Quantcast
Channel: Business Insider
Viewing all 103316 articles
Browse latest View live

Tom Cruise held his breath for 6 minutes in this crazy underwater stunt in the new 'Mission: Impossible'

$
0
0

tom cruise mission impossible swim final

Since Tom Cruise started the "Mission: Impossible" movie franchise 19 years ago, his reputation as an actor who wants to do his own stunts has become legendary. Each new film for "M:I" seems to bring new spectacular stunts, with Cruise himself doing the heavy lifting.

You probably thought Cruise couldn’t top climbing the tallest building in the world in "Mission: Impossible — Ghost Protocol" in 2011, but you’d be wrong.

mission impossible ghost protocol"Mission: Impossible — Rogue Nation" doesn't hit theaters until Friday, but you've probably already caught a glimpse of Cruise's latest stunt in which he hangs on the side of a massive airplane as it takes off.

mission impossible plane 4And yes, that’s really the actor — not a stunt double.

But according to the film’s stunt coordinator, Wade Eastwood, that wasn’t the stunt he was most concerned about Cruise taking on himself.

At a key moment in the movie, Cruise, playing IMF agent Ethan Hunt, has to dive into an underwater safe to retrieve the computer chip that will lead him closer to the film’s villain. Along with having to hold his breath the whole time, he must keep away from a large crane that’s circling around the safe.

The stunt first required Cruise to jump off a 120-foot ledge (the bottom was all CGI, but he really did the jump).

tom cruise mi waterThen, in an underwater set that was filled 20 feet high with water, Cruise had to hold his breath as he acted out the scene.

tom cruise mi water 2“It’s all Tom,” Eastwood told Business Insider. “There’s no time you don’t see Ethan in the film and it’s not Tom.”

Eastwood (no relation to Clint) had worked previously with Cruise on “Edge of Tomorrow,” so he was aware of Cruise’s obsession with authenticity when it comes to stunt work. But he still marvels over Cruise’s physical ability.

“It’s been said in other interviews, if he wasn’t an actor he would have been a great stunt man,” said Eastwood. “The difference between Tom and a stunt man is he acts the character after hearing ‘action.’ A stunt person just does the stunt to double the character.”

And that is the aspect that made Eastwood’s job to pull off the underwater scene the most challenging.

Though they had cameras all over the set monitoring the star as he was underwater, and stunt crews at the ready to jump into action if anything went wrong, Eastwood said Cruise still had to act in the scene. This meant it needed to look like he was losing breath and becoming unconscious.

Tom Cruise Mission Impossible David James“On two or three occasions I brought him up because I felt he was down for too long,” said Eastwood. “He was like, ‘What are you doing? I was right in the moment. I’m acting.’ And I was like, ‘I know, it was just too real for me and I wasn’t comfortable.’”

Eastwood said the longest Cruise was underwater for a take was over six minutes.

Eastwood recalls Cruise telling him one time after having the actor come up for air, “I got plenty of breath, trust me. I don’t want to die.”

The scene took two weeks to shoot, according to Eastwood. But training for it started two months before production began.

To prepare Cruise for an underwater scene in which he’d be holding his breath for over six minutes, Eastwood brought in a freediving record holder to teach the actor breathing exercises. Basically, as Eastwood explains, teaching your mind “that you don’t have to take a breath.”

Eastwood said Cruise blacked out a few times during the training.

“That’s how you learn your limits,” Eastwood said.

That was another concern of Eastwood’s — what if Cruise got too into character?

“It’s a very calming and surreal state being underwater, especially when you’re holding your breath for that long,” he said. “You’ve gone through training to let your mind to that place where you can control it. It’s dangerous because you get carried away in the acting and you get in such a euphoric and relaxed state being in character that you forget what you’re doing. That was my worry.”

Thankfully, Cruise kept his head together and pulled off a scene that’s agonizingly claustrophobic yet remarkable to watch.

And that’s after seeing him hang from a moving plane.

SEE ALSO: How Scientology almost ruined Tom Cruise's career and 'Mission: Impossible' saved it

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: This 'Mission Impossible' behind-the-scenes footage of a 53-year-old Tom Cruise hanging off a plane is terrifying











'Bankrupt' rapper 50 Cent has a 24-bathroom house with a nightclub in it

$
0
0

50 Cent Curtis Jackson House

The rapper 50 Cent's recent bankruptcy filing has drawn attention to a court hearing last month where a lawyer for a woman who sued him grilled about his notoriously flashy lifestyle.

50 Cent, whose real name is Curtis Jackson, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy after he lost a lawsuit brought by a woman named Lastonia Leviston whose sex tape he published on the internet.

The rapper was ordered to pay $5 million, and an attorney for Leviston has suggested he only filed for bankruptcy to avoid paying up in the lawsuit. During a hearing in Manhattan earlier this month, attorney Philip Freidin pressed 50 Cent repeatedly about his assets, earning opportunities, and showy lifestyle.

50 Cent admitted that he had a home with the following amenities:

  • His own personal nightclub (in the house)
  • 21 bedrooms
  • 24 bathrooms
  • Movie theater
  • Basketball court
  • Swimming pool
  • Grotto (It's not clear what "grotto" means in this instance, but it's generally a word used to refer to a cave.)
  • 17 acres of land

Grotto 50 Cent Curtis Jackson MansionHere's the exchange about 50 Cent's house from the court transcript, which Business Insider has obtained:

Lawyer: What about your home, let's talk about your home. That home has 17 acres?

50 Cent: Right.

LawyerTwenty-one bedrooms?

50 Cent: Yeah.

LawyerYou own that home, right?

Movie Theater 50 Cent Curtis Jackson50 Cent: Yes. 

LawyerAnd it has 24 bathrooms?

50 Cent: Yes.

Lawyer: Tennis court?

50 Cent: Yes.

Lawyer: Basketball court?

50 Cent: No tennis court.

Dining Room Curtis Jackson 50 CentLawyer: No tennis court?

50 Cent: No.

Lawyer: Are you sure?

50 Cent: Yeah.

Lawyer: Basketball court?

50 Cent: Yes.

Lawyer: Your own personal nightclub?

50 Cent: Yes.

Lawyer: In the house, right?

Spiral staircase 50 Cent Curtis Jackson50 Cent: Yes.

Lawyer: You've got a movie theater in the house?

50 Cent: Yes.

Lawyer: You've got a large swimming pool?

50 Cent: There is a swimming pool.

Lawyer: And a grotto?

50 Cent: Yep.

We reached out to a representative for 50 Cent for comment on this exchange, and we will update the post if we hear back.

SEE ALSO: Take a tour of 50 Cent's sprawling 24 bathroom mansion

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: 50 Cent testifies his lifestyle is an illusion










17 podcasts that will make you smarter

$
0
0

ira glass marc maron mike birbiglia

The massive success of last fall's "Serial" true crime podcast and this year's "WTF" podcast interview with President Barack Obama marked a cultural shift in podcasts going from a niche interest to a mainstream form of media.

According to a report this April from the Pew Research Center, one-third of Americans age 12 or older have listened to at least one podcast episode, up from just 9% in 2008.

There are tons of great podcasts on nearly any subject you can think of, but we've collected some of our favorites that are perfect for those of us always eager to learn something new, whether it's about the economy, history, or even the workings of Hollywood.

Here's some prime listening material for your next commute:

SEE ALSO: 14 books Mark Zuckerberg thinks everyone should read

'This American Life' provides a deep look into American society.

