Quantcast
Channel: Business Insider
Viewing all 103018 articles
Browse latest View live

The insane workouts Alison Brie did to get in shape for her new show

$
0
0

Glow Netflix final

At 5'3", Alison Brie seems like the last person who could play a convincing professional wrestler, but her trainer is here to tell you she's the real deal. 

For Brie's new show, Netflix's "GLOW" (available June 23), the funny actress busted her butt for months with trainer Jason Walsh to not just look the part, but also to actually withstand the rigors of playing one of the Gorgeous Ladies of Wrestling.

"Alison did all her stunts," Walsh recently told Business Insider. "I'll tell you right now, I've worked with a lot of people and she's a little bad a--."

In "GLOW," Brie stars as Ruth Wilder, a struggling actress who gets invited to audition along with 12 other women for the professional wrestling promotion Gorgeous Ladies of Wrestling (G.L.O.W.), which was indeed a real promotion started in the '80s.

Walsh, who's worked with everyone from Emily Blunt on "Edge of Tomorrow" to Matt Damon for "Jason Bourne," put together a workout plan for Brie that was a mix of cardio and strength training four days a week (often with a workout in the morning and afternoon each day) so her body could take the abuse.

"Alison would be jumping off ropes and landing on people and flipping. I wanted to get her resilient so she didn't run the risk of injury," Walsh said. "The science of training has really shifted the past decade to that more than glamour muscles." 

Walsh did this through two different workout methods of his creation: Rise Movement, which is one-on-one strength training, and Rise Nation, a cardio class in which clients use a VersaClimber.

Here's a glimpse at the exercises Walsh put Brie through:

SEE ALSO: 100 movies on Netflix that everyone needs to watch in their lifetime

Heavy bag slams

Here's Brie (center) with Molly McQueen (left) and Mika Kelly (right) doing this insane workout.

"This is a full-body, explosive workout for conditioning," Walsh said.

They would do 6 sets of 5 reps.

Instagram Embed:
http://instagram.com/p/BSCQEuyl0hZ/embed/
Width: 658px

 



Deadlifts

Another full-body workout. Walsh said Brie was deadlifting 165 pounds and did 6 sets of 3-5 reps.

Instagram Embed:
http://instagram.com/p/BMh-Wx4jAai/embed/
Width: 658px

 



Farmer walks

"Great way to get the body warmed up," Walsh said. Brie held onto 65-pound dumbbells and did 45-second walks for 3-4 sets.

Instagram Embed:
http://instagram.com/p/BTZsEn7jdlM/embed/
Width: 658px

 



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

'Wonder Woman' wins the weekend box office, but 'The Mummy' turns out to be bulletproof

$
0
0

The Mummy 2 Universal final.JPG

This week's domestic box office winner was pretty much decided before we even got to the weekend.

The acclaimed "Wonder Woman" followed up its record-breaking opening weekend last week by winning the United States box office for a second-straight weekend with an estimated $57 million, according to Exhibitor Relations, a dip of only 45% from last weekend. The movie has now brought in a total of $205 million domestically.

In a distant second place with $32 million is "The Mummy," which is both a Tom Cruise movie and the kick-off to another cinematic universe, this one being Universal's reboot of the classic monsters of decades past that its named Dark Universe.

On the surface, the pitiful US gross for "The Mummy" looks like the worst possible scenario for Universal in launching a franchise to go up against Marvel Studios and DC Films. But looking globally, the movie has the most interesting box office storyline of the weekend.

With a 20% rating on Rotten Tomatoes going into the weekend (it's now at 17%), "The Mummy" was going to be DOA domestically by Sunday, and Universal would have to hope for a strong outing overseas to save face. And that's exactly what happened.

It started on Friday when news hit that the movie opened in China (perhaps the most important international market) on Thursday with an $18.7 million take, the biggest opening day ever there for a Tom Cruise movie. The movie debuted in Russia on Thursday as well and took in $1.6 million, also the biggest first day ever there, too. In the 33 international markets where "The Mummy" opened between Wednesday and Thursday, the movie took in $20.5 million.

The Mummy Universal final.JPGBy Friday, the movie was playing in 63 markets and had taken in $56.8 million. It would end the weekend with an estimated $142 million overseas.

Combining that with its domestic take, "The Mummy," budgeted at around $125 million (tack on another $90 million or so for marketing), earned Cruise his biggest global opening ever with $174 million, passing the $167.4 million earned for 2005's "War of the Worlds."

"The Mummy" director, Alex Kurtzman, told Business Insider late last week he didn't make the movie for critics. It seems the audience he did make it for came to see the movie in droves.

But "The Mummy" being bulletproof from negative critical reaction is something the franchise even had back in its Brendan Fraser era. The three movies with Fraser and the spinoff starring Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson, "The Scorpion King," totaled close to $1.5 billion in its worldwide box office.

Add that with the box office clout Tom Cruise has, and you'll understand why "The Mummy" is far from a bust financially, and why Universal is still very bullish on its Dark Universe.

SEE ALSO: The insane workouts Alison Brie did to get in shape for her new show

DON'T MISS: 'The Mummy' director responds to critics bashing the movie: 'I'm not making movies for them'

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Here's how Jay Z and Beyoncé spend their $1.16 billion

The 10 biggest box-office bombs of 2017 so far

$
0
0

King Arthur: Legend of the Sword

As we're halfway through 2017, we thought it would be a good time to look at the movies that pretty much no one has wanted to see in theaters this year.

