Quantcast
Channel: Business Insider
Viewing all 103018 articles
Browse latest View live

This home video shows an 8-year-old Meghan Markle playing the Queen and ordering her 'servants' to make 900,000 cookies

$
0
0

meghan markle

  • A home video shows Meghan Markle playing the Queen in a childhood play at just 8 years old.
  • It was discovered by the mother of her childhood friend, Ninaki Priddy.
  • She bosses around "servants" ordering them to make her cookies, sew her a dress, and do her groceries.
  • Priddy says it shows that Markle was "always the centre of attention, always the ringleader."
  • Markle becomes part of the royal family when she marries Prince Harry on Saturday May 19.


A home video of eight-year-old Meghan Markle playing "the Queen" in a childhood play has been published — and it shows that the actress was always meant to be in the spotlight as a royal.

Shot on January 29, 1990, the 11-minute video was filmed at the ninth birthday party of Markle's childhood friend, Ninaki Priddy.

After Priddy's mother recently discovered the footage, Ninaki told Mail Online: "The show was called 'Your Royal Highness' and the star was Meg. It’s very funny to see this now and given what is going on with her life it’s quite eye-opening."

She added that Markle was "always the centre of attention, always the ringleader — it was my birthday but she took the starring role!"

The video shows Markle wearing a gold crown in the garden of the Priddy's LA home. She is acting out the role as a fictional Queen, while her classmates from Hollywood's Little Red School House are princesses and servants.

Markle — known now for her role in legal drama "Suits" — is seen introducing the play by saying, "Your Royal Highness, Take One!"

She then sits on a blanket as one of her friends comes over, gives a bow, and asks: "Your Highness, isn’t there anything to do around this kingdom anymore?"

Markle replies: 'Yes, make 900,000 cookies and sew me a nice dress."

She adds that the cookies and dress are for a meeting she's having, during which she is hosting "people from Florida and Canada, Mississippi, Missouri."

At one point Markle yells: "10 minute break!" and a friend replies: "Oh thank you, Your Highness." Markle then herds her friends inside.

Later in the play, she's heard saying: "Go do the grocery shopping, I didn't have time to do it." According to Ninaki, the story, which Markle created, "came out of the blue."

"It wasn’t something we had done before. She just came up with it on the spot," she said, adding: "My parents were in the audio-video industry so we always had a camera around. We would do little videos."

You can watch the video here:

SEE ALSO: 'Knocked Up' and 'Grey's Anatomy' star Katherine Heigl has confirmed she's joining the cast of 'Suits' as Meghan Markle departs

SEE ALSO: Prince Harry and Meghan Markle have sent out invitations to the royal wedding — here's what they look like

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: What Trump University was really like — according to a former professor


The US Senate votes in favor of restoring the FCC's net-neutrality rules

$
0
0

FILE PHOTO - Supporters of Net Neutrality protest the FCC's recent decision to repeal the program in Los Angeles, California, November 28, 2017. REUTERS/ Kyle Grillot

  • The US Senate voted 52-47 on Wednesday to put the Federal Communications Commission's net-neutrality rules back in place.
  • The Senate resolution would overturn a vote by the agency in December to scuttle its open-internet regulations.
  • The resolution had drawn the support of half of all senators, including all Democrats; two additional Republicans backed it in the final vote.
  • Despite the Senate's vote, the resolution faces a dubious future, as it would still need to pass the House of Representatives and be signed by President Donald Trump to become law. 

The US Senate on Wednesday voted narrowly in favor of reinstating the Federal Communications Commission's net-neutrality rules, a surprising move that could lead to the reversal of one of the Trump administration's most controversial policies involving America's tech industry.

Three Republicans joined with all 47 Democrats and two Democratic-leaning senators to back the measure.

Sen. John Kennedy of Louisiana, a Republican who voted in favor of the measure, said that for him the decision came down to whether he or anyone else should trust their local cable company, from which most Americans get their internet access.

"If you trust your cable company, you're going to support" the FCC's move in December to eliminate its net-neutrality rules, Kennedy said. "If you believe as I do, that I trust everybody, but I still believe in verification — it's like I said in my campaign — I believe love is the answer, but back in Louisiana, I still own a handgun just in case."

He added: "I just think there should be a free and open internet."

Supporters of net neutrality cheered the Senate's vote.

"This is a historic day in the fight for the future of the Internet," said Evan Greer, the deputy director of Fight for the Future, an internet activist organization that had been pushing for the resolution.

The Senate's vote showed that "the voices of the American people were heard," said Democratic Sen. Tammy Duckworth of Illinois.

Though the vote on the measure had been expected for months, its outcome had been uncertain. Fifty senators had declared their support for the resolution — one shy of the majority needed to pass it.

In the end, 47 senators — all Republicans — voted against it. Sen. John McCain, who has been receiving treatment for a brain tumor, did not vote.

Republican opponents blamed the vote on 'politics'

Sen. John Thune, a South Dakota Republican who led the effort against the resolution, decried its passage.

Thune has called on Congress to pass legislation that would enshrine at least some version of net neutrality into law. He said the passage of the resolution would encourage Democrats to hold off on coming to the table to negotiate over such a bill.

"This vote was about politics, not protecting net neutrality," he said.

Though few Republicans joined the Democrats to pass the measure, and Thune and other Republicans opposing it tried to paint the debate in partisan terms, net neutrality in general — and the FCC's net-neutrality rules in particular — enjoy widespread, bipartisan support outside the Beltway. A poll last month found that 86% of the public, including 82% of Republicans, supported leaving the rules in place.

Earlier Wednesday, the measure overcame a procedural hurdle that portended its eventual outcome. Three Republicans — Kennedy, Susan Collins of Maine, and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, who all eventually voted in favor of the resolution — joined their colleagues across the aisle to pass a motion to proceed with a final vote.

Senate Democrats cheered the procedural vote. In a tweet, Sen. Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota called it an "amazing victory for consumers, small businesses and rural communities."

The resolution is under the Congressional Review Act, a law that allows Congress, with a simple-majority vote in both houses, to overturn new regulations by federal agencies within 60 legislative days of implementation.

The resolution seeks to overturn a rule voted on by the FCC in December that would eliminate most of its net-neutrality regulations.

Net neutrality is the principle that all traffic on the internet should be treated the same. While the name for the principle isn't that old, the basic idea predates the internet and has its roots in the telephone and telegraph networks and even older services.

For nearly all of the past 10 years, the FCC has had in place rules that sought to guarantee net-neutrality protections. The latest version of the agency's rules, from 2015, barred internet service providers from blocking, slowing, or giving preferential treatment to particular online sites or services.

The FCC in December reversed its longstanding policy on net neutrality

The FCC's new anti-net-neutrality regulation, set to take effect next month, eliminates those prohibitions. Instead, it simply requires providers to disclose how they handle internet traffic. It also hands off to the Federal Trade Commission the job of ensuring providers abide by the terms they've disclosed and watching out for anticompetitive behavior.

That the FCC overturned its net-neutrality rules was no surprise. Ajit Pai, the new chairman appointed by President Donald Trump, made clear that he opposed them and would seek to eliminate them when he took over as the FCC's head.

