Quantcast
Channel: Business Insider
Viewing all 103217 articles
Browse latest View live

Ukrainian Politician Blasts Mila Kunis Using Anti-Semitic Slur—Here's Today's Buzz

$
0
0

Mila Kunis

  • Ukrainian politician Igor Miroshnichenko used an anti-semitic slur in a Facebook rant about Mila Kunis, writing that Mila (a Jew who was born in the Ukraine) is not a true Ukrainian because she's a "zhydovka" ... a word that has been used as a slur meaning "dirty Jewess" since the Holocaust. Well, The Simon Wiesenthal Center in Los Angeles, a global Jewish human rights organization, has come to Kunis' defense in a letter to the Ukrainian prime minister expressing their "outrage and indignation" and say Kunis is owed an apology.
  • Former Missouri roadworker Tate Stevens just won the second season of "X Factor" — and a $5 million recording contract.
  • Jersey Shore bid farewell to Snooki and the gang last night as it aired its last episode ever Thursday evening.
  • Ridley Scott, who hasn't directed for TV since the 1960s, has signed on to direct a Showtime pilot for hour-long drama "The Vatican"— "a provocative contemporary genre thriller about spirituality, power and politics set against the modern-day political machinations within the Catholic church."
  • 31-year-old "Boy Meets World" Danielle Fishel (aka Topanga) announced Wednesday that she has finally completed college. "I'm officially a college graduate," she wrote on her Tumblr. “I took my last two undergraduate finals today and I am so happy, relieved, and proud.” The actress went back to school four years ago at the age of 27, and despite her worries about being the “old lady in class,” she persevered and did well enough in math to become a tutor. “And that is how I met my fiancé,” she adds.
  • Despite Charlie Sheen's $100,000 check to help his "Scary Movie 5: co-star Lindsay Lohan pay off the IRS, the actress refused to kiss Sheen during filming because she "didn't trust" his mouth.
  • Watch Kim Kardashian (not playing herself) in the first trailer for Tyler Perry's new "Temptation: Confessions of a Marriage Counselor." The movie, which opens in March, is described as “a bold exploration of the intrigue and perils of infidelity.”
  • "Bridesmaids" and "Pitch Perfect" star Rebel Wilson will host the MTV Movie Awards in April. The announcement comes as the actress has landed on a several end-of-the-year lists, including Entertainment Weekly’s “2012 Top Entertainers.” Watch the first promo video below: 
        

Get More: MTV Movie Awards 

SEE ALSO: The best & worst performances by the same actor in 2012 >

Please follow The Wire on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »




The 10 Highest-Grossing Concert Tours Of The Year

$
0
0

madonna

Taylor Swift may be atop the Billboard charts right now; however, she didn't have the top-earning concert tour for the year. 

Billboard broke down the highest-grossing tours for 2012 and though Swift sold out her 21 shows, the earnings weren't enough to beat out the likes of Barbra Streisand, Lady Gaga, and Madonna.

See which artists raked in the most, how many fans showed up, and who worked the most shows. 

Check out the top 10 below: 

10. ANDRE RIEU
Total Gross: $46.8 million
Total Attendance: 490,165
Number of Shows: 99 

9. JAY-Z & KANYE WEST
Total Gross: $47 million
Total Attendance: 371,777
Number of Shows: 31

kanye west jay-z

8. VAN HALEN
Total Gross: $54.4 million
Total Attendance: 522,296
Number of Shows: 46

7. KENNY CHESNEY & TIM McGRAW
Total Gross: $96.5 million
Total Attendance: 1,085,382
Number of Shows: 23

6. LADY GAGA
Total Gross: $124.9 million
Total Attendance: 1,111,099
Number of Shows: 65

lady-gaga-grammy

5. COLDPLAY
Total Gross: $147.3 million
Total Attendance: 1,811,787
Number of Shows: 67 

4. MICHAEL JACKSON THE IMMORTAL WORLD TOUR (by Cirque Du Soleil)
Total Gross: $147.3 million
Total Attendance: 1,374,482
Number of Shows: 183

3. ROGER WATERS
Total Gross: $186.5 million
Total Attendance: 1,680,042
Number of Shows: 72 

2. BRUCE SPRINGSTEEN & THE E STREET BAND
Total Gross: $199.4 million
Total Attendance: 2,165,925
Number of Shows: 72

Bruce Spingsteen

1. MADONNA
Total Gross: $228.4 million
Total Attendance: 1,635,176
Number of Shows: 72

Want to see where Taylor Swift fell on the roundup? Check out the full list at Billboard >

SEE ALSO: The best and worst acting performances of 2012 >

Please follow The Wire on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »



ENDING TODAY: Subscribe To A Newsletter For A Chance To Win An iPad Mini

$
0
0

ipadmini

Just in time for the holidays we're giving you have a chance to win an iPad mini.  Become a newsletter subscriber now and you'll have a chance to win Apple's latest tablet.  If you're the lucky winner you will have all of these great features at your finger tips and can stock up on our favorite iPad mini apps.  Click below to enter and to start receiving one or more of our newsletters to keep up to date with the news you need to know.

Entry deadline is today, December 21.

As a newsletter subscriber, you'll get daily updates and alerts on topics that matter most to you. You must subscribe to at least one newsletter to be eligible, so if you have not already, be sure to choose one or more newsletters before submitting your entry.

CLICK HERE TO ENTER >

On or before December 21, 2012, we'll announce the lucky winner.

You must be a legal resident of the U.S. and a newsletter subscriber to win.

Please follow Business Insider on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »



BMG Purchases Virgin's HUGE Song Vault, Rights To Nirvana & Iggy Pop

$
0
0

Nirvana, Kurt Cobain, grunge, 90s

The world's fourth-largest music publishing company just got a little bit bigger.

Bertelsmann Music Group (BMG) has signed a deal to gain rights to selected music catalogs from Virgin Music Publishing, Famous U.K. Music Publishing, and titles from Sony/ATV and EMI Music.

As a result, BMG now has access to Virgin's some 21,000 song catalog featuring Nirvana, Duffy, and Iggy Pop. 

The deal is a result of Sony/ATV's earlier $2.2 billion purchase of EMI's publishing segment this summer

Though specific monetary details of the transaction haven't been revealed, it's thought the purchase is in the area of $90 million.

Back in September, The Hollywood Reporter reported Sony/ATV Music Publishing was auctioning off the rights to Virgin's music catalog for an estimated $150 million.

SEE ALSO: The highest-grossing concert tours of the year >

Please follow The Wire on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »



'Pi' To 'Lincoln' To 'On the Road': How Hollywood Adapted Unadaptable Books For The Screen

$
0
0

cloud atlasThe Best Adapted Screenplay category is always the more crowded and competitive of the Oscar writing categories, but this year it feels as if the contenders should be judged the same way diving competitions are: with one score for how artful the film is, the other for the degree of difficulty.

If that were the case, those D.D. scores would be off the charts for a few of this year's adaptations, because a number of the year's most notable films come from books that seem all but unfilmable.

In fact, "Cloud Atlas" author David Mitchell has used exactly that word, unfilmable, to describe his 550-page novel, which tells six different stories from six different eras in a mirror-image construction that begins in the 19th century, progresses to the distant future, then reverses course and ends on the same story with which it began.

But Andy and Lana Wachowski and Tom Tykwer, holed up in a rented Costa Rican house, turned those stories into color-coded index cards and rearranged them in countless ways until they figured out how to turn that unfilmable novel into an enormous, messy, exhilarating film, with help from the likes of Tom Hanks and Halle Berry in multiple roles.

"Lincoln" screenwriter Tony Kusher took Doris Keans Goodwin's "Team of Rivals" -- a book about Abraham Lincoln in which less than five pages deal with the passage of the 13th Amendment -- and turned it into a two-and-a-half hour film about that legislative struggle.

Peter Jackson, Fran Walsh, Philippa Boyens and Guillermo del Toro started with "The Hobbit," a 300-page children's book, and somehow pumped it up into a three-part big-budget extravaganza à la the "Lord of the Rings" trilogy, another three-part Jackson epic based on a far meatier book.

And Tom Stoppard wrestled the 800-plus pages of "Anna Karenina" into a script sturdy enough to withstand director Joe Wright's last-minute decision to stage the whole thing in a decrepit theater, while John McLaughlin took a non-fiction book about the making of Alfred Hitchcock's "Psycho" and turned it into an entertaining yarn leagues removed from the style of the original.