"This American Life" has become a byword for oral storytelling.

Beyond being a place for moving and hilarious stories, "This American Life" does staggering levels of reporting; few outlets made the financial crisis as human and understandable as Ira Glass and the gang.

It lives up to the hype.

Start listening here >>



'Fresh Air' will give you an intimate look at your favorite writers, celebrities, and journalists.

NPR's "Fresh Air" host Terry Gross has been on the air for more than four decades, and her interviewing skills have earned her accolades like the Peabody award, the Columbia Journalism Award, and a spot in the National Radio Hall of Fame.

Gross may have a smooth, relaxed speaking style, but the way she digs deep into her interview subjects will keep you engaged throughout the conversation, whether it's about Jake Gyllenhaal's acting process or what a writer learned from covering Mexican drug cartels.

Start listening here >>



'Freakonomics Radio' will show you surprising connections.

Journalist Stephen J. Dubner and economist Steven D. Levitt became sensations when their book "Freakonomics" was published in 2005.

In 2010, Dubner launched a podcast with the same mission as their bestselling books: ferreting out connections between seemingly unrelated things.

Unsurprisingly, the shows tend toward the intellectually provocative, with the biggest hits having titles like "Is College Really Worth It?" and "How Much Does the President of the U.S. Really Matter?"

Start listening here >>  



See the rest of the story at Business Insider








Here's how Derek Jeter tries to keep his private life out of the media

$
0
0

derek jeter hannah davis

Off the baseball field, Derek Jeter is known for dating beautiful women like Minka Kelly, Vanessa Minnillo, and his current girlfriend, Sports Illustrated cover model, Hannah Davis. But the former Yankee says he makes a strong effort to keep his private life out of the media because he isn't immune to the scrutiny.

"I was always scared that I’d see my name and then scroll to see what they’re saying," Jeter recalls in a new cover interview with The Hollywood Reporter. "And I didn’t want to deal with that when I was playing. I’d tell my family and friends, 'If you read something or hear something, don’t tell me about it.' I didn’t want to read negativity."  

Throughout his career, Jeter has always tried to maintain a strong sense of privacy.  

"I always knew that my job was to limit distractions for my team and not cause headlines," he added. "So I kept a lot of things to myself."  

Once shunning the media, Jeter is now embracing it with his new website, The Players' Tribune (TPT).

When the site launched in October, The New York Times speculated that this was Jeter's chance to become more "chatty," to which he strongly denies.  

"Yeah, I'm so chatty," laughed Jeter, who has only posted a few publisher's letters. "Their reaction was, I never said anything for 20 years and now all of a sudden I was going to be telling my whole life story. But this was not built for me. It was built for the athletes."  

But, Jeter adds, "I've never said that we're trying to eliminate the media. We're not covering day-to-day sports scores. We don't have sports highlights. This is completely different. We're starting the conversation. I think we can coexist."

Read Jeter's full interview with THR here.

SEE ALSO: John Cena gruesomely broke his nose during 'Monday Night Raw' but that didn't stop him from dominating the match

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: How Alex Rodriguez, the highest-paid player in MLB history, makes and spends his $400 million










50 Cent's comments on 'Conan' are coming back to haunt him in court

$
0
0

50 Cent Conan

On July 15, Curtis “50 Cent” Jackson went on TBS’ “Conan” to promote his new film, “Southpaw.” During the appearance, the rapper/actor also addressed his filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection just two days prior.

He explained to host Conan O’Brien: “Yeah, I need protection. You get a bull’s-eye painted on your back when you’re successful, and it’s public. You become the ideal person for lawsuits.”

Jackson filed for bankruptcy days after he was ordered to pay $5 million to rival rapper Rick Ross' ex-girlfriend, Lastonia Leviston, who sued him for posting a sex tape online to millions of viewers in an alleged attempt to embarrass Ross.

While testifying on July 21 in a Manhattan Supreme Court, Leviston’s attorney took the comments Jackson made on "Conan" and ran with them.

50 cent courtUsing Jackson’s comments on “Conan” as ammunition, Leviston’s attorney tried to make the point that the only reason Jackson filed for bankruptcy was to shield himself from the lawsuit. (A clip of 50 Cent’s comments originally available on the show’s website has since been taken down.)

Check out the back-and-forth questioning, according to a court transcript of the proceedings obtained by Business Insider:

Lawyer: Let's talk about things you've said since this bankruptcy. You went on Conan O'Brien, did you not?

Jackson: Yes.

Lawyer: You said that you made a joke out of the fact that you need protection regarding bankruptcy?

Jackson: Yeah. You got to smile when you are in public situations. If you're crying, they will just have more fun with you.

Lawyer: Did you also say that you considered yourself a target?

Jackson: I do.

Lawyer: Were you talking about this case?


Jackson: Well, just in general because overall if you know attorneys make a living off this.

Jackson then addressed Leviston in court and said, “I’m sorry if you feel I hurt you in any way,” in regards to posting the sex tape, which he said was given to him by Leviston's fiancé.

Leviston’s attorney then went back on the offensive.

From the court transcript:

Lawyer: Mr. Jackson, you went on the Conan O'Brien show after the verdict came in and after you filed for bankruptcy — 

Jackson: Right.

Lawyer: — protection and you said I'm the target not her. I'm the target, right?

Jackson: Right. When you look —


Lawyer: Did you say that?


Jackson: Yes.


Lawyer: Did you say that filing bankruptcy is about asset protection?


Jackson: Yes, I believe I said that.


Lawyer: Did you also say — it may not have just been on that show — that reorganization or this filing does stop things moving forward that you don't want moving forward?

Jackson: Yes.

Lawyer: Were those your words?

Jackson: Yes.

Lawyer: That's what you filed this bankruptcy petition for reorganization, wasn't it, to stop something from moving forward that you didn't want moving forward?

Jackson: Yes.

Lawyer: And you also said, did you not, that "I'm not going to give people what I work for. They are going to have to work for it too." People that you owe money to?

Jackson: No, I was saying I'm not going to give money to people. They have to work hard like I worked hard to get what I have.

Lawyer: Did you say, "I'm not going to give people what I work for, they are going to have to work for it too," in the context of talking about this bankruptcy?

Jackson: No, just in general they are going to have to work for it like I worked hard for it.

Lawyer: When did you say that, was this last week?

Jackson: Yes. That was on the talk show. You're talking to a comedian. You're taking a lot of things out of context. It's like taking a joke wrong to the media.

Three days later, Jackson was ordered to pay Leviston $2 million in punitive damages on top of the $5 million he was originally ordered to pay.

BI reached out to 50 Cent's rep for comment, but did not receive a reply. We will update this story accordingly.

SEE ALSO: 'Conan' yanked a video of 50 Cent talking about his bankruptcy

MORE: 50 Cent is the Lehman Brothers of hip-hop

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: The director of 'True Detective' season 1 is unveiling a new Netflix movie that looks just as intense










The author of Jon Stewart’s biography thinks this is what the host will do after leaving 'The Daily Show'

$
0
0

jon stewart

On August 6th, Jon Stewart will end his 17-year run as host of “The Daily Show” and theories on what he’ll do next range from a possible “Meet The Press”-like show to getting into politics.

But someone with an interesting perspective on the subject is Lisa Rogak, author of the 2014 New York Times bestseller, “Angry Optimist: The Life and Times of Jon Stewart.” 

Rogak believes Stewart will not start a new show, or put his foot into the political ring.