But Pai did so despite widespread support for the rules; a survey taken around the time of the FCC's December vote found that an overwhelming majority of Americans supported keeping them in place, including most Republican voters.

Despite the Senate's passing of the resolution, the measure is unlikely to be enacted. It has drawn far less support in the House of Representatives, and Trump is unlikely to sign a resolution that would effectively rebuke his FCC chairman.

However, net-neutrality supporters are also seeking to overturn the FCC's action in federal courts and pushing measures that would offer net-neutrality protections within a state's borders.

And they're hopeful the resolution will gain steam now that the Senate has passed it.

"My hope is that as the public gets more and more involved in the course of this year that we will be able to get more Republicans to support it, especially in the House of Representatives," said Sen. Ed Markey, a Massachusetts Democrat, who led the effort to pass the resolution. "I think it's an education process."

SEE ALSO: Net neutrality is weeks away from dying, and the first signs of change are already showing up at Netflix and other internet companies

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Jeff Bezos reveals what it's like to build an empire and become the richest man in the world — and why he's willing to spend $1 billion a year to fund the most important mission of his life

HBO is making a series that will 're-examine' the murder case of the 'Serial' podcast

$
0
0

serial

  • HBO and Sky Atlantic are making a documentary series that will "closely re-examine" the murder case of Adnan Syed, the subject of the popular podcast "Serial."
  • The four-hour series, directed by Oscar-nominated documentarian Amy Berg, is titled "The Case Against Adnan Syed."
  • The series promises "new discoveries, as well as groundbreaking revelations that challenge the state's case" in Syed's trial.

HBO is teaming with the UK's Sky Atlantic to release a documentary series following the murder case and conviction of Adnan Syed, the subject of the first season of the popular podcast "Serial" from 2014.

Directed by Oscar-nominated documentarian Amy Berg ("Deliver Us From Evil"), the four-hour series is titled "The Case Against Adnan Syed." 

The series will "closely re-examine" the 1999 disappearance and murder of 18-year-old Baltimore high school student Hae Min Lee, and the subsequent conviction of Syed, her ex-boyfriend.

A press release on the series states that the show will present "new discoveries, as well as groundbreaking revelations that challenge the state's case."

Syed was convicted and sentenced to life in prison in 2000 for Hae Min Lee's murder. In March of this year, Maryland's court of special appeals granted a retrial for Syed's case. The Baltimore Sun reported this week that Syed's prosecutors had asked the court to reverse the retrial ruling. 

Berg has been working on "The Case Against Adnan Syed" since 2015, per the release. The show will also feature original music from singer-songwriter Nick Cave. 

"We'll be offering viewers a compelling window into one of the most talked about murder cases in recent years," Sky director of programming Zai Bennett told Variety of the series. "The hugely talented Amy Berg has unprecedented access to those closest to the investigation, which is sure to make unmissable viewing."

HBO has not yet announced a release date for the series. 

SEE ALSO: The best TV show of 2018 on each network so far — from FX to Netflix to HBO

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: I ate nothing but 'healthy' fast food for a week — here’s what happened

A new Captain America viral meme is here to make you think about your bad decisions

$
0
0

captain america

  • A Captain America meme has gone viral this week based on a clip from "Spider-Man: Homecoming" in which Captain America delivers a PSA to high school students in detention.
  • The meme generally begins with "So, you..." and mentions a bad decision someone has made that Captain America is about to talk you through.
  • "Homecoming" was released almost a year ago, so it's strange that it's only now going viral.

A new Captain America meme has gone viral this week based on a clip from "Spider-Man: Homecoming," and it might help you deal with some bad decisions.

The meme is based on a "Homecoming" clip in which Captain America delivers a PSA to high school students in detention (Cap doesn't actually show up; it's just a video shown to the students).

Even though "Homecoming" was released nearly a year ago, the meme is only now gaining popularity on Twitter. The meme is an image of Captain America sitting in a backwards chair about to give students a life lesson on the choices they make. It usually begins with "So, you..." and then mentions a bad decision.

Some Twitter users have even crossed the meme with other popular memes, such as the "Is this a pigeon?" meme, this week's "yanny vs. laurel" viral sensation, and the "I don't feel so good" meme based on another Marvel Cinematic Universe movie, "Avengers: Infinity War."

Others were topical for different reasons, and poked fun at everything from the NBA semi-finals to "Solo: A Star Wars Story."

Check out some of the funniest examples below:

 

SEE ALSO: Plans are 'in the works' to add Muslim superhero Ms. Marvel to the Marvel Cinematic Universe

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Why you should never release your pet goldfish into the wild

The world of Fortnite keeps changing, and players are loving it

$
0
0

Fortnite: Battle Royale, Fortnite, updates, Easter eggs

The creators of "Fortnite: Battle Royale" are still changing the map almost every day, and players are loving it.

It all started in April, when a meteor slowly made its way towards a cataclysmic collision with the game's iconic island battlefield. Every day, the meteor got a little closer.

It all ended recently with a dramatic meteor shower that left craters all over the map and leveled the Dusty Depot area. The impact marked the beginning of Season 4, the current phase of the game. Every new season brings new rewards to unlock, new weapons, and new challenges.

The changes after the meteor impact was so huge that most players assumed that Epic Games, the creators of "Fortnite," were done messing with the map. 

Not so: Epic Games has not stopped adding new easter eggs and places to explore — many of them themed around superheroes, the theme of the game's current season. And Fortnite fans are digging deep, trying to figure out what the heck is going on.

Here are a few of the newest developments to the "Fortnite" map since the meteor hit:

 

SEE ALSO: Why isn't Fortnite, the world's most popular game, on Nintendo's Switch?

One of the first changes fans immediately noticed was this mysterious hatch, which was added to the map just days after Season 4 began.

The hatch is located in Wailing Woods, a rural and relatively low-traffic area of the Fortnite map, right next to the hedge maze. 

So far, no one has been able to open the hatch and see what's inside, including an intrepid Reddit user who dug into the game's coding to see what hints they may contain— but was ultimately unsuccessful. 

Curious players will simply have to wait for Epic Games to reveal what's down the hatch, or for some other adventurous player to uncover its mysteries. 



With tens of millions of people playing"Fortnite," it's hard to keep anything under wraps for very long. Players logging in after the new season began also immediately noticed a handful of new underground superheroic lairs.

The sky-blue theme and mysterious, yet grand, symbol mounted on the wall make many players feel like this lair belongs to a superhero. This one in particular is located underneath a mansion, giving some Batman vibes.

Reporters at Kotaku provided detailed descriptions of each of the lairs discovered so far, and where to find them.



...and, perhaps, some super villains are involved, too. This lair is visible from the air while parachuting in, thanks to the massive, menacing-looking missile sticking out.

The dark purple motif gives this lair an evil-genius-vibe.

If "Fortnite" players thought the meteor was catastrophic, they definitely won't want to be around when this bad boy goes off. 



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

We asked the Queen's former chef what Prince Harry was like as a kid, and the stories suggest he was just as mischievous as you'd imagine

$
0
0

prince harry

  • Prince Harry is arguably the most popular member of the British royal family.
  • His royal wedding to Meghan Markle on Saturday May 19 provides the perfect opportunity to reflect on times past.
  • Business Insider spoke to the Queen's former chef Darren McGrady.
  • McGrady had plenty of stories to share about Prince Harry tearing around Kensington Palace — and the mischievous things he used to get up to.