A few more case studies from a year of high degree-of-difficulty adaptations:

Life of PiSLICE OF "PI"

When David Magee first read "Life of Pi," he was working on "Finding Neverland" with director Mark Forster. He recommended the book to Forster but had a ready answer when the director asked if it would make a good film: No, it's too difficult to adapt. "It's a great book," he thought. "But I don't think it's a movie."

"And I really didn't give it much more thought than that," said Magee, who worried that the novel had insurmountable story obstacles, as well as the technical challenge of putting a boy and a tiger together in a lifeboat.

A decade later, with CG imagery improved to the point where the film was technically possible, Magee tackled the novel with director Lee.

"The first act particularly took a long time," he said of the section in the novel in which the character of Pi tells the story of his childhood. "We were eliminating characters, we were combining characters, and a lot of the challenge was finding the right tone for that first act so that you didn't feel like you were sitting down to a class in comparative religion.

"For several months I tried different structures, different rhythms, and it wasn't until Ang and I went on a research trip to India, which is a fantastical place, that Ang said to me, 'It's kind of like an adult telling a great yarn, a great children's adventure story.' We had been dancing around that idea for weeks, but when he said it that time it registered to me, and I started writing the first monologue while we were driving."

Then there was the second act. It took countless drafts for Magee and Lee to crack the challenge of finding the appropriate tone, figuring out what to do with a long act in which the main character is adrift on a boat with only a Bengal tiger named Richard Parker as a companion.

Magee said he tried to use as little dialogue as possible to emphasize its stark difference from the third act, which he said "is very much spoken ... and in some ways calls into question everything that preceded it. "We tried to contrast it as much as possible, so it felt like two different stories. You had to decide: Do you believe the visual story you experienced, or the story you're told?"

On the Road movie poster"ROAD" TRIP

"I think I might have been the eighth writer that had been hired to do an adaptation of 'On the Road,'" Jose Rivera told TheWrap. But unlike the first seven -- which included Francis Ford Coppola and his son Roman, as well as Michael Herr, Barry Gifford and Russell Banks -- Rivera's version actually made it to the screen, in a film directed by Walter Salles and starring Garrett Hedlund, Kristen Stewart and Sam Riley.

"It's was a tough one, because 'On the Road' is a novel full of digressions and subplots and secondary characters, including some very one-dimensional women characters," said Rivera, a playwright whose previous film was Salles' "The Motorcycle Diaries."

"But I had a couple of advantages. One was I wasn't one of those people whose life was changed by the book. So I wasn't in thrall to the book, and I wasn't treating it like sacred territory. In a way, I treated it almost like a standard buddy film about two men on the road, as opposed to kind of worshipping the icons that were the beat writers."

Rivera and Salles made a point of adapting the original, "scroll version" of "On the Road," which he said is "far edgier and sexier" than the bowdlerized version that was initially published.

But he still had to find a movie-friendly structure in a book that really didn't have one—so he focused on a section in which the main characters, Dean Moriarty and Sal Paradise, spend some debauched time south of the border.

"Everything accelerated in that section,” he told TheWrap. “They go crazier, and it's also the biggest crisis of their friendship. So when I read the Mexico section I thought, that needs to be the third act, and we'll just build the other two acts around that."

Still, he admitted, it took about 40 drafts to structure the screenplay—and even after the film's Cannes debut, Salles went back to re-edit the film and remove a number of scenes, many of which were improvisations that had not been in Rivera's script.

Quartet movie posterFOUR'S A CROWD

Ronald Harwood learned that the theater and the cinema are vastly different mediums the first time he adapted one of his plays to the big screen. The play was "The Dresser," a 1980 drama that was turned into a 1983 movie and for which he received an Oscar nomination. He adapted it almost intact, and later had an enlightening encounter with director Billy Wilder.

"He said to me, 'That film of yours, 'The Dresser,' it's a terrible film," Harwood told TheWrap. "'I should know, I've seen it six times.' It was the greatest compliment I've ever been paid. And he was right."

Theater, Harwood said he has since learned, "is an entirely different way of telling a story. The theater is a medium of language: Words matter in the theater. In the movies the images matter, it's self-evident. So you have to abandon the play, in a way, but try and preserve the heart of it. Your instinct might be to use as much as possible of the original play, but I think it should be to use as little as possible, in terms of dialogue and that."

For "Quartet," that meant losing the opening of the play, which he called "one of my favorite openings to anything I've ever written." In the play, the action begins in a home for elderly musicians, with one aging but randy opera singer watching a former diva who can't hear him because she has headphones on. "May I tell you, Cissy," he announces, "that you have the most beautiful tits I've ever seen."

"I loved that line, and it got a huge laugh wherever it's been played," Harwood said. "It's still in the film, but we couldn't open with that, unfortunately. We had to set it up differently."


SEE ALSO: Donald Trump Wins $5M Legal Victory Over Miss USA Who Called Contest Fake

Please follow The Wire on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »



PSY's 'Gangnam Style' Makes YouTube History With 1 Billion Views

$
0
0

psy gangnam style 1 billion

As predicted, Psy's addictive "Gangnam Style" trotted past the one billion mark before noon today on YouTube.

The achievement makes it the first on the video-streaming site to hit that historic landmark

To commemorate the achievement YouTube has placed a dancing caricature of the singer next to his current number of views.

YouTube analytics site ChannelMeter gathered together a few facts on Psy's road to one billion views.

  • The video had its most views ever October 27 gaining 34.5 million views. 
  • OfficialPSY, the Korean pop singer's YouTube channel, went from being ranked 12,907 at the debut of his "Gangnam Style" video to 28th. 
  • "Gangnam Style" averages more than 38,000 likes per day. (Currently it has more than 6 million.)

Incredibly, it's only taken a little over five months for the video to hit the landmark number. The road to the first 100 million views was a little slow; however, after that, "Gangnam" has been gaining an average of 200 million views per month!

Take a look at Psy's incredibly fast road to 1 billion views below:

gangnam style views youtube

SEE ALSO: The 10 highest-grossing concert tours of the year >

Want more PSY?

See how PSY went from K-Pop sensation to international infatuation >

Here's what "Gangnam Style" means in English >

Find out everything you need to know about PSY >

Learn how to do the "Gangnam Style" dance >

Please follow The Wire on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »



HOUSE OF THE DAY: Korean Pop Star Psy Picks Up A $1.25 Million Los Angeles Condo

$
0
0

psy apartment

Korean pop star Psy's viral "Gangnam Style" music video hit one billion views on YouTube today, and it seems like the celebrity is marking the occasion with a major real estate purchase.

TMZ reports that Psy just bought a two-bedroom condo on Wilshire Boulevard in Los Angeles, which had been listed for $1.25 million.

Both Curbed LA and celebrity real estate blogger The Real Estalker say this unit in Westwood's Blair House is the correct listing. It's a spacious apartment, but if Psy's interior design taste is half as flamboyant as his fashion sense, we have a feeling this place will soon be popping with color and sparkle.

Jane Siegal Properties had the listing.

Psy's new building is located on Wilshire Boulevard, in the heart of Los Angeles.



The apartment has 2,700 square feet of living space, and two bedrooms.



Right now it looks pretty sparse. TMZ says Psy plans to completely remodel.



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

Please follow The Life on Twitter and Facebook.



Tiny Co-Star From 'Gangnam Style' Stars In Hilarious Korean Wonton Commericial


The 19 Worst Plot Holes In Blockbuster Movies

$
0
0

armageddon

Movies like "Batman Begins," "Jurassic Park" and "Mean Girls" enthralled audiences worldwide and gained huge fan followings. 

But they also have notable plot holes. While most movies are supposed to be fantasies, some of the events just don't make sense. 

A recent Reddit thread explored some of the worst oversights. 

The one in "Armageddon" was pointed out by star Ben Affleck, while another might change your view on the "Santa Claus" series. 

"In Jurassic Park, they restart the Park's systems in an attempt to get the fences back online"

"It works but they have to restart the power. Samuel L. Jackson leaves to go do that. He is gone for too long, so Laura Dern decides she needs to go do it. Muldoon gets a shotgun and goes with her. Why didn't you take a gun and go with Samuel L. Jackson?! They just let him get eaten."

