friend and on approachability. Where he didn’t rate as high is things like, as a leader, keeps promises, is a good adviser."

Of course, Snoopy was a bit of a troublemaker in the original comics, and had moments where he mocked his owner Charlie Brown.

MetLife also announced it has a new tagline: “MetLife. Navigating life together."

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: The final trailer for the Harry Potter spinoff ‘Fantastic Beasts’ is here

Why Tom Cruise is Hollywood's last movie star

$
0
0

jack reacher never go back paramount

The hardest act to pull off in Hollywood is sustainability.

Whether you’re considered an A-list talent or one of the “it” young stars, at any second your stock can drop. And with tenacious paparazzi and social media now the norm, that mystique of movie stars is no more. Except for one — the actor who continues to have that movie-star aura and, frankly, is the last of them: Tom Cruise.

With the release of his latest action movie this Friday, “Jack Reacher: Never Go Back,” Cruise is poised to rule the weekend box office once again, despite the film's poor reviews (it currently has a 38% rating on Rotten Tomatoes).

But lackluster reviews is nothing to Cruise. He's dealt with a lot more going into a release.

In early 2015, the latest Cruise pile-on came when the documentary “Going Clear” revealed the misdeeds that allegedly occur at the Church of Scientology, of which Cruise is a devout supporter (according to the film, the actor may have known about some of the evil goings-on there). But that summer, we were gushing over his performance in "Mission: Impossible — Rogue Nation" (which would go on to make over $680 million worldwide).

But that’s the magic of Cruise: With any negative press he receives, his movies always seem to cause us all to hit the reset button on him. Why is that? Because we can forgive our movie stars. If they can continue to entertain, all is forgiven.

Cruise was close to being thrown off his pedestal when the infamous couch jump on “Oprah” led to a domino effect of controversy for him. But he’s weathered that storm and is a bigger draw than ever, which is extremely rare.

Let’s look at his contemporaries, who are summed up in this photo from 1983's “The Outsiders.

the outsidersThis was the future of Hollywood in the 1980s — Matt Dillon, Rob Lowe, Patrick Swayze, and let’s also throw in Charlie Sheen and Mickey Rourke. They all had their time and today are nowhere near Cruise’s stardom. (Swayze died from pancreatic cancer in 2009.)

Cruise has topped them all thanks to being ahead of the curve — first in choosing dramatic projects (“Rain Man,” "Born on the Fourth of July," “A Few Good Men”) and then being America’s heartthrob (“Jerry Maguire”), and most recently turning into one of the few action stars who don't need a comic-book franchise to back them (he's made it clear he's not so into the idea of wearing a cape).

Where Arnold Schwarzenegger and Sylvester Stallone failed at staying action stars, Cruise excelled by keeping his action as practical as possible and proudly saying that he does his own stunts. (He also quite clearly still hits the gym.)

tom cruise mission impossible rogue oneBut being a movie star also means knowing when to stay off the radar. Cruise has done this masterfully since the couch jump. And leading up to the release of “Going Clear,” he was mum, though some rumors have come out that Cruise has seen the movie and now wants to leave Scientology. True or not, it only helps his image going into this weekend.

You could argue that actors like Brad Pitt and George Clooney are at the same level of movie stardom as Cruise, but it’s not the same. The two don’t rake in the kind of box-office cash Cruise does (Cruise's films usually make at least $200 million; Pitt's and Clooney's films usually top $100-$150 million worldwide).

While Cruise has become one of the best at selling a movie all over the world, Pitt and Clooney take that under-the-radar stance a little too seriously. They pop out to sell their movies, but not with the globe-trotting gusto of Cruise. In fact, Cruise has pulled back on the throttle in his press for "Jack Reacher," sticking to a couple late-night appearances, but it doesn't matter — it still will likely be No. 1 this weekend at the box office.

Tom CruiseThere are a lot of popular actors in Hollywood, from the new breed like Chris Pratt to the ones who have blown us away for years yet are still somewhat harder to relate to, like Robert Downey Jr. But with Cruise, it’s different.

We've marveled at Cruise's diversity as an actor throughout his career, the many iconic moments he’s given us (from sliding across the hall in his undies to “You Complete Me” to his “M:I” thrill seeker), and the energy he gives every role and press appearance. Perhaps that's why we always find ourselves rooting for him.