While movies like "Get Out," "Logan," "Beauty and the Beast," "Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2," and "Wonder Woman" have all found love at the box office, there are some titles that were seeking major coin and Rotten Tomatoes "Fresh" ratings only to be playing in front of empty seats at the multiplex.

From "Baywatch" to "Monster Trucks," these are the 10 worst box-office earners of the year — so far:

Note: This selection is limited to only those titles released by the six major studios that have played in more than 2,000 screens for at least two weekends. Grosses below are all US earnings from Box Office Mojo.

SEE ALSO: RANKED: The 11 best movies of the year so far

10. "Smurfs: The Lost Village" — $43.8 million*

Reported budget: $60 million

(Note: Production budgets are estimates and do not include expenses for marketing and release.)

*Movie is still playing in theaters.



9. "Baywatch" — $41.7 million*

Reported budget: $69 million

*Movie is still playing in theaters. 



8. "Ghost in the Shell" — $40.5 million

Reported budget: $110 million



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

Daniel Craig didn't break character or his weird voice while shooting 'Logan Lucky'

$
0
0

Logan Lucky Daniel Craig

One of the many highlights from the trailer for Steven Soderbergh's "Logan Lucky" is the hilarious voice Daniel Craig uses to play bank robber Joe Bang. 

It turns out, to keep that high-pitched twang on the tip of his tongue, the James Bond star talked like that even off the set for the entire time he was working on the movie.

"He was doing the voice the whole time," Riley Keough, who also stars in "Logan Lucky," told Business Insider while she was promoting her upcoming movie "It Comes at Night" (opening in theaters on Friday). "If I saw him at the hotel after shooting he would be doing the voice. It was really funny."

And Craig wasn't the only comic relief. Between him and costars Channing Tatum and Adam Driver, the jokes were constant, according to Keough.

Logan Lucky Bleecker Street2"When I start laughing I just can't stop, so that was really hard because they were all so funny," the actress said. "And they wouldn't stop bantering between takes. It was ridiculous."

In the movie, Tatum and Driver play brothers who hire Craig's Joe Bang to help them pull off a heist during a NASCAR race.

So why did Craig insist on staying in character off the set?

"I think the thing is because he's English he wanted to not lose the voice," Keough said.

It seems like a good theory.

"Logan Lucky" opens in theaters August 18. Check out Craig's unique voice in the trailer below:

 

SEE ALSO: The 10 biggest box office bombs of 2017 so far

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: 7 details you might have missed in the premiere of season 3 of 'Twin Peaks'

The Xbox One just got a killer price drop (MSFT)

$
0
0

If you've been fighting off the urge to buy a new video game console, the time may be right to finally give in: Microsoft just dropped the price of its Xbox One S console by $50, to $249.

Even better: It comes with a free game!

xbox one s

There are a few different options for games, and they're all pretty strong. One option is an excellent first-person shooter, "Battlefield 1." Another comes with "Forza Horizon 3," one of the finest driving games ever made. A third and final option at the $249 price point is "Gears of War 4," a critically-acclaimed, narrative-driven third-person shooter.

Let's be clear: There are no bad options here.

Battlefield 1

If you're looking for an Xbox One with slightly more storage space, or a different game, the $50 price drop applies across most of Microsoft's Xbox One S consoles on its website

If you're interested, we'd suggest action fast as the deal is for a limited time only — Microsoft says it's gonna jump back up by $50 on June 17. That said, Microsoft has a history of issuing "temporary" price drops for Xbox One consoles and then making that price permanent soon after.

And there's good reason to believe that might be the exact plan.

project scorpio new xbox one

The timing of this price drop is no coincidence — Microsoft's Xbox group is holding a big press conference in Los Angeles on Sunday afternoon, where the company is expected to detail the next, significantly more powerful version of the Xbox One (codenamed "Project Scorpio"). The new console is said to launch in late 2017, and Microsoft is likely to announce the price and release date — as such, it makes sense that Microsoft's previous Xbox One model would drop in price on a permanent basis. 

Regardless, there's a strong price drop right now that will do. Head to Microsoft's site for more details.

SEE ALSO: Xbox has a secret weapon that Sony's PlayStation completely dismisses

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Here are all the major changes coming to your iPhone

A crazy new game dares you and a friend to escape prison together

$
0
0

Ever wondered what it's like to break out of prison with your best friend? A new game called "A Way Out" offers just such an opportunity, and it looks fascinating.

A Way Out

The game — planned for release in early 2018 on Xbox One, PlayStation 4, and PC — stars two men named Vincent and Leo. They each have their own backstories and goals, but they must work together to escape prison.

The way that applies to gameplay is what's so interesting: You and a friend control one of each character, either in a room together on one TV or online. There is no other way to play it.

That's a risky move, no doubt, but it allows for some really unique gameplay elements.

In one instance demonstrated in the first gameplay trailer, each character is being controlled independently: While one character is in a cutscene (unable to move), the other player above is able to watch and move around the area with full autonomy. It's simple, but effective; having that subtlety of perspective difference looks like it will be used in surprising and clever ways.

A Way Out

Beyond playing with perspective, co-operative in "A Way Out" also means a variety of instances where you're dependent on your partner. Whether it's making a long jump or being helped up from a dangling ledge, there are dozens of ways this co-dependency could play out.

And that's cool! Too few games cater to people playing games together on a couch; "A Way Out" is a rare game made with co-op as the focus.