Angry Optimist Jon Stewart St Martin Press“He’s going to take a long break,” Rogak told Business Insider. “He was starting to get really tired, that was obvious on the show.”

Rogak’s book, which Stewart declined to take part in, portrays the funny man as a news junkie who at the end of his reign on the show has become burnt out and bitter. (The recent story former “Daily Show” correspondent Wyatt Cynac told Marc Maron on his podcast confirms the latter.)

“His whole show, and this is why he'll never do it again,” Rogak believes, “is shaking his fist at the world. Doing what he did as a kid, trying to get people to laugh and pay attention and think about things by using humor. But nothing has changed and it's gotten much worse since he's started in terms of the decisiveness of how politics are in this country. He thought he could change things and nothing happened.” 

Though Rogak believes Stewart will never take on a new show (comedic or legitimate news), she does think he won't lose that hunger to give his opinion on issues or the news makers of the day. She wouldn’t be surprised if he did stand-up gigs (Stewart actually voiced this with recent guest Judd Apatow) once in a while or directed another film. (His directorial debut, "Rosewater," was released last year.)

“He’s still going to do things where he feels he will accomplish some degree of change,” she said.

SEE ALSO: Here's how Jon Stweart's successor Trevor Noah plans to change "The Daily Show"

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Watch Jon Stewart break it to his audience that he's leaving 'The Daily Show'










League of Millions: Inside the video game phenomenon that's selling out global arenas and earning stars up to $1 million

$
0
0

Far more than an internet video game, "League of Legends" is a cultural phenomenon, a pastime that is deeply ingrained in the lives and lifestyle of millions of fans worldwide. It appeals across cultures and demographics, inspiring a passion and sense of community rarely matched in modern culture.

Twenty-seven million people play it every day. At peak hours, more than 7 million people are playing concurrently.

Not only do people play it themselves, they love to watch others play — including the top pro "League of Legends" (LoL) teams, which span 4 continents and fill coliseums with fans.

BI Films presents Part 1 of its documentary series, "League of Millions," in which we meet the five young pros who make up Team Liquid, one of the leading North American LoL teams, in their quest to win the 2015 championship.

Director and Producer: Sam Rega

Editor: Josh Wolff

Production and Research: David Fang and Lauren Browning

Executive Producer: Diane Galligan

Follow TI: On YouTube

Join the conversation about this story »










Apple's signature software is uncharacteristically bad for the world's most valuable company

$
0
0

Apple-Cook-Tim-iTunes-Festival

iTunes is the glue of Apple’s software universe: It connects the company’s phones and tablets, desktops and laptops, and online media store and streaming service.

It is also, in the inimitable judgement of the indie iOS developer Marco Arment, “a toxic hellstew.”

I agree: It’s why I wrote about how poorly iTunes performs for classical music listeners and, really, for anyone with a large music library.

But it’s worth spending time on iTunes’s specific design problems, which surpass those raised by managing a music library or listening to a specific genre. Toxic hellstew it may be, a new version of iTunes points at what kinds of technology are allowed to come out of Apple.

Apple is the most valuable company in the world and an organization hailed for its good design. Why does iTunes fail at what it sets out to do?

Arment blames its failures on Apple’s decision to cram too many different features into one piece of software.

He believes the company should have discontinued iTunes, its media management service, and rolled out a new Apple Music app. (Arment doesn’t say whether this new app would also play MP3s.)

iTunes’s user interface follows from this poor strategy, too. Its “design is horrible […] not because it has bad designers, but because they’ve been given an impossible task: cramming way too much functionality into a single app while also making it look ‘clean,’” writes Arment.

Does this kind of failure—call it institutional cruft—appear in iTunes? I think absolutely. Let’s look at the app.

Look specifically at the horizontal navigation bar, which sits below the scrolling song title and the main window content. Because iTunes inserts a forward and back button to the far left in Apple Music and the iTunes Store, menu options in the bar will sometimes change location after you click them.

itunes nav bar

So if you’re in your own iTunes Library, then click on “For You,” you’ll find the entire navigation bar has shifted under your mouse: Your mouse is now hovering over “Playlists,” as the software has inserted forward and back buttons on the far left.

From a user-interface perspective, this doesn’t make any sense. Users expect that menu items in a navigation bar won’t change their location after they click on them. When you click on a bookmark in your browser’s navigation bar, all the bookmarks don’t suddenly shift around.

This messiness is as institutionally crufty as they come.

With Apple Music, iTunes’s designers had to find a way to navigate a web-y, browser-like environment in the main content area, and that requires back and forward buttons.

In a music library, though, the content area also needed to scroll through a stable list of MP3s. The designers couldn’t move the forward and backward bar any higher, into the playback area, because the logic of that area is that it’s all music control—and, besides, there’s already a forward-arrow and backward-arrow in there, on the left, which control tracks.

Jimmy Iovine Apple Music 2015 WWDC

iTunes had to serve two different purposes, so the forward and back buttons had to go in the navigation bar.

Keep looking at that bar, though, and I think a different kind of user-interface failure emerges: the kind that results from poor decisions. In other words, I wonder if iTunes’s failures can’t just be entirely blamed on Apple’s crufty, legacy obligations, but on a deeper inattentiveness in the company.

Focusing on that bar, here’s what sticks out to me: iTunes can’t decide how to address the user. The user’s MP3 library sits behind the menu title “My Music.” But Apple Music’s recommendation interface is accessed by clicking on “For You.”

Is the user “my” or “your”? Is iTunes an extension of the user or is it in conversation with them? Designers have thought about these issues before; Yahoo’s own interface guide suggests:

Labeling stuff with ‘My’ imitates the point of view of the user. It is as if the user has printed out labels and stuck them to various objects: My Lunch, My Desk, My Red Stapler. Except the user hasn't done this; you (the site) did it for them.

Labeling stuff with ‘Your’ instead reinforces the conversational dialogue. It is how another human being might address you when talking about your stuff. Even with MySpace, people say things like ‘I saw what you put on your MySpace.’

I’ve also seen financial apps use “your,” because a bank saying “my money” is a little weird. That $200 in my savings account isn’t yours, dude.

Which is all to say that this is a solved problem.

People have considered this, set precedents, and shipped software, yet here comes iTunes, from the most design-friendly company in the world, disregarding them.

And this isn’t the only odd microcopy choice: Apple Music, the company’s entire streaming archive of recorded music, is located at the menu item labeled “New.”

the atlantic new

That’s partly where Apple promotes new releases in an iTunes Music Store-like interface, but it’s also where searching for a record in Apple Music will send you.

Nearly everything in Apple Music—from a Thelonious Monk record from 1963 to a CHVRCHES single released last week—is conceptually located in “New.”

It doesn’t have to be this way. “For You” could be titled “Recommendations,” resolving the discrepancy.

It’s possible that these mistakes originated in institutional politics: Maybe Jimmy Iovine insisted, required, would get up right now and walk away from this stupid white plastic table if the recommendation system was called anything other than “For You.” (Apple did not respond to my interview requests.)

But I doubt it. It strikes me as an inferior design decision, arising from inattention.

It’s a minor problem, sure, and there are more pressing ones in the software.

I have seen Apple Music streams drop mid-play; other users have lost music with iTunes Match. But as Apple is never far from telling us, music is something about which they’re “profoundly passionate,” “a force that’s driven and inspired us from day one.”