SEE ALSO: THEN & NOW: The cast of "Mission: Impossible" 19 years later

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: This 'Mission Impossible' behind-the-scenes footage of a 53-year-old Tom Cruise hanging off a plane is terrifying

Google's VR team is testing a prototype of a mystery wireless device (GOOG, GOOGL, FB)

$
0
0

Daydream View

Google is testing a prototype wireless device that appears to be related to its virtual reality efforts, according to new documents filed with the FCC on Wednesday.

Google is asking the FCC for permission to conduct nationwide testing of the mystery device with employees, contractors, and developers. The device transmits across a broad swath of wireless frequencies, from 2.4 GHz to 5.8 GHz, according to the documents.

While Google redacted the details about what the device is and what it will be used for, the company listed Mike Jazayeri as one of the contacts on the filings.

Jazayeri, who joined Google in 2005, is a director of product management on the "leadership team" for Google's virtual reality group, according to his LinkedIn profile. He was previously involved in Google's Cardboard VR viewer.

Google recently began accepting pre-orders for its new $79 Daydream VR headset, which customers should begin receiving in the next few weeks. The Daydream headset relies on a user's smartphone, which is inserted into the headset, to create a VR experience.

But the mystery device referred to in the filings is still just a prototype that Google wants to begin testing and demonstrating. And, unlike the Daydream, it appears to have built-in radios. 

One possibility is that the device could be Google's first all-in-one VR headset that doesn't require a smartphone, similar to Facebook's Oculus Rift headset. Google's Glass augmented reality headset also has built-in radios, but Google stopped selling the device to consumers in 2015 and it's unclear if the company will release a new version of it.

Guessing game

If you like to play "fill-in-the-blanks," Google gives you this to work with:

"The Device consists of a [REDACTED]. To enable [REDACTED], the Device also has a [REDACTED]. Consistent with [REDACTED], the [REDACTED] in the Device will enable [REDACTED], as needed."

Apparently the device exceeded certain FCC limits in two frequencies during "unintentional radiated emission tests," Google noted in the filing.

While Google says the prototypes are not intended for use by the general public, that doesn't mean the final version won't be a consumer product.

Virtual reality and augmented reality, in which digital images are super-imposed over the real world, are among the hottest technologies that are attracting increasing investments from the likes of Facebook, Apple, Microsoft, and Google.

Facebook began shipping the Oculus Rift VR headset in March, two years after acquiring Oculus for $2 billion. And Google has made it clear that it sees VR as an important part of its future.

Interestingly, the FCC responded to Google on Thursday, seemingly incredulous about the broad frequency listed in the filing.

"Does the one device truly transmit across the entire 2.4-5.8 GHz band? If not, this band should be broken up into sub-bands in which the device actually transmits," the FCC wrote in a letter to Google.

Google did not immediately return requests for comment from Business Insider.

Here are more details from the filings about Google's prototype testing:

"The Device will be used by professional Google employees and contractors. The Device also may be used by external trusted professional developer [REDACTED]. The Device is not intended to be used by general public. No commercial operations will be conducted under the requested authorization, and all Devices will be collected or destroyed at the end of the experimentation period.

The proposed testing does not create a material risk of harmful interference. The Device meets all Part 15 Class A and nearly all Class B device limits for electromagnetic compatibility and radio operations. The Device exceeded Part 15 1 Class B device limits at two frequencies—43.4 MHz and 639.0 MHz—during unintentional radiated emission tests conducted by [REDACTED] at a distance of three meters."

SEE ALSO: Google's got a new virtual reality headset — this is 'Daydream View'

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Google just unveiled the Pixel — its first smartphone

Netflix is winning the battle against geo-fence evaders (NFLX)

$
0
0

Netflix Subscriber GrowthThis story was delivered to BI Intelligence "Digital Media Briefing" subscribers. To learn more and subscribe, please click here.

Netflix appears to be winning in its crackdown against virtual border hoppers, as a number of prominent unblocking companies that once allowed Netflix subscribers to watch content restricted in certain countries have thrown in the towel, CBC reports.