Check out the full gameplay trailer right here:

SEE ALSO: The people behind the popular 'Mass Effect' games have a brand new title: 'Anthem'

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Everything you need to know about 'Battlegrounds' — an unfinished game that’s already made $60 million

A new show features ‘Biggest Loser’ winners who regained weight — and reveals a deeper truth about weight loss

$
0
0

big fat truth

The truth hit Ryan Benson when he couldn’t fit into a seat on his son’s favorite roller coaster: He’d regained the weight he’d fought so hard to lose as a contestant on "The Biggest Loser."

In 2005, Benson was crowned the first winner of the popular TV show, which ran for 12 years and has since ballooned into a multi-million-dollar franchise. Benson lost 122 pounds and won $250,000, but he's since returned to his pre-show weight.

That problem wasn't unique to Benson — a 2016 study from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) followed more than a dozen former “Biggest Losers” and  found that of the 14 people studied, 13 regained a significant portion of the weight they lost on the show. Four were heavier in 2016 than they were before they set foot on the set.

Experts have various takes on why this happened, blaming everything from inevitable biological factors to the show’s shaming approach to weight loss. But the show's producer, JD Roth, argues that anyone can push themselves to slim down by breaking what he calls “bad behaviors.”

To that end, Roth has produced a new show called “The Big Fat Truth," which is set to premiere June 11. The program seeks to highlight "bad" behaviors and mentalities that it suggests are responsible for participants' weight gain. In one episode, six former “Biggest Losers" — including Benson— return and try to lose some of the weight they've regained.

“They all say the same thing,” Roth says of the contestants. “They say ‘I went back to my old behavior and made bad decisions.’”

But nutritionists and dietitians counter that Roth’s new show is another version of what they see as a dangerous approach to weight loss that favors quick results over science. As with many things in the world of health and nutrition, the truth falls somewhere in between.

From 300 to 175 to 325

After spending five grueling months exercising and dieting as a "Biggest Loser" contestant, the first thing Benson did to celebrate his accomplishment was order a burger and fries.

“In my mind I just thought I’ve been training so hard I want to eat something I craved for a few months — a burger, fries, some ribs,” Benson tells Business Insider. “That was one of the things that propelled me to the finish line. I thought, when I’m done I’m going to get this. It was a reward.”

Within weeks of returning home, the clothes Benson had worn during the show's season finale seemed to shrink. He caught himself stopping by his favorite fast-food chain more and more on the way home from work to appease his appetite for the foods he missed.

“It was real easy to slip back into old habits,” he says. “The cameras aren’t on 24/7 so no one’s going to see you pick up four donuts on the way to work.”

ryan

The NIH study of "Biggest Losers" — along with a New York Times feature story on the research — suggested that slimming down for good is virtually a biological impossibility for people who have been significantly overweight. Despite forcing their bodies to shed pounds in an intense 3-month boot camp, most of the show's participants seemed to succumb to powerful hormonal and metabolic forces that were out of their control.

“The key point is that you can be on TV, you can lose enormous amounts of weight, you can go on for six years, but you can’t get away from a basic biological reality,” Michael Schwartz, an obesity and diabetes researcher at the University of Washington, told the Times last year. “As long as you are below your initial weight, your body is going to try to get you back.”

Studies suggest that people who've lost significant amounts of weight produce fewer of the hormones that make human bodies feel full and more of the hormones that make us feel hungry. There’s evidence that the metabolism also slows down, perhaps because strict dieting convinces the body that it is starving, leading it to run as efficiently as it can and burn the fewest calories possible.

Roth has spent the past 15 years working on reality TV shows about weight loss, but rejects this idea. 

“I just don’t believe that that’s true,” he says of the Times’ suggestion that it might be biologically impossible for some people to keep weight off. “It’s different behavioral things. A lot of times emotional reasons are why you gain the weight back. There are so many factors that go with it.”

Heart hunger 

Roth blames Benson's weight gain on the fact that he fell prey to old habits.

“People start to get comfortable, sort of like how you might get a job you’ve really been working hard towards, and then after you get it you say to yourself, ‘Oh I knew I’d get that job.’ And they start accepting over and over again.”

Biggest LoserThe new show is in part a response to criticisms from some registered dietitians and nutritionists, who suggested the restrictive regimen imposed by “The Biggest Loser" failed to address what may be potential emotional and psychological issues connected to weight gain.

“If someone is using food as escapism or as comfort from emotional trauma, you have to deal with that," says Andy Bellatti, a registered dietitian and the cofounder of Dietitians for Professional Integrity. "That takes time and that takes a very qualified professional to help you get to the bottom of that. That has nothing to do with weight loss tips or Bob Harper telling you to run an extra mile.”

Nichola Whitehead, a nutritionist and registered dietitian with a private practice in the United Kingdom, calls emotional eating “heart hunger.”

“Food won’t satisfy heart hunger in the long-term,” she says. “It can’t solve the underlying problem.”

Whitehead advises her clients to take a closer look at when and why they eat certain foods to see if certain feelings drive specific eating behaviors.

“So being aware of what you’re craving — are you craving chocolate because you’ve just seen it?" Whitehead says. "Do you just need to relocate or move the chocolate inside a cupboard? Are you feeling emotional? Is something else going on? Is it a good time to call a friend to talk or maybe take a walk?”

Safe, sustainable weight loss

When Roth got involved with “The Biggest Loser,” he says he assumed he could get contestants to lose about 100 pounds over the 5-month window of the show. When he talked to doctors, however, they told him that participants should only be losing one to two pounds per week. That figure, which exercise physiologists and registered dietitians agree is a good ballpark number for safe, sustainable weight loss, would mean that contestants could only lose about 30 pounds by the show’s end.