The point of Apple’s design ethos is that making things a little better than they have to be, for the average user, is a form of respect. I hope that as Apple becomes less of a media-tech company and more of a jewelry maker, its leaders remember that.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: This drummer created a whole song by only using the sound of coins











Rapper Snoop Dogg stopped in Italy airport with $422,000 stuffed in his Louis Vuitton luggage

$
0
0

Rapper Snoop Dogg performs in Uppsala, Sweden, July 25, 2015. REUTERS/Marcus Ericsson/TT News Agency

Italian police stopped California rapper Snoop Dogg on Friday as he prepared to board a private plane bound for Britain with $422,000 in cash in his Louis Vuitton luggage, said an Italian lawyer representing the entertainer.

In the European Union, the maximum amount of undeclared cash one can take on board a plane is 10,000 euros ($10,986.00). Snoop Dogg, who has been touring Europe after releasing the album "Bush" earlier this year, will have to pay a fine, said Andrea Parisi, his lawyer.

"We clarified everything from a legal point of view. The money came from concerts he had performed around Europe. There was no crime; it was just an administrative infraction," Parisi told Reuters on Saturday.

Half of the cash was given back to Snoop Dogg, whose real name is Calvin Broadus, while the other half is being held by Italian authorities until the amount of the fine is determined, Parisi said.

(Reporting by Steve Scherer; Editing by Digby Lidstone)

Join the conversation about this story »










'Friends' co-creator says it's 'ridiculous' that the show's stars made $1 million per episode

$
0
0

friends cast

Toward the end of NBC's sitcom "Friends," the show's cast members famously negotiated a deal that paid each of them a whopping $1 million per episode.

Recently, Marta Kauffman, one of the "Friends" co-creators, admitted that she found the actors' salary demands to be a bit excessive.

Kauffman, who is now the showrunner of Netflix's "Grace and Frankie," spoke on "Friends" at the Television Critics Association Summer Press Tour on Tuesday. As The Wrap reported, Kauffman was responding to a reporter's question on the differences between her previous and current jobs when she called the million-dollar "Friends" deal "ridiculous."

marta kauffman"A million dollars an episode is kinda ridiculous," Kaufmann said. "Let's be honest, that's a lot of money."

"I think it’s inflated," she continued. "And there’s something unrealistic about it. Not everybody is going to get a million dollars an episode. So I think actually what we’re all doing [at Netflix] is actually more reasonable and makes more sense."

Kauffman added that the Netflix model of producing 13 or fewer episodes per season actually stemmed from the unrealistic demands of shooting traditional sitcoms like "Friends."

"When you do 24 episodes for a network, you know, that’s your whole year. You don’t have time to do other stuff, Kauffman said. "When an actor is doing 13 episodes, they have many, many, many weeks left. They can pursue movies and theater and other stuff."

grace and frankie netflixAccording to Kauffman, Netflix's refusal to share their ratings with actors, showrunners or the public also allows for an environment that's more conducive to creativity than the advertising-centric model of traditional television.

"[Friends] was a case where the cast knew how valuable the show was to the network in terms of the advertisers," Kauffman said. "There are no advertisers on Netflix. And I think you’re hoping that I’ll say ‘It’s frustrating’ but the truth is, it’s wonderful, because there’s only one thing we’re doing — we’re not pandering to advertisers, we’re not pandering to a network, all we’re doing is making the show we want and that we believe in.”

Without knowledge of their show's ratings, however, Netflix actresses like Lily Tomlin and Jane Fonda from Kauffman's "Grace and Frankie" would potentially have a difficult time leveraging for greater pay. For now, Kauffman doesn't really see this as an issue:

"If someday, the cast says, ‘We’re worth more than you’re offering,’ then we’ll deal with it then."

SEE ALSO: Netflix is targeting older viewers with new original series 'Grace and Frankie'

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: How To Get The Salary You Really Want










The new Star Wars movie could rake in a whopping $2.2 billion worldwide (DIS)

$
0
0

x-wing pilot star wars episode vii trailer

The new Star Wars movie could bring in a lot of money.

In fact, about $2.2 billion, according to some analysts.

"As expectations begin to ramp/get framed for 'Star Wars' we look at how to benchmark the film compared to 'Avatar' and some of the other recent global blockbusters," Stifel analysts Benjamin Mogil and Kevin Lee Hon Siong wrote in a note to clients. "In aggregate, we believe that the film can gross around $2.2bn globally."

As a reference point, that means that "The Force Awakens" could literally eclipse the GDP of 22 countries.

Mogil and Siong suggest that there are two major tailwinds for this movie. First, the number of IMAX screens has nearly doubled, and the number of 3D screens has nearly quadrupled since 2009. And second, international markets like China, Russia, and Latin America have seen "significant" screen and box office growth.

However, there is one wildcard factor: the movie's release date in China.

"There is a strong inverse correlation in Chinese box office performance from the release date duration between the global data and the Chinese data, owing to piracy," Mogil and Siong wrote.

In any case, we'll have to wait until "The Force Awakens" opens on December 18 to see how many people rush to see it worldwide.

The film is being produced by Lucasfilm, a subsidiary of Disney.

Mogil and Siong have a buy-rating on Disney with a $130 price target.

SEE ALSO: 'Jurassic World' eclipsed the annual GDP of these 7 countries in one weekend

Join the conversation about this story »










The insane life of Facebook billionaire Sean Parker (FB)

$
0
0

sean parker

Sean Parker found immense success at an incredibly young age. 

At the age of 19, he cofounded Napster, a file-sharing service that would change how the world consumes music. 

By 24, he was the founding president of Facebook, a startup that was then tiny but would go on to become the biggest social network in the world. 

The 35-year-old, whose net worth is now estimated to be about $3 billion, hasn't slowed down a bit. He recently launched Brigade, a social platform meant to encourage civic engagement, and donated $600 million toward his own foundation. 

He's found a bit of controversy along the way, developing a reputation for being a big partier and an even bigger spender. 

 

Parker cofounded file-sharing service Napster in 1999, when he was only 19 years old. Napster became one of the fastest growing businesses of all time, as well as one of the most controversial. Parker and his cofounder, Shawn Fanning, are often credited with revolutionizing the music industry.

Source: Fortune



After several law suits from music associations eventually shut down Napster, Parker went on to found a social networking site called Plaxo. He was ousted two years later.

Read more about Plaxo »



Parker joined the Facebook team in 2004, when it was just a fledgling college startup. As the social network's founding president, he would play a huge role in the site's early investments, design, and transition into a viable company.

 



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

NOW WATCH: 2 texting tricks you didn't know you could do on your iPhone










Tom Cruise's 10 greatest movie stunts, reviewed by a professional stuntman

$
0
0

mission impossible ghost protocolThis post originally ran on April 8, 2015. We figured it was worth resurfacing before this weekend's release of "Mission: Impossible — Rogue Nation."

When the trailer for the new "Mission: Impossible" film landed last month, it seemed all anybody could talk about was the stunt of Tom Cruise hanging off an airplane. And with good reason — ever since the first "Mission: Impossible" movie, Tom Cruise films have featured more and more daring stunts, often performed by the actor himself. Impressive stuff, to be sure.

But what do real stuntmen think of Tom Cruise’s stunts? To get a professional’s opinion, we turned to Randy Butcher, a veteran Canadian stuntman, stunt coordinator, and director who is currently the stunt coordinator for Orphan Black and has worked on a variety of films, including "X-Men," "Dawn of the Dead," "K-19: The Widowmaker," and countless others. He took a look at some of Cruise’s best-known and most impressive stunts, and offered his take on how they might have been done — and whether that really is Tom Cruise doing those stunts.