These unblocking companies use virtual private networks (VPNs) that allow users to mask their IPs so that it appears like they’re surfing the internet from a specific location. This helps users protect their privacy, and gives them access to the full range of Netflix’s catalog. Netflix CEO

Reed Hastings had said in the company’s Q1 2016 earnings that VPN users were inconsequential to the company’s bottom line, but cracking down does have a number of strategic implications nonetheless:   

  • It appeases broadcasters and content-providers. These companies already fret about partnering with a subscription streaming company that is disrupting their industry. Stamping out on border hoppers helps Netflix’s negotiations with these content suppliers. For example, Netflix’s recent deal with CBS to stream Star Trek content in all countries but the US and Canada may not have gone through if Netflix couldn’t guarantee CBS exclusivity over the content in North America.
  • It could dent Netflix's international ambitions. The company’s catalog is much smaller in countries like the UK and Australia than in the US. Circumventing geo-restrictions using VPNs provides an impetus for international users to sign up for Netflix even if their local catalog underwhelms. Without VPN access, these users could cancel their Netflix subscriptions in favor of local services with more extensive catalogs, or piracy.
  • It relates to Netflix’s goal of eliminating geo-restrictions. The company wants to have a universal catalog accessible across all territories, as reiterated by Neil Hunt, its chief product officer, at CES. This is part of why the company is so focused on creating Netflix originals. Owning its content means that it doesn't have to enter geo-restricted licensing negotiations with third-party broadcasters. And localized content like its Narcos original series can turn into international sensations.
  • It helps Netflix amass user data that can be monetized. Many people use VPNs as a security measure to hide their data and prevent companies from abusing users' privacy. On the other hand, companies can offer this data to advertisers, or use it to improve their own products. For Netflix, this could involve creating content that's more specifically caters to users' preferences. The company recently stated that its goal is to release at least one piece of content per month that caters to each individual subscriber.

Over the last few years, there’s been much talk about the “death of TV.” However, television is not dying so much as it's evolving: extending beyond the traditional television screen and broadening to include programming from new sources accessed in new ways.

It's strikingly evident that more consumers are shifting their media time away from live TV, while opting for services that allow them to watch what they want, when they want. Indeed, we are seeing a migration toward original digital video such as YouTube Originals, SVOD services such as Netflix, and live streaming on social platforms.

However, not all is lost for legacy media companies. Amid this rapidly shifting TV landscape, traditional media companies are making moves across a number of different fronts — trying out new distribution channels, creating new types of programming aimed at a mobile-first audience, and partnering with innovate digital media companies. In addition, cable providers have begun offering alternatives for consumers who may no longer be willing to pay for a full TV package.

Dylan Mortensen, senior research analyst for BI Intelligence, has compiled a detailed report on the future of TV that looks at how TV viewer, subscriber, and advertising trends are shifting, and where and what audiences are watching as they turn away from traditional TV. 

Here are some key points from the report:

  • Increased competition from digital services like Netflix and Hulu as well as new hardware to access content are shifting consumers' attention away from live TV programming.
  • Across the board, the numbers for live TV are bad. US adults are watching traditional TV on average 18 minutes fewer per day versus two years ago, a drop of 6%. In keeping with this, cable subscriptions are down, and TV ad revenue is stagnant.
  • People are consuming more media content than ever before, but how they're doing so is changing. Half of US TV households now subscribe to SVOD services, like Netflix, Amazon, and Hulu, and viewing of original digital video content is on the rise.
  • Legacy TV companies are recognizing these shifts and beginning to pivot their business models to keep pace with the changes. They are launching branded apps and sites to move their programming beyond the TV glass, distributing on social platforms to reach massive, young audiences, and forming partnerships with digital media brands to create new content.
  • The TV ad industry is also taking a cue from digital. Programmatic TV ad buying represented just 4% (or $2.5 billion) of US TV ad budgets in 2015 but is expected to grow to 17% ($10 billion) by 2019. Meanwhile, networks are also developing branded TV content, similar to publishers' push into sponsored content.

In full, the report: 

  • Outlines the shift in consumer viewing habits, specifically the younger generation.
  • Explores the rise of subscription streaming services and the importance of original digital video content.
  • Breaks down ways in which legacy media companies are shifting their content and advertising strategies.
  • And Discusses new technology that will more effectively measure audiences across screens and platforms. 