Roth says the network told him that number simply wouldn’t work for TV. So season after season, the show’s contestants lost one to two pounds per day— essentially seven times what doctors had said was healthy.

Experts say such rapid weight loss doesn’t give people enough time to create new healthy eating and exercise patterns.

“You’ve got to give yourself two, three, four years of consistent behavioral changes. That is hard work. You’re building new habits. And that takes time,” Bellatti says.

Roth's new show seems to accept this logic — to some degree. In one scene, he visits Benson at home and sends him out to pick up a fast food dinner in the time Roth says it'll take to prepare a vegan meal. When Benson returns with a bag of fried chicken sandwiches for his family, Roth has a fresh pasta and vegetable dish ready for them to eat.

Roth believes that showing Benson how easy it is to cook a healthy meal will spur him to change his behavior.

“I’m not a doctor or an exercise physiologist, but that said I have more experience in this area than most people have,” Roth says. “I live it.”

This one-off example may be enough to prompt some people to change their behavior. But for many of those who struggle with weight, long-term behavioral changes are grueling. Results don't come quickly, and many people simply give up.

“I’ve seen it a lot with people I work with,” says Bellatti. “I’d say nine times out of 10 the people who change slowly and do manageable goals are the people who three years out still have success. I know many people who’ve gone on some kind of crash diet for a week and lose a bunch of weight and a few months later they’re back to square one.”

Building new habits

biggest loserA recent study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association illustrates just how hard sticking to a diet can be. For the study, 160 adults spent two years on one of four popular diets. For the first two months, they had to adhere to the diet fairly strictly; for the rest of the time, they were told they could be as strict or lenient as they wanted.

At the end, everyone who'd kept up with the eating plans had lost some weight and seen moderate improvements in their heart health. But a lot of people didn’t make it to the end — in one group, more than half of the participants dropped out.

“A variety of popular diets can reduce weight and several cardiac risk factors under realistic clinical conditions, but only for the minority of individuals who can sustain a high dietary adherence level,” the study authors write. “No single diet produced satisfactory adherence rates.”

In other words, as registered dietitian nutritionist Kara Lydon likes to say, “Diets don’t work.”

It’s a finding that squares with what many dietitians recommend — that the best eating plan is simply the one you can stick with.

“If you don’t take the time to help somebody set up realistic, sustainable behaviors that they can keep up over time, gaining weight and going back into old habits is inevitable,” says Bellatti.

For many people, losing weight means committing to a different lifestyle — one that in large part is not supported by the dietary options made available to us.

“We live in a society where making healthy choices and being at a healthy weight, it’s not defaulted toward that," says Bellatti. "Unhealthy foods are cheaper and they’re everywhere; if you go to any store, you can buy a candy bar at the checkout but not a piece of fruit.” 

Nevertheless, he maintains that losing weight and keeping it off is possible.

“It can be very challenging, and you need to stay on top of a lot of things, but I know a good number of people who’ve lost a significant amount of weight over a long time.”

Ryan Benson says his experience on Roth’s new show did encourage him to make changes to his diet and lifestyle. But he’s also made use of several tools outside of the show’s guidelines, such as learning how to prepare healthy food and becoming involved in the healthy food scene in his Los Angeles neighborhood.

“I think [“The Big Fat Truth”] set me on the right path,” says Benson, though he adds, “it’s a lifetime struggle.”

SEE ALSO: Americans have been making a huge diet mistake for 100 years — here's what they should do instead

DON'T MISS: 13 diet 'truths' that are doing more harm than good

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: The pros and cons of drinking protein shakes after a workout

A huge change is coming to 'Minecraft' that unites all of its players

$
0
0

LOS ANGELES — One of the biggest games in the world is doing something no game has done before: connecting all of its players, regardless of platform. Even more bizarrely, that game is owned by Microsoft — a company with a serious stake in the world of video games with its Xbox platform.

The game we're talking about is "Minecraft," of course, the enormously popular survival game that's on everything from your iPhone to your Xbox One. 

Minecraft

Microsoft announced on Sunday that it's unifying all versions of "Minecraft." That may sound like no big deal, but it's actually a huge deal in terms of the big picture: It means the the tens of millions of people playing "Minecraft" on all platforms — a bunch of competing platforms, mind you — will all play together going forward.

It's a new concept for "Minecraft" as a platform unto itself rather than a distinct game.

The concept is simple: If you're playing "Minecraft" on any platform, you're playing with everyone else. It's the kind of thing that more games could do, but don't

Xbox vs Playstation

There's a simple reason, of course, that more games don't work across platforms: Business. Because Microsoft's Xbox and Sony's PlayStation are competitors, there are certain functions that remain locked to each platform despite being identical. Online play, for instance — and that means that games like "Minecraft," which are identical across many platforms, remain balkanized.

In the case of "Minecraft, "though, Microsoft managed to bridge the game across different types of devices from different, competing companies. And that's really great — the kind of precedent that will hopefully be adopted by more games. 

It's not clear exactly when "Minecraft" will be updated to enable cross-platform play, but it sounds like it's coming sooner than later. 

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Here's everything Apple is rumored to be launching in 2017


The next 'Assassin's Creed' game will be one of the first to take advantage of Microsoft's newest Xbox

$
0
0

assassins creed origins

The next game in the blockbuster "Assassin's Creed" franchise, called "Assassin's Creed: Origins," is coming to the Xbox One, PlayStation 4, and PC later this year, on October 27. 