Prince Harry, arguably the most popular member of the British royal family, will marry his US actress fiancée Meghan Markle this Saturday May 19.

To say that the royal occasion is eagerly anticipated by the public, both at home and abroad, is an understatement — billions of viewers are expected to tune in for the affair around the world.

As with all rites of passage, the wedding provides the perfect opportunity to reflect on times past for the prince.

Business Insider did just that with the Queen's former royal chef Darren McGrady, who worked for Queen Elizabeth II, Diana, Princess of Wales, and Princes William and Harry for 15 years.

To celebrate the royal wedding, McGrady has teamed up with Kellogg's — the brand that makes the Queen's favourite cereal Special K — to curate a royal-worthy menu of dishes inspired by his time spent serving the royals that will be served at a breakfast party at Kellogg's NYC on the day.

McGrady has previously revealed a number of intriguing eating habits of the royals in interviews— like how the one thing Her Majesty can't bear is garlic or strong onion flavours in dishes, or how she'd take her breakfast items from Tupperware containers, like any other commoner.

This time, the royal chef went into some detail about what Harry was like as a boy tearing around Kensington Palace — and his anecdotes depicting a young mischievous Prince Harry are pretty adorable.

"The naughty one with the big smile"

p harry

"Harry was lots of fun," McGrady told Business Insider. "He was always around the kitchen, the naughty one with a big smile."

McGrady said he used to bake the young prince a caramel banana cake for when he got home from school.

It's no secret that Wills and Harry, who he describes as "royal princes but with children's' palates," were partial to the odd bit of fast food. American-style foods like loaded potato skins, baby-back BBQ ribs, and pizza were apparently among Harry's firm favourites. Princess Diana would take them down to Sticky Fingers near Kensington High Street for a treat, McGrady says.

p h

But their nannies at Kensington Palace — who used to decide on the Princes' menu — were not always as keen to indulge the boys with their favourite foods, often opting for traditional roast meat and vegetables instead, with lots of healthy greens like broccoli and cabbage.

"One evening roast chicken was on the menu," McGrady said. "And I found a note on the desk that read 'Darren please give the boys pizza' signed Jess, the name of the nanny.

"But it was written in 10-year-olds' handwriting," he continued, explaining that he soon realised it was Harry attempting to pick his own menu.

McGrady said he didn't make the boys pizza that night and made sure they got the original chicken option "because he was too scared of the nanny," but kept the note to tease Harry about it.

His playful side stayed with him into adolescence, when he earned a reputation as a party boy...

harry

...And well into adult life.

invictus

An inquisitive child

Harry was also a very inquisitive little boy, according to McGrady. "He used to come into the kitchen all the time. One time I was making [spaghetti bolognese] and I had a big copper pan of boiling water.

"I was talking to William and Harry came into the kitchen, when I turned around I realised Harry had hold of the pan's handle to see what was for dinner. I had to sprint across the across the room shouting [in order] to stop him."

On Saturday, Harry and Meghan are breaking with tradition and, instead of having a seating plan or sit-down meal, are opting for "bowl food." McGrady says: "It's a very trendy decision, typical of Meghan who is a real foodie."

The bowls will offer a chance to show off her love of health foods like grains, quinoa, and pulses, he says, but there could also be bowls of cottage and shepherd's pie — another of Harry's favourite dishes.

For those unfamiliar with shepherd's pie, it's a traditional British dish of minced meat topped with layered mash potato, baked in the oven — although if it's served on May 19, it'll probably look a bit fancier than this.

shepherds pie

SEE ALSO: Here's what time Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's royal wedding will start where you live — and how to watch it

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: How a tiny camera startup is taking on Amazon and Google

Meghan Markle's dad has been axed from the royal wedding — and it shows how powerful the paparazzi still are

$
0
0

press media journalists paparazzi

  • Meghan Markle's father, Thomas Markle, will not go to the royal wedding, it was confirmed on Thursday.
  • It follows a paparazzi scandal in which he was exposed cooperating in tabloid photoshoots.
  • The incident is another episode in the fierce battle between the royals and the press.
  • At its lowest ebb, the media pursued Princess Diana literally to her death, and there have been scandals since.
  • Though legacy media is weaker than it used to be, this proves that it is still capable of stopping the royals from controlling their own narrative.

 

Meghan Markle's father will officially have no role in the royal wedding, after a week of unedifying flip-flopping and health scares.

In a firm statement on Thursday morning, Markle said that her father Thomas needed "space" and would steer clear of the wedding for health reasons.

But, more tellingly, the dramatic change followed a paparazzi scandal which embarrassed the royals and harked back to the darkest days in their modern history.

The statement confirms that Markle will no longer fly to London, meet the Queen, and walk his daughter down the aisle in what would have been the wedding's central moment.

The debacle is a scalp for the press, who have long been foes of the royal family, and a reminder that the media still wields power over the royals despite several decades of setbacks.

The photo scandal has managed to drive a wedge between Markle's extended family and the Royal household. In the process it has deprived Meghan and Prince Harry  — not to mention the meticulous royal media machine — of a fairytale moment at the centre of the wedding.

Markle Sr.'s absence will now inevitably hang over the ceremony at Windsor Castle, and besmirch the otherwise exceptionally cheery, inclusive image of the event the royals have worked so hard to foster.

It is also an insight into the pitched war that powerful publications wage with the royals, as well as each other, in pursuit of the next big story.

That conflict reached its most bitter, brutal, and tragic low in 1997, when Princess Diana died in a car crash while trying to flee photographers who were chasing her through Paris.

Princess Diana car crash

It edged on in the UK media through the 2000s, when the royals were targeted by phone hackers, who illegally listened to voicemail messages of those close to the royals to source scoops, especially about Harry and his brother William, who were then still growing up.

In September 2012, long-lens photographs of a topless Kate Middleton were published in the European media. No British publication touched them, but, because of the rise of the internet, anybody with five minutes to research the images was capable of seeing them.

The magazine behind the pictures was later prosecuted and fined more than $100,000 — but the damage was done.

kate middleton topless chi

Royal press officers, private secretaries and other staff have tried to draw boundaries to give breathing space to members of the royal family, but it can never work completely.

The sheer level of interest in the royal cast of characters means that vast amounts of money are available for those with access to secret information, or even just pictures of them going about their daily lives.

As an example, a home video of Kate Middleton starring in a musical while at grade school made tens of thousands of dollars in a matter of days for the journalists who managed to find it and sell it on to the media.

Staged photos like the ones starring Markle senior, showing vignettes like him getting measured for a suit, working out ahead of the big day, or boning up on royal history, would similarly attract large fees.

Markle told TMZ he only began cooperating with the paparazzi in an attempt to change his image after they had stalked him, and published photos of him buying beer and looking unkempt. But cooperating in this way clearly crossed a line.

Competition between publications drives up the prices, and also compels them to try to ruin each other's stories. The article which undid Markle senior this weekend was published by The Mail on Sunday.

Ironically, its sister publication, MailOnline, had touted some of the original photos as its exclusive material.