Source: Reddit



"In 'Toy Story," Buzz believed he was a space ranger and not a toy."

"So how did he know how to freeze when humans were around?" 

Source: Reddit



"In Mean Girls, everyone thinks Cady made the Burn Book."

"But how did she get all those pictures of everyone if she was a new student?"

Source: Reddit



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

Please follow The Wire on Twitter and Facebook.



A Guide To 2012's Worst Words

$
0
0

Artisanal

Every year is chock-full of words, and we have feelings about those words. We live with them, we love them, we let them roll around in our mouths, and we express them. We think about them and spit them out, vehemently, when we are angry. We grow tired of them, we dislike some on sight, and we drop them, eventually, and move on to hate others. Many times, we use the same words year after year, and sometimes, we rail on those words (see our continued excoriation of poor old moist. What did moist ever do to any of us?).

There are words, phrases, and coinages that end up marking each year — some old, some new. There are the long-existing words that have shifted in meaning, or become popularized because of a public usage, like malarkey, as invoked by Joe Biden in his vice presidential debate with Paul Ryan in the fall. And there are the ones we create, like Romneyshambles, or mansplain. Or maybe the coinage enters our consciousness because of a news story, event, or person (fiscal cliff, Kony). However we meet them, we use them in all sorts of ways, and there are also all sorts of ways in which we can dislike them: their sound, what they remind us of, what they make us think, their actual meaning, their overuse, their descent into meaninglessness, and so on.

But, look, the list that follows, comprising our year in worst words, isn't just about word-hating. There were also words and phrases and silly and serious expressions we loved! Fine, they're not on the list, but we'll briefly recognize a few of them here: Like, for instance, malarkeySnor'eastercane (in name if not in deed). "Très Brooklyn," maybe it was très terrible, but it was fun, too, no? Oui! And underbrag, a word with a special place in my heart, even if it did arise on these very pages, which may make this statement an unfortunate brag-brag (I promise, I wrote it while covered in Doritos crumbs after a brutal night at a holiday party).

Of course, you may hate any and all of those words and others; that is your prerogative. But agree with me on this: There is no better way for a semantic-minded person to remember the year than with a list of the words we used and saw and heard, those words we'd just as soon never write or see or hear spoken again.

Note: We mean no offense to these words, even when we call them despicable. One woman's worst word might be another's best. Bad words are a matter of opinion, and each is entitled to his own. And sometimes by hating a word, you—strangely—grow to love it. Here, with the help of some friends, is our semantic walk through 2012.

Actually. Adverb, mostly. When Sarah Miller declared war on literally over at The Awl, I argued that actually was worse, the "talk to the hand of the adverb community," or "the word that you use when you're actually saying, 'You are wrong, and I am right, and you are at least a little bit of an idiot.'" Actually, I still agree with that. 

Artisanal. Adjective. I got rid of Artisanal this May, or at least I tried to, and I wrote him an obituary I thought he would appreciate—"Artisanal, a word that fought early in his career to ensure recognition of craftsmen for their important contributions to society before later being drafted into the creation of a worldwide gourmet branding glut, died Wednesday at his brownstone in Brooklyn overlooking a small gourmet mayonnaise store. At best estimates, he was approximately 474 years old." And yet ... he has the audacity to continue to pop up in cubicles. As related to NASA. On The Simpsons. In, yes, mayo. On pizza crusts, in another word form. Everywhere, including even in water. He is us and we are he. Like a character in a soap opera who turns out to have been living in a cave and plotting his revenge the whole time that his lover and arch nemesis thought he'd been "taken care of" by a biker gang off the coast of Newfoundland, Artisanal is not going away anytime soon, I fear. He'll probably live forever.

Baby BumpHorrid compound noun. I just hate this twee term, I really do, which manages to be both infantalizing and depersonalizing to both baby bump and baby carrier. It's not a bump; that human woman is pregnant. (See T for more on twee).

Brogrammer. Noun. Our tech writer Rebecca Greenfield offers up her opinion on this one, which she sees as an issue with meaning rather than the specific formulation of letters: "The word itself isn't so horrible, though we're starting to get a little tired of the portmanteaux [see for more on that]," she says. "But it describes the rise of a darker side of tech nerdism that makes us sad. While the phenomenon might not be as widespread as certain reports suggest, over the last year we've seen instances of sexism come out of that world that lead us to believe at least some Silicon Valley coders fall under this fratty programmer umbrella. Like, all the times tech companies have used 'bikini babes' in professional settings. Come on, guys."

Butt-chugging. Whatever you want it to be, really. This one from language columnist and linguist Ben Zimmer, who wrote in an email, "My candidate for worst word of the year is butt-chugging. It’s an unpleasant term for an unpleasant practice, which came to light when a member of the University of Tennessee’s Pi Kappa Alpha fraternity was hospitalized for alcohol poisoning." He explains further of this horrible term and its horrible logistical realities, "Reports said he had engaged in an alcohol enema, known in frat circles as butt-chugging. The student, through his lawyer, denied the butt-chugging charge, but in so doing made the slang term national news. I hope I never have to hear it again." 

Curate. Verb. "I must say that no Internet buzzword irked me more this year than curate," explains The Atlantic Wire's Richard Lawson. "It's a reappropriated term that used to mean something good — putting lovely and interesting things in a museum! — but now denotes a technique of cobbling together preexisting web content and sharing it with readers/followers/whomever. In other words, linking to things. It's an awfully highfalutin term for something that many of us do every day, on Facebook and Twitter. Sharing links isn't some special skill or trade, but self-described curators, who rose to great power in 2012, are effectively asserting that it is."

Curvy. Adjective to describe female bodies. As writer and editor Lauren Bans recently pointed out in New York's The Cut, we appear to be at peak curviness, that is, in terms of using this word to describe the female form, whatever that form might be. Has curvy lost all meaning, and if it has, is this a bad thing? (Jezebel's Tracy Moore thinks it is a good thing, in fact.) I agree with Bans that curvy, whether celebratory or not, is falling into a kind of overused meaninglessness, which says more about editors and writers being a wee bit lazy and less about the word itself. But also, does one really need to tack such a word onto a photo of a woman who people can very well see for themselves is shaped the way in which she is? Isn't this consummate to pointing out that so-and-so wore a red dress, when so-and-so is clearly wearing a red dress? Then again, if we don't know what curvy means, maybe it's not, which curves us right back again to the meaninglessness in which the word is now immersed, like so many starlets gallivanting in the ocean waters in retro polka-dot bikinis, showing off their curves. Proposal: Let's use curvy to describe lines, not humans. 

Disrupt. Verb, but with noun and other forms. Developer and writer Matt Langer erupts on disrupt!: "Oh my god will someone PLEASE disrupt the disruptors already? This revolting word has got to go. Because while the past five years or so of startup mania has been insufferable and obnoxious and annoying it's all in all been generally innocuous, mostly just a bunch of well-capitalized B-school bros Ubering around and talking all this big game about 'changing the world' when all they're really doing is masquerading good old fashioned naked greed as some kind hopey-changey photo-sharing app, which: fine, whatever. But this disruption nonsense is actually a genuine, insidious problem, because it has engendered this fierce cult of Now, of The New, this influential school of VC evangelist types pedaling a wrecking ball mentality which dictates that anything not in the process of starting up ought to be kneecapped. Disruption isn't so much a business strategy anymore as it is a knowing sneer, the thinly veiled desire of the aspirationally 1% to just watch it all burn. It's the new first principle of business, which suggests the primary function of business anymore isn't to build things up but to tear them down. Disruption is now an end in itself, and no industry is safe when the sole moral obligation of the disruptor is to disrupt. And so it is that we get for-profit education. Or we get Farhad Manjoo trolling the entire literary world by saying it should celebrate the rise of Amazon and the death of the independent bookstore. And this is all CRAZY! Enough disrupting. Let's get back to 'doing business.'"

Ecosystem. Noun. Pity ecosystem, a case of what happens when good words fall in with a bad crowd. Rebecca Greenfield explains, "This reasonable science-related word has been co-opted by the tech writing community, which has senselessly ravaged it. The true meaning of the term translates to a 'biological community of interacting organisms and their physical environment.' As in, the place where living things live together. To tech writers, however, ecosystem involves a lot of non-living things that just happen to share characteristics. The Android ecosystem, the app ecosystem, the tablet ecosystem, the digital ecosystem, the start-up ecosystem — it's not like at the end of the day all the little gadgets go home to their gadget neighborhoods and hang out."