Interested in getting the full report? Here are two ways to access it:

  1. Subscribe to an All-Access pass to BI Intelligence and gain immediate access to this report and over 100 other expertly researched reports. As an added bonus, you'll also gain access to all future reports and daily newsletters to ensure you stay ahead of the curve and benefit personally and professionally. » START A MEMBERSHIP
  2. Purchase & download the full report from our research store. »BUY THE REPORT

Join the conversation about this story »

Stephen Colbert mocks Donald Trump's latest election comments: 'The p---y has grabbed us'

$
0
0

stephen colbert donald trump election comments late show cbs

Stephen Colbert torched Donald Trump's new twist on his debate comments refusing to accept the results of the election during Thursday's "Late Show."

During a campaign stop in Ohio on Thursday, Trump told the audience, "I would like to promise and pledge to all of my voters and supporters and to all of the people of the United States that I will totally accept the results of this great and historic presidential election — if I win!"

The "Late Show" host had already gone on record during a live post-debate show on Wednesday when he agreed with Hillary Clinton that the initial statement was "horrifying." But Trump's newest comments weren't any better for Colbert.

"You really got me for a second there," Colbert said. "I actually believed you had a shred of integrity."

He then wondered, "How did we get to the point where the fate of the American experiment rests in Donald Trump’s tiny, whining loser hands? Truly the p---y has grabbed us.”

Watch Colbert take on Trump's election comments below:

SEE ALSO: The election results? Donald Trump still refuses to concede that he didn't win an Emmy

DON'T MISS: Stephen Colbert rips apart Donald Trump for his most shocking answer at the presidential debate

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Animated map shows Clinton has a commanding lead over Trump

People are going nuts over a Janet Jackson song after Trump called Hillary Clinton 'nasty'

$
0
0

Janet Jackson

After Donald Trump called Hillary Clinton "such a nasty woman" at the final presidential debate on Wednesday, the comment immediately got picked up all over the internet and TV — and received plenty of scorn.

Many people apparently voiced their distaste for the line by streaming a hit Janet Jackson single from 1986.

Jackson's song "Nasty" saw a 250% spike in Spotify streams following Trump's insult at the debate, according to the streaming service.   

As Uproxx points out, some people on social media even created Janet Jackson-themed memes in support of Clinton.

 

Similarly, many Clinton supporters mocked Trump by calling themselves "nasty women" in the aftermath of the debate. Merriam-Webster also noted that the word "nasty" became one of the dictionary website's most searched-for words following Trump's insult.

Listen to Janet Jackson's "Nasty" below: 

 

SEE ALSO: Trump's 'bad hombres' and 'nasty woman' remarks stoke online outrage

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Watch Alec Baldwin mock Trump's mic issues on 'Saturday Night Live'


Nintendo's new console won't support your old games

$
0
0

Nintendo announced a new game console on Thursday morning, called Nintendo Switch.

It's a hybrid console that combines mobile and home console. You can play it on your TV at home, in high-def, or on the go as a handheld console. Like so:

Nintendo Switch

It's the first console from the Japanese game maker since 2012's ill-fated Wii U — a console full of ambition that ultimately failed with consumers. Just 13 million Wii U consoles sold in its lifetime, despite having launched a year ahead of competition from Sony (PlayStation 4) and Microsoft (Xbox One). 

Nintendo's hoping for a restart with Switch, and apparently that restart extends to Nintendo's entire last generation of consoles: Games from the Wii U and the handheld 3DS console won't work on Nintendo Switch. That means none of the games you bought for Wii U and 3DS will work on Switch; it's not clear if games purchased digitally will carry over. Japanese game publication Famitsu got that information directly from Nintendo Japan.

The concept is known as "backwards compatibility" — the ability for new game consoles to play games from previous hardware. For example, it means being able to play PlayStation 1 games on a PlayStation 2 by putting the disc into the PS2 drive like you would on a PS1. The PlayStation 2 was "backwards compatible" with PlayStation 1 games.

Nintendo Switch

It's a hotly-contested concept. Dedicated game fans insist backwards compatibility is crucial for game consoles, while game console makers have gone back and forth on its importance. It was a major move, for instance, when Nintendo announced that the Super Nintendo wouldn't be able to play original Nintendo Entertainment System games — parents who spent hundreds of dollars on games were out of luck.