Media watchers have noted a tendency for The Mail on Sunday to go to unusual lengths to contradict, expose, or otherwise chip away at the credibility of stories published by its own stablemates — a phenomenon which may have manifested again here.

Though the royal establishment has done their best to keep the press at bay by issuing repeated, public warnings to media pursuing Markle or her family, it clearly wasn't enough. (Even in the latest scandal, they still pushed for reporters to go easy on Markle Sr, before ultimately announcing that he won't attend.)

Markle Sr. claims that he didn't take the photographs for the money. Whatever it was that persuaded him to cooperate, it soured the happy-families narrative of the wedding, and proved that the royals cannot control their own story.

Though many of the trends which trouble legacy publications — falling circulations, competition online, declining trust in the media — are doubtless taking their toll, this incident proves that their power to influence events is by no means extinguished.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: NBA ref explains why the James Harden step-back jumper isn't traveling

YouTube's new music-subscription service takes on Apple Music and Spotify

$
0
0

cobra kai 2 youtube

  • YouTube is taking on the likes of Apple and Spotify with a new $10-a-month music-subscription service named YouTube Music Premium.
  • The service pairs with YouTube Premium, the new name for YouTube Red, to offer one monthly subscription to both services for $2 more.
  • Paying the additional $2 monthly gets rid of ads on YouTube and offers access to original YouTube content like the series "Cobra Kai."

Forget about YouTube Red — on Thursday morning, YouTube rebranded its paid service as YouTube Premium and is offering it bundled with a streaming-music service.

The name of the music service: YouTube Music Premium.

For $10 a month, YouTube Music Premium offers access to ad-free music that can be downloaded for offline listening or streamed over an internet connection — very similar to Apple Music and Spotify. For an additional $2 a month, you'll also get access to YouTube Premium.

Here's how YouTube describes that new service:

"With YouTube Premium, you'll get access to the full slate of YouTube Originals, including recent hits like the Karate Kid-inspired series, 'Cobra Kai,' the dance drama, 'Step Up: High Water,' and upcoming series like the sci-fi thriller, 'Impulse,' and Liza Koshy's 'Liza on Demand.'"

In so many words, YouTube Premium offers more or less what YouTube Red did: a way to watch original YouTube shows, enjoy YouTube without ads, and download shows for offline viewing.

Still confused? Don't worry — YouTube created this helpful chart:

YouTube Premium / YouTube Music Premium

Rather than solely relying on the YouTube app for music playback, the company is creating a desktop app, and the mobile app is getting "reimagined."

Existing YouTube Red subscribers will automatically be enrolled in the new service at whatever price they're already paying. It's expected to launch soon.

SEE ALSO: If you loved 'Karate Kid' you need to watch 'Cobra Kai' on YouTube Red — which has a 100% score on Rotten Tomatoes

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Steve Jobs made 3 AM phone calls to argue about Apple ads


All of the 'X-Men' movies, ranked from worst to best

$
0
0

xmenlist6

Back in 2000, what is now the modern superhero genre probably didn't seem possible. "Blade," about a half-vampire Marvel Comics anti-hero, was the closest audiences had at the time. That changed with "X-Men," which introduced a franchise that is still churning out movies.

In that sense, even though it's suffered from a confusing timeline in recent years, the "X-Men" series may be the original "cinematic universe," before the Marvel Cinematic Universe came to be.

The next entry in this franchise comes to theaters this weekend with "Deadpool 2." It's hard to remember that the "Deadpool" movies are technically part of the "X-Men" franchise. But they are loosely connected to that universe built by Fox for nearly two decades.

As the Disney-Fox deal looms, it's impossible to predict where the franchise will be in the future. But for now we can expect "Deadpool 2" and both "X-Men: Dark Phoenix" and "The New Mutants" next year.

To prepare for "Deadpool 2," Business Insider has ranked all 10 "X-Men" movies from worst to best. 

Below is every "X-Men" movie, ranked:

SEE ALSO: All 19 Marvel Cinematic Universe movies, ranked from worst to best

10. "X-Men Origins: Wolverine" (2009)

A movie so bad it basically destroyed any plans Fox had for future "Origins" spin-offs, "X-Men Origins: Wolverine" is a monstrosity of a movie that is cluttered with useless characters (will.i.am from the Black Eyed Peas shows up for some reason?) and a nonsensical storyline. It also had the audacity to cast Ryan Reynolds in a role he was born to play (Deadpool, before Deadpool was even cool) and sewed his mouth shut. Deadpool's nickname is "The Merc with a Mouth," and this movie sews his mouth shut. It is beyond comprehension how awful this movie is, but for an idea, I have a friend who saw a leaked version of the movie before special effects were finished and said that was infinitely more fun to watch.



9. "X-Men: The Last Stand" (2006)

After director Bryan Singer left the third "X-Men" movie to make "Superman Returns" (not the greatest decision in hindsight), Brett Ratner stepped in to direct "X-Men: The Last Stand." The promise of the superb "X2's" ending, in which Jean Grey sacrifices herself but a phoenix silhouette hovers over the water as the screen fades to black, meant that the third movie had a lot to live up to. Turns out Ratner was not the guy to answer the call. "The Last Stand" presents a lot of good ideas, but ultimately fails to deliver on the only one that matters: The Dark Phoenix storyline that is an essential part of the X-Men comic books. To make matters worse, not only is the movie such a misfire, but Ellen Page recently accused Ratner of using homophobic and abusive language on the set. In conclusion, this movie is such a stain on the X-Men franchise that it's basically being ignored and Fox is trying it again with next year's "X-Men: Dark Phoenix."



8. "X-Men: Apocalypse" (2016)

I don't know who had the idea to cast a great actor like Oscar Isaac in a role that demanded he be covered in blue make-up the entire movie, but it was a bad idea. Unlike Josh Brolin's Thanos in "Avengers: Infinity War," Isaac is miscast as the universe-decimating big blue alien. Bryan Singer came back to the "X-Men" franchise in full-force with "Days of Future Past," so it was disappointing he followed that up with this. 



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

Everything you should know about the deadly X-Force before 'Deadpool 2'

$
0
0

deadpool

  • The X-Force makes its big-screen debut in this weekend's "Deadpool 2" as a team that Ryan Reynolds' Deadpool recruits to protect a young mutant from Josh Brolin's Cable.
  • A spin-off movie is being developed that will be directed by "The Cabin in the Woods" director Drew Goddard.
  • In the comics, the X-Force is an aggressive antithesis to the X-Men, and has grown to use lethal force to handle threats throughout the years. 

 

Don't get it confused with the X-Men. The X-Force, which makes its big screen debut in "Deadpool 2" this weekend, isn't afraid to get a little dirty.

So it makes perfect sense for the team to get the live-action treatment in this R-rated sequel to 2016's surprise hit "Deadpool." In "Deadpool 2," Ryan Reynolds' Merc with a Mouth recruits a ragtag team to protect a young mutant from Josh Brolin's time-traveling assassin, Cable. 

But once the lights go up in the theater on "Deadpool 2," that won't be the last time audiences will see the X-Force. Fox is currently developing a spin-off  "X-Force" movie (don't worry, Reynolds is set to return) and "The Cabin in the Woods" director Drew Goddard is on board to direct. 