Epic. Adjective. Unless you're describing The Iliad or The Odyssey (and in a high school or college English class), choose anew, friends. Don't make me say this again in 2013.

Fiscal Cliff. Noun. Our Dashiell Bennett says, "The fiscal cliff is the worst kind of jargon because it's both inaccurate and unhelpful. America's economy won't suddenly plummet to the bottom of a crevasse on January 1, and even if it were going to, an imaginary rock formation doesn't teach anyone about how budgets are made. [The phrase] is a convenient way to scare people without actually having to tell them what they should be scared of — which is perfect for the majority of people who don't even understand the issues at stake and aren't particularly interested in learning."

Gaffe. Noun with political inclinations. From the Wire's Elspeth Reevegaffe is veering off a semantic cliff: "The definition of a gaffe has been broadened to any time a politician says something you can put in an headline and then write jokes about. A gaffe is a guaranteed two-post story — one on the original comment, and one on the follow-up comment explaining the comment. Reporters' excessive reliance on gaffes to make it through a slow news day was most apparent when a Washington Post reporter was caught on tape yelling across a parking lot to Mitt Romney, "WHAT ABOUT YOUR GAFFES?"

Glocal. Noun? Adjective? What is this, even? Get rid of this word "and all senseless tech start-up jargon because what does that even mean? Nobody knows. Not even the people who use it. Just stop it," says Greenfield.

Hashtag. Seriously, a proper noun askdljflasdjflasdjf;adjlkfa;. Did you hear the one about theparents who named their new baby Hashtag? Yeah, that's about enough of that.

Hehehe. The way a serial killer chuckles. This is a particular spelling of laughter which I personally cannot stand, mostly because it is so very creepy. Don't like LOL or ha ha ha, either? The Atlantic's Megan Garber can help. 

Hipster. Noun. It's gotten so it's boring to decry this term, which makes it even sadder when we see it. Again with the meaninglessness as related to pervasiveness! And yet, it's a dig, too. How can that be? Writer Drew Magary adds, "Hipster has grown into such a widely used pejorative that it doesn't really mean anything anymore. You're just saying 'white person.'"

Historic, historical. Adjective. Dashiell Bennett speaks to the gross overuse of this word, saying, "Every election is historic. Technically, anything that ever happens can become history, so pundits really need to stop throwing this word around anytime they want to make something sound important. It's like that old saying: If everything is special, then nothing is."

INITIAL-WORDS. Usage type. This is not a word, per se, but instead something we do. Writer and "sometime televisualist" Kurt Loder brings it to our attention. "A continuing annoyance, not peculiar to this year, is the prevalence of such prissy formulations as 'the C word' and 'the N word,'" he explains. "When Bill Maher calls a woman a cunt in a public venue, or Quentin Tarantino makes a movie that is distinguished by its wall-to-wall use of the word nigger, these facts should be reported in a straightforward way, however un-PC they may be. I don’t know anyone who uses such words in day-to-day conversation, but we all know they exist. The coy and N euphemisms (like the laughably juvenile F bomb) are an understandable alternative in family-oriented newspapers and magazines, and, I suppose, on broadcast television. But anyone over the age of, say, 12, likely knows what the letters stand for, and in more worldly outlets —like this one! — is unlikely to be traumatized by having them spelled out. Let’s be real." Related: In 2013, will theNew York Times print STFU

INTERNET-HYPE WORDS. Expressions of "internet popularity." The New Yorker's Ben Greenman says, "I do not like words associated with internet popularity: viral, traffic, metrics, and similar examples. I don't like them because they're convulsive. They aim to describe an idea of phenomenon that is impersonally successful: something that reaches large numbers of people without necessarily forging strong relationships with any of them. And then, strangely, those words themselves circulate through the system in the same way as the phenomena they are describing. They are like bloodless blood. To be fair, I'm not sure the words themselves are the problem so much as the thoughts behind them, which suggest that many things are more important than quality and that skimming meaninglessly past the eyes of millions is more important than settling meaningfully into the minds of a few."

Jeah. Expression of douchey enthusiasm. Drew Magary explains: "So Jeah ... Jeah is the 'Jayden' of catchphrases. Ryan Lochte took a normal word ("Yeah") and then EXTREEMIFIED 50% by subbing the J.  Jeah makes me despise the idea of affirming anything.  I don't want to be here when he coins Xamesome and Zadical."

Ryan Lochte

Kony. Proper noun. Grantland's Rembert Browne traces the evolution of this one for us: "I don't think there's a word that has had so many different life cycles and connotations in one year as the word Kony. The word, the last name of Joseph Kony, the Ugandan leader responsible for numerous war crimes, was virtually unknown in the mainstream andscape in the beginning of 2012. Then, in March, it became the name of a viral movement, KONY, aimed at taking him down, headed by director Jason Russell. At this point, the word KONY was everywhere. And while the word was a bad thing (the last name of a ruthless leader), the word became word for good (stopping the ruthless dictator). The point of KONY was to stop Kony. But then, a few weeks later, the San Diego police found Russell naked in the street, interfering with traffic, appearing to have completely snapped. And the video of that became the new KONY video. It was at that point that KONY became something bad again, or more a joke of a phrase than an important movement. The buildup to April 20, the date at which all of those around the world that supported KONY were supposed to band together, had been deflated and while not completely dead, the movement was all but over some three weeks after it started. Both KONY and Kony still exist, but as the year comes to a close, both are approaching their pre-2012 levels of importance within the American landscape, which is, again, very little."

Legitimate rape. Adjective-noun clause. "Missouri Rep. Todd Akin used this term in August to explain that in for-real rapes, women can't get pregnant because their bodies reject rapist sperm, and it's the major reason he was unable to defeat Sen. Claire McCaskill in November," remembers Elspeth Reeve. "Akin eventually apologized for both the word legitimate and the fake science. But if you've ever hung out in a frat house or military barracks, you know that he was voicing a common sentiment — that some women 'cry rape' to get back at their boyfriends or husbands. Akin himself suggested that as a state legislator in 1991, when he said he warned a marital rape statute might be used 'in a real messy divorce as a tool and a legal weapon to beat up on the husband.'" Alas, Akin's defeat doesn't mean the phrase and the sentiment behind it haven't continued to exist,though. 

Literally. Adverb. See Sarah Miller's piece for The AwlJoe Biden, Rob Lowe.

Meggings. Noun. These are "men's tights" and worse than men wearing tights (let 'em wear what they like, we say!) is the horrifying proliferation of the word meggings to describe tights worn by men. One small up-side is that meggings make jeggings sound rather lovely, actually.

Nostalgia. Existential noun. Village Voice web editor Nick Greene waxes nostalgic on nostalgia. "A long time ago, nostalgia was thought to be a medical condition, something so powerful it could cause pyrexic fits or even death. Once people realized you couldn't actually bite the big one from nostalgia, it still was classified as a type of depression. Nowadays, nostalgia is a cheap throwaway word that has lost all its clinical power; it's used to define a trivial pining, be it for a television show cancelled 7 months ago or a broad, complicated construct like the '90s. And if you think I am being nostalgic for the former usage of nostalgia, then you are part of the problem."

October. Noun, month, alleged friend of Drake. While I like this month and the sound of it, ourConnor Simpson does not. He says, specifically, his dislike is for "October, as occupied by Drake. He calls himself 'October's very own' and it's the stupidest thing ever. Also the month. October is the first official, real month of fall, and fall is not summer. October is a close second to February as the worst month."

Organically. Adverb. Did you think of those thoughts all in your own brain? And in doing so, did you dub whatever emerged as having come to you organically? This is a pretentious word that too often means one is avoiding the effort it takes to come up with a word that means what one really intends it to mean.

PingVerb. Gizmodo's Sam Biddle despises this word, saying "I hate ping because it means the exact same thing as contact. There's no difference between ping and contact. But when we say ping, we can pretend like we're in a scene from The Social Network, when in fact we're just regular idiots like everyone else. It's also too ambiguous—if someone asks me to ping them, do I text, call, ring a bell in their face? I hate ambiguity in language." Do not ping me. Do not dare. 