This newest game, announced on stage at Microsoft's event at the E3 video game conference, will take place in ancient Egypt — letting players experience the, ahem, origins of the namesake assassins. 

Notably, "Assassin's Creed: Origins" is one of the first confirmed blockbuster games to support the new Xbox One X, Microsoft's souped-up new Xbox, slated to ship on November 7. While it will work on any existing Xbox One console, "Assassin's Creed: Origins" will get a big graphical boost on the new console.

In a short on-stage gameplay demo, "Assassin's Creed: Origins" looks to be much in the same vein as previous games in the franchise. The player character infiltrated a temple-turned-fortress in order to assassinate his target, getting into acrobatic fights along the way.

This time, the player can use their pet falcon as a scout, controlling it as it flies around and see what they're seeing. The game is expected to be more wide-open and focused on exploration than previous "Assassin's Creed" games. Graphically, it all looks amazing.

Here's the trailer:

 

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: The Secret Service may have been 'impaired' the day JFK was assassinated

Microsoft's most powerful Xbox yet is called 'Xbox One X,' and it costs $500 (MSFT)

$
0
0

LOS ANGELES —The next version of Microsoft's long running Xbox line of video game consoles is named Xbox One X. It costs $500, and launches November 7.

Microsoft detailed the new console during a press briefing in Los Angeles. The Xbox One X looks strikingly similar to the Xbox One S (Microsoft's previous console), but is notably smaller.

xbox scorpio

The other big difference about the Xbox One X is how powerful it is.

It's capable of powering 4K gaming — the next step up in graphical fidelity after HD — as well as 4K Blu-ray discs. It's got "six teraflops" of processing power, which means it's far more powerful than the current models of Xbox One and PlayStation 4 — even the new, more powerful PlayStation 4 Pro.

The console is being touted as the most powerful game console ever made, and Microsoft says it's also the smallest Xbox ever made. 

project scorpio new xbox one

Aside from being powerful and small, the Xbox One X is an Xbox One: It can play all your existing Xbox One and Xbox 360 backwards compatible games. It also works with all your existing Xbox One accessories, from gamepads to racing wheels.

A variety of new games are coming to the Xbox One X in 4K, including a new entry in the "Forza Motorsport" racing series, a new entry in the first-person shooter "Metro" series, and a new entry in the third-person action "Assassin's Creed" series. 

All were on display during Microsoft's press briefing in Los Angeles on June 11, and they were all quite impressive. Perhaps most impressive of all was "Metro: Exodus," a first-person shooter series set in a post-nuclear apocalypse Russia. A trailer showed a player carefully creeping through a sewer tunnel, fighting off mutant animals of some type. It was gorgeously detailed and genuinely impressive for a home game console.

microsoft xbox one x e3

Xbox One X was previously announced as "Project Scorpio," and Microsoft only showed off its chip at the time (seen above). The Xbox One X console is expected to launch on November 7, starting at $500.

SEE ALSO: The Xbox One just got a killer price drop

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: I wear these computer glasses every day even though I have perfect vision — here's why

Microsoft just did something with Xbox that Sony won't do with PlayStation (MSFT)

$
0
0

bill gates xbox the rock

Microsoft shared some pretty big news for Xbox One owners on Sunday: The company will let you play select games from the original Xbox — the one that launched in 2001 — on the current Xbox One console, with a software update coming later this year. 

The news was announced at Microsoft's annual press briefing at the E3 video game mega-conference in Los Angeles.

Microsoft started down this path in June 2015, with the announcement that the Xbox One console would get the ability to play an ever-growing roster of Xbox 360 games. Now, Microsoft will be taking it a step further, adding compatibility with first-generation Xbox classics like "Crimson Skies: Road to Ruin." 

Furthermore, Xbox boss Phil Spencer promises that classic Xbox games will "look and play better" on Xbox One than they did on the original hardware. In other words, these games are likely to get graphical upgrades when they arrive on Xbox One.

This is a stark contrast with Sony's strategy with the market-leading PlayStation 4. Sony has repeatedly downplayed the importance of so-called backwards compatibility, going so far as to question why anybody would want to play old-school PlayStation games on modern consoles.

From Microsoft's perspective, however, this plays directly into Spencer's Xbox strategy. Now, the Xbox One will support games from three different "generations" of Xbox — which dovetails nicely with Spencer's idea that a new console shouldn't mean that your old games and accessories are immediately obsolete and worthless. 

So while Sony's position, with almost 60 million PlayStation 4 consoles sold, speaks for itself, there are a lot of gamers out there who welcome the notion of playing old games on new hardware. Now, we'll see how much this moves the needle for Microsoft.

SEE ALSO: Xbox has a secret weapon that Sony's PlayStation completely dismisses

DON'T MISS: Sony explains why it's rejecting the core philosophy behind Microsoft's next Xbox, 'Project Scorpio'

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Watch Microsoft announce the next Xbox — Xbox One X

'Doom' is getting a VR game

$
0
0

The long-running "Doom" series is getting a brand new entry in "Doom VFR," a new virtual reality game for the HTC Vive and PlayStation VR headsets. 

Doom VFR

The new game is being developed by id Software, the development studio originally responsible for the "Doom" franchise. It's not a departure from the "Doom" series in any way, it seems, as the trailer features an all-star cast of the franchise's greatest hits. 

Notoriously, "Doom 3" was an early prototype game used for early models of the Oculus Rift headset. The creator of "Doom," John Carmack, famously went on to leave the studio he founded (id Software) to become CTO of Oculus VR. He remains in that job even after Facebook purchased the company in 2014. Carmack is also the central character of a high-profile lawsuit between Facebook and ZeniMax Media, the owner of id Software and his former employer. Mark Zuckerberg even had to testify in the case.