Reynolds recently described the movie to Collider as an "ensemble" where Deadpool can "just be part of the team" — though he did confess that while there is "a storyline that everyone's happy with," there isn't a script yet. 

It remains to be seen how the looming Disney-Fox deal could affect the "X-Force" movie, but Reynolds isn't concerned: "I would assume that it’s just gonna be business as usual, but f--- if I know," he told Collider.

While the spin-off movie could be a couple years away, it's worthwhile to have a basic idea of what the X-Force's comic book history entails before seeing "Deadpool 2."

x-force

WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT THE X-FORCE

The team was created in 1991 by writer Fabian Nicieza and artist Rob Liefeld as a sort of reaction to the X-Men; whereas the latter were guided by moral righteousness, the X-Force had little holding them back from getting the job done by whatever means necessary.

While Deadpool will be leading the X-Force in "Deadpool 2" against Cable, the team originally consisted of Cable as one of its members in the comic books. It was also originally a rebooted version of the New Mutants team (the New Mutants is getting its own movie next year).

The team has gone through various rosters since its debut, and was typically portrayed as mutant misfits that didn't quite belong with the X-Men. It has generally consisted of more aggressive characters compared to the X-Men, and that "aggressive" premise has taken on a more extreme meaning in recent years. 

In 2008, X-Men leader Cyclops formed a secret X-Force that acted as a black-ops style team and used lethal force to handle threats. This team included Wolverine, Wolfsbane (which "Game of Thrones" star Maisie Williams will play in "The New Mutants" movie), X-23 (played in "Logan" by Dafne Keen), and Warpath (who was a founding member in the comic books).

That team was rebooted in 2010 as "The Uncanny X-Force," and added members Deadpool and Psylocke (played in "X-Men: Apocalypse" by Olivia Munn).

There's not currently an X-Force comic book being published by Marvel.

The "X-Men" franchise has already used, or will use, a lot of characters from the X-Force comic books. As mentioned, Wolfsbane will debut in "The New Mutants" next year, along with a character named Cannonball played by "Stranger Things" star Charlie Heaton. Cannonball was a founding X-Force member in the comic books. 

But "Deadpool 2" won't be lacking. Most notably, Domino — another founding member — will make her screen debut played by "Atlanta" star Zazie Beetz. Lewis Tan will also play another X-Force original member Shatterstar.

More on Deadpool:

SEE ALSO: 6 of the weirdest superhero movies that almost got made, from James Cameron's creepy Spider-Man to Joss Whedon's sexist Wonder Woman

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Why so many fast food logos are red

The 10 most popular TV shows of the year so far, according to Nielsen ratings

$
0
0

roseanne

Several of the most popular TV series this year have been established favorites like "The Big Bang Theory," "The Voice," and "NCIS."

But the surprise hit of the year is ABC's reboot of "Roseanne," a program that has drawn many millions of viewers each week along with controversy from its firebrand, Trump-supporting lead, Roseanne Barr.

To find out which shows were the most popular this year so far, Nielsen estimated the average number of US viewers tuning in to regularly scheduled programming.

ABC's massive success with "Roseanne," along with CBS' high ratings across numerous shows on this list, demonstrates how broadcast networks remain the heavyweights in overall viewership — even in the age of streaming.

Here are the 10 most popular TV shows of 2018 so far, according to Nielsen's ratings:

SEE ALSO: The worst TV show of 2018 on each network — from Fox to Netflix to HBO

10. "The Voice" (NBC) — 12.5 million

Series run: 14 seasons (2011-present) 

Summary: "Singers square off for a coveted recording contract in this reality talent contest from the producers of 'Big Brother' and 'Survivor.' Four vocal coaches mentor the contestants."



9. "NCIS: New Orleans" (CBS) — 12.7 million average viewers

Series run: 4 seasons (2014-present) 

Summary: "A drama about the local field office that investigates criminal cases involving military personnel in The Big Easy, a city known for its music, entertainment and decadence."



8. "Blue Bloods" (CBS) — 13.2 million average viewers

Series run: 8 seasons (2010-present)

Summary: "A drama about a multi-generational family of cops dedicated to New York City law enforcement."



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

This is why Harry is called Prince of Wales, not England

$
0
0

prince harry

  • Prince Harry's official title is of Prince Henry of Wales.
  • The real Prince of Wales is his father, Prince Charles, who has held the title since 1958.
  • The title dates back to 1301, when it was created for Edward II, who was born in Caernarfon, Wales.
  • It is normally passed on when the existing Prince of Wales takes the throne.
  • There is no Prince of England, as the country's monarchs rule all of Great Britain. 

When Meghan Markle marries Prince Harry on Saturday, in keeping with tradition, she will be awarded the title Princess Henry of Wales— though it's one she's unlikely to ever use, as it dates back to days when royal spouses took their husband's name.

Prince Harry's name is actually Henry, and his full, official title is Prince Henry of Wales.

The official Prince of Wales is Prince Charles, who has held the title since 1958, but his sons, William and Harry, have also held versions of it. William was also Prince William of Wales until he married Kate Middleton and became the Duke of Cambridge.

Welsh princes used the title in the 12th and 13th centuries, according to Wales Online. It was then given by the English monarch after Edward I conquered Wales.

But the title in its existing format apparently dates back to 1301, when it was created for Edward I's eldest son, Edward II, who was born in Caernarfon, Wales, and became the first of the current line of Princes of Wales.

While Edward II did not pass the title on to his son Edward III — it instead went to his grandson — it has since been held by the eldest surviving son of most kings and queens. The title isn't automatically given but usually passed on when the existing Prince of Wales takes the throne.

Charles' investiture as Prince of Wales took place at Caernarfon Castle on July 1, 1969.

Though the British royal family doesn't really use last names, you may see Wales used as a surname from time to time, particularly for military purposes. Harry was known as Captain Wales during his time in the British army.

There is no Prince of England

Meanwhile, nobody has the title of Prince of England, because England does not have its own royal family.

The country's monarchs rule all of Great Britain and have done so since the Kingdom of England and the Kingdom of Scotland merged their crowns in May 1707.

More on the royal wedding:

SEE ALSO: The best photo from every single year of Prince Harry's remarkable life

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: What Trump University was really like — according to a former professor

All the TV shows that have been canceled in 2018

$
0
0

jane the virgin

As the year flies by, the list of canceled TV shows is piles up.

Networks are starting to make announcements in May, including Fox which canceled comedies "The Mick," "Brooklyn Nine Nine," and "The Last Man on Earth."

Amazon kicked off the year with a slew of cancellations, announcing the end of three quirky comedies, including the Golden Globe nominee "I Love Dick" and the comedian Tig Notaro's semi-autobiographical show, "One Mississippi." It canceled Golden Globe nominee "Mozart in the Jungle" in April, after four seasons, and recently canceled "Transparent," which will end after the upcoming fifth season.

Also in April, Netflix canceled the 90s coming-of-age comedy, "Everything Sucks," which came to the streaming service in February. 

There are many more cancellations to come, as networks announce the fate of newer shows as well as older ones.

We'll update this list as more are announced.