Plus-one (+1).  Vote of digital support. This one from The Atlantic's social media editor Chris Heller, who believes that "+1" is the scourge of Twitter. "You can't go far without seeing the filthy little thing attached to puns, hashtag games, and all the other sorts of frivolous ephemera," he says. "It's a lazy acknowledgement that someone out there did something entertaining, but it's also a not-so-ironic admission that we're all stuck in the same sad, sorry game of 'personal brands' and egotistical nonsense. Nobody's counting your stupid Internet points. Stop the '+1' menace."

PORTMANTEAUXING. Usage type. Not all portmanteauxing is bad, just like not all portmanteaus are bad. But simply smashing two words together and thinking it's all funny and brilliant and original, that's a word-making style whose shark has been jumped (shumped?) in 2012.  

Quinoa. Healthy food noun. And yet, at the same time, unknown! New York's Stefan Becket says, "I'm not a fan of quinoa. I'm not entirely clear what it actually is and I have no idea what it tastes like, but it sounds like some bland hipster thing."

Really?! Expression of incredulity. The New York Times' Neil Genzlinger decided people were saying really? too much on television, and wrote about it. Jerry Seinfeld decided Neil Genzlinger's piece was "so deeply vacuous that I couldn’t help but feel that you have stepped into my area of expertise," and responded in a letter to the New York Times with numerous Reallys? of his own. This was all fun and games, an afternoon of amusement, but, really? Are we still saying really? We really are, apparently.

"Retweets are not endorsements." Banal assertion. I agree with Cord Jefferson that this phrasing is deplorable and should be erased from our collective word consciousness.

Selfies. Plural noun. It's the sound of this word that bugs me so much. But also, what is a selfy? It seems ominous and vaguely perverse, so you don't really want to know, but then you do, and it doesn't really matter what it is because it turns out it's rather boring, in fact. And yet that word, which stands for taking pictures of oneself, hilariously, is so meta and navel-gazing that it would very nearly be perfect if we didn't dislike it so very much.  

Slacks. Noun used by our elders. Personally, I don't mind this word and in fact rather like it (not that I own any of my own) but the New Yorker voted to ban it for a brief time this year, so we're including it for posterity.

Slut. Noun used to convey judgment, mostly by terrible people. See the Rush Limbaugh/Sandra Fluke controversy of early 2012. 

Sustainable. Adjective. Drew Magary weighs in again: "As for sustainable... I don't care.  I really don't.  Sustainable is the kind of word that ends up being co-opted and used by everyone to the point where it means nothing (See: Organic). I don't believe anyone when they tell me their food is sustainable.  I think half of them lie just so they can convince me they didn't buy their chicken breast at the local Key Food. Sustainable is just an invitation for hipsters to lie."

TLDR. Acronym used by the weary and disaffected. The shortening of several words that are admittedly difficult to concentrate long enough to spell out, this is my vote for the Internet's worst comment, and it means Too Long, Didn't Read. (Thanks for commenting, though!)

Twee. Wee wittle 'dorable adjective. Among the twee-haters there is New York's Stefan Becket, who says, "My first thought is always that it's supposed to be tweet, and then I'm disappointed when it ends up describing something terrible," he says. Related: the twee-est word relating to tweeting istweeps, which I cannot stand. Love the people, hate the name.

Ugh. Guttural sound to denote unpleasant emotion. A powerful word, true, because it makes one feel exactly what it is, but every time I see this one I feel a little bit crankier. Can't we muster legitimate words for human expression? Ugh. I guess not. 

Vagina. Noun. Esquire's Ross McCammon calls out the way people have been using this word for the female anatomy as a punchline or joke. He says, "No word has been more abused this year. It's persisted as an easy punchline on bad sitcoms. The vagina is many things but it shouldn't be the butt of a joke. Then it appears as the title of Naomi Wolf's book, which gets widely mocked. Tough year for vagina."

Whatever Whatever. An expression we are using, apparently. Francesca Stabile, who works in the music industry (where such expressions run amok!), explains, "If the brains behind @SeinfeldToday wanted an update to the Yada Yada Yada episode they'd be smart to choose this latest verbal tick (that is, if their internet shelf life hasn't expired already, which I'm afraid it might have). I've noticed it more and more as a way of glossing over the boring parts of a tale or rendering something unimportant, but while yada yada yada was more amiable and had excellent mouthfeel, whatever whatever comes off as supremely dismissive."

X. Usage type. Spelling anything with just an X when it should be spelled out. Like, X-cellent. X-citing. X-uberant. X-it. As seen in tXt messgs.

YOLO. Soul-searching, soul-sucking acronym. YOLO is probably the most disliked word among the groups I surveyed for this post. Merriam-Webster's Kory Stamper says it best, prefacing her opinion with this disclaimer: "As a lexicographer, I must withhold judgment on any word, either established or in-the-making. Words are raw materials and each has its place and purpose; some people find eggs to be slimy and gross, yet they will happily eat them when they're incorporated into a cake. Even moist, which seems to get the brunt of the word-hate, has its place."

YOLO-haters, hang in there, there's a but! "But lexicographers are human, and humans have deeply felt emotions and opinions (or so I'm told)," she continues. "So speaking as a human, I'm pretty over YOLO, particularly when used by my kids in answer to 'Why haven't you done [tedious chore] yet?' Intellectually, I recognize that YOLO is a perfectly fine initialism and may gain enough currency and longevity in print to merit entry into one of our dictionaries — but the heart wants what it wants. My apologies to Drake, apparent coiner of YOLO, and Ben Zimmer, my favoriteYOLO apologist."

Zero, Inbox. State of email-being. NYU Local editor and Gawker writer Myles Tanzer closes us out for the year with this one, which has been the cause of some discussion on this very site recently. Spoiler: He hates it. "Zero, as in inbox zero, is really pathetic. For those fortunate ones who are blissfully ignorant to 2012's worst humblebrag, inbox zero is the process of getting your unread emails down to nil to ensure you have a more stable existence," he says. "Most email scrubbers tweet 'inbox zero!' to the world when they are done with their chore, which has all the charms of a toothless first grader tugging at his mom's pant leg and wailing, 'I cleaned my room!' By subscribing to the compulsive impulse to get away from the junk in our inboxes, you're you're committing the worst sin of 2012 — letting technology control your life. A real Internet pro works seamlessly with the messiness that comes with being glued to the screen. Also, the concept of inbox zero is a slippery slope that strikes fear into my heart. Is outbox zero the next thing that we deem necessary to brag about? Is there an impending movement to show off that all of your scheduled Tumblr posts for the day have autoposted? Where does the clutter clearance end? In 2013, I'd like to see less showboating about the way we shoo away emails like dirty flies and more tweets showcasing our inboxes being filled to capacity. Inbox one million has a way better ring to it, anyways."

All in all, it was a very good (bad?) word year. Disclaimer: Simply because a word appears above does not mean we will cease to use it. That's just the way the word world works.

Please follow Business Insider on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »



Doctor Assesses The Real Harm From Booby Traps In 'Home Alone"

$
0
0

Home Alone

Since its debut in 1990, "Home Alone" has become as much a part of the Christmas cinematic ritual as "It's a Wonderful Life."

But unlike that uplifting tale about the good of mankind, "Home Alone" tells a rather unsettling Christmas story of a precocious 8-year-old who, accidentally abandoned by his family, is forced to defend his home from two dimwitted burglars.

The doctor weighs in >

Kevin McCallister (Macaulay Culkin) turns his family's home into a veritable funhouse of torturous booby traps that so-called Wet Bandits Marv (Daniel Stern) and Harry (Joe Pesci) hilariously stumble through, and the transformation of a suburban Chicago home into a relentless injury machine is nothing short of spectacular. 

But it does require quite a suspension of disbelief.

Can a man really be hit square in the face with a steam iron and walk away unfazed? What kind of permanent physical damage would a blow torch to the head really do?

To answer these questions and officially dissolve "Home Alone"'s Hollywood magic, I spoke with my friend Dr. Ryan St. Clair of the Weill Cornell Medical College. Enjoy.

The injury: BB gun to the forehead

The set-up: Marv and Harry try to sneak into the McCallister home by sweet talking Kevin from the back door. Kevin, meanwhile, points his BB gun through the doggie door and directly at Harry's groin — and shoots. When Marv goes to investigate the source of Harry's pain, he is met by the same BB gun, which is fired at extremely close range to his forehead. 