In the long run, Nintendo sold its Super Nintendo (even without backwards compatibility) to enormous success by having the best games on any console. It looks like that may be the strategy once again with Nintendo Switch.

SEE ALSO: It looks like Nintendo will release a new Mario game for its new game console 'Switch'

DON'T MISS: Nintendo just announced a new game console — here's everything we know

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Nintendo just showed off the Nintendo Switch — an entirely new console

Apple could learn a thing or two from Nintendo's surprise announcement (AAPL)

$
0
0

Apple and Nintendo are two of the most innovative companies in the world. And even though Apple is the most valuable brand in the world, and exponentially more successful than Nintendo, there's still much it could learn from the Japanese gaming company.

Take Thursday's surprise announcement of Nintendo's new console, the Switch. We had known Nintendo would unveil its new console in 2016 before launching it next March, but we had no idea when to expect the announcement. There were no press invitations, no hints from the company's social-media accounts. No one knew when to expect Nintendo's bombshell.

And then, suddenly, it dropped Wednesday night via Nintendo's Twitter account:

People were stunned. After years of hype, it was finally happening — and in such a short time frame, too. Apple announces its product unveilings roughly a week ahead of time, but Nintendo wasn't going to wait a week to unveil this thing — not even a day. Just a brief 12 hours or so.

And this event wouldn't be an Apple-type gala, in which the company would rent out a grand auditorium and invite executives and members of the press to an elaborate two-hour event, complete with musical guests.

No.

Nintendo opted to release a three-minute video on YouTube at 10 a.m. on a Thursday morning.

That's it.

The overall timing was a bit suspect. Was Nintendo unaware that Wednesday night was the third and final presidential debate of one of the most bizarre election cycles in modern US history? Would people get the word in time to tune in?

Well, as of Friday morning, it looks as if Nintendo made a smart choice: In less than 24 hours online, Nintendo's Switch unveiling has racked up over 10 million views on YouTube, with an extremely positive response from viewers (96.2% gave a thumbs-up, while 3.8% weren’t sold on the video).

As a longtime Nintendo fan who has been less enchanted with the company's hardware products in recent years, I thoroughly enjoyed Nintendo's video, and I look forward to learning more about the Switch — and eventually buying one next March.

I have many thoughts about the console itself, but I was most impressed with Nintendo's strategy for this unveiling. Sure, we had an idea of now the Nintendo Switch was going to work, but there was still so much we didn't know— the name, for one (we had only the "NX" codename to work with), the looks of the console, and some of the play mechanics (which my colleague Alex Perry describes well here).

And even after watching Nintendo's video, there's still so much I want to know: the full cost of the system, the price of any individual parts and accessories, the Switch's battery life. But the important thing is that I'm intrigued; the video was effective because I want to know more.

Apple is also very good at generating interest. But its tried-and-true formula for unveiling a product — inviting the press ahead of time to a big event in California, where it takes two hours to show off new stuff and describe new features — is getting a bit stale.

Tim Cook

I get the argument for Apple keeping things the way it is. Its product unveilings, however formulaic, are extremely effective at educating the public about its new products. But it's difficult to do that when people and other companies are leaking your products ahead of those unveilings. Even Apple's own Twitter account outed the iPhone 7 before Phil Schiller could formally introduce it in San Francisco.

Apple may never be able to stop the leaking — but it could still regain the element of surprise, which has long been a company staple since the Steve Jobs era.

If Apple borrowed Nintendo's recent strategy and released brief teaser videos days or even weeks before its big events, it could make its annual product cycles much more exciting.

Apple doesn't need to reveal the full product, as Nintendo did with the Switch. But perhaps it could release a teaser video, like this 30-second ad for the iPhone 7, which doesn't give too much away.

For example, most people by now expect Apple to release new iPhones every September. It might throw people off, however, to see a video like the one above in August or even July. It would add to the mystique.

Again, it's hard to argue that mystique is a good enough reason to out a new product as big as the iPhone before it's *officially* unveiled and detailed by a company executive. But I can't help feeling as if Nintendo got something right about its Switch reveal, in both the delivery of the message itself (a snappy, three-minute ad showing off what it can do) and the overall timing (leaving less than a day between news of the announcement and the announcement itself).