Here are all the shows that have been canceled this year, including those from networks and Netflix:

SEE ALSO: The worst TV show of every year since 2000, according to critics

Amazon



"Jean-Claude Van Johnson" — Amazon, one season



"I Love Dick" — Amazon, one season



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

'Deadpool 2' director opens up about the pressures of jumping into a hit franchise and what working with Ryan Reynolds was like

$
0
0

deadpool 2 fox

  • David Leitch, the director of "Deadpool 2," explains why he took on the movie following the exit of the first movie's director, Tim Miller.
  • Leitch also explains the pressures of working on a big studio movie that has a set release date in place before production even begins.
  • He also tells us why doing multiple test screenings made "Deadpool 2" better.

David Leitch has proved to be one of the top filmmakers in the action-movie genre with only two movies under his belt — but they certainly left an impression.

After building one of the most respected stuntman crews in Hollywood with Chad Stahelski in the early 2000s (they were called on to do all the big action movies like "The Bourne Legacy" and the "Expendables" movies), the two made their directorial debut with the surprise hit "John Wick" starring Keanu Reeves in 2014. It proved that they could do more than just come up with innovative fight sequences. Leitch then went on his own to make "Atomic Blonde" last year (Stahelski made "John Wick 2") and proved it wasn't a fluke. He could really direct. His stylized Cold War ultraviolent tale starring Charlize Theron wowed audiences.

Now he's hit the big time, having signed on to direct "Deadpool 2" (in theaters Friday) after the first movie's director, Tim Miller, exited the project. The sequel doesn't just deliver on bigger fights and jokes. With Leitch at the helm (and most likely a little more budget than the first one), and with Ryan Reynolds reprising the outlandish Marvel superhero, the movie feels bigger and more slick.

But Leitch isn't letting up. He's now prepping his next movie, "Hobbs and Shaw" starring Dwayne Johnson and Jason Statham, the first spin-off project from the "Fast and Furious" franchise.

Leitch sat down with Business Insider to talk about the pressures of jumping in a franchise like "Deadpool," how the looming predetermined movie release date brought lots of anxiety, and why test screenings really helped the movie.

Jason Guerrasio: Was getting on "Deadpool 2" similar to what you did with "Atomic Blonde" where you showed Charlize a kind of sizzle reel of your vision of the movie?

David Leitch: It was a completely different experience. I was actually working on "X-Force" with Ryan and Simon Kinberg, for a very short window of time. I had gotten the gig to develop it and I had just started working in that world, and then when this opportunity came up for "Deadpool" — "We're going to be doing 'Deadpool 2' first, would you be interested in directing?" — I was like [does a big exhale]. It was more an offer because we had a relationship.

It was a daunting decision to make because what I liked about the idea of "X-Force" was that I would be able to break new ground and create my own world. Here you have this franchise that's a global phenomenon and how are you going to meet the expectations of that? But because there's an element of "X-Force," really the introduction of these characters in this world, I sort of got to have my cake and eat it too, I guess. I felt there was enough room in the creative palette of what "Deadpool" can be for me to have an impact as a director but also stay true to what people love from the original.

Deadpool 2 20th Century FoxGuerrasio: And I'm assuming there was something on page already, so you could have some vision of where they wanted to go with the sequel when you came on?

Leitch: Well, no. [Laughs.] It was more of a pitch. They had gone down the road of trying to crack the story of what we wanted to do for number two, and when I came on board they were sort of piecing things together from those ideas. So I was loosely involved in the beginning of that process as I was coming on board. We put the movie out in note cards, as you do, and they went away and wrote it as I started to prep. We had a short time. We knew we were shooting in Vancouver, so we were scouting locations as the pages were coming in.

Guerrasio: So because of the speed this was very different from doing "John Wick" or "Atomic Blonde."

Leitch: It is. It's because of that release date. The release-date pressure.

Guerrasio: It's hanging over everyone's head.

Leitch: It's hanging in the air and every week you push principal photography it gives you less days on post. And on these big visual-effects movies, post is key. It's really hard with these release-date schedules.

Guerrasio: And with this movie in particular, because your main character is wearing a mask, post is crucial because if you guys think of a better line or joke, you can place it in with very little extra work.

Leitch: You want to allow for that process to take place. You need a window of creativity in post that you may not have in another movie. You have the luxury of putting words in the mask: making a joke more current, or work better, or help the narrative with a couple of lines. You want to maximize that.

Guerrasio: Were you aware of that need in post going into the project?

Leitch: I was pretty aware of it. I had never done it before, but talking to Ryan and his experience on the last film and understanding how post works, it's a great tool. But we needed time to experiment. And test jokes. We needed some sort of development period where we're not under the pressure of the release date.

Guerrasio: Did you test this movie with audiences a lot?

Leitch: Yeah. And I'm grateful we did. We were testing really high. We were testing in the 90s in our first test screening. It was crazy. On an independent film you get that score you pack up shop and polish the color and sound and ship the movie. But because we had the resources of the studio and we had gotten our first test out early we felt we could improve on this. We did test a couple of more times and we refined jokes and we trimmed scenes, and it was definitely progressive. Our scores were increasing all the way to the last one where we had this insane score. But it was all due to this refinement process in post.

Guerrasio: And not every movie can be pulled off this way.

Leitch: Well, you have some help with the character being in a mask.

Guerrasio: You can put in anything and it's going to match.

Leitch: Yeah. It helps.

Atomic Blonde 2 Jonathan Prime Focus Features finalGuerrasio: Compare Ryan to working with Keanu and Charlize.

Leitch: They are in the position they are in the world because there's a work ethic and a level of professionalism and then there's a talent. So those three things are the mix that makes them who they are. I had close collaborations with Keanu on "John Wick" in the beginning process. A lot in the script and who he is as a character, and then once he connected with the character and found his emotional way in then he let Chad and myself, the filmmakers, go and do what we had to do. Charlize was a producer on "Atomic" so she had a lot of say in the beginning as well, but once I gave her the pitch of making it a punk noir music mashup she got really excited, and once she found the character and trusted the vision she's all business. Ryan is a different process because he's a producer, writer, performance artist —

Guerrasio: Keeper of the Deadpool flame.

Leitch: Yeah. Head of marketing, not really, but you know what I mean. He's essential in marketing. So there's a big brand that he's shepherding so it was a little different process but it was really collaborative and really supportive. He was really supportive of me as a filmmaker to the studio. He wanted this to be a David Leitch film. It was a great experience.

Guerrasio: You've been working nonstop. Have you had a moment to take a breath and take in everything you've done in the past few years? Not just the movies, but the level of difficulty and scope in such a short time.

Leitch: I haven't. My close collaborator since "Atomic" has been my wife, Kelly McCormick, and we were kind of looking at each other last night and were like, "Are we ever going to take a break?" And we do find joy in the process. But, in my below-the-line career I didn't take breaks.

Guerrasio: But I hope you're doing things now that are more financially satisfying than when you were doing stunt work.

Leitch: [Laughs.] Granted, this is a Champagne problem. But it's just that the material has spoken to us and we see a path in. That's so rare that I want to grab it. I know we're now jumping into "Hobbs and Shaw" really quickly, but I'm not daunted by it.