Doom VFR

The game is planned for release at some point this year on both PC and PlayStation 4. In the meantime, there's a trailer to get an idea for what it looks like to play something as crazy as "Doom" in virtual reality.

SEE ALSO: The next 'Assassin's Creed' game will be one of the first to take advantage of Microsoft's newest Xbox

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: These doomsday shelters for the 1% make up the largest private bunker community on earth

Stephen Colbert predicts Trump impeachment at the Tony Awards

$
0
0

stephen colbert donald trump tonys cbs

Stephen Colbert found a way to bash President Donald Trump while presenting the award for best revival of a musical at Sunday's Tony Awards.

Before announcing the nominees, the "Late Show" host compared the Trump administration to an ailing Broadway musical.

"It's my honor to be here presenting the Tony for best revival of a musical,” Colbert said at New York City's Radio City Music Hall. "And it’s been a great year for revivals in general, especially that one they revived down in Washington, D.C. It started Off-Broadway in the ‘80s, way Off-Broadway, over on Fifth Avenue. Huge production values. A couple of problems: The main character is totally unbelievable, and the hair and makeup, yeesh. No, no."

Colbert extended the comparison by gesturing toward a possible impeachment of the president whose administration has been marred by an investigation into potential collusion with Russia.

"This D.C. production is supposed to have a four-year run, but reviews have not been kind,” Colbert said. “Could close early, we don’t know, we don't know, best of luck to everyone involved."

The late-night host wasn't done yet. Before announcing that "Hello, Dolly!" had won the award, he described one of the nominees, "Miss Saigon," as "the only pageant whose locker room our president hasn’t walked in on."

Watch the video below:

SEE ALSO: Stephen Colbert points out all the 'weird stuff' about Trump in James Comey's testimony

DON'T MISS: Samantha Bee believes she knows the 'real' story behind Trump's 'covfefe' tweet

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Comey shreds Trump administration: 'Those were lies, plain and simple'

John Oliver: The most important thing in James Comey's testimony

$
0
0

John Oliver Comey Testimony

On Sunday night's "Last Week Tonight," host John Oliver speculated that James Comey knows a lot more about President Donald Trump's relations to Russia than he let on at last week's Senate testimony. 

“The most tantalizing moments may turn out to be the things that Comey didn’t or wasn’t able to say," Oliver said.

Oliver then rolled a clip from the testimony in which Comey refused to respond in an open setting to the question, “Do you believe Donald Trump colluded with Russia?”

“Yeah, I can’t answer that question here,” Oliver said, pretending to be Comey. “Although I have been screaming the word 'yes' into this paper bag for the last four weeks.”

Oliver mentioned Trump’s press conference following the Comey testimony, in which he offered to testify himself.

“I cannot explain his behavior,” Oliver said. “Jane Goodall could not explain his behavior. She could watch Trump for a decade and eventually conclude, ‘I don’t know, I think it’s a cocktail of insecurity, horniness, and malice. But which is in control of which is beyond me. I miss the integrity and emotional intelligence of the apes.’”

But Oliver says that the most “pathetic” response to the Comey testimony didn’t come from Trump, but from House Speaker Paul Ryan, a man Oliver says proves that “you can live a normal, happy life without a spine.” Ryan defended Trump by saying that he is “just new to this.”

You can watch John Oliver below:

 

SEE ALSO: RANKED: The 11 best movies of 2017 so far

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: 7 details you might have missed in the premiere of season 3 of 'Twin Peaks'

Why 'The Mummy' has no post-credits scene

$
0
0

The Mummy Universal final.JPG

If you went to see "The Mummy" over the weekend, you were probably waiting through the end credits to see if it had a post-credits scene. Seeing as it's the first in a franchise of monster movies known as Dark Universe, you'd assume Universal would want to tease that out. Sadly, there was no such scene to be found. 

The movie's director, Alex Kurtzman, recently told Business Insider that he doesn't want Dark Universe to feel like another cinematic universe that's known for its post-credit scenes. 

"It feels very much to me that this is Marvel's domain," Kurtman said.

The Marvel Cinematic Universe movies, from the standalone movies like "Iron Man" and "Ant-Man" to the bigger adventures like "The Avengers," all end with a scene (sometimes multiple) that teases what's coming next.

Dark Universe isn't the only franchise that's been shy about doing post-credit scenes. The DC Comics Extended Universe ("Suicide Squad," "Wonder Woman") also doesn't do them.

But Kurtzman admits he might rethink it.

"You are like the 50th person to ask me that question, which makes me feel that people want it," he said. "It's definitely worth reevaluating."

SEE ALSO: The insane workouts Alison Brie did to get in shape for her new show

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Here's how Jay Z and Beyoncé spend their $1.16 billion


The first 'Biggest Loser' shares the key healthy eating tip he wishes he'd learned earlier

$
0
0

ryan

The first thing Ryan Benson did after being crowned the "Biggest Loser" on national television was order a burger and fries.

Benson had spent the previous five months exercising six hours a day and eating a strict regimen of healthy food as a contestant on the first season of the popular TV series "The Biggest Loser." He lost 122 pounds.

“In my mind I just thought I’ve been training so hard I want to eat something I craved for a few months — a burger, fries, some ribs,” Benson tells Business Insider. “That was one of the things that propelled me to the finish line. I thought, when I’m done I’m going to get this. It was a reward.”