1. Mission: Impossible (1996): Breaking into Langley, suspended on a wire.

Butcher: This is the wire gag that everybody copied forever. I’ve personally copied it myself. That’s Tom, hands down. It’s a pretty contrived scene, but I was on the edge of my seat. He’s in a harness, and they’re using some Spectra Rope, which is better than cable. Whether it’s 30 or 40 feet, Tom is absolutely in that harness, using his own stomach muscles and his own balance to maintain that position and that shot. They don’t cut away from it at all.

Jul 31, 2015 12:26

The fact that we can always see that it’s Tom really helps make the scene. There’s a profile shot of him over the computer, and you can actually sense his struggle to maintain that balance, which really adds to it. I know it’s not cool to like Tom Cruise anymore, but I’m a fan of his. I think he’s an underrated actor. His physical mannerisms complement what’s happening inside his mind. I like watching him act.

2. Mission: Impossible (1996): Fleeing as a giant fish tank explodes behind him.

Butcher: I’ve done stuff similar to this. They have a build, they fill it with water, and the special-effects team goes through a great deal of trouble to place detonation devices on that glass. If memory serves, in the scene, Tom Cruise sticks some kind of explosive on the glass. And there’s a guy standing in front of it. And that guy is jerked backwards on a cable, which is taken out in post, of course. If you have the opportunity to watch this scene frame by frame, watch the top of the glass before the guy gets jerked through. As he rises into the air, they cut to the opposite side of the glass that he’s going to come through. And if you look closely, you will see that at the top of the glass is a little hole that breaks first — that’s where the cable is going through. They’ve probably cut a hole in the glass, fed the cable through it to his harness, then, on action, he’s jerked backwards, probably from an air ratchet. And as he blows through, special effects create that spider effect that completely shatters the tempered glass.

mission impossible gif

And once he’s come blasting through, he’s opened up this huge, empty space in front of this tank for Tom Cruise to come through. And if you watch, you’ll see that Tom is at first behind a pillar. So he was out of harm’s way when they jerked the guy through. Once the glass is blown through, he comes out from behind that pillar and runs through the scene, towards [the] camera. I would have personally no issue at all putting an actor in that spot. I have no doubt that that’s Tom Cruise. (I’m pretty sure that that’s not live fish in there, though.) His only danger is that when this glass does blow, some of the broken glass will be carried along by the water, but not at any speed that would turn it into a projectile and potentially harm Tom. Plus, the lens has compressed the distance so much that he could be quite far away and you wouldn’t necessarily know it.

On the TV series Orphan Black, I just put an actor through a window. I had a stunt double there, and the actor and I had a chat. He was into doing it, but the producers weren’t because it was the first shot of the day and we had to shoot in sequence because of the way this apartment was going to be destroyed. But I designed how to do it so this guy wouldn’t be harmed. I needed him to go through, but I didn’t need to drag him back — that’s where the danger would have been. And he did it. So we had his face coming through the glass, and not the back of the stunt guy’s head. And I can’t begin to tell you what a big difference that makes, to be able to see the actor’s face in a situation like that.

3. The Last Samurai (2003): The final charge.

Butcher: I’m a big, big fan of this movie. I’ve seen it a million times. I’m a lifelong martial artist, so I really enjoy it. As I noted, I think Tom Cruise is a really accomplished horseman. He rides really, really well. And he’s obviously a quick study as far as physical technique is concerned — for example, fighting with swords. Sometimes, as in Far and Away, these stunts can be more impressive than the wirework stuff, because of all the other people around you.

4. Mission: Impossible 2 (2000): Opening credits free-climbing sequence.

Butcher: I’ve done similar climbing shots here, on the Niagara Escarpment in Ontario. Cables and ropes were employed for actor safety and removed in post. So, just like hanging and climbing outside the tower in Dubai, Tom was suspended on cables and/or rope from overhead for his climbing scenes here. And that is absolutely him doing many of these shots. There is a stunt double used in some of these free-climbing scenes — as a matter of fact, somewhere in my notes, I have the name of the fellow who did it.  But the shots comprising the sequence are seamless. With the advances in CGI technology, it’s getting difficult for even old pros like me to tell the difference.

Shooting climbing elements on rock setpieces against a green-screen in a studio would have been something to consider had John Woo been working with another actor, I suppose. To do that, you would create in a studio a point of rock maybe 10 to 15 feet high, and put a green-screen behind that. And then you would have the actor climb that, and hang from that. But Tom Cruise has balls of steel, and a stuntman’s nerve. There’s absolutely no reason for me to believe he did not do these climbing shots in question. I respect him very much. He surrounds himself with skilled professionals, and the trust goes two ways. 

5. Minority Report (2002): Jumping on his pursuer’s hoverpack and flying around.

Butcher: Every one of those guys in those hoverpacks were on cranes — either on giant cranes, or on mechanisms built on the rooftops of those buildings. I imagine they were all in harnesses and cabled in above their heads. This movie is from 2002, I think; the technology of flying back then wasn’t up to what it is today, and you can tell the stunt guys are on cables and bobbing side to side. When he jumps on that other guy, Tom would have been in a harness on cables, and the two of them would have matched, and then they’d be lifted by some sort of mechanism.

cruise gif

I don’t remember whether it was Cruise doing that stunt or not. But I don’t see a reason why it couldn’t be him. When we do wirework of that nature, everything is measured out perfectly — timing, speed, distance, everything. It’s all in the edits. Your editor’s your stuntman’s best friend. You see Cruise come down from a low shot, and then you see him get on the guy’s back from another shot.

And absolutely, it’s Tom Cruise doing a lot of that stuff. The wirework takes some nerve to do, but [it's] relatively very safe to do. Things to do go wrong — if anything ever jammed, they’d have to get him down from there. There has to be a safety team ready to come off the rooftop to transfer whoever’s in trouble to the rescuer and lower [him] to the ground.

6. Mission: Impossible 3 (2006): Jumping off a skyscraper in Shanghai.

Butcher: When Tom starts his run, and then jumps off, with that city in the background, that is one of the most beautiful plate shots I’ve ever seen — somebody shot that from the roof of the building in the movie. But Tom jumps off a build in a studio, with a green-screen. He falls about 25 feet or so, and then it cuts to the side view. Tom Cruise may have fallen towards an air bag, and then that shot was married to the plate shots of the city. Then we cut to a wide profile shot: This is not Tom Cruise. But at the same time, this stunt is not being done from those buildings. It’s my understanding that they couldn’t do it. They went out and got plate shots. Then they actually built models of this city, projected the plate shots on 3-D models.

cruise gif

Watch the stunt guy closely in this side shot, after the shot of Cruise jumping off the building — you see him start to fall to the ground, and ever so slightly, he moves forward, which is gravitationally impossible. So, I would guess that he’s on what we call a highline. (Watch, some stunt coordinator is gonna call me and say that’s not how they did it now.) But I can build a highline from one place to another and leave it slack, so that when he takes off of one point, he begins to fall — but as the highline becomes taut, he is now going to go in the direction of the highline, which is on the next building on the other side of this street.

Then, when he falls on the building, they may have had Tom Cruise falling against a green-screen, on a cable, for maybe 30 or 40 feet, to get those shots with the camera running beside him — but that was not done here at this location. Good stuff, though.