SEE ALSO: "Solo" is the worst "Star Wars" movie since "Attack of the Clones," according to critics

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: What will probably happen with the North and South Korean peace treaty

'Star Wars' screenwriter is against using a 'Guardians of the Galaxy' tone: 'To me, it isn’t what "Star Wars" is'

$
0
0

han solo trailer

  • Veteran "Star Wars" screenwriter Lawrence Kasdan told Indiewire that he doesn't think the franchise is ready for the tone of movies like "Guardians of the Galaxy."
  • "To me, it isn’t what 'Star Wars' is," he said. 
  • Fired directors Phil Lord and Chris Miller reportedly wanted a "Guardians of the Galaxy" vibe for "Solo: A Star Wars Story" before Ron Howard replaced them.

 

Lawrence Kasdan, a longtime screenwriter for the "Star Wars" saga, doesn't think the franchise is ready for a "Guardians of the Galaxy" tone.

Kasdan is a veteran of the "Star Wars" series, having co-written numerous movies in the franchise including "The Empire Strikes Back" and next week's "Solo: A Star Wars Story."

In an interview with Indiewire, Kasdan admitted that he doesn't think the comedy of Marvel Cinematic Universe movies like "Guardians of the Galaxy" and "Thor: Ragnarok" reflects the type of comedy of "Star Wars."  

"It may be that the times and the zeitgeist dictate that at some point," Kasdan told Indiewire. "But we’re not at that point, in my mind. And look, I’m about through with 'Star Wars,' so maybe other people [involved in the franchise] will feel differently. But, I love ‘Guardians of the Galaxy,’ and I like that kind of movie. To me, it isn’t what 'Star Wars' is."

A "Guardians of the Galaxy" vibe is reportedly what fired "Solo" directors Phil Lord and Chris Miller were originally aiming for before they left the project over creative differences and Ron Howard replaced them, according to The Wall Street Journal.

"Ron wanted to go back to the spirit of the original trilogy, while Phil and Chris were looking forward to something new, more like 'Guardians of the Galaxy,'" a person close to the "Solo" production told the Journal.

"Solo" comes to theaters May 25, but it's currently the worst-reviewed "Star Wars" movie since 2002's "Attack of the Clones."

SEE ALSO: 'Solo' is the worst 'Star Wars' movie since 'Attack of the Clones,' according to critics

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: What Trump University was really like — according to a former professor


YouTube's new subscription plans are a bad deal if you just want to watch videos (GOOG)

$
0
0

smartphone taking pictures

  • YouTube announced two new services on Thursday that will replace its paid YouTube Red service. 
  • YouTube Music Premium will be a music streaming service and will compete with Spotify and Apple Music. 
  • YouTube Premium includes YouTube Music, as well as ad-free video and video downloads. 
  • But there's no option just for video-based benefits, so you'll have to pay for YouTube Music even if you only want the premium video plan.

 

YouTube announced on Thursday that it's restructuring its paid YouTube Red service into two new services that are launching on May 22, including YouTube Music Premium and YouTube Premium.  

YouTube Music Premium offers ad-free music, listening in the background (without having to be in the app to listen), and music downloads for $10/month.

YouTube Premium offers everything from YouTube Music Premium, but with ad-free video, playing videos in the background without having to be in the app, video downloads, and access to YouTube originals for $12/month.

Here's a handy chart that makes what each plan offers clear:

youtube premium chart 800x600

But what if you already have a music streaming service, and you just want the video-based benefits of YouTube Premium, like ad-free video and video downloads?

Unfortunately, there's no choice for you. 

Missing in YouTube's new plan is a video-only option that costs less than the YouTube Premium service for those who just want the video-based benefits of YouTube's Premium plan, like ad-free viewing and — I suppose — YouTube Originals like Cobra Kai. To get those benefits, you have to sign up for the YouTube Premium service, where you're also paying for YouTube's new Music service. 

That's a bad deal if you already subscribe to a music streaming service like Spotify or Apple Music and you're happy with it. If all you want are the video-based benefits of YouTube Premium, you'd essentially be paying $10/month for the music service on top of what you pay for your current music streaming service, and $2/month for what you actually want. 

With that said, it's unlikely that the video-based benefits are worth $2/month to YouTube. Those benefits are surely subsidized by being bundled with YouTube's Music service. It's hard to estimate what a video-only option would cost on its own. Either way, there's no option for it!

You could always give YouTube Music a shot and switch over if you prefer it to your current music streaming service. It'll offer its own playlists, recommendations based on your listening history, and ad-free access to music videos.

youtube music on android

But I'd assume that YouTube Music would have to be as good or better than your current music streaming service to get you to switch. 

To be fair, I haven't tried YouTube's new music service, and it could be very good. It could be a great option if you don't already use a music streaming service like Spotify or Apple Music, or if your source of music is YouTube. And I'll certainly give it a shot when it launches on May 22. Otherwise, in trying to become a music streaming service, YouTube seems to have forgotten that it's also a place to watch videos.

SEE ALSO: YouTube is killing one of the best parts of Google’s music streaming service

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: How to get a billion views on YouTube

Here's exactly what time the Queen, royal family, Harry, and Meghan will arrive at Windsor Castle for the royal wedding on Saturday

$
0
0

queen elizabeth fuschia

  • The final countdown is on to Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's royal wedding this Saturday, May 19.
  • Kensington Palace has detailed the exact timings of the arrivals of members of the public, wedding guests, and the royal family.
  • Her Majesty the Queen will be the last of the royals to arrive. 

The world is giddy with excitement in the final countdown to Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's royal wedding this Saturday, May 19 — and Kensington Palace has detailed the exact timings of the arrivals of each member of the wedding party.

The wedding officially begins at 12 p.m. local time, but most channels broadcasting the big day will begin live coverage of the arrivals of the members of public, guests, and royal family hours before.

Here's a rundown of exactly what time people are arriving, according to a notice issued by the palace:

the royal wedding schedule

Friday May 19

On the eve of her wedding day, Meghan Markle, accompanied by her mother Doria Ragland, will head to the $2,000 per night Cliveden House Hotel. The pair are expected to arrive in the early evening. Meanwhile, Harry and the Duke of Cambridge will head to Coworth Park hotel.

Saturday May 19

9 a.m.

The 1,200 members of the public who were invited to watch the wedding from inside the grounds of Windsor Castle begin to arrive.

9.30 a.m. — 11 a.m.

The 600 guests invited to the ceremony at St George's Chapel begin to arrive by coach at the castle’s Round Tower, from where they will walk to the chapel, entering through the South Door.

11.20 a.m.

Members of the royal family begin to arrive — some walking, some in cars — and they will all enter the chapel through the Galilee Porch.

Meanwhile, Markle and her mother will depart the Cliveden House Hotel in a car that will pass along the Long Walk, providing onlookers with a glimpse of the bride. The car will drop Ragland at the castle from where she will head on to the chapel, while Markle will be joined by some of her bridesmaids and page boys before continuing on to the church.

11.30 a.m.

Prince Harry and brother and best man William arrive at St George's Chapel around 10 minutes after the royal family begin arriving at the chapel, according to Reuters, most likely on foot, and will enter via the West Steps. The pair will have greeted some of the 200 charity representatives gathered in the Horseshoe Cloister at the bottom of the steps that were also invited into the castle's grounds.

Queen Elizabeth II will be the last member of the royal family to arrive.

Finally, Markle will arrive at the church and also enter via the West Steps.