As the show cycled through 17 seasons between 2004 and 2016, Benson regained all of the weight he'd lost — and then some.

Now, Benson is returning to national television as part of a new show from the producer of "The Biggest Loser." Called "The Big Fat Truth," the show seeks to highlight "bad" behaviors and mentalities that it suggests were behind the participants' weight gain — and help them change.

Experts say the show's fast-paced approach likely won't work for many people, but Benson says it "set him on the right path" to lose some of the weight he's regained. Being on the show, he says, has pushed him to think more about incorporating healthy eating into every aspect of his life.

eating healthyBenson realized that unexpected situations — such as surprise trips or last-minute plans — can bring out his least-healthy habits and lead him to resort to fast-food. While filming the series, Benson had to take an unexpected plane trip. Worried about going off of his new vegetarian diet, he texted the producer's wife, Christine Roth, who was taking a nutrition course at a nearby university.

She advised Benson to bring his own healthy snacks, including fresh fruits and veggies, rather than showing up at the airport hungry and exhausted.

"A lot of it is preparing so you have the stuff you need," Benson says.

Dietitians and nutritionists often suggest that the best way to ensure you'll eat something healthy is to bring it yourself.

"We live in a society where making healthy choices and being at a healthy weight, it’s not defaulted toward that," says Andy Bellatti, a registered dietitian and the cofounder of Dietitians for Professional Integrity. "Unhealthy foods are cheaper and they're everywhere; if you go to any store, you can buy a candy bar at the checkout but not a piece of fruit."

Benson agrees.

"It's a life-long struggle. If I don't prepare for when I’m going somewhere — for example I went to a barbecue recently and we brought the salad. Otherwise it's eegh, I guess I'll have a burger or else I'm not eating."

SEE ALSO: Americans have been making a huge diet mistake for 100 years — here's what they should do instead

DON'T MISS: 13 diet 'truths' that are doing more harm than good

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: The pros and cons of drinking protein shakes after a workout

Playing games on Samsung's massive new computer monitor and other ultra-wide monitors gives you an advantage

$
0
0

I've been playing PC games on Acer's X34 ultra-wide monitor for a few months, and I can safely say that compared to standard monitors, wider monitors offer a distinct advantage.

Ultra-wide monitors like Acer's X34 have a 21:9 aspect ratio, whereas standard monitors have a 16:9 aspect ratio. That 21:9 aspect ratio translates to a wider field-of-view than a standard monitor, which means I can spot enemies that I normally wouldn't see with a standard monitor. 

acer predator x34 game

The benefits of a wider field-of-view was one of Samsung's main selling points for its latest "super ultra-wide" CHG90 monitor, which has an insane 32:9 aspect ratio and is wider than standard 16:9 monitors, and even the 21:9 X34 ultrawide monitor. From Samsung's demo and my own experience with ultrawide monitors, those benefits ring true.

Check it out:

CHECK OUT MORE PHOTOS OF SAMSUNG'S SUPER ULTRAWIDE CHG90 MONITOR: Samsung just unveiled the widest computer monitor you can buy — here's how it looks in person

Here's what the "Battlefield 1" game looks like while using a standard 16:9 monitor.



And here's what "Battlefield 1" looks like on Samsung 32:9 CHG90 monitor.

See those green circles surrounding the red highlighted enemies on the edges of the screen? You may have spotted the enemy on the left with a standard monitor, but you may not have spotted the enemy on the very right. Being aware of that enemy on the right, I can plan my next move and react to dangers much more quickly and effectively.



Is it cheating?

Though I'm a huge fan of these ultra-wide computer monitors, I've certainly felt that they've given me an unfair advantage while playing against players with standard monitors.

There were a few instances while playing "PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds" where I saw an enemy player on the very edge of the X34's ultrawide screen, and I was able to dispatch those players before they could even see me. There's no way of knowing whether or not the enemy players had a regular or ultra-wide monitor, but assuming they had the more-common standard monitor, the playing field essentially became uneven because of my choice of hardware.



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

Diddy is the highest-paid celebrity, according to Forbes

$
0
0

sean diddy combs

Sean "Diddy" Combs has topped Forbes' annual list of the highest-paid celebrities.

With $130 million in earnings over the past 12 months, Combs edged out Beyoncé for the No. 1 spot. Forbes reports that there are three reasons behind the rapper and mogul's climb. He sold one-third of his Sean John clothing line for an estimated $70 million, he has his lucrative Diageo Ciroc vodka partnership, and he put on his Bad Boy Family Reunion Tour.

Combs wasn't on last year's list, which was topped by Taylor Swift. She fell from the top spot to No. 49 with $44 million earned over the past year.

Beyoncé made a huge jump from No. 34 last year to this year's No. 2 ranking with $105 million earned. Forbes attributes her meteoric rise to her Formation World Tour and the release of her visual album, "Lemonade."

"Harry Potter" author J.K. Rowling, Drake, and Spanish soccer player Cristiano Ronaldo round out the top five.

Here are the top 10 celebrity earners:

1. Sean Combs, $130 million

2. Beyoncé Knowles, $105 million

3. J.K. Rowling, $95 million

4. Drake, $94 million

5. Cristiano Ronaldo, $93 million

6. The Weeknd, $92 million

7. Howard Stern, $90 million

8. Coldplay, $88 million

9. James Patterson, $87 million

10. LeBron James, $86 million

For the full list, go to the Forbes website.