7. Mission: Impossible 3 (2006): Cruise hangs out of a car, close to the ground, firing away during a high-speed chase.

Butcher: The excitement of the action, the illusion, is all in the cuts. But Tom Cruise, in a harness, hanging outside that car — absolutely. You’ll notice that his left arm never leaves where it is. I’m quite certain that he’s probably triangulated into the car. I would have him in a harness, I would harness him low, and I would harness up his arm high. If he wanted to drop his gun hand and whack the ground with it, he could. But otherwise, he couldn’t touch the pavement. He couldn’t hit his head. He is locked in there so tight. There is either a MotoCam [a camera mounted on a motorcycle] or a camera car, with a Russian arm, with a crane on top, following him. But that’s definitely Tom Cruise doing it.

He’s got a great deal of physical skills, he knows his team and trusts his equipment. That’s extremely important. He knows what a harness can do, he knows what a Spectra Rope or cable can do. There are a lot of actors who would never do anything like this. I’m really surprised his producers let him do it. Of course, he often is one of the producers, so maybe that’s it — there’s nothing the insurance company can say about it. But man, if he ever got really hurt, you’d have a couple-hundred-million-dollar movie going down. The other producers must not go to set and watch this stuff — they’d have a heart attack. I’m really impressed with his willingness and ability to do a lot of this stuff.

8. Knight and Day (2010): Cruise falls on the hood of a car, and hangs onto it during a chase.

Butcher: This scene is hilarious. So bogus, but so fun. Just looking at the angles and the movements of the camera, I don’t think he’s on that car rooftop. It’s likely the guy surfing the car in the wide shots is a stuntman; in close-ups, you cut to Tom. It could very well be Tom is riding on that car in a street, but I would never put my actor on top of that. No, you do it in a studio, with rear-screen projection. Then you marry that with the CGI of the car blowing up in front of me and flying over me.

You see the motorcycle helmet fall on the car hood, and Tom Cruise lands on the camera looking through the hood. That is probably a plate shot they did prior, and this is now rear-screen projection as Tom falls on the hood. And then he talks, and then they cut back to Cameron Diaz, most likely with the rear-screen projection behind them. And then you see there’s an SUV about to overtake the car — that is a stuntman laying on the hood of that car firing back at the SUV. When they cut to a close-up of Cruise on the top of the car, going through the tunnel, that’s probably Tom in the studio again. When the car rolls over him — that’s obviously not done in-camera. That’s all CGI.

9. Knight and Day (2010): Cruise and Cameron Diaz ride a motorcycle during a chase, as she switches position around him to shoot at their pursuers.

Butcher: Tom Cruise is an accomplished rider, so I’m sure he rode the bike for some of these shots. But mostly, I’m pretty sure there were two stunt doubles. When Cameron Diaz is on the back, her stunt double is behind Tom Cruise’s stunt double in the wide shot of the motorcycle, racing through town. That’s a given. That switch, where Cameron Diaz’s character slips around in front of Tom, that’s a stunt double doing that. And then they would cut to Tom and Cameron on a process trailer or stationary, in-studio, with rear projection behind them, with fans in their faces. Because they’re cutting from wides to close-ups. They’re very well-done, because it’s all in the illusion created by the editor and the stunt coordinator.

People often focus on the wirework and how dangerous that looks, but actually, a stunt where you’re racing a sport bike with a passenger — especially in front of you, like they did with that switch — is actually a lot more dangerous. You’ve got an expert motorcycle rider on the bike, to be sure, and the woman switching is an expert as well. But the fact that they’re taking corners and there’s cars in their way — that makes it a lot more dangerous. More things can go wrong with that gag than with, say, wirework outside a tower in Dubai. The wirework takes nerve, but it’s very safe.

10. Mission: Impossible — Ghost Protocol (2012): Climbing (and hanging from) the Burj Khalifa.

Butcher: Like I said, balls of steel. He was definitely outside that building. He hung outside that building. I’m not convinced it’s him running down the side. It’s entirely possible that it is. But the close-ups of climbing, with that glove — that takes incredible nerve. If you’ve ever been up to the top of the CN tower in Toronto — which is no longer the tallest building in the world — they have a skywalk where you can go outside on the roof of the building, and they put you in this big orange jumpsuit and they cable you off, and you stand on the edge of the building and lean out over the city backwards. It’s an incredible experience. And you’ll get some sense of the "Oh my God" that must have gone through Tom Cruise’s heart when he hung on that rope outside the tallest building in the world in Dubai. Some of that stuff is done in the editing — when he’s kicking through the window, for example, that’s a setpiece.

cruise gif

But when you think about it, what he’s doing outside the Burj Khalifa on cable or Spectra Rope, is exactly what they did on the first Mission: Impossible movie, where he comes down to the computer. Just trusting your harness, trusting the guys that are controlling — if he can do it from 40 feet, he can do it 3,000 feet up in the air. It’s no different, except for wind and chill. A lot of these Mission: Impossible stunts are wirework — guys being pulled. It’s time-consuming, and that costs money. In order to do it properly, you need the money, and that’s why these movies look as wonderful as they do.

I used to work with Wade Eastwood, the stunt coordinator on his new Mission Impossible movie. Tom Cruise obviously has a really good team around him, the trust that he has in these people is incredible. And vice versa — they trust him. He’s a good student, he does it properly, and everybody gets to go home at the end of the day.

SEE ALSO: Why Tom Cruise is Hollywood’s last movie star

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: This 'Mission Impossible' behind-the-scenes footage of a 53-year-old Tom Cruise hanging off a plane is terrifying










New 'Mission: Impossible' dominates the weekend box office

$
0
0

tom cruise mission impossible rogue one

Tom Cruise proves he's still a box office draw as his latest movie, "Mission: Impossible: Rogue Nation," tops the weekend with an estimated $56 million in the US, according to Deadline.

That's the second-highest opening weekend for a film in the "M: I" franchise, just behind "Mission: Impossible II" ($57.8 million).

The $56 million figure tops projections late last week of the film grossing around $40 million for the weekend. This was due not only to positive critical reaction for "Rogue Nation," with an above 90% rating on Rotten Tomatoes, but the film also followed a strong $20 million take on Friday (which includes $4 million for Thursday evening screenings), according to Box Office Mojo, with an impressive $19.9 million on Saturday, according to Deadline.

Things were even better for "Rogue Nation" internationally, where it grossed $65 million so far. In 32 markets it was the biggest opening ever for an "M: I" film, while in 27 it's the best opening for a Cruise film, according to Deadline.

The hot weekend temperatures proved to be a success for the other big release out this weekend, as people also flocked to their air conditioned-friendly multiplexes to see "Vacation."

The reboot of the classic Chevy Chase-starring "Nation Lampoon's Vacation" franchise, with Ed Helms now in the lead, took in $14.85 million over the weekend ($21.17 million for it's five-day total), according to BoxOffice.com.

SEE ALSO: Why Tom Cruise is Hollywood's last movie star

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: We unearthed Donald Trump's Vine account from 2013 and it's incredible










Salma Hayek on Donald Trump: 'Everybody's entitled to be dumb'

$
0
0

salma hayek

Salma Hayek isn't letting Donald Trump's comments on Mexican immigration ruffle her feathers.

"It's a very simple tactic for self-promotion," the Mexican actress told the L.A. Times. "What's sad is how easily people are manipulated. I'm not insulted because I cannot be insulted by stupidity."

Hayak is referring to controversial comments Trump made in his mid-June announcement that he would be running for president. During the speech, he referred to Mexican immigrants as criminals, drug runners, and rapists.