The doctor's diagnosis: "Classic air-powered projectile weapons typically have muzzle velocities of 350 feet per second or less. A BB fired at close range from such a weapon could break the skin, but will not penetrate the skull, and is unlikely to penetrate Harry's scrotum, especially through fabric."



The injury: Iron to the face

The set-up: Thwarted by the BB gun at the back door, Marv runs around to the basement stairwell — which Kevin has deliberately iced. Once he has stumbled his way down into the dark basement, Marv grabs for what he thinks is the light bulb cord. It's actually a rope attached to a steam iron that is propped up on the laundry chute door. The heavy iron comes plummeting down and smacks Marv in the face.

The doctor's diagnosis: "Let's estimate the distance from the first floor to the basement at 15 feet, and assume the steam iron weighs 4 pounds. And note that the iron strikes Marv squarely in the mid-face. This is a serious impact, with enough force to fracture the bones surrounding the eyes. This is also known as a 'blowout fracture,' and can lead to serious disfigurement and debilitating double vision if not repaired properly."



The injury: Handling a burning-hot doorknob

The set-up: While Marv is getting an iron to the face, Harry tries to enter the home through the front door. The first attempt doesn't go well, as the stocky burglar slips on the icy steps and falls to the ground, landing with a thud on his back. Easing up a second time with the help of the railing, Harry makes it to the front door, reaches for the doorknob — which we see is literally burning red — and grasps the searing handle, the pain of which forces him once again down the icy steps.

The doctor's diagnosis: "If this doorknob is glowing visibly red in the dark, it has been heated to about 751 degrees Fahrenheit, and Harry gives it a nice, strong, one- to two-second grip. By comparison, one second of contact with 155 degree water is enough to cause third degree burns. The temperature of that doorknob is not quite hot enough to cause Harry's hand to burst into flames, but it is not that far off... Assuming Harry doesn't lose the hand completely, he will almost certainly have other serious complications, including a high risk for infection and 'contracture' in which resulting scar tissue seriously limits the flexibility and movement of the hand, rendering it less than 100 percent useful. Kevin has moved from 'defending his house' into sheer malice, in my opinion." 



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

Please follow Science on Twitter and Facebook.



10 Stars Who Got Arrested But Still Pulled Off Successful Careers

$
0
0

nicole richie

For most people, getting arrested isn't a good thing.

But it hasn't seemed to bother these celebrities – at least not in terms of their careers.

Many celebs have been brought down by an arrest or two, while others get arrested over and over again.

But some have overcome the stigma of a criminal record and go on to cash in super successful careers.

Rob Lowe

Before Lowe was arrested in the late 80s, he starred in cult classics like St. Elmo's Fire and The Outsiders.

He was arrested in 1988 after a videotape surfaced allegedly featuring the actor having sex with two women, one of whom was only 16, according to CBS News.

After his arrest, Lowe went on to star in The West Wing, one of the most popular political dramas in recent memory.



Khloe Kardashian

Kardashian was arrested on suspicion of driving under the influence in 2007 and was later sentenced to 30 days in jail for violating her probation stemming from the charge, People reported in 2008.

No one can deny the arrest did nothing to hamper the youngest Kardashian sister's reality TV career.

In fact, her legal drama was even featured on America's biggest guilty pleasure show.



Charlie Sheen

Sheen has an arrest record nearly as long as Lindsay Lohan's.

Two standouts: He was arrested in 2009 on domestic violence charges stemming from an alleged fight with now-ex-wife Brooke Mueller, People reported at the time.

He was also charged with misdemeanor battery in 1997 after an ex-girlfriend claimed he abused her, according to Babble. He pleaded no contest to that charge.

But through it all, and until recently, Sheen maintained a successful career, starring in everything from Platoon to Two and a Half Men.



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

Please follow Law & Order on Twitter and Facebook.



AND THE SURVEY SAYS... "Mobile First" Is A Dumb Strategy

$
0
0

There has been a lot of talk over the past couple of years about how laptops and desktops are toast and everything's going mobile.

As a result, the prevailing wisdom is that companies should become:

  • "Mobile Only" (just forget big screens, keyboards, and mice--they're dead)

Or, at least,

  • "Mobile First" (design everything for smartphones first and big screens as an afterthought) 

For some mobile-centric companies--Instagram, location-based apps, mobile games--these strategies obviously make sense. The applications the companies offer are centered on mobile gadgets.

For other companies, however--including some news and information companies that are frantically redesigning their businesses to focus on "Mobile First"--the strategy seems misguided.

The smarter strategy, I think, is this:

  • "Mobile, Too"

With the explosive growth of smartphones, tablets, and super-sleek laptops, mobile usage continues to grow as a percentage of overall Internet usage. In some countries, moreover, smartphones have already vaulted past laptops and desktops to become the dominant personal-computing device. In these countries, companies should obviously focus on mobile first.

But in the developed world, which already has a massive installed base of desktops and laptops, bigger screens are still extremely important. And they are likely to remain so, even when everyone who uses them also owns a smartphone and tablet.

Critically, the users of big screens, smartphones, and tablets access much of the same information and services across all these devices--they don't adopt separate (and largely duplicative) services for each.

The "Wikipedia for smartphones," for example, already exists: It's called "Wikipedia."

The "Amazon for smartphones" also exists: It's called "Amazon."

And the "Google for smartphones" exists: It's called "Google."

In short, in developed markets, the reality is that we live in a multi-screen world, not a "mobile world" that operates parallel to a "desktop world."

And for some services, such as news and information, the laptop/desktop screen is still by far the most dominant screen. So abandoning that screen, or designing for another screen first, just doesn't make sense.

To illustrate this, I recently published a picture of the Business Insider newsroom, which is populated by ~50 of the most digitally savvy mobile information consumers on earth. The folks in our newsroom are nuts about mobile gadgets. And yet, there is not a single person in the newsroom whose primary office device is a smartphone (or even tablet).

BI Newsroom

And why would it be?

We all work for 8-12 hours a day at a desk. Why would we spend that time staring at a tiny mobile screen?

(Yes, some of us power our big screens with portable laptops and Minis, but we still use keyboards and mice. And if any of us ever decide to make a tablet or smartphone our primary office gadget, we'll almost certainly attach it to a monitor, keyboard, and mouse. Would you type on a smartphone keyboard all day if you didn't have to?)

We all also have smartphones, of course.

And many of us have tablets.

And we use those devices, too.

When we're walking around, we use our smartphones.

When we're at home, we use laptops or tablets.

Then, when we get into the office, we fire up our big screens again.

In short, we use all of our gadgets. And we read Business Insider and other publications on all of them.

So the idea that we would suddenly drop everything and design Business Insider for, say, smartphones first just doesn't make any sense.

If we did that we would annoy the millions of readers who read Business Insider through laptops, desktops, and tablets every month.

Almost 30% of our readership now comes through tablets and smartphones. That's why we have a mobile site that is designed to be read on smartphones. And it's also why we give our mobile readers the ability to use the full site--or a dedicated iPhone and Android app--if they want. Mobile is growing rapidly, and we want our readers to be able to read us wherever they are: Home, work, on the road, and everywhere in between. So our strategy is to provide a good BI experience on every screen -- a.k.a., "Mobile, Too."

We often talk about our mobile strategy internally, though, and we certainly want to give you--our readers--what you want.

So if you ever want "mobile first," that's certainly what we will give you.

For now, however, "mobile first" is not what you, our readers, seem to want.

Rather, you want "Mobile, Too."

How do we know this?

Because we asked you!

Earlier this week, we asked our readers for their help in answering 6 questions relevant to this discussion. Here are the answers we got.

QUESTION 1: Which of the following devices do you use regularly?

The goal here was to figure out what devices our readers are using. The answers match our internal site logs. Laptops/Desktops are the most popular, followed by smartphones and tablets.

What Devices Do People Use?

 


QUESTION 2: Which of these devices do you use to read news and information?

The answer here is simple: All of them.

What Devices Do People Use For News

 


QUESTION 3: Which of these devices do you use to read the MOST news and information?

This one should rattle folks who are designing for "mobile first." Desktops and laptops are still by far the predominant devices through which news and information is consumed.

Which devices do people read the most

 


QUESTION 4: When you read digital news and information, which of the following do you do regularly?