Meghan Markle Prince Harry

12 p.m.

The ceremony begins with a service conducted by David Conner, the Dean of Windsor. Justin Welby, the Archbishop of Canterbury, will officiate as the couple make their vows.

1 p.m.

The newly married couple will process out of the chapel and acknowledge the 200 charity representatives. They will then embark on a carriage procession through Windsor Town, waved off by their close family members from the West Steps. The carriage procession is expected to last just under 25 minutes.

Meanwhile, all members of the congregation will start heading towards the reception at St George's Hall, which is hosted by Her Majesty the Queen.

Around 200 of the guests have also been invited to a more intimate evening reception at Frogmore House, hosted by Prince Charles.

The last glimpse the public will have of Harry and Meghan will be their departure from Windsor Castle to the evening reception.

Photographer Alexi Lubomirski is charged with taking all of the formal photographs of the wedding.

Find out how you can watch the royal wedding wherever in the world you are here.

SEE ALSO: Here's what time Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's royal wedding will start where you live — and how to watch it

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Why children write their letters backwards

Call of Duty took a note from Fortnite's playbook and made its own battle royale mode

$
0
0

Call of Duty, Call of Duty Black Ops 4, battle royale

  • Activision teased several new additions to the first person shooter series "Call of Duty" this morning, with the reveal of the first gameplay trailer for "Call of Duty: Black Ops 4."
  • Perhaps the most highly-anticipated announcement was Activision's addition of a Fortnite-style battle royale mode to the game.
  • Call of Duty: Black Ops 4 will be released in October this year.


The creators of "Call of Duty: Black Ops 4" confirmed today that the game — the latest in the first-person military-style shooter series, slated to release in October — will include a battle-royale mode similar to "Fortnite: Battle Royale."

"Blackout" mode will pit players against each other on what "CoD" developer David Vonderhaar called the biggest map ever featured in a "Call of Duty" game, where they must fight to be the last man standing, with the help of land, sea and air vehicles, according to Activision.

"We're bringing to bear 10 years worth of Black Ops features. That's your favorite characters, your favorite weapons, and the most iconic parts of your favorite maps. We're putting them all in one place," said Vonderhaar, speaking at a live-streamed "community event" in Los Angeles to announce the news.

Black Ops is the first of several upcoming video games expected to adopt the battle royale style, first popularized by "PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds," then catapulted into stratospheric success by "Fortnite: Battle Royale."

While Activision did not reveal official gameplay footage for Blackout mode, promotional footage played at Thursday's event featured memorable characters like CIA Special Agent Jason Hudson, Captain Viktor Reznov of the Red Army and Master Sergeant Frank Woods.

Activision also showed this stylized rendering of the massive map that players will be dropped into during each match:

Black Ops 4, Call of duty Black ops 4, battle royale mode

The "Black Ops" team also confirmed suspicions that this year's installment would not include a single-player campaign, instead opting to inject more story aspects into the classic multiplayer. The game will also include two new zombie-hunting modes upon release, including "Voyage of Despair," set on a Titanic-inspired cruise ship that experiences a zombie outbreak at sea, and "IX," which depicts Roman Colosseum-style fighting, except...with zombies.

Here's the trailer for the new Blackout mode in "Call of Duty: Black Ops 4":

And here's the full trailer for the classic multiplayer mode in "Call of Duty: Black Ops 4":

You can also watch the full community event here:

 

SEE ALSO: It sounds like this year's 'Call of Duty' is getting some major changes, including a 'Fortnite'-inspired 'Battle Royale' mode — here's what we know so far

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Google's new AI can impersonate a human to schedule appointments and make reservations

No, Melania Trump is not a Russian spy

$
0
0

melania trump russia vladimir putin

  • There's a wild conspiracy theory that first lady Melania Trump is a Russian spy.
  • The only "evidence" internet commenters seem to have is that she speaks six languages and met Russian Vladimir Putin at the G-20 Summit last year.

There's an outlandish conspiracy theory floating around that first lady Melania Trump is really a Russian spy.

As "evidence," internet commenters point to a chat she had with Russian President Vladimir Putin at a dinner for last year's G-20 Summit.

While Trump doesn't speak Russian, she does know English, French, German, Italian, and Serbian, in addition to her native Slovenian — more languages than any previous American first lady.

Many saw her engaged in conversation at dinner with Putin, and reports described the two as friendly during the meal.

But there is no proof that Trump and Putin have had any other interaction, and no reason to think she has performed any work as a Russian spy beyond the occasional satire piece.

Melania Trump and Vladimir Putin

Trump was born and raised in Slovenia before she moved to New York in 1996 when she was 26. She still has a Slovenian accent, which is different from a Russian accent.

Slovenia is a former Soviet Republic that broke from the USSR in 1989, when its people rose up to push for reform, becoming a parliamentary democracy. Today, the country is part of the European Union and NATO.

This isn't the first conspiracy theory about the first lady. Since the 2016 presidential campaign season, she's been accused of having a body double and not living in the White House, both claims her staff have flatly denied.

The slew of similarly shaky conspiracy theories seem to thrive on the first lady's private, steely public persona.

But Trump is slowly stepping into the spotlight as she becomes a more visible figure in her husband's administration, and people who have close personal relationships with her describe her personality very differently.

French first lady Brigitte Macron said she gets along well with Trump, whom she called "really fun".

"We have the same humor; we both laugh a lot," Macron said in April. "She is a woman who has a lot of character but who is keen to hide it. She laughs very easily about everything, but she shows it less than me."

SEE ALSO: Melania Trump has a Secret Service agent who looks strikingly similar to her — and it's fueling a wild conspiracy theory

DON'T MISS: Incredible facts about Melania Trump that show she's completely unlike any other first lady

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Ian Bremmer: Why Nikki Haley is fighting Trump over Russia

Everything we know about the mysterious $1.5 million apartment Melania Trump owns in Trump Tower

$
0
0

melania trump apartment trump tower

On Wednesday, the Office of Government Ethics released President Donald Trump's financial disclosure form for 2018.

While it revealed much about Trump's finances, including the reimbursement of the hush money Trump lawyer Michael Cohen paid Stormy Daniels, the form also provided an insight into first lady Melania Trump's income.

Two of her disclosures in the report were related to a one-bed, 1.5-bath apartment in Trump Tower in Manhattan that Melania bought from the building's condo board for almost $1.5 million in January 2016, according to The Real Deal and City Realty.

Here is everything we know about the mysterious apartment Melania owns in Trump Tower.

SEE ALSO: A look inside the daily routine of first lady Melania Trump, who eats 7 pieces of fruit a day, is a 'full-time mom', and is finally stepping into the spotlight as first lady

DON'T MISS: We learned how much money Melania Trump made in 2017 from her husband's financial disclosure form

Located on Fifth Avenue in Midtown Manhattan, Trump Tower's 68 floors contain 263 apartments.

Source: Trump International Realty



On the 26th floor was President Trump's office for the Trump Organization. He reportedly had a private elevator that could whisk him from his office to his penthouse.

Source: Town & Country



The bottom floors feature office, dining, and retail space, while condominiums fill floors 30-68.

Source: Trump International Realty



See the rest of the story at Business Insider
Viewing all 103018 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images