Donald TrumpThe remarks led to NBC cutting its ties with Trump, which included "The Apprentice" and the "Miss USA Pageant," of which the real estate mogul is a part-owner. Univision also backed 0ut of its agreement to air the pageant.

"Everybody's entitled to have uninformed opinions," Hayek also said. "Everybody's entitled to be dumb. But I'm not dumb, so I see through the manipulation."

Hayek went on to say that the lesson here is that we need to "wake up" to the fact that not everyone shares our values and get out to the vote.

SEE ALSO: Here's why Salma Hayek's billionaire husband made her go back to work after having a baby

MORE: Tina Fey and Colin Jost agreed that Donald Trump's presidential run is 'wonderful' for 'SNL'

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: We unearthed Donald Trump's Vine account from 2013 and it's incredible











Here's how Jake Gyllenhaal feels about losing out on Batman and Spider-Man roles

$
0
0

jake gyllenhaalThe casting process for films is often more art than science. Many actors are considered for a role that ultimately can go to only one. Jake Gyllenhaal has, at various times, been considered for the roles of both Batman and Spider-Man and, while he ended up not getting either big role, he is very much at peace with that.

Speaking with the UK’s Daily Mail Gyllenhaal says not getting those franchise roles was neither a blessing nor a curse:

"I believe whatever happens, happens for good. I was definitely open to both the roles (of Spider- Man and Batman). However at a certain point you realise there is always someone more interesting, talented and ready to do the role. In any case, you are not going to get every role you go for. So you can say I neither rue nor am I thankful for having not worked on these superhero films."

spider-manThere was a point during pre-production of Sam Raimi’s Spider-Man 2 when it looked like Tobey Maguire may not be able to return due to back injuries he sustained while filming Seabiscuit. Gyllenhaal was considered as a replacement, but eventually Maguire was able to return to do the work. He was also up for the lead in Batman Begins which eventually went to Christian Bale. Losing out on roles is par for the course in Hollywood and as he says, you’re not going to get every role you go after so it’s nice to see that he doesn’t let it get to him.

batman beginsWe may take some issue with the idea that there are always people more interesting or talented, however. Over the years Gyllenhaal has put together one of the more interesting collections of work in the movies, which obviously show his talent. From Donnie Darko to Brokeback Mountain to Nightcrawler Gyllenhaal seems to always be working on something interesting, and the awards and nominations he’s received for those two latter films shows that many believe he has the talent.

In the end, his choosing to not rue missing out on the superhero roles may be because of the wide variety of projects he’s been able to do. In addition to the time commitment that these films tend to require, heavy effects movies take a while to film, plus there are the ever present sequels, would a casting director have cast the new Spider-Man in Brokeback Mountain? It’s possible he might have lost out in other roles if he’d landed one of those big parts.

While we’d love to see Gyllenhaal take a spot in the Marvel or DC Cinematic Universe if the right spot comes along, we’re also happy to just wait and see what’s coming next after Southpaw.

SEE ALSO: Here's how Jake Gyllenhaal got ripped for his new movie 'Southpaw'

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: This Lego version of the 'Batman v. Superman' trailer is absolute gold










This brilliant Netflix hack makes it a lot more fun to watch shows with other people

$
0
0

When Harry Met Sally

One of the biggest problems with binge-watching shows on Netflix is that everybody watches at their own pace. It takes away the shared experience of watching an episode or two and then having someone to talk about it with immediately after the credits roll.

Never fear: A brilliant extension for Google Chrome solves that problem. Meet Showgoers, a plug-in that allows you to sync up your stream with someone else's so you can watch together. (It's not affiliated with Netflix in anyway; we reached out to Netflix for comment, but have not heard back.)

Here's how to install Showgoers

Go to the Showgoers website (showgoers.tv), where an "Install Showgoers" button will direct you to the Chrome store. Once you download this feature, go check out your Netflix account and you will notice a pair of old fashioned 3-D glasses:

Netflix Showgoers

Unfortunately, this won't allow you to watch "Wayne's World in 3D, but it will allow you to watch a classic like this with somebody else! 

Once you click on the glasses, it will lead you to this message:Screen Shot 2015 08 03 at 9.38.23 AM

Send that link to anybody you want to share your viewing experience with. (They also have to have Showgoers installed.)

Once you're watching, the pause, rewind, and fast forward options will all be in red:

Screen_Shot_2015 08 03_at_9_52_36_AM

This year, Netflix's original programming has increased in an unprecedented way. Their ambitious slate of television shows has surpassed both FX and HBO. Unlike FX and HBO, Netflix does not provide the option of watching shows live at a set time. This option could bring Netflix users one step closer to actually being on the same page about "Orange Is the New Black" and "The Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt."

In terms of film, Netflix plans to have a few original movies as well, including a four movie deal with Adam Sandler. Use Showgoers and it will be like a virtual trip to a theater, except you get to choose who shares the stadium seating with you and the snacks cost a lot less.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: TV's best kept secret just released season 2










'Star Trek' reveals an important truth about the robot takeover

$
0
0

replicator

When discussing my upcoming book on the economics of "Star Trek" with people who have only a passing interest in the show, I have noticed that the issue of work keeps coming back.  More specifically, casual viewers, professional economists and members of the press alike seem to hone in on the (fictional) consequences of automation.

Arguably, "Star Trek" is the only sci-fi franchise that takes automation seriously.

In "Star Trek", the necessity to work to provide for oneself has vanished. "Star Trek" society, as depicted in the show, is perhaps the most popular example of what is called a ’post-scarcity' economy, for lack of a better term.

Blame the replicator. That machine can produce anything on demand and on the spot, from Captain Picard's tea, Earl Grey, hot to clothing, knickknacks and even medicine.

As described by art director Michael Okuda (in "Star Trek: The Next Generation Technical Manual" - yes! there is such a thing), the replicator draws from its tanks of shapeless molecular goo to form objects based on pre-existing designs, stored as data. The requested objects appear out of thin air on the replicator's plate, with the same tingling effect as a the illustrious "Star Trek" transporter of “beam me up, Scotty” fame.

Yet, how the replicator functions, its plumbing so to speak, is probably its least interesting aspect. Besides, you shouldn't take it too literally. This is science fiction, after all.  

What really matters is the replicator's economic powers.

First, the device separates design from fabrication.  Aside from the occasional maintenance, the only real work involved in operating a replicator is intellectual in nature.  It consists mainly in creating software models of objects that can then be stored and readily be produced according to the whims of the machine's users.  It should be noted that in "Star Trek", copyright protection and patents do not seem to exist.  Models stored in a replicator's data banks are DRM-free.

Replicator

Which leads us to the replicator's second striking economic feature  its ability to turn each and every single thing it materializes into non-rival, non-excludable public goods.  Think of it as the air you breathe.  Your consumption of air does not limit its availability to anybody else, and no-one can restrict access to air through any ad-hoc mechanism.  

Obviously there are some limitations: lines may form in ship's mess hall at chow time, and from time to time an indelicate free-rider might drain the replicator's matter reservoirs by ordering too much stuff.

That being said, as it appears on the show, the replicator invariably delivers its products for free. Case in point: you never see Captain Picard put a coin in a slot on the side of his office machine.  The Enterprise as a whole bears the costs of operating and maintaining the Captain's replicator.  Those costs, matter, energy, and object design are mutualized.