The next question is HOW people read news and information on their gadgets. And the key question is whether people use browsers and web sites or "apps"--and, if apps, what kind of apps. The answer, again, is clear:

News web sites are still the predominant means by which people consume news and information. Social media and other referral links are also important. Apps from news sites are used by about 30% of readers. "Aggregation" apps are used by less than 20%.

How do people read news

 


QUESTION 5: When you read news and information on your SMARTPHONE, which of the following do you do regularly?

One key question for news and content sites is whether they should emphasize "apps" or the web when delivering their content to readers over smartphones. For now, the answer is "both." Readers access content over smartphones using both dedicated site apps and the web. "Aggregation apps" are less popular.

How do people read news on smartphones


QUESTION 6: When you read news and information on a TABLET, which of the following do you do regularly?

The tablet is a hybrid device, and it's primarily used for consumption. People use tablets differently than smartphones, desktops, and laptops, so it makes sense to direct a question specifically to tablet usage. The browser is the dominant "app" for information consumption on tablets, followed by dedicated apps.

How do people read news on tablets

CONCLUSION

Where things stand now, therefore, is that we're in a multi-screen world: In developed countries, people consume news and other content through all devices, and laptops and desktops are still dominant.

Usage by Business Insider readers, by the way, isn't substantially different from broader surveys: If anything, Business Insider readers are more mobile-centric than typical readers--and yet news consumption from mobile gadgets is still a minority of overall consumption. (This Pew study, for example, found that 15% of Americans access news from mobile phones, while 46% access it "online.")

The percentage of usage from mobile gadgets will obviously continue to increase, especially when one considers tablets "mobile."

But as long as there are offices and desks, it seems highly unlikely that big screens, keyboards, and touchpads/mice are going to become an afterthought. And with about 60% of mobile phones in America already smartphones, it also seems unlikely that smartphone content consumption will eclipse laptop/desktop consumption, at least not anytime soon.

The bottom line is this:

For news and information companies, at least those that primarily serve developed markets, the smart strategy is not "Mobile Only" or even "Mobile First."

It's "Mobile, Too."

SEE ALSO: Facebook Unveils A Sexting App

Please follow SAI on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »



Marine Turned Filmmaker Explains Why We Need An Animated Film About The Korean War

$
0
0

brian iglesias

Brian Iglesias, a combat decorated Marine infantry officer now in the Reserves, just completed his most recent campaign.

But unlike earlier ones in combat, this campaign was online. Using the social funding network, Kickstarter, Iglesias and his team have been able to raise $25,000 to produce a first installment of an animated feature, Chosin

Iglesias told Business Insider that Kickstarter has proven a decent platform for fundraising. However, most of the traffic has come from his team's work spreading the word through their social networks, especially Facebook, and not through Kickstarter itself. 

In 2010, Iglesias released Chosin, a documentary about an epic battle during the Korean War. Fought in the winter of 1950 deep in the mountains of North Korea, 15,000 US Soldiers and Marines were surrounded by enemy forces and had to fight their way to safety. In the process they traversed 78 miles of challenging mountainous terrain and saved the lives of 98,000 civilian refugees. 

Many of the stories from this incredible, but often overlooked, battle had never been shared or archived so Iglesias and his creative partner Anton Sattler, a fellow Marine turned filmmaker, set out to make a documentary on it. They funded the project themselves, shooting interviews and gathering archival materials as they could; working, cashing in their life insurance policies, and maxing out credit cards for extra money when they needed to. Later they also produced a graphic novel based on the film, also self-funded. 

The documentary and graphic novel have helped bring recognition to the soldiers who had been largely silent about this incredible mission. But from the beginning Iglesias had a bigger goal in mind, connecting civilians to the realities of war and improving the relationship between the American public and the military. The documentary can work for adults but isn't so appealing to the younger generation, Iglesias, a father of two, told Business Insider.

The idea behind an animated feature is to frame this difficult concept in a way that can engage youth while maintaining the seriousness of the issue, according to Iglesias. Going for a PG-13 rating, the film will be targeted at teenagers, because, as Iglesias said, "18 years total I've been in the Marine Corps, so I've been in it for a long time, and I remember when the war started and people came back, America as a public we don't really have a relationship with our military...Guys and girls coming back weren't getting the support they needed."

He feels the situation has improved, but issues remain, particularly with a generation coming up that were young or not born when the the attacks on 9/11 occurred. Iglesias is concerned that the connection between the public and military and the public understanding of war is weakening. He hopes this Chosin project can be a piece in the bridge building between the public and the military.

The $25,000 raised in the Kickstarter campaign will fund the production of a short scene from the feature length film and will be used to try and raise more funding for production of the whole 90-minute film. While they have reached their goal already they have four more days and the more money they raise the more of the movie they can make now. 

Here is the video from their campaign:

Check out the Kickstarter campaign to learn more about this moving film project >

Please follow Military & Defense on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »



The 25 Most Expensive Domain Names Of All Time

$
0
0

adriana lima sexy model victorias secret

A few weeks ago, Investing.com was sold for a whopping $2.45 million.

But that's not even close to the highest price someone's paid for a domain name.

We collaborated with DN Journal and put together a list of the 25 most expensive domains in the world.

Not surprisingly, sex and gambling-related domains were the biggest money makers.

NOTE:  Web businesses have other assets and are not domain only sales, so they were not eligible for this list. For example, Insure.com was bought for $16 million as a fully-operating, profitable company.

DN Journal only reports domain names sold after 2003 because prior sales are not verified by credible sources. Also, most buyers and sellers remain anonymous for legal reasons, so names/companies are not included in this article.

21. (tie) Cameras.com - $1,500,000

Year sold: 2006

"Cameras.com attracted the highest bid in the live domain auction conducted by Moniker.com at the recently concluded T.R.A.F.F.I.C. East Conference in Hollywood, Florida," The DN Journal wrote in 2006.

"The winning bidder, Sig Solares (the CEO of Parked.com), wasted no time ponying up the $1,500,000 due, making that domain the first from the live auction that we have seen change hands."



21. (tie) Russia.com - $1,500,000

Year sold: 2009

Sedo.com brokered the deal back in 2009. Paley Media, based in Seattle, sold the pricey domain off.



21. (tie) Tandberg.com - $1,500,000

Year sold: 2007

"Tandberg Data, a leading global supplier and manufacturer of backup and archiving solutions, decided to take the cash offer for Tandberg.com from Tandberg, a leading global provider of visual communication products and services with dual headquarters in New York and Norway," The DN Journal wrote at the time of the sale.

The deal was actually completed in December 2006 but wasn't made public until early 2007.



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

Please follow SAI on Twitter and Facebook.




Santa Claus Plays James Bond In This 'Snowfall' Video

7 Real-Life Holiday Movie Homes You Can Visit

$
0
0

home alone

In the next week, we'll be barraged with holiday classics.

While you're watching Kevin McCallister laying traps for burglars, hearing Ralphie freak out over his eye being shot out, or watching Will Ferrell tell Peter Dinklage he's an angry Elf consider that not all of the Christmas classics are filmed on sets.

A lot of the homes – and apartments – where the holiday favorites take place are real, scattered throughout the U.S.

From New York to California see where you can visit the iconic homes from "Elf," "Home Alone," and "A Christmas Story." 

The apartment where Buddy's dad lives in "Elf" is right outside Central Park in New York City.

Address: 55 Central Park W, New York NY



Though most of "It's a Wonderful Life" was filmed on a set built for the movie, the Martini's home does exist in Flintridge, California.

Address: 4587 Viro Rd, La Canada Flintridge, California



The McCallister house in "Home Alone" really is in Illinois.

Address: 671 Lincoln Ave, Winnetka, Illinois



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

Please follow The Wire on Twitter and Facebook.



Bethenny Frankel Announces Split From Husband, Here's What Will Happen To Her Skinnygirl Fortune

$
0
0

Bethenny Frankel and Jason Hoppy

Bravo star and creator of Skinnygirl margaritas, Bethenny Frankel, announced Sunday that she and her husband of three years, Jason Hoppy, are splitting.

Frankel, 41, originally introduced Hoppy to the world while a cast member on "Real Housewives of New York City" before the couple starred on spin-off shows of their own showcasing their marriage and the birth of their two-year-old daughter, Bryn.

Frankel released a statement the day before Christmas Eve:

"It brings me great sadness to say that Jason and I are separating. This was an extremely difficult decision that as a woman and a mother, I have to accept as the best choice for our family. We have love and respect for one another and will continue to amicably co-parent our daughter who is and will always remain our first priority. This is an immensely painful and heartbreaking time for us."