SEE ALSO: Jon Hamm says he 'might still' go back to teaching instead of acting

DON'T MISS: Jerry Seinfeld explains why he snubbed Kesha: 'I don't hug a total stranger'

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Here's how Jay Z and Beyoncé spend their $1.16 billion

Katy Perry has been live-streaming her life for 3 days straight, and she's still going

$
0
0

katy perry live stream

Katy Perry is pulling out all the stops to promote her new album, "Witness," including exposing every moment of her life on a YouTube live stream.

Perry started the video stream on Friday, the day "Witness" came out, and it's still going on Monday. (She's sleeping as of this writing — 9:38 a.m. for Perry.) It's set to concluce on Monday night when she performs at a concert.

katy perry

According to Spin, Perry has done a lot in the course of the stream, including going to therapy, hanging out with James Corden, cooking with Gordon Ramsay, calling for an end to her notorious feud with Taylor Swift, and apologizing for appropriating black culture. That's a busy weekend.

Swift released her music catalogue on Spotify Friday, which was widely seen as a move against Perry's album rollout.

You can check out Perry's live stream below:

 

 

SEE ALSO: The 10 biggest box-office bombs of 2017 so far

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: This man played Barney the dinosaur for 10 years — here's what it was like

I got an early look at Microsoft's new Xbox One X in action, and I was not blown away (MSFT)

$
0
0

I'll never forget the first time I saw a game running on the Super Nintendo.

My older brother rode his bike to our local mall, purchased the SNES and a copy of "Super Mario World," and returned as quick as he could. I'm still not really clear on how he physically carried the Super Nintendo back home while riding his bike, but he did. And soon enough, he was booting up "Super Mario World." And then, soon after that, I saw little Super Mario's bright yellow cape. It was amazing.

Super Mario World (cape)

It was — quite literally — like nothing I'd ever seen before. The graphical jump from the original Nintendo to the Super Nintendo was astounding to my young brain. 

I've encountered a few other major evolutions in video games across the past 30 years:

  1. When games like the first "Resident Evil" debuted on the original PlayStation they changed everything once again. Not only was 3D gaming possible — it was impressive.
  2. Another major change happened with the introduction of so-called "high definition" (HD) graphics. The difference between games on the PlayStation 2 compared with the PlayStation 3, for instance, was huge! 
  3. When VR was first introduced, it understandably impressed those who tried it. While still in its infancy, the promise for VR as a medium-moving concept is clear. You're no longer the player — you're there.

When it comes to 4K — the next graphical step up after HD, and the main sell point of new game consoles from both Sony and Microsoft — I remain unconvinced. 

Xbox One X

Sony's PlayStation 4 Pro — the 4K version of the PlayStation 4 — has been available for over half a year, and it's seemingly a success. Sony's head of all things PlayStation, Shawn Layden, told us in an interview that 20% of all PlayStation 4 consoles sold are of the Pro variety. 

Microsoft is no doubt looking for similar or better success with its upcoming Xbox One X console — a far more powerful version of the original Xbox One that's capable of powering games and movies in 4K. 

After spending two hours this evening watching games being played in 4K, a half hour of which was spent in a room watching an Xbox One X press demonstration, the thrill is not coming. It's not that the games look bad, of course; they look better than ever. But games already look better than ever!

This year's "Horizon Zero Dawn," a PlayStation 4 exclusive, looks incredible

Horizon Zero Dawn

The same thing could be said about Xbox One exclusive "Forza Horizon 3." It's a remarkably pretty game that runs smoothly at very high speeds — something that's especially taxing on processors and hard to achieve. 

"Forza Horizon 3" looks insanely good, even on your phone.

Forza Horizon 3

Both of these games look this good right now, on game consoles that cost around half the price of their more powerful equivalents. 

Perhaps it's because 4K is still new, and game developers haven't had time to take full advantage of what it can do. Perhaps it's because we're at a graphical plateau, where visual updates focus more on incremental stuff like lighting, shadows, weather, and other peripheral effects. Perhaps I'm jaded.

Perhaps it's something else entirely, but I'm just not that impressed with the graphic improvements that I've seen displayed on consoles like the Xbox One X and PlayStation 4 Pro. I came out of the Xbox One X press demonstration saying, "Okay," not "Wow."

Metro: Exodus

At $500, the Xbox One X is delivering a ton of power for a relatively affordable price. Being able to power 4K gaming is an expensive endeavor. If you were building an equivalent PC, it would be costly. 

The $500 price point for Xbox One X doesn't even make Microsoft any money, Xbox leader Phil Spencer told me in an interview. He was quick to point out that it's not losing Microsoft money, but that the business model is similar to a razor and razor blades — sell the box at cost, make money on the games/accessories/etc.

So, while I have no interest in paying $500 for a new version of the Xbox One, at least it makes sense that it costs what it does. I'm not going to bag on Microsoft for pricing the Xbox One X at $500; it's a genuinely good price for what you're getting. 

Xbox One X

I'm just not sure who this console is for.

It is indeed more powerful, and the graphics are quite nice, but unless you own a 4K television there isn't much reason to buy the Xbox One X (or the PlayStation 4 Pro, for that matter). In a year or two, when the price has come down by a hundred (or more) dollars? When more games are in 4K, and more people own 4K televisions? Absolutely. But right now in 2017? I'm not sure.

And for me personally, I'm still waiting for these new 4K consoles to thrill me like so many graphical jumps before.

SEE ALSO: Microsoft's most powerful Xbox yet is called 'Xbox One X,' and it costs $500

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Here's everything Apple is rumored to be launching in 2017

Viewing all 103018 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images