This is clearly the result of a deliberate choice on the part of the United Federation of Planets.  Consider the Ferengis, one of the more colorful species in Star Trek's alien bestiary.  In the hands of Quark, the jocular and profit-obsessed bar owner of "Star Trek: Deep Space 9", the replicator becomes a license to print cash (or rather to press latinum into gold) and to fleece his patrons.

star trek

That in turn underlines the last, and perhaps most provocative aspect of the replicator.  The services it provides force profound behavioral changes upon its users.  When technology makes every necessity of life available to the consumer at no immediate cost, then all bets are off. The audience is thrown into a purely science-fictional world where most familiar motivations, greed, the accumulation of wealth and economic competition, no longer apply.

What is the point of conspicuous consumption and luxury for the Enterprise crew when everybody has equal access to all the good things life has to offer? What is the psychological effect on Federation citizens to never experience poverty or financial stress (it is well-known, for instance, that poverty has dreadful consequences on children's brain development)? What happens to people when satiation is the norm and the baseline, rather than a rare occurrence in a life otherwise devoted to struggling and hustling?

Well, for one, the characters on the show are notoriously unrelatable to us.  They never squabble amongst themselves and they rarely display envy, jealousy or acquisitiveness. In fact they all come across as 50 shades of Spock: stoic, rational, devoted to improving themselves and infinitely curious about the universe.

Furthermore, the abolition of the necessity to work has certainly not abolished work itself.  The Enterprise crew is always busy.  

Screen Shot 2015 08 02 at 9.17.37 PM

Geordi LaForge, the chief engineer, is constantly hacking away at his warp engine to squeeze more power and efficiency from it.  Deanna Troi, the ship's counselor and therapist, holds regular sessions with her patients. Dr. Crusher and Nurse Ogawa are treating a stream of crew members who sustain injuries playing in the ship's holodeck.  

The Captain is called upon to exercise his talents for leadership and diplomacy. Furthermore, the wider Federation, or at least what we get to see of it, seems inordinately populated by experimental scientists all eagerly trying to invent new devices and to test new theories.  

"Star Trek" presents a world where freedom from material want, brought on by the replicator, compels people to be even more productive and creative.  Not so much for monetary gains as for reputation, glory and the recognition of one's peers.

This at least is not entirely incomprehensible to us 21st century humans.  There are in fact many hints of such incentives and behaviors in our own world, from free software such as Linux and TeX (which enables the sharing of scientific research), to Wikipedia and social networks.  

This does not mean that once the robots have arrived and become self-aware we will instantly live in Star Trek's merry world.  But it may indicate that perhaps the impact of automation will not be nearly as dire as some people predict.

"Trekonomics"by Manu Saadia is currently available for preorder at Inkshares.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Get ready to root for the bad guys — your first look at 'Suicide Squad' is here










Ryan Reynolds just surprised everyone with this hilarious and irreverent ‘Deadpool’ teaser

$
0
0

We won't see the first trailer for "Deadpool" until Tuesday night, but that's okay — because that trailer now has a trailer, and it's pretty much everything you'd expect from a Deadpool movie. 

The wisecracking, fourth-wall breaking antihero has a few words to say about his upcoming movie, and that first terrible movie he was in. Check it out. 

 

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: It looks like Ryan Reynolds may be giving the performance of his life in this trailer for 'Mississippi Grind'










This new David Foster Wallace biopic is rebelling against its own genre — and it’s perfect

$
0
0

End of the Tour Jason Segel

"Biopic" is a short-hand term for a biographical film which covers the life of a real-life figure. These films, sometimes epic in scope, have always been popular, especially with Oscar voters. Look at best picture winners "Lawrence of Arabia", "Gandhi", "Braveheart", and "The King's Speech."

The typical biopic model seems to be the birth-to-death story, which was sort of run into the ground following "Ray" and "Walk the Line". Despite going through the entire life of an individual, most of these films barely touches on what makes a lot of these individuals so great or so interesting.

In comes "The End of the Tour", which tells the story of a real person in an extraordinary way. Instead of documenting an entire life, it takes place over just four days.

End of the Tour

The subject of "The End of the Tour" is David Foster Wallace, the late author of "Infinite Jest", a novel which spans over 1,000 pages and is often cited as one of the greatest books ever written. Wallace, who suffered from depression throughout his life, committed suicide in 2008.

In the film, Rolling Stone reporter David Lipsky (Jesse Eisenberg) follows Wallace (Jason Segel) during the last few days of his "Infinite Jest" book tour. The film doesn't even include the title card that most biopics would have at the end saying that the profile Lipsky was working on was never published.

Rather, the film is based off a book Lipsky eventually wrote about Wallace called "Although Of Course You End Up Becoming Yourself: A Road Trip with David Foster Wallace." There were a lot of interesting stages in David Foster Wallace's life. He held odd jobs, attempted suicide, entered rehab, and lived in a halfway house. The decision to only capture four days in his life seems limiting, but it is a deliberate decision that really pays off, and it allows us to see this brilliant person in ways that a typical birth-to-life biopic could not.

Jesse Eisenberg End of the Tour

It is not the entire scope of Wallace's life that is the best way to know him, but rather the little things. That's aided by Jason Segel's phenomenal performance as David Foster Wallace, where he teaches you so much about the man by doing so little. When Lipsky first enters Wallace's home, Wallace says, "I feel like I should offer you tea or something." Right away, you understand that this is a guy who isn't completely adjusted to social norms.

The most unique part about "The End of the Tour" is that it isn't so much a story but rather a series of long and insightful conversations. Instead of trying to hit on all the major benchmarks in Wallace's life, the film instead attempts to capture how Wallace felt at this certain moment, when he was starting to achieve the sort of fame that most writers can only dream of. You can just tell from every shot that director James Ponsoldt and screenwriter Donald Marguiles have the utmost respect for Wallace.

End of the Tour

"The End of the Tour" is the perfect entryway into David Foster Wallace for those of us who are only vaguely familiar with his work. I have read his short story "Consider the Lobster" and his commencement speech at Kenyon College. Like many others, I am too intimidated by "Infinite Jest" to ever pick it up and read it. The book clocks in at 1,079 pages and includes about 400 footnotes. If you search for "Infinite Jest" on Google, you will come across many websites that give you instructions on how to read this book. In this regard, "The End of the Tour" might be best for people who aren't as familiar with the author, as it gives an in-depth look at Wallace's brilliant and intriguing musings on life, death, and junk food.

And yet, "The End of the Tour" does not come close to giving us the full picture of David Foster Wallace, and that is what makes this film so good. Watching Wallace recover from depression to go on and work on his masterpiece would feel too Hollywood.

Watching Wallace try to reconcile his newfound success with his depression, however, is much more enlightening. This is a film that pits Wallace's public persona with his private life. It could be hard to know, like with most public figures, how much of his image is manufactured. Then again, this is a guy who doesn't own a television set, not because he is pretentious, but because he is afraid that he would watch it too much.

End of the Tour

This whole story is told primarily through the Lipsky's perspective. This storytelling trick has been used many times before, but it really works wonders here. Lipsky is a struggling young writer who wants the life Wallace has. You can tell that from the moment Lipsky first glimpses at Wallace's much nicer hotel room. At some points, Lipsky wants to interview Wallace when all Wallace wants to do is have a conversation. So many people have connected with Wallace so deeply through his writing, and the tragedy that the film captures is that he had trouble connecting back with them.

Again, this does not define all of David Foster Wallace. What this excellent and innovative film teaches us though, is that even a few insignificant days can teach us a lot about a person.

"The End of the Tour" is in theaters now.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Pixar's next movie shows what would have happened if dinosaurs never went extinct and it looks gorgeous










Viewing all 103316 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images