There's no way Nintendo Switch sales could ever be compared to iPhone sales, but I do believe Nintendo's strategy will pay off in some way, shape, or form for the company — and I think it could work for Apple, too. It is, after all, great at making videos.

SEE ALSO: Nintendo just announced a new game console — here's everything we know

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Google just unveiled the Pixel — its first smartphone

Stephen Colbert shows you what you need to do to move to Canada after the election

$
0
0

stephen colbert

On Thursday's "Late Show," host Stephen Colbert pointed out that around this time in every presidential election — no matter how crazy — people begin to proclaim that they are going to move to Canada if the candidate they want to win ends up losing. 

And with candidates Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton both being disliked heavily by a majority of Americans, that declaration to move in with our neighbors in the north is more prevalent than ever. 

But what does it take to become a Canadian citizen?

Colbert went to visit Toronto immigration lawyer Andrew Cumming to find out. 

Check out what Colbert learned about the process of moving to Canada, like the need to have a knowledge of Canadian symbols, how members of Parliament are chosen, and being able to sing some Gordon Lightfoot songs.

SEE ALSO: Why Tom Cruise is Hollywood's last movie star

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: The final trailer for the Harry Potter spinoff ‘Fantastic Beasts’ is here

Jimmy Kimmel hires Doctor Strange for a children's birthday party, and it's a disaster

$
0
0

Dr Strange Jimmy Kimmel ABC YouTube final

There's huge anticipation for Marvel's next movie, "Doctor Strange" (out November 4), but we learned Thursday night on "Jimmy Kimmel Live!" that you shouldn't hire the "Master of the Mystic Arts" to entertain at your kid's birthday party.

Benedict Cumberbatch reprised his role of Dr. Stephen Strange on "Kimmel" for this sketch in which the late-night host holds a party of sugar-high children and Strange finally teleports a half-hour late. Strange thinks he's there to destroy "little demons," only to find the kids running around.

The superhero is ready to bail (though he touts on his LinkedIn page that he's the "mightiest magician in the cosmos") but when Kimmel offers $150 to entertain the kids, Strange has an idea.

Watch the complete skit below:

SEE ALSO: The best Donald Trump impressions on 'SNL' ever, ranked

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Here is the best cosplay of the 2016 New York Comic Con

Hilary Swank says that after winning 2 Oscars she was still offered 5% of her male costar's pay

$
0
0

hilary swank salary wage gap hollywood chelsea netflix

Hilary Swank proves that even if you've won an Oscar (or two), the struggle is very real for actresses in Hollywood.

Swank attended a dinner party taped for Chelsea Handler's Netflix talk show, "Chelsea," this week and explained that winning Oscars didn't automatically place her on easy street.

For example, she said her salary for "Boys Don't Cry," the breakout film that earned Swank her first Oscar, in 2000, wasn't enough to get health insurance.

"When I did 'Boys Don't Cry,' I was 24 years old. I made $3,000," Swank told the other women at the dinner. "In order to have health insurance, you have to make $5,000. So I didn't even know that I didn't have health insurance until I went in and tried to get a prescription filled. ... I had an Academy Award, no health insurance."

Swank clearly learned how to keep an eye on her salaries as she moved along. After winning a second Oscar, for "Million Dollar Baby" in 2005, she discovered the harsh reality of Hollywood's wage gap.

"Then I win my second Academy Award," Swank said, "and the next couple movies later, I get offered a movie. But the male hadn't had any kind of critical success, but had been in a movie where he was 'hot.' And he got offered $10 million, and I got offered $500,000."

That comes out to just 5% of what the man was offered. Swank said she turned down the job and was replaced by a newcomer, who made just $50,000.

"So they made a savings of $450 [thousand] probably to give the guy his bonuses," Swank said.

Watch a portion of the interview from "Chelsea" below:

Even powerhouse women like @hilaryswank have to deal with the wage gap. Women's Dinner Party now streaming ✨🍽

A video posted by Chelsea (@chelseashow) on Oct 18, 2016 at 7:26pm PDT on

SEE ALSO: Chelsea Handler explains why she left E! and how her Netflix show is 'a different level'

DON'T MISS: Neve Campbell says she's never been paid equally to her male costars

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: The directors of 'Catfish' and 'Nerve' reveal how to make it in Hollywood without going to film school

Viewing all 103267 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images