Frankel also tweeted:

Bethenny Frankel Tweet

The news is a blow to Bravo fans who have been rooting for the couple as viewers watched their rocky romance unfold throughout three seasons of "Bethenny Getting Married?" "Bethenny Ever After" and "Bethenny."

bethenny frankel skinnygirl margaritaFrankel's fortune will likely be an issue in the split, as the reality TV star-turned-cocktailpreneur sold her Skinnygirl drink line to Jim Beam in March 2011 for a reported $120 million. Later SEC filings in August of that year proved the acquisition of solely the brand name was $8 million.

So how much was the purchase of the brand?

The company never divulged a clear number on the acquistion, telling Forbes it reported to the SEC what was necessary under accounting rules.

However, scouring through the company's quarterly reports gives an idea the company spent at least $39 million.

Page five of 2011 first quarter reports show the company spent $39 million on acquisitions in the first three months of the year when Beam's only acquisition was Skinnygirl.

Further in the same 10K, the company reports a clear increase of nearly $50 million in investments that's attributed mostly to the Skinnygirl acquisition.

From the filing:

"Net cash used in investing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2011 increased by $48.9 million to $72.7 million, compared with $23.8 million used in the same three-month period last year, primarily due [to] the acquisition of the Skinnygirl cocktail business and the absence of the 2010 repayments of loans to affiliates of $7.6 million."

In April, Frankel took home a $25 million bonus as sales of her cocktails soared 400 percent in a year and it was reported she took home $12 million in 2012 alone.

But the couple did sign a prenup that will waive Hoppy's rights to Frankel's Skinnygirl fortune.

“The prenup clearly outlines that all of Bethenny's business deals, endorsements, Skinnygirl, are hers,” an insider tells RadarOnline. “The prenup was modified after the couple got married, but Skinnygirl is and always will be Bethenny's, and Jason waived any rights to it.”

But in addition to profits from Skinnygirl margarita, Frankel is also raking it in from her reported $40,000 per episode reality TV paycheck, daytime talk show, and four best-selling books.

It is still unclear what exactly Hoppy will receive in the split.

Soon after the couple got engaged in 2008, Frankel told People magazine of Hoppy: "He's my anchor. I fell in love with a regular guy with a regular salary. He taught me that being taken care of was emotional and not financial."

SEE ALSO: 7 Real Life Holiday Movie Homes You Can Visit >

Please follow The Wire on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »



CNBC Ratings Keep Falling, FOX Business Ratings Keep Rising

$
0
0

lou dobbs

When FOX Business launched five years ago, many people thought it was dead on arrival.

Five years later, however, FBN is still plugging away. And it's gaining ground slowly but surely against market-TV heavyweight CNBC.

The third market network, meanwhile, Bloomberg, is still too small to be rated. It has gotten much, much better, though. We watch it all the time in the office, along with CNBC and FBN.

Here are some recent ratings highlights, from Chris Ariens at TV Newser:

  • Over the past week, here's where things stood:
    • CNBC Total Day Average: 171,000 Total Viewers, with 51,000 in the key 25-54 year-old demographic
    • FBN Total Day Average: 63,000 Total Viewers, with 14,000 in the 25-54 demo
  • "CNBC is down -14% in viewers and down -15% in the demo vs. 2011, while FBN is up +2% and up +17%. CNBC is delivering its lowest rated year since 2005 with some shows down as much as -30% vs. last year."
  • In the battle of right-wingers, Lou Dobbs is now beating Larry Kudlow among younger viewers.

Can FOX boss Roger Ailes repeat the same magical come-from-behind triumph he delivered at FOX News? It seems like he might be headed that way...

More at TV Newser >

Please follow Clusterstock on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »



'The Hobbit' May Be In Trouble At Theaters – Here's Your Box-Office Roundup

$
0
0

Bilbo Baggins The Hobbit

"The Hobbit" may have held on to the box office for a second week in a row; however, its earnings are nowhere near where they should be.

And, that's a problem for the big $250 million budget film which is playing in IMAX, 3D, 3D IMAX, and high-frame rate versions.

In week two, the film has dropped nearly 60 percent in ticket sales growth. (The biggest loss recorded by a "Lord of the Rings" film was a 30 percent drop during week two of "The Return of the King.")

To date, the "LOTR" prequel has earned less than any of Jackson's previous Middle Earth films. (And, remember, each "LOTR" film cost under $100 million to make.)  

Meanwhile, Tom Cruise's "Jack Reacher" didn't bomb; however, it didn't perform anywhere near as well as previous Christmas performances, "Valkyrie" and "Mission Impossible – Ghost Protocol." 

Instead, the most unexpected weekend flop came from Disney's 3D re-release of "Monsters, Inc." 

And, "This is 40" continues Judd Apatow's streak of low-opening 2012 films. 

Out of the top ten this week are Weinstein Company's hugely successful "Silver Linings Playbook," Disney's "Wreck-It Ralph," and "Red Dawn."  

Gerard Butler's rom com "Playing for Keeps" finally takes a tumble in week three from spot eight to 20.  

Here are this week's winners and losers at the box office: 

10. Kristen Stewart's final installment of "Twilight" just clinches the last top spot in the top ten earning $2.6 million. The film may be falling off the box-office charts faster than "Skyfall" or "The Avengers," however, the vampire movie has earned more than any of the other films in the series with nearly $800 million worldwide. 

9. "Life of Pi" holds steady for Fox earning adding another $3.8 million in week five. Ang Lee's adaptation has earned $235.8 million worldwide to date. 

8. "Skyfall" finally makes a significant fall at the box office top roundup in week seven. Dropping four spots this week with $4.7 million, the 23rd Bond film has earned nearly $1 billion worldwide this year. 

7. Disney may want to reconsider its 3D re-releases. Its latest trip down memory lane, "Monsters, Inc." earned a disappointing $5 million opening weekend. Compared to Disney's four other 3D re-releases ("The Lion King," "Toy Story," "Beauty and the Beast," and "Finding Nemo"), "Monsters, Inc." earned the lowest of any of the films opening weekend. 

6. Barbra Streisand and Seth Rogen's "Guilt Trip" following a mom heading cross country with her grown son turned up sour with a meager $5.7 million debut. Paramount's estimated budget sits at $40 million, a number the film will struggle to hit with a current 37% rating on Rotten Tomatoes and underwhelmed reviews

5. Steven Spielberg's Oscar worthy "Lincoln" holds out in week seven earning $5.6 million. The film has earned a massive $116.8 million in U.S. 

4. We knew "Rise of the Guardians" would stick around through the holiday season. The film's $5.9 million in week four is still nowhere near DreamWork's "How to Train Your Dragon" status, nor will it be; however, the film has picked up earning $142.9 million overseas to bring its worldwide gross to $222.6 million. 

3. Judd Apatow's "sort-of" sequel to "Knocked Up," "This is 40," underperforms with $12 million. Back in 2007, the former earned $30.7 million opening weekend. Even 2009's unfunny "Funny People" debuted to $22.7 million. "This is 40" is another example of Apatow's underwhelming year at the box office after his "Wanderlust" bust with Jennifer Aniston and "The Five-Year Engagement." "This is 40" cost an estimated $35 million to produce.

2. "Jack Reacher" easily cruises into second place earning $15.6 million. Tom Cruise's latest action flick based on the novel "One Shot" by author Lee Child didn't exceed weekend expectations; however, the film didn't flop. Compared to Cruise's past two Christmas films, 2008's "Valkyrie" ($21 million) and last year's "Ghost Protocol" ($30 million), "Reacher" came up a bit short. 

1. "The Hobbit" still reigns supreme with $36.7 million at the box office. Though the number may seem huge, it's a disappointment given both the trajectory of "The Lord of Rings" series earnings at this same point nearly a decade ago and the added bump 3D, IMAX, and high frame rate showings should produce.  

Both "The Two Towers" and "The Return of the King" earned more than $48 million in its second week. Instead, "The Hobbit," is currently tracking much closer to "The Fellowship of the Rings" which earned $38.7 million in the same week.  

To date, the prequel has earned most of its money outside the U.S. bringing it to $433.9 million worldwide.

SEE ALSO:The highest-grossing films of 2012 >

Please follow The Wire on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »



Viewing all 103